A História
Bio
"Hi. My name is Wellington and I'm a passion for general history. Here, I publish articles on different periods and themes in history, from prehistory to the present day.
Stories (165)
Filter by community
The Mokoi
In the rich tapestry of Aboriginal Australian mythology, the Mokoi is a figure of fear and mystery. A malevolent spirit associated with death, disease, and witchcraft, its name literally means "evil spirit." This dark entity is described as a tall, thin, and shadowy figure, with glowing eyes and skeletal limbs. Its haunting presence lurks in remote, dark areas of the bushland, where it waits to strike. The Mokoi is not bound by the limits of the physical world, capable of swift movement through the air, making it nearly impossible for its victims to escape. The origins of the Mokoi trace back to a tale of dark magic. According to Aboriginal legend, a powerful sorcerer, in his quest for eternal life, struck a sinister deal with a malevolent spirit. The spirit promised to grant the sorcerer his wish, but the price was steep: the sorcerer had to serve the spirit for eternity. Desperate for immortality, the sorcerer agreed, and as a result, he was transformed into the Mokoi—a creature of darkness, forever tasked with carrying out the wicked deeds of the spirit.
By A Históriaabout a year ago in History
The Rise and Fall of the Mauryan Empire
Few things have driven humanity more than the ambition for power. Across history, we've witnessed how the desire for control, glory, and land can elevate or destroy empires. Today, we explore one of the most influential civilizations in ancient India: the Mauryan Empire. This post dives deep into how this empire emerged, expanded, and left a lasting impact not only on the Indian subcontinent but on the world. Starting in the 6th century BCE, the Indian subcontinent saw the rise of various political units called the Mahajanapadas. Among them, the Kingdom of Magadha was the most powerful, but under the rule of the Nanda dynasty, it became infamous for oppressive governance. King Dhana Nanda's reign (329-321 BCE) was marked by high taxes and cruelty, making the dynasty deeply unpopular. Adding to this internal unrest, the western part of India was thrown into chaos after the invasion of Alexander the Great, further destabilizing the region. Amidst this turmoil, a Brahmin statesman named Kautilya (or Chanakya) envisioned the possibility of uniting India under a centralized empire to ward off invaders and restore peace. After being scorned by King Dhana Nanda, Kautilya found an ally in Chandragupta Maurya, a young warrior with immense potential. Together, they plotted to overthrow the Nanda dynasty and establish a new order. Taking advantage of the power vacuum left by Alexander’s forces, Chandragupta began his military campaigns in northwest India, toppling weakened Greek-Macedonian rule. With Kautilya’s brilliant strategy, Chandragupta continued to advance through India, eventually taking the heart of Magadha and claiming the throne. In 321 BCE, Chandragupta founded the Mauryan Empire, establishing Pataliputra (modern-day Patna) as its capital. Chandragupta's empire quickly expanded to encompass much of India, from its western coast to the southern regions. Plutarch even noted that his army reached an astonishing 600,000 soldiers. Chandragupta also came into conflict with Seleucus I Nicator, one of Alexander’s successors. After a war in 301 BCE, the two leaders signed a treaty that gave Chandragupta large territories in exchange for war elephants—a move that further cemented the Mauryan power. The Mauryan Empire was one of the most well-organized empires of its time. Chandragupta ruled through a sophisticated bureaucratic system. The king was the head of the state, with a council of ministers advising him on military, financial, and administrative matters. Provinces were governed by royal princes, and the administration extended down to village levels, ensuring strict control over social and economic life. The empire maintained a vast spy network and a large standing army, with specialized units for infantry, cavalry, navy, and war elephants. Soldiers were highly valued, focusing solely on warfare and not being required for other services. Chandragupta’s rule established a model of efficient governance that influenced later rulers in the region. The Mauryan economy was largely state-controlled. The empire monopolized essential industries like coinage, salt production, mining, and weapon manufacturing. Agriculture was heavily taxed, and merchants were organized into guilds that held judicial and executive power. Trade flourished under state supervision, with strict regulations on prices, weights, and measures. Roads and rivers connected the empire to foreign markets, extending even to Sri Lanka, China, and Arab ports, promoting a vibrant trade network. After ruling for 25 years, Chandragupta abdicated in favor of his son Bindusara, who expanded the empire further into southern India. However, it was Ashoka, Chandragupta’s grandson, who left the most significant mark on the empire and the world. Initially a ruthless ruler known for his cruelty, Ashoka waged a bloody war against the kingdom of Kalinga, resulting in immense loss of life. This campaign traumatized Ashoka, leading him to adopt Buddhism and embrace non-violence, promoting the concept of dhamma—a philosophy of righteous behavior and goodwill. Ashoka’s reign saw the construction of monumental stupas and the spread of Buddhism across Asia, with missionary efforts reaching Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia, and beyond. Yet, despite Ashoka’s efforts to promote peace, his successors lacked his strength. After his death, the empire began to fracture, and by 185 BCE, the last Mauryan ruler, Brihadratha, was assassinated, ending the dynasty. The Mauryan Empire, the largest to ever exist on the Indian subcontinent, was driven by a relentless pursuit of power, but like many great empires, it faced internal strife and external pressures that led to its decline. The administrative, economic, and cultural advancements during its reign left an indelible legacy that shaped the Indian subcontinent for centuries. The rise and fall of the Mauryan Empire serve as a testament to the cyclical nature of power—where ambition builds great civilizations, but also sows the seeds of their eventual collapse. Their names, however, live on, carried by the cultural and social reforms they left behind. If you enjoyed this article, give it a thumbs up, and don't forget to share it with others. Stay tuned for more stories about empires, power, and history!
By A Históriaabout a year ago in History
Medieval Egypt
After the Islamic conquest in 639, Lower Egypt came under the governance of governors who acted on behalf of the Rashidun Caliphs and later the Umayyad Caliphs in Damascus. However, in 747, the Umayyads were ousted from power. During the Islamic rule, Askar was designated as the capital and served as the administrative center. The conquest resulted in the formation of two separate provinces, Upper and Lower Egypt, which were governed by the military and adhered to the directives issued by the governor of Egypt and the leaders of their respective communities. Egypt experienced a series of dynastic rule following the establishment of Islamic control in 639, lasting until the early 16th century. The Umayyad period, spanning from 658 to 750, marked an important phase in Egypt's history. Subsequently, the Abbasid period emerged, characterized by a greater emphasis on taxation and the consolidation of power. In 868, the Tulunids, led by Ahmad ibn Tulun, expanded Egypt's territorial influence into the Levant. Ahmad ibn Tulun's reign persisted until his demise in 884, after which his successor faced significant challenges, leading to a defection of many citizens back to the Abbasids. Consequently, in 904, the Abbasids regained control from the Tulunids.
By A História2 years ago in History
Pre-Islamic Arabia
The Arab world prior to the emergence of Islam was a sprawling territory inhabited by numerous nomadic and settled tribes, each with its own distinct culture. These tribes existed independently of one another, lacking any form of cohesion or unity. Present-day Muslims commonly refer to this period as the "jilia" or pre-Islamic era of Arabia. It is important to note that the concept of Arabia or the Arab world during this time is not based on geographical boundaries, but rather a modern construct. The amalgamation of various tribes in pre-Islamic Arabia, despite possessing minimal cultural similarities, can be likened to the situation with the Celts. The term "jilia" was used pejoratively by Muslims to describe the era of ignorance, during which the Arabs were believed to engage in destructive and sinful behaviors such as gambling, alcohol consumption, usury, and fornication, in addition to practicing polytheism. Similarly, the Dark Ages and the Middle Ages were terms coined during the Renaissance to denigrate the medieval period in Europe. However, our understanding of the pre-Islamic era primarily relies on legends and poems, as written sources from that time are scarce. Islamic sources, such as the Quran and the Radit, also provide information about this period, although they are often criticized for their biased portrayal of pre-Islamic Arabia. Despite these limitations, the available information allows us to gain insights into the lives of the pre-Islamic tribes in Arabia. These tribes were organized along tribal lines, with each tribe being named after its esteemed leader, similar to the dynasties of medieval Europe. Within these tribes, smaller family groups known as clans existed, often engaging in fierce competition for control. However, in the face of external threats, the clans would set aside their disputes and unite against the common enemy, mirroring the behavior of the Celts when confronted with the invasions of the Roman Empire. These clans were led by individuals known as "shakes," who were selected based on their age, generosity, and courage. These leaders held positions of authority within a council responsible for making important decisions and judgments. In instances where conflicts arose between tribes, the clan councils convened to seek resolutions. It is important to note that during the Pre-Islamic period, there were no established laws, resulting in arbitrary judgments and the potential for bribery. In tribal councils, individuals with influential connections often escaped punishment, highlighting the prevalence of biased judgments. Additionally, it was common for aggrieved parties to take matters into their own hands rather than seeking justice through the tribal court system. This was likely due to the understanding that they would likely lose their case, particularly if the dispute involved members from different tribes. In such instances, the accused, if belonging to a more powerful tribe, would often evade punishment. Conversely, the most powerful tribes held authority over various territories, akin to medieval European kingdoms. These territories encompassed cities, towns, and even smaller settlements consisting of local tents, with access to essential resources such as water, pastures, and cultivable land. Despite the perception of desert lands in Arabia as insignificant by ancient empires, the tribes inhabiting the region were not entirely excluded from major political engagements. The Byzantine and Sasanian Empires, representing the Eastern Romans and the pre-Islamic Persians respectively, utilized Arab tribes as vassals, allies, and clients to safeguard their southern borders. Arab forces were integrated into the armies of both empires and occasionally clashed with each other on the battlefield. However, historical records indicate instances where Arabs refused to engage in warfare against fellow Arabs, demonstrating a sense of communal solidarity that would later become significant. The foundation of Islam was established on the principles of equality and justice. However, in certain circumstances, tribes within Arabia would form alliances with foreign powers if they believed it would lead to victory in conflicts with other tribes. Occasionally, empires would even launch military campaigns in Arabia to seek revenge or conquer territory. Nevertheless, due to the harsh arid conditions and the fierce resistance of the Arab tribes, these invaders were typically expelled within a few years.
By A História2 years ago in History
The Thracians
Thrace, a region situated in Southeast Europe, holds significant geographical and historical importance. It is demarcated by the Balkan Mountains in the north, the Aegean Sea in the south, and the Black Sea in the east. Presently, Thrace encompasses southeastern Bulgaria (known as Northern Thrace), northeastern Greece (referred to as Western Thrace), and the European portion of Turkey (known as East Thrace). This region roughly corresponds to the ancient Roman Province of Thrace. Furthermore, the lands once inhabited by the ancient Thracians extended northwards to encompass modern-day Northern Bulgaria and Romania, and westwards into Macedonia. The term "Thrace" originates from the ancient Greek word "Thrake" and initially denoted the Thracians, an ancient population residing in Southeast Europe. The term "Europe," derived from the ancient Greek word "Εὐρώπη," also initially referred to this particular region before its meaning expanded to encompass its contemporary definition. The designation of the region may have been influenced by the principal river in the area, Hebros, which could potentially derive from the Indo-European term "arg," signifying a "white river" (in contrast to the Vardar River, meaning a "black river"). Alternatively, according to an alternative hypothesis, Hebros may have originated from the Thracian word for "goat."
By A História2 years ago in History
The History of Kievan Rus
Kievan Rus, often referred to simply as Rus, was a medieval East Slavic state that existed from the late 9th century to the 13th century. This historic region, centered around the city of Kiev, played a crucial role in shaping the early history of Eastern Europe. The history of Kievan Rus is a rich tapestry of political, cultural, and social developments that left a lasting impact on the region and laid the foundation for modern-day Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. This text will take you on a journey through the fascinating history of Kievan Rus, exploring its origins, expansion, cultural achievements, and ultimate decline. The origins of Kievan Rus can be traced back to the late 9th century when a group of East Slavic tribes began to coalesce around the city of Kiev. The primary source of information about this period is the "Primary Chronicle," also known as the "Tale of Bygone Years" or "The Chronicle of Nestor." Compiled in the early 12th century, this chronicle provides valuable insights into the early history of the region. The legendary figure credited with the establishment of Kievan Rus is Prince Rurik, who, according to the Primary Chronicle, was invited to rule over the Slavic tribes in the area. Rurik's arrival marked the beginning of a dynasty known as the Rurikid dynasty, which would rule over Kievan Rus for centuries. The 10th and 11th centuries are often referred to as the "Golden Age" of Kievan Rus. During this period, the state expanded its territory, established a stable governance system, and embraced Christianity. Prince Vladimir the Great (ruled 980-1015): Vladimir is perhaps the most renowned ruler of Kievan Rus. He converted to Christianity in 988, adopting Eastern Orthodox Christianity as the state religion. This conversion marked a profound cultural and religious transformation for the region, as it brought the Byzantine Christian tradition to Kievan Rus. Yaroslav the Wise (ruled 1019-1054): Yaroslav, the son of Vladimir, is remembered for his legal reforms and the compilation of the "Russkaya Pravda" (Rus' Justice), a legal code that helped standardize laws and regulations within the state. His reign also saw an increase in cultural activity, with the construction of impressive churches and the establishment of the first East Slavic library in Kiev. Iaropolk II (ruled 1015-1019): Iaropolk II, while ruling briefly, faced challenges from his brothers and neighboring states, which ultimately weakened the unity of Kievan Rus. The 12th century marked a period of decline and fragmentation for Kievan Rus. Several factors contributed to this decline, including internal strife, external invasions, and the emergence of regional power centers. The 12th century marked a period of decline and fragmentation for Kievan Rus. Several factors contributed to this decline, including internal strife, external invasions, and the emergence of regional power centers. The Cumans (Polovtsians) Invasions: The Cumans, a nomadic Turkic people, launched several incursions into Kievan Rus territory, destabilizing the region and causing widespread destruction.
By A História2 years ago in History
The Franks
The Franks, a Germanic ethnic group, emerged from the lower reaches of the Rhine River. During the period of mass migration, they migrated into Gaul, where they successfully established a kingdom of considerable magnitude and influence in Europe subsequent to the collapse of the Western Roman Empire. The zenith of their impact was witnessed under the reign of Charlemagne (742-814), whose rule played a pivotal role in shaping the course of Europe during the Middle Ages and beyond.The Roman conquest of Gaul, which was successfully carried out by Julius Caesar during the 1st century BCE, established the Rhine River as the definitive boundary of the Roman world. Consequently, the river assumed the role of a political demarcation line between 'civilization' (namely, Rome) and the 'barbaric' Germans who resided beyond its banks. In the Roman perception, these Germans were commonly depicted as being tall, fair-haired, unclean, and predisposed to acts of violence. Over the course of several centuries, the Roman legions stationed along the Rhine frontier effectively deterred the incursions of the Germanic tribes, until the gradual erosion of Roman authority, exemplified by events such as the Crisis of the Third Century, facilitated the infiltration of certain Germanic peoples into Roman territory. There exist various accounts regarding the origins of the Franks. The historian Gregory of Tours, writing in the 6th century, posits that the Franks originated in Pannonia and subsequently migrated to the Rhineland before settling in Thuringia and Belgium. In contrast, the Chronicle of Fredegar and the Liber Historiae Francorum, both of which are of uncertain authorship, offer more legendary accounts that trace Frankish origins back to the Trojan War. According to these myths, King Priam led 12,000 Trojan refugees to Pannonia, where they established the city of Sicambria. Some remained there, while others followed a leader named Francio to the Rhine, where they became known as the 'Franks'. The connection to Troy was likely an attempt by the Franks to establish a lineage on par with that of the Romans, who also claimed descent from the Trojans. While this origin story is undoubtedly mythical, some contemporary scholars, such as Ian Wood, contend that there is little evidence to support the notion that the Franks undertook any significant migration and instead propose that they originated in the Rhineland. During the reign of King Clovis I (r. 481-511), the Franks underwent a well-known conversion to Christianity. Prior to this, however, it is believed that they adhered to a form of ancient Germanic paganism. This particular belief system was characterized by a pantheon of multiple deities, each of which was associated with specific local cult centers. Additionally, forests were considered to be sacred spaces within this mythology. Prior to their unification, each Frankish tribe adhered to its own distinct set of laws, which were orally transmitted and recited by a designated law speaker. However, during the reign of Clovis between 507 and 511, a comprehensive civil law code was formulated to govern the newly established Frankish kingdom. This legal code, known as Salic Law, derived its name from the influential Salian tribe. Primarily composed in Latin, Salic Law primarily addressed matters pertaining to inheritance and criminal justice, thereby serving as a foundational framework for subsequent legal systems across Europe. Subsequently, another Frankish law code, known as the Ripuarian Law, was compiled circa 630, coinciding with the ascendance of the Ripuarians within the Kingdom of Austrasia. The Franks were initially recognized by a contemporary Roman source in 289 CE, although it is likely that the Franks had been involved in conflicts with the Romans for several decades prior. A Roman marching song from the 260s mentions the unfortunate deaths of many Franks, while archaeological evidence suggests that the Franks began their attacks on Roman Gaul as early as the 250s. By the end of the 3rd century, the Franks had launched multiple invasions into Roman territory, utilizing both land and sea strategies. Historical records indicate that Frankish pirates ventured into the Mediterranean, conducting raids as far as North Africa. In 486, Clovis initiated his conquest of Gaul by defeating Syagrius, the final major Roman official in Gaul, and capturing the city of Soissons. Utilizing this power base, he launched campaigns against the Alemanni, the Burgundians, and the Visigoths, thereby expanding Frankish influence throughout Gaul and Aquitaine. Clovis' conversion to Nicene Christianity (Catholicism) in approximately 496 marked the beginning of the gradual Christianization of the Franks. This conversion was significant in establishing Frankish Gaul as a stronghold for Catholicism, as opposed to Arianism, a competing Christian sect that was favored by other barbarian kingdoms. In the latter part of his reign, Clovis ruthlessly annexed the other Frankish kingdoms and executed their leaders, thereby unifying the Franks as a single people for the first time. At the time of his death in 511, Clovis reigned as "King of All the Franks" and held dominion over all of Gaul, with the exception of Burgundy, Provence, and Septimania. Following the passing of Clovis, the Merovingian kingdom underwent a division among his four sons, which may have set a precedent for future successions. Initially, the sons worked collaboratively to build upon their father's conquests, successfully expanding their territory by conquering Burgundy, Provence, and Thuringia in the 530s. Additionally, the sons of Clovis campaigned against the Visigoths in northern Spain, sent armies into Italy, expanded Frankish influence into Bavaria, and secured an annual tribute of 500 cows from the Saxons. With the passing of the Ostrogothic king Theodoric the Great in 526, the Merovingian kingdom emerged as the largest and most powerful barbarian successor state to have replaced Rome in western Europe. Despite their achievements, the Merovingian rulers frequently engaged in conflicts and consistently sought ways to undermine and conspire against one another. In the year 558, Chlothar I, the youngest son of Clovis and reigning from 511 to 561, emerged as the triumphant figure. This victory came after enduring decades of rivalry with his siblings, which involved the heinous acts of murdering his nephews and executing his own son. By outliving his brothers and inheriting their territories, Chlothar I successfully reunited the Frankish kingdom under his sole authority. Regrettably, his reign was short-lived, lasting less than three years before his demise in 561. Consequently, the kingdom was once again divided among his four sons, leading to the formation of three distinct Merovingian realms: Neustria, Austrasia, and Burgundy. The demise of Chlothar I instigated a fresh wave of machinations, internal conflicts, and targeted killings, driven by the intense rivalry between Queen Brunhilda of Austrasia (l. c. 543-613) and Queen Fredegund of Neustria (d. 597). This protracted confrontation endured for several decades and escalated into proxy wars waged by the offspring and descendants of these queens, until its culmination in 613 when Queen Brunhilda was ultimately vanquished and executed by King Chlothar II (r. 584-629), who happened to be the son of Fredegund. Chlothar II successfully reunited Francia and assumed the prestigious title of "King of All the Franks," yet his triumph came at a considerable cost. In order to consolidate his position, he was compelled to make substantial concessions to the nobility. The 614 Edict of Paris formalized the customary privileges of the aristocracy and decentralized authority, placing it in the hands of regional elites. Dagobert I, the son of Chlothar II, reigned as the final Merovingian monarch to exercise substantial royal power during his tenure from 623 to 639. Despite the Merovingian dynasty's continued reign for over a century following Dagobert's demise, their authority gradually waned as the mayors of the palace emerged as the de facto powers behind the throne. The decline of Merovingian influence prompted the chronicler Einhard to label subsequent Merovingian rulers as "rois fainéants" or "idle kings". In the year 687, the Kingdom of Austrasia achieved a significant victory over Neustria and Burgundy at the Battle of Tetry, thereby establishing itself as the predominant kingdom in Francia. This triumph resulted in an increase in power for the esteemed aristocratic family, commonly referred to as the Pippinids or the Arnulfings, who had long served as mayors of the palace of Austrasia since the reign of Dagobert I. Despite their newfound influence over the entire realm of Francia, the Pippinids did not seek to claim the throne for themselves, instead choosing to govern through their Merovingian puppets. The Franks, at that time, were not yet willing to accept any other dynasty to rule over them. However, this sentiment would eventually shift following the dynamic reign of Charles Martel (l. c. 688-741), a member of the Pippinid clan who assumed the position of mayor of the palace of Austrasia in 715. Charles, the great leader of the Franks, achieved a momentous victory over the Umayyad Caliphate at the Battle of Tours in 732. This triumph solidified his position as the de facto ruler of Francia, showcasing his exceptional prowess and strategic brilliance. By 737, Charles' personal influence had grown to such an extent that he no longer felt the need to appoint a new ruler after the death of his puppet king, Theuderic IV. The throne remained vacant, a testament to Charles' unrivaled power and authority, until his own demise in 741.
By A História2 years ago in History
El Cid "Campeador"
The life of Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar, better known as El Cid Campeador, is an epic saga that took place in medieval Spain during the 11th century. He is one of the most iconic and revered figures in Spanish history and was a legendary hero both in real life and in literature. His story is a mixture of military bravery, shrewd diplomacy and complex political relationships. El Cid was born Rodrigo Díaz circa 1043 in Vivar, also known as Castillona de Bivar, a small town about ten kilometers (or six miles) north of Burgos, the capital of Castile. His father, Diego Laínez, was a courtier, bureaucrat, and cavalryman who had fought in several battles. Despite the fact that El Cid's mother's family was aristocratic, in later years the peasants would consider him one of their own. However, his relatives were not major court officials; documents show that El Cid's paternal grandfather, Laín, confirmed only five documents of Ferdinand I's; his maternal grandfather, Rodrigo Álvarez, certified only two of Sancho II's; and El Cid's father confirmed only one. As a young man in 1057, El Cid fought against the Moorish stronghold of Zaragoza, making its emir al-Muqtadir a vassal of Sancho. In the spring of 1063, El Cid fought in the Battle of Graus, where Ferdinand's half-brother, Ramiro I of Aragon, was laying siege to the Moorish town of Graus, which was fought on Zaragozan lands in the valley of the river Cinca. Al-Muqtadir, accompanied by Castilian troops including El Cid, fought against the Aragonese. The party slew Ramiro I, setting the Aragonese army on the run, and emerged victorious. One legend has said that during the conflict, El Cid killed an Aragonese knight in single combat, thereby receiving the honorific title "Campeador".
By A História2 years ago in History
The Jinn
The jinn (Arabic: جن, jinn) are a supernatural being in Islamic mythology and folklore. They are often described as being made of fire or smoke, and they have the ability to shapeshift. The jinn are said to be capable of great feats of magic and deception, and they can be both benevolent and malevolent.
By A História2 years ago in History
The Most Famous Pirates in History
During the golden age of piracy, the civilized world faced the rise of several pirate captains who terrorized merchant sea routes by boarding and plundering ships in search of valuable goods. We will learn more about some of the main and most famous pirates in history.
By A História2 years ago in History
The Different Ages of Man in Greek Mythology
The rich and diverse Greek mythology plays a fundamental role in understanding the culture and beliefs of the ancient world. Among its many stories and characters, one of the most fascinating narratives is the description of the ages of man, which illustrates the evolution of humanity through five distinct golden ages, silver, bronze, heroes, and iron. Each of these ages represents a unique period in mythical history, reflecting changes in the relationship between human beings, gods, and nature, as well as transformations in human morals and ethics.
By A História2 years ago in History
The Epic of Gilgamesh
In ancient times, during the reign of the ancient Gods, there existed a powerful Sumerian King named Gilgamesh who ruled over the great city of Euroque in Mesopotamia. Gilgamesh was not an ordinary man, but rather a Demigod, being the son of the priest king, Wanda, and a God. As a result, he possessed extraordinary physical strength and beauty, and had a longer lifespan than normal humans. However, despite his physical qualities, Gilgamesh had an arrogant personality and abused his authority as King, demanding to be idolized by his people and ordering the construction of monuments in his honor. He also seduced any woman who pleased him, regardless of her status or marital status. Over time, the population of the city of Uruk began to repudiate their king and prayed to the Gods to be saved from his cruelty.
By A História2 years ago in History
