Trump Media Group denies it’s raising $3B for crypto buys Report
Trump Media & Technology Group Denies $3 Billion Crypto Investment Plan Amidst Market Speculation
Trump Media and Technology Group has denied reports suggesting that the company is planning to raise three billion dollars for the purpose of purchasing cryptocurrency assets including Bitcoin According to a recent article published by the Financial Times unnamed sources claimed that the media company associated with former President Donald Trump was seeking to generate funding through a combination of equity sales and convertible debt offerings with the intention of investing heavily in digital currencies
The report triggered immediate reactions across both financial and cryptocurrency markets and sparked renewed speculation regarding the potential influence of political figures in the evolving landscape of blockchain and digital finance Despite the widespread attention the story received Trump Media responded forcefully denying any such fundraising efforts or investment plans A spokesperson for the company referred to the claims as fiction and criticized the original report as being based on unreliable sources and speculative information
This is not the first time that Trump Media has been linked to cryptocurrency ventures Earlier in the year discussions around the former presidents associations with certain crypto themed meme tokens created further media buzz and market volatility At that time too Trump distanced himself from any direct involvement stating that he had no control or ownership over those projects
The denial from Trump Media this time around was similarly emphatic asserting that the company had no such financial strategy and had made no filings or public statements indicating any interest in acquiring Bitcoin or other crypto assets The company went further calling the report laughable and suggesting that any claims about multibillion dollar fundraising efforts were deliberately misleading and damaging to the companys reputation
Still the rumor alone was enough to influence market activity Shares of Trump Media trading under the ticker DJT experienced a noticeable uptick following the circulation of the report reflecting investor excitement or perhaps confusion over the alleged strategic pivot into crypto This pattern mirrors similar market behavior observed when other high profile companies announce or are rumored to be investing in digital currencies
Speculators saw parallels between that strategy and the alleged plans of Trump Media, potentially seeing it as an opportunity for a similar bullish breakout in valuation. For instance, MicroStrategy has been a prominent example of corporate Bitcoin acquisition, and its stock performance has frequently mirrored the movements of the cryptocurrency market. Analysts, on the other hand, were quick to point out that Trump Media's financial fundamentals do not currently support such a risky investment. The company recently reported a net loss of over thirty million dollars and has yet to generate significant revenue from its core operations. The gap between the rumored three billion dollar crypto fund and the company's actual financial capacity further fueled skepticism among experts in the industry. Furthermore any such move into the digital asset space would not only attract market attention but also political scrutiny given the founders profile and the regulatory uncertainties surrounding crypto investments Lawmakers and watchdog groups would likely question the implications of a media company led by a major political figure engaging in speculative asset purchases using investor capital
Some analysts suggested that the report may have been part of a broader misinformation campaign or simply an exaggeration based on internal discussions that were taken out of context Regardless of its origins the story has reignited conversations about the intersection of politics media and financial speculation especially in relation to emerging technologies like blockchain
Investors are eager for signals that major players might reenter the market with large-scale purchases because Bitcoin continues to fluctuate between phases of recovery and downturn following past highs. Whether those players are corporations, institutions, or political influencers, the result is frequently significant price action even in the absence of concrete moves. The current state of the crypto market also plays a role in how such news is received. In the case of Trump Media the situation illustrates just how sensitive markets remain to news and rumors involving cryptocurrency and celebrity figures Even a single speculative article can move share prices alter investor sentiment and trigger wider discussions on social media and financial forums
Despite the official denial from the company the story remains a talking point among market observers with some suggesting that even if the report was inaccurate the public reaction has demonstrated strong appetite for crypto themed narratives involving well known names Others caution against reading too much into unconfirmed reports pointing to the need for transparency accountability and responsible reporting in an increasingly interconnected media environment
The incident serves as a reminder of how volatile and reactive both the media and financial markets can be when it comes to digital assets and political associations. For the time being, Trump Media and Technology Group maintains that it is focused on its primary mission of building an alternative social media ecosystem and has no plans to enter the world of crypto investing. In conclusion, despite Trump Media and Technology Group's unambiguous declaration that it is not raising billions of dollars to invest in Bitcoin or any other form of cryptocurrency,
About the Creator
GLOBAL NEWS
World News Updated
Short News upload
Technology News
Keep reading
More stories from GLOBAL NEWS and writers in Trader and other communities.
The 90-Day Rush to Get Goods Out of China
**The Rush of 90 Days to Get Things Out of China** The clock is ticking for businesses that rely on manufacturing in China in the global race for supply chain security. Over the next 90 days, businesses around the world are rushing to move goods out of China in response to growing geopolitical tensions, increasing tariffs, and the unpredictable nature of international trade policies. The urgency is a reflection of a larger change in the way multinational corporations manage sourcing, production, and distribution in a global economy that is more volatile. China has been the world's manufacturing hub for decades thanks to its low costs, enormous industrial capacity, and unparalleled logistics network. However, recent developments have accelerated efforts to diversify supply chains. Companies are reevaluating their reliance on Chinese suppliers as a result of trade wars, the COVID-19 pandemic, and now worries about rising tensions between the United States and China. As a result, inventory must be shipped out of China in a frantic 90 days before new restrictions, tariffs, or political developments impede the flow of goods. The anticipation of rising trade barriers is one of the driving forces behind this rush. Many executives are concerned about the imposition of additional export controls or tariffs in light of the escalating rhetoric about China and the approaching elections in the United States. In an effort to stock up before costs rise or supply lines are disrupted, businesses are accelerating shipments to beat potential policy changes. In order to avoid delays and shortages in the near future, some businesses are choosing to overstock right now. Logistics and shipping companies are already feeling the effects. Freight companies report a surge in demand for cargo space, especially on trans-Pacific routes. Container shortages are reemerging, and port congestion is on the rise. Despite remaining lower than their peak during the pandemic, shipping costs are currently trending upward due to the increase in outbound volume from Chinese ports. Last-mile delivery networks, customs brokers, and warehouse operators are also under pressure as a result of this rush. The urgency stems not only from the current demand but also from the strategy for the long term. This window is being utilized by businesses to relocate manufacturing capacity to other nations like Vietnam, India, and Mexico. This process—often called “China +1”—involves building secondary supply chains outside China to mitigate future risk. However, this transition is time-consuming, expensive, and complicated. For many, the 90-day window is more about buying time to implement longer-term solutions than it is about fully moving operations. The automotive, electronics, and apparel industries are among the most affected. Because of their close ties to China, these industries are particularly challenging to decouple from. For instance, China continues to be a significant supplier of semiconductors and battery components in the electronics industry. Although assembly can be moved elsewhere, Chinese factories are still frequently used to obtain advanced components and raw materials. This makes it nearly impossible to exit in the short term, making it even more important to secure goods right away while alternatives are investigated. The uncertainty of policies makes things even more complicated. Export controls, like those that focus on rare earth materials or sensitive technologies, are becoming more common. In parallel, China has enacted new laws to safeguard its own economic interests, which may make it more difficult for foreign businesses to operate or exit without restriction. Global businesses place a high priority on contingency planning as a result of these factors. Inventory management is also being rethought by some businesses. The "just-in-time" model put efficiency and minimal storage first for years. However, the current environment has prompted many to implement a "just-in-case" strategy, which involves maintaining higher inventory levels to safeguard against disruptions. Better forecasting, more warehouse space, and more money invested in logistics infrastructure are all required for this shift. Despite the rush, not all companies are able to move quickly. Particularly, smaller businesses lack the resources necessary to move production or speed up shipments. They see the next 90 days as a test of their resilience in the face of geopolitical uncertainty as well as a logistical challenge. In order to assist smaller businesses in adapting, governments and industry associations may need to intervene with assistance or direction. The frenzied movement of goods out of China may signal a turning point in global trade in the future. It indicates a shift away from an excessive reliance on a single manufacturing hub and toward a supply network that is more diverse and resilient. The current frenzy demonstrates that businesses are no longer willing to place all of their bets on a single nation, despite the fact that China will likely continue to be a significant player in global commerce. The next 90 days could shape the next decade of global supply chain strategy.
By GLOBAL NEWS8 months ago in Trader
The Simple Formula of Warren Buffett for His Wife's Inheritance: 90% Stocks, 10% Bonds
When legendary investor Warren Buffett gave instructions for how to divide a portion of his estate, he surprised many with a straightforward but effective plan for how to handle the majority of his wife's inheritance. Even though Buffett has led Berkshire Hathaway for decades, he doesn't want to make flashy stock picks or pick winners. Instead, he supports a straightforward strategy that is intended to provide steady, long-term growth: a preponderant allocation to an inexpensive index fund.
By Raviha Imran6 days ago in Trader
Silver Screen Magic with Mae West
American actress and singer Mae West became a popular film actress during the Great Depression. She started entertaining in vaudeville, then performed on Broadway, and finally went to Hollywood. She signed up with Paramount Pictures and made her debut in the 1932 film “Night After Night.” She also starred in musicals, comedies, and crime dramas. The American Film Institute named her one of the best classic Hollywood actresses.
By Rasma Raisters6 days ago in Geeks
Comments (1)
This story about Trump Media and the crypto rumors is quite something. It shows how wild speculation can move markets. I remember when similar rumors caused a stir before. It makes you wonder how these unsubstantiated reports spread so fast. And it's interesting that Trump Media is so quick to deny, but the damage to their rep might already be done. Do you think there's more to these rumors than meets the eye, or is it just a case of misinformation getting out of hand?