Ukrainian side alleges Russian drones supplied by Iran
UN Launches Closed-Door Meeting to Investigate Iran
Recently, the United Nations initiated a closed-door meeting of the Security Council, wanting to investigate the Iranian aid to Russian drones, Russia's first deputy permanent representative to the United Nations Polyandry directly protested: If the UN Secretary-General sends experts to investigate the matter, the Russian side will re-evaluate cooperation with the UN, because it is not in the interests of any party.
First Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia to the United Nations Polyandry
Ukrainian side accuses Russian drones of being supplied by Iran
The Russian side used drones to launch an attack on Ukraine, with several ground facilities in Ky-iv attacked and 30 percent of Ukraine's power stations destroyed, putting the population at risk of losing electricity, and Kerensky angrily stating that he would not give Putin any chance to negotiate.
After the drone battle was launched, the Ukrainian side accused Iran of supplying drones to Russia for striking Ukrainian ground facilities, saying the move violated the Iranian nuclear deal. The U.S. and Western countries also believe that Iran provided the drones directly to Russia, and the European Union immediately announced that it would investigate the matter thoroughly.
But both the Iranian side and the Russian side have denied this outright. The Iranian side is also repeatedly denied that it provided drones to Russia, and Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Kana said such claims are completely false and a malicious assumption, criticizing the West with extremely strong political implications.
Iranian drones
UN launches closed-door meeting to investigate Iran
The United Nations launched a closed-door meeting specifically for Ukraine's allegations, at which representatives of the United Kingdom, the United States, and France sided with Ukraine, saying they agreed with the Ukrainian side that it was Iran that provided the drones to Russia and that an investigation should be made into the matter. After the meeting, Polyandry said that the drones used by Russia were made in Russia and that the Ukrainian side's accusations were groundless.
The Russian side's refusal is not unreasonable, the Russia-Ukraine conflict has lasted so long, the United States and European countries to Ukraine millions of billions of aid, wave after wave, never stop stopping, Russia is only suspected of receiving Iranian drones, in the West caused such a big wave, citizens also said: "so many countries in the West to support Ukraine, an Iran to sell some weapons to Russia on Such a big news?" The news is that Iran is afraid that more countries will transfer weapons to Russia."
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Tutankhamen said in a speech that when Iran released drone photos a few years ago, the West said they were all P's and that Iran was engaging in a false stunt, and now they say Iranian drones are dangerous, and what we are considering is how to respond to the sanctions imposed on Iran by the U.S. side.
Iran's Supreme Leader Tutankhamen
The U.S. and the West Continue to Aid Ukraine
The U.S. and the West have been giving Ukraine uninterrupted aid since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. on February 25, Biden authorized $350 million in military aid to Ukraine, on March 12, another $200 million was issued, and only four days later, on March 16, Biden provided $800 million in military aid directly to Ukraine.
Throughout April, Biden successively approved huge amounts of $300 million, $100 million, and $800 million in aid to Ukraine, and since then in 56789 months, the U.S. has continued to give huge amounts of military aid to Ukraine, and regardless of how the situation in Russia and Ukraine changes, the aid from the U.S. will not change. The former deputy chief of staff of the U.S. Army also said that the U.S. spent only $66 billion to get Ukraine to help fight Russia.
There is also a lot of assistance from European countries for Ukraine, and Putin said that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has evolved into a conflict between Russia and NATO. Kerensky has also been asking NATO to provide help for it, and there is no sign that the U.S. will reduce aid to Ukraine, and G leaders have also said that they will stand with Ukraine as long as it needs it and that financial support military support we will continue to provide until Ukraine wins.
U.S. President Joe Biden
The U.S. and the West have become accustomed to acting with double standards
Without definitive evidence yet confirming Iran's supply of weapons to Russia, the State Department took a stand, saying the U.S. will continue to take strong measures to keep Iran from supplying military equipment such as drones to Russia. U.S. spokesman Patel said the relationship between Iran and Russia should be seen as a threat, adding that there are many ways to hold Russia and Iran accountable. The double standard of providing military support for yourself is fine, but not for others, and this double standard is the usual style of the U.S. and the West now.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from rio branco and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Ukraine's Zaporozhye region recreates Russian shelling
Recently, the Russian army shelled the Zaporizhzhia region of Ukraine again, and the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant suffered heavy losses. Not only Zaporizhzhia but also the front line of the U.S. Army has made a mistake, the "Starling" terminal has a direct "catastrophic" failure to disconnect, leading to panic among soldiers.
By rio branco3 years ago in The Swamp
Affection and Healing for Yourself: A Journey to Inner Peace
In today’s fast-paced world, it’s easy to forget the importance of self-affection and self-healing. Many people dedicate themselves to work, family, and social obligations, often neglecting the most important relationship of all—the one with themselves. Cultivating love, compassion, and healing for oneself is not selfish; it is essential for emotional well-being, resilience, and overall health.
By Aarif Lashariabout 22 hours ago in The Swamp
Protests in Greenland and Denmark Against Trump Plans
Greenland and Denmark are witnessing a wave of protests in response to former U.S. President Donald Trump’s controversial plans regarding the Arctic territory. The unrest highlights a growing concern among citizens about sovereignty, national security, and the broader implications of foreign involvement in the region. With Trump’s past interest in acquiring Greenland making headlines, the protests reflect both local frustrations and the international significance of Arctic geopolitics. The protests have been widespread, with thousands of Greenlanders taking to the streets in the capital Nuuk and other towns. Demonstrators carried placards reading slogans such as “Greenland is not for sale” and “Our land, our future”. Many citizens expressed deep unease over what they perceive as attempts by external powers to exert control over the island’s resources and strategic position. Greenland, while an autonomous territory under the Kingdom of Denmark, is rich in natural resources including rare earth elements, minerals, and potential oil and gas reserves. The Arctic region’s strategic importance for shipping routes and military positioning has also intensified interest from global powers. In Denmark, protests have echoed similar concerns. Copenhagen has seen demonstrations both in support of Greenland’s autonomy and in opposition to any U.S. intervention. Citizens worry that political negotiations involving Trump could compromise Denmark’s influence over its territories and destabilize the delicate balance of governance in the Arctic. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has reiterated that Greenland’s people must decide their future, emphasizing self-determination and the right to manage their land without outside pressure. Trump’s reported interest in Greenland, first revealed during his presidency, reignited fears that the U.S. might attempt to exert control over the island in ways that bypass local governance. Though Trump later downplayed his intentions, the issue has persisted in public discourse, fueled by social media campaigns and news coverage. Greenlanders’ reaction is rooted in a long history of asserting their independence from external powers. While Denmark retains responsibility for foreign affairs and defense, Greenland exercises control over its domestic policies, cultural affairs, and natural resources. Experts note that the protests are also a statement on broader Arctic geopolitics. The Arctic has become a focal point for competition among global powers, including the U.S., Russia, and China. Strategic military bases, shipping lanes that could reduce trade times significantly, and untapped natural resources make the region increasingly valuable. Greenland’s location between North America and Europe adds to its importance. Protesters argue that any move by foreign governments to influence Greenland could set a precedent, risking the island’s autonomy and sovereignty. Environmental concerns have also fueled public anger. Greenland’s fragile ecosystem is under threat from climate change, rising sea levels, and potential industrial exploitation. Many activists fear that foreign intervention could accelerate environmental degradation, putting communities and wildlife at risk. Local leaders stress that decisions regarding mining, oil drilling, and infrastructure must be made with Greenlandic priorities in mind, not as part of geopolitical maneuvering by powerful nations. The protests have drawn international attention. Media outlets worldwide have reported on the demonstrations, highlighting how Greenlanders and Danes alike are mobilizing to defend their land and decision-making rights. Social media platforms have amplified the message, with hashtags calling for respect for Greenlandic autonomy trending in multiple countries. Some commentators suggest that these protests serve as a reminder that small populations can exert significant influence on global conversations, particularly when it comes to territorial sovereignty and environmental stewardship. Political analysts note that while Trump is no longer in office, his plans continue to have a symbolic impact. The protests represent a broader resistance to foreign interference and a call for local governance. Greenland’s government has responded diplomatically, urging calm while reaffirming that any discussions regarding the island’s future must involve Greenlandic representatives directly. The Danish government has also supported this stance, ensuring that any international engagement respects Greenland’s autonomy. In conclusion, the protests in Greenland and Denmark against Trump’s plans underscore the importance of sovereignty, self-determination, and environmental stewardship in the Arctic. They highlight the intersection of local concerns with global geopolitics and demonstrate how communities can mobilize to protect their interests. As international attention remains focused on the Arctic, Greenlanders continue to assert their voice, reminding the world that the island’s future rests in the hands of its own people, not external powers. The protests are more than just a reaction to past political statements; they reflect a deep, ongoing commitment to local decision-making, cultural preservation, and sustainable development. For Greenland and Denmark, the message is clear: the Arctic is not a bargaining chip—it is home to people who are determined to shape their destiny.
By Fiaz Ahmed Brohi4 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.