The Swamp logo

Comparative Analysis: Which Party Caused Greater Harm?

The Receipts Behind the Rhetoric

By Lanny NewvillePublished 8 months ago 4 min read

✍️I have been working on this for some time because I keep hearing from Trump supporters how the Democrats have destroyed/ruined the country. In my recollection, all 6+ decades of it, I have not come up with anything to support the assertion, so I spent a few days chatting with three readily available AI engines, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot. I was unsure how to define ruined, so I tossed in factors related to loss of life and economic impact.

What follows is a fully integrated comparative analysis, based on significant harms caused by major Republican and Democratic policy missteps over the past 50–100 years.

  • Notably, (I asked) World War II and the Korean War were excluded as the reasons for our involvement were very clear and are not generally viewed as policy failures.
  • The Afghanistan withdrawal was also excluded because it was shaped significantly by the agreement negotiated by Donald Trump during his first term (Doha Agreement 02/2020). Biden was left with the dilemma of either honoring the agreement Trump made with The Taliban, or risk renewing the conflict, so clearly the responsibility is shared. (13 U.S. Service members and 170 Afghan civilians died, and 45 U.S. personnel sustained injuries). Further the DOD determined the attack was not preventable.
  • The drone strikes carried out under Barack Obama were also excluded for the reasons that there were no direct U.S. deaths, no domestic economic damage and no structural harm to the U.S. democracy or society.
  • Obama’s intervention in Libya was excluded for many of the same reasons: No American deaths; no long-term U.S. occupation or troop deployment; no measurable economic impact; the policy failure was geopolitical, not domestic, and while the U.S. involvement was significant, it was a NATO led operation.

The following combines military, domestic, and fiscal policy impacts to the U.S. to offer a clearer picture of which party has caused greater measurable harm to the American people.

⚖️ Comparative Analysis: Which Party Caused Greater Harm?

🔍 Evaluation Criteria

  1. Loss of life (direct, attributable)
  2. Economic damage (cost, job loss, dislocation)
  3. Erosion of civil liberties or democracy
  4. Long-term structural harm
  5. International fallout

🧾 Summary and Verdict

While both the Republican and Democratic parties have presided over significant policy failures in the last 50–100 years, the Republican Party is responsible for vastly greater measurable harm—both in terms of human life and economic damage. Republican-led policies such as the Iraq War, the 2008 financial crisis, COVID-19 mismanagement, and efforts to undermine democratic institutions have resulted in an estimated 425,000 to 630,000 American deaths. These figures include over 4,400 troops lost in Iraq, approximately 21,000 during Nixon's Vietnam escalation, and an estimated 400,000–600,000 avoidable COVID-19 deaths due to delayed response and politicized public health messaging1. The January 6 insurrection adds another 9 deaths (5 immediate and 4 police suicides) tied directly to the violent breach of the U.S. Capitol.

Economically, Republican-led missteps have cost the U.S. an estimated $43 to $48 trillion. This includes up to $22 trillion from the Great Recession2, $16 trillion in pandemic-related losses3, $2–6 trillion from the Iraq War4, and nearly $2 trillion added to the national deficit from the 2017 tax cuts5. Additional costs from the War on Drugs and Nixon’s portion of the Vietnam War further inflate the total.

By comparison, the Democratic Party’s harmful policies, while significant, have resulted in fewer than 30,000 direct U.S. deaths, primarily from the Vietnam War escalation under Kennedy and Johnson. Economically, Democratic missteps such as the 1994 Crime Bill, NAFTA, and partial responsibility for pre-2008 housing policy have imposed an estimated $1 to $1.5 trillion in long-term cost. These policies did cause structural harm—especially to Black communities and manufacturing towns—but did not result in mass death or macroeconomic collapse.

In total, the magnitude, scale, and direct consequences of Republican-led governance failures far exceed those of Democratic administrations in the same timeframe. The human toll and economic burden of the Iraq War, the 2008 crash, the COVID-19 crisis, and democratic backsliding position Republican actions as the most harmful to the American public when measured by objective outcomes.

🔎 Bottom Line:

The phrase “Democrats have ruined the country” is not supported by a sober review of history. It reflects ideological frustration, not quantifiable harm.

The most deadly wars and economic collapses in modern U.S. history have occurred under Republican leadership.

The most expansive social programs, such as Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act, were Democratic initiatives that are now broadly popular.

While both parties have made mistakes, the data contradicts the narrative that Democrats are uniquely or predominantly destructive.

📚 Footnotes and Sources

Estimates of avoidable COVID-19 deaths range from 400,000 to 600,000, based on excess mortality analysis and counterfactual modeling from The Lancet, Brookings Institution, and CDC data.

→ The Lancet Commission on U.S. COVID-19 Response (2021): https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00656-7/fulltext

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas estimated the 2008 financial crisis would cost $22 trillion in lost output and destroyed assets.

→ Dallas Fed Economic Letter (2015): https://www.dallasfed.org/research/eclett/2015/el1507

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) estimated total COVID-19-related economic damage at $16 trillion as of late 2020.

→ Cutler & Summers (NBER, 2020): https://www.nber.org/papers/w28958

Brown University’s “Costs of War” project estimates the full economic burden of the Iraq War—including veterans' care and interest—between $2 and $6 trillion.

→ Brown University: https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar

Congressional Budget Office projects the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will add $1.9 trillion to the national debt over ten years.

→ CBO Analysis (2018): https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53787

✍️Afterward

After making my edits and sprucing things up a bit, I asked all three AI’s to score the analysis (excluding my opening comments and this Afterward) with two thumbs up or down regarding truth and bias. The unvarnished results:

Reasons for the mixed bias score from CoPilot:

  • The analysis leans toward a critical view of Republican-led policies, but this is based on quantifiable outcomes, not emotional or ideological framing.
  • The tone is persuasive, but not misleading. It acknowledges Democratic failures and avoids hyperbole.
  • The analysis reads as balanced and intellectually honest, even if the conclusions are stark.

controversiesfact or fictionpoliticspoliticians

About the Creator

Lanny Newville

Retired public sector professional with 30+ years in law enforcement and community corrections. Keenly interested contributor in areas of governance, public policy, and the intersection of technology and justice. Seeks truth. Exposes lies.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.