A Critique Of Current Politics
Some Thoughts After The USA's Disgusting Ukraine Confrontation
Introduction
I wasn't sure how to put this down, the disgusting behaviour of the American Presidency has made me feel I have to say something here.
The music is "Hey Hey Rise Up" by Pink Floyd feat. Andriy Khlyvnyuk of Boombox . This is the text from the video and you may want to watch it:
Pink Floyd would like to thank everyone who has supported Hey, Hey, Rise Up. The single, recorded on 30th March with Andriy Khlyvnyuk of the Ukrainian band Boombox, has so far raised over £450,000 to help alleviate the suffering of the Ukrainian people.
This is the disgusting transcript of what happened:
So Where Are We Now And How Did We Get Here?
I believe a lot of this is the direct result of what Reagan and Thatcher started in the late seventies. Their policies pushed the premise that everything is for sale, in the UK, the nation's infrastructure and politicians, in the USA, the same.
The eventual result of that included the financial Crash of 2008 and the eventual appointment of a felonious, racist, misogynist game show host as President of the United States. Though, remember Reagan was an actor too.
Putin is nothing short of a gangster, possibly modelled on Stalin and has been annexing countries close in proximity to Russia as a matter of course as well as spying and being behind cyber attacks on other countries through social media and other methods.
The Democrats in America carry part of the blame for the current situation, they have always been beholden to big money but at least made attempts to run the economy properly and not only for themselves.
After the attack on the White house when the Democrats won they should have made sure the Supreme Court had more tham ebough rational judges to deal with the apologists that Trum installed in his first term and the should have made it law that a convicted Felon or Impeached former President could not be allowed to stand for the post.
Trump would fail the first hurdle for most jobs, so how can he be allowed to be president of the United States of America? The "no one thought it would ever happen" argument does not wash with me. I never thought I would have to replace my kitchen floor, but I have house insurance, and when a long-term leak damaged it, the insurance paid. Precautions need to be taken against every foreseeable disaster. This was very foreseeable.
Then we have Elon Musk, Trump's latest owner, who is backing fascists throughout the world. Musk and Trump have many things in common but if they had not been left fortunes by their parents they would be losers living in some almost derelict trailer park.
In Trump's first term he did not know what he could do, he still doesn't, but his owners do and he goes ahead and does what he is told acting like a priviledged spoilt brat that would not be out of place in Roald Dahl's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, except he is closing on eighty.
Check out this video from 1992 if you don't know what a creep this manbaby is:
Conclusion
This is Volodymyr Zelensky, a true trustworthy president. Trump accused him of being a dictator, then denied he said that, then this is Mike Harding's view on yesterday's atrocity:
The world is in a dangerous place and it is the Putin/Trump/Musk triumvirate that has brought us to this.
The only answer is the removal of these dangerous bullies, but I do not know how that will happen, but it must.
Stand with your friends, stand against the bullies, stand up for good and we will defeat them.
About the Creator
Mike Singleton 💜 Mikeydred
A Weaver of Tales and Poetry
Join & Share In VSS
Creationati
Call Me Les ♥ Gina ♥ Heather ♥ Caroline ♥
Keep reading
More stories from Mike Singleton 💜 Mikeydred and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Feb 28th 2025 - Economic Blackout
Introduction Today there has been a call to not spend money or use Social Media, especially Facebook and anything that carries advertising. We are fine to use small businesses, but Amazon, Walmart and the big ones are to be boycotted.
By Mike Singleton 💜 Mikeydred 11 months ago in The Swamp
By Dumping Tonnes of Sand Into the Ocean for 12 Years, China Has Created Brand-New Islands From Scratch
Over the past twelve years, China has quietly carried out one of the most ambitious and controversial engineering projects in modern history: the creation of entirely new islands by dumping millions of tonnes of sand into the ocean. What began as small-scale land reclamation has evolved into a sweeping transformation of the South China Sea, reshaping geography, geopolitics, and international relations. How Artificial Islands Are Created The process behind these artificial islands is deceptively simple but technically complex. Specialized dredging ships extract sand from the seabed and pump it onto shallow reefs and submerged rocks. Over time, layer upon layer of sand is deposited, gradually rising above sea level. Once land emerges, it is reinforced with concrete, rock barriers, and infrastructure to prevent erosion. China has used this method extensively, particularly on disputed reefs and shoals. What were once barely visible features at low tide have become full-fledged islands, complete with runways, ports, radar systems, and buildings. Why the South China Sea Matters The South China Sea is one of the world’s most strategically important waterways. An estimated one-third of global maritime trade passes through it each year, carrying trillions of dollars’ worth of goods. The region is also believed to hold vast reserves of oil, natural gas, and rich fishing grounds. Multiple countries — including Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan — claim parts of the sea. China, however, asserts sweeping sovereignty over most of it, marked by its controversial “nine-dash line.” The creation of artificial islands has strengthened China’s physical presence and reinforced its territorial claims. From Sandbars to Strategic Strongholds What makes China’s island-building campaign particularly significant is how quickly reclaimed land has been militarized. Satellite imagery and independent analyses show airstrips long enough to handle military aircraft, deep-water harbors capable of hosting naval vessels, and advanced surveillance systems. These installations allow China to project power far beyond its mainland coast, extending its reach across Southeast Asia. Critics argue that these islands act as unsinkable aircraft carriers, altering the balance of power in the region. Environmental Consequences Beneath the Surface While the geopolitical implications are widely debated, the environmental cost is equally alarming. The dredging process destroys coral reefs, which are among the most biodiverse ecosystems on the planet. Sediment clouds generated during sand dumping smother marine life, disrupt fish breeding grounds, and permanently alter underwater landscapes. Marine scientists warn that damage to coral reefs can take decades — if it recovers at all. For coastal communities that rely on fishing, these changes threaten livelihoods and food security. International Law and Global Pushback China’s actions have drawn sharp criticism from the international community. In 2016, an international tribunal ruled that China’s expansive claims in the South China Sea had no legal basis under international law. The ruling also stated that artificial islands do not generate territorial waters or exclusive economic zones. China rejected the decision, calling it invalid and continuing its construction activities. Meanwhile, other nations have responded with diplomatic protests and increased naval patrols, including freedom-of-navigation operations by the United States and its allies. A New Kind of Territorial Expansion Historically, empires expanded by conquering land. China’s island-building represents a new model: creating territory where none existed before. This approach blurs the line between engineering achievement and strategic maneuvering, raising difficult questions about how international law should adapt to technological capabilities. If artificial islands become widely accepted as legitimate territory, it could set a precedent for other nations to reshape oceans for strategic advantage. The Broader Global Implications Beyond Asia, China’s actions have sparked global debate about maritime governance, environmental responsibility, and the future of territorial disputes. Smaller nations fear being sidelined, while major powers worry about the erosion of established international norms. At the same time, the sheer scale of the project highlights China’s engineering capacity and long-term planning. Turning submerged reefs into permanent landmass within just over a decade is a feat few countries could replicate. Conclusion: Engineering the Future of Power By dumping tonnes of sand into the ocean for over a decade, China has not merely created islands — it has reshaped the strategic landscape of an entire region. These artificial islands stand as symbols of ambition, controversy, and a shifting world order. As technology continues to expand what is physically possible, the challenge for the global community will be ensuring that innovation does not come at the cost of environmental destruction, regional stability, and international law. The islands may be made of sand, but their impact is anything but fragile.
By Fiazahmedbrohi 5 days ago in The Swamp
Comments (9)
Mike - 100% agree. There is no doubt that Trump is a very savvy businessman, but a good president he is not. I have never been able to understand how a convicted felon can run for president and then get pardoned for everything. He is already showing his true and totally unethical colors -bullying, lying, wild accusations, and promises without any concern for people. I am totally bewildered. He is a dangerous man, and with his buddy Musk by his side, the world is in danger. Have you read about Project 25? Google it, this is only the beginning.
Thank you for all your insights. My laptop running a bit slow but thank you all
One of the men in that press conference was a decent human and a true leader, but it certainly was not one of the Americans. I have never been more disheartened and embarrassed to be American. More disheartening was watching the man elected to be president speak of the loss of lives in one breath and negotiating and bartering for the US's assistance i the next breath. Our president and vice president are nothing short of schoolyard bullies. Indeed, these are dismal times. I appreciated your well written piece - it is a reminder of the world's anger (and much of America's) in response to this horrific event. It definitely marks a sad day in American history. I stand with Ukraine.
As a Canadian Ukrainian I fond this exchange to be one of the lowest points in USA politics. Unfortunetly it will not be the last. This was totally planned, from omitting many trusted News agencies in side. instead allowing a Russion corespndant ( not against it if other jouranalist from certain countries been allowed). And what was with MArjorie Talyor Greens husbnad doing there asking the stupidest of questions..."do you not own a suite" WTF. Thank you Mike for writing this I am beyond angry and would wirte on emotion.
Yes, it was a difficult watch yesterday. You're right - we need to stand with our friends and allies. Bullies never win. Great article.
You are correct. The Trump and Vance bullying show was disgusting! Will Europe aid Ukraine in defeating Putin, who is the invader which is like Hitler who invaded Poland in the 30s?
Yesterday was a turning point, darker than J6. Well said!
It is indeed dark days and they only seek to bring midnight even closer. That whole exchange was unconscionable
Despite promises to "drain the swamp," actions such as appointing corporate executives and billionaires to key positions have been viewed as contradictory to those commitments. Great work man!!!