What If the CEO Assassin was Black?
If the CEO Assassin was a sexy, African American man would he get the same treatment as Luigi????
Six days after the CEO murder manhunt, I thought the suspect would get away with it until he was found in Altoona, Pennsylvania at McDonalds eating a hash brown after a rat-ass McDonalds' worker called the police on him. The suspect was identified as 26-year-old Luigi Mangino Maryland native Italian American Ivy League graduate with a handsome face and gleaming smile from a large wealthy family.
The Mangino family has released a statement on the behalf of Luigi:
"Our family is shocked and devastated by Luigi's arrest. We offer our prayers to the family of Brian Thompson and we ask people to pray for all involved. We are devestated by this news. "
Nino Mangino X's account (Luigi's cousin)
Since his arrest, The internet including TikTok applauds Mangino for unaliving the CEO calling him the American Hero or the Hot Assassin. Video Edits would be made on TikToks using sensual music including Britney Spears' song "Criminal" which is currently soaring the Spotify top song list thanks to Luigi. Women on TikTok drooling over this sexy man non-stop like a sex god, even everyone making up stories on social media that Luigi was with them instead of saying he is the murderer and feeling sympathy for him and those who died from being denied via United Healthcare. Before the manhunt, before he was caught, NYPD described Mangino as a "light-skinned" man and the weirdest part was that police said the suspect was somewhere in Atlanta, Georgia which I don’t know how would they know he was Atlanta until he was caught at McDonalds' in Aloonta where he was identified as an Italian-American ("White"), not a mixed man but then it hit me with a question wondering what would happen if was a biracial or African American man would everyone treat him differently or treat him as an American Hero or Hot Assassin. So far, I noticed everyone both leftist and right-wing calling Mangio a hero but if it was a black man he would've been called a "terrorist" via the media ten times worse so we'll people on social media even if he was attractive it would still be the same except black women and black men and some partially from other races would applaud him. Black women and some women would thirst over him sexy light-skinned or dark-skinned sex god.
Who he also be praised as a hero? Obviously not! He would most likely be not named as a hero. No doubt in my mind, if he was black he would be called Batman nor T'Challa.
How would the mainstream media taint him? When Mangino was caught, mainstream media like Fox News, CNN, and other mainstream media outlets reacted by painting Mangino as a bad man and threat even though he was an Ivy graduate. Honestly, even if it were a black man everything would be filled with a lot hate like the way they bash unarmed black people who were shot and killed by police or white people but yet Fox News would praise Kyle Rittenhouse and Daniel Penny as “American Heroes” even Mangino killed 1 person that works at a company killing innocent people that have been denied for their coverage. It would be biased for a black shooter and it would be on both sides agreeing he was wrong, less sympathetic to his background whether he is rich or poor and most likely look at his criminal record to make him look worse. Honestly, I could care less even if the shooter was black or white unalived the CEO I would still find him a hero either way. It still doesn’t matter I do not condone violence for what the person did however I don’t know why they’re not bringing up stories on Luigi and not bringing stories of people being denied from healthcare and how they had suffered.
So What Do Think Would It Matter if Luigi Mangino was a different race would he be called a hero????
Comment below
If you want to read my stories on Kyle Rittenhouse and United Healthcare CEO:
About the Creator
Gladys W. Muturi
Hello, My name is Gladys W. Muturi. I am an Actress, Writer, Filmmaker, Producer, and Mother of 1.
Instagram: @gladys_muturi95
Facebook: facebook.com/gladystheactress
YouTube: @gladys_muturi
COMING SOON TALES & CONFESSIONS OF HIGH SCHOOL
Keep reading
More stories from Gladys W. Muturi and writers in Criminal and other communities.
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi 5 days ago in Criminal
Federal Law Enforcement Shooting in Minneapolis Sparks National Debat
## **Federal Law Enforcement Shooting in Minneapolis Sparks National Debate** In early 2026, a serious incident unfolded in Minneapolis when federal law enforcement officers shot a civilian during a large-scale operation in the city. The event immediately drew public attention and ignited widespread discussion about the role of federal agencies, public safety, and accountability. The shooting occurred in a residential area, creating fear and confusion among residents and prompting strong reactions from local leaders and community groups.
By America today 6 days ago in Criminal
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.