Criminal
True crime, exposed – the innocent, the guilty, and the downright gruesome. Criminal explores the intricacies and complexities of law, order, and crime.
Stats
Stories
- 17,142
Creators
- 7,528
Top Creators
Top Stories
Stories in Criminal that you’ll love, handpicked by our team.
The Junko Furuta Case: Japan’s Most Disturbing Tragedy of Torture and Injustice. Content Warning.
On 25th November 1988 in Japan, 17-year-old Junko Furuta was kidnapped. She was brutally gang-raped and tortured for 40 days and then murdered on 4th January 1989. The monsters who did this were Hiroshi Miyano, Shinji Minato, Jo Ogura, and Yasushi Watanabe, who were all aged between 16 and 18 years old. Hiroshi and Shinji, despite being teenagers, were already serial rapists. On 25th November 1988, they were out looking for a victim and spotted Junko who was returning home from her part-time job. All of them went to the same high school. Previously, Hiroshi had confessed his feelings to Junko and she had rejected him politely. That night, he decided that their victim would be Junko as a way to take revenge for rejecting him. Hiroshi told Shinji to run away after kicking her off her bicycle and then he would swoop in to help her. Shinji did as he was told. As planned, Hiroshi then went up to her and helped her to her feet. He offered to walk her home and she accepted, not knowing what she was getting herself into. She got off her bicycle, and they started walking and talking. After some time, Hiroshi stopped following her directions and tried to take her into an abandoned warehouse that allegedly had ties with the Yakuza.
By Dharrsheena Raja Segarran8 months ago in Criminal
South Korean Plastic Surgery By Ghost Doctor Resulted In Death (Case of Kwon Dae-Hee). Content Warning.
On 8th September 2016, in Seoul, South Korea, 24-year-old Kwon Dae-Hee underwent plastic surgery. It cost him both 6.5 million won ($5,766) and his life because his surgery was performed by a Ghost Doctor.
By Dharrsheena Raja Segarran2 years ago in Criminal
in good time
…in light of my own changing values – the expansion of my family and the recent deaths from improperly using the technique – I have decided to discontinue the practice. My last piece, a beautiful frame I spent many hours on for someone very special, will be the last of my work to display fractal burning.
By Katie Kelly Koppenhofer2 years ago in Criminal
Something In the Water. Runner-Up in the Whodunit Challenge. Content Warning.
Sascha was the first to find the fish. At least, she thought she must be. The sky outside was still a bruised purple, light gradually seeping through the horizon. No other patients had been in line at the nursing station when Sascha went for her morning meds. She did not know what time it was, only that she had been lying awake in the interminable darkness of her room for longer than she could stand it. Deciding to wander the halls instead, it was by coincidence rather than intention that Sascha was the first to arrive for her medication. The morning nurse had chirped merrily at her, some praise for being an early bird, and did not ask her to wag her tongue when she lifted it after swallowing.
By Elle Marie2 years ago in Criminal
Latest Stories
Most recently published stories in Criminal.
Shadows on the Arkansas – A Mechanic's Fight for Justice
It was in a tranquil place called Muskogee, Oklahoma, where the Arkansas River took its sweet time flowing through cotton fields, and the sound of freight trains far away mixed with the warm air, that a certain man, Jack Harlan, made his residence. Jack was a mechanic whose activity responded to the demands of the farmers living in the area by working on old pickups and tractors. He could endure hard labor, but life sometimes presented him with challenges in a straightforward manner, and that night marked one such occasion when he got a curveball hurled directly at him.
By CEO A&S Developersabout 3 hours ago in Criminal
Shooting Involving ICE Agents in Portland: What We Know So Far
## Shooting Involving ICE Agents in Portland: What We Know So Far A shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, commonly known as ICE, took place in Portland, Oregon and quickly drew national attention. The incident raised serious questions about federal law enforcement operations, use of force, and the relationship between federal agencies and local communities. As details emerged, the event became a focal point for public debate, political reaction, and calls for transparency.
By America today about 6 hours ago in Criminal
Donald Trump Threatens to Strike Mexico: A New Escalation in Political Rhetoric
Donald Trump Threatens to Strike Mexico: A New Escalation in Political Rhetoric Recent statements attributed to former US President Donald Trump have sparked widespread debate after he suggested the possibility of military action against Mexico. The comments, framed around combating drug cartels and cross-border crime, immediately drew attention from media outlets, political analysts, and the public. While such remarks are not entirely new in Trump’s political style, the idea of striking a neighboring sovereign nation has raised serious concerns about diplomacy, international law, and regional stability.
By America today about 9 hours ago in Criminal
Iran Protests: Causes, Dynamics, and Their Impact on Society and Politics
**Iran Protests: Causes, Dynamics, and Their Impact on Society and Politics** Iran has experienced recurring waves of protests over the past years, reflecting deep social, economic, and political tensions within the country. These demonstrations are not isolated events but part of a broader pattern of public frustration that has emerged as Iranians respond to rising living costs, restrictions on personal freedoms, political grievances, and dissatisfaction with governance. The protests vary in size, intensity, and duration, yet they share common roots that reveal much about the challenges facing Iranian society today.
By America today about 10 hours ago in Criminal
"Mean Nadean". Content Warning.
This tale of a bully and her motherly love will leave you wondering what’s in the drinking water out here in Gans, Oklahoma. It’s been said by many mothers, including myself, that we would do anything for our children. I would like to point out that not all mothers are bullies. This was a woman so mean in high school they called her “mean Nadeen”. How much of a bully was she?
By Cassie Mooreabout 19 hours ago in Criminal
Geronimo Bank Robbery. Content Warning.
There is a little town in Oklahoma called Geronimo. Just like the Indian Warrior. Yes, I know. I either find ones I cannot pronounce, or I find ones that sound like they were made up for a 1970’s cop show. I can assure you that Geronimo is a real town. Just a little southeast of Lawton, Oklahoma. Oklahoma is rich in these little towns and odd histories.
By Cassie Mooreabout 21 hours ago in Criminal
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates. AI-Generated.
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi about 23 hours ago in Criminal
The Dark Side of Fame
The high-gloss world of indie-pop and the gritty reality of a missing person’s investigation collided in a way that no one could have predicted when the name David Anthony Burke—known to millions as d4vd—suddenly appeared on a police report for all the wrong reasons. In a digital age where the distance between a fan and an idol is often just a Discord message away, the tragedy of Celest Rivas Hernandez has become a haunting case study in the dark underbelly of internet fame. What started as a local search for a runaway teenager in 2024 morphed into a nationwide scandal in late 2025, leaving the music industry in shock and the public demanding answers that the legal system is only beginning to provide.
By Teodor Monescua day ago in Criminal
Creators We’re Loving
The creative faces behind your favorite stories.
