We Solve Murders
"A New Mystery, New Detectives, Same Brilliant Fun"
🌟 A Fresh Start: Meet Steve and Amy
After the massive success of his Thursday Murder Club series, Richard Osman introduces us to two brand new characters in We Solve Murders:
Steve Wheeler and Amy Wheeler a not so typical uncle and niece detective team.
Steve is a retired high-ranking police officer who’s seen it all crime, corruption, and too much sadness. After leaving the force, he just wants a peaceful life in a cozy little English village.
Amy, his lively and fearless niece, is a former police officer herself. She's tough, smart, and always ready to dive into a mystery.
But peaceful life?
Not so easy when murder comes knocking.
🕵️♂️ A Murder in the Village
The story begins when a shocking murder shakes their small village.
At first, it looks like an accident or maybe a tragic mistake. But Steve’s sharp instincts tell him something darker is going on.
Amy agrees there's too much that doesn’t add up:
A victim with too many secrets.
Strange behavior from the villagers.
Clues that seem to vanish as soon as they appear.
The police are treating it like a simple case.
But Steve and Amy know better.
So they team up, almost by accident, to solve the murder themselves.
🔍 Clues, Secrets, and Small-Town Drama
As Steve and Amy dig deeper, they uncover layers of secrets hidden beneath the quiet village life.
They meet all sorts of fascinating (and suspicious) characters:
A charming but slippery pub owner.
A rich widow with too many enemies.
A nosy neighbor who knows more than she says.
Old friends who suddenly act like strangers.
Everyone has something to hide.
Everyone has a motive.
And in the middle of all this, Steve and Amy must piece together tiny clues, chase down old grudges, and survive a few dangerous surprises.
The village may look calm and cozy, but underneath, it's a boiling pot of old rivalries, secret loves, and hidden betrayals.
💬 Humor, Heart, and Clever Twists
One thing Richard Osman does brilliantly is mix serious mysteries with humor and heart and he brings that same magic here.
Steve and Amy aren’t perfect detectives:
They bicker like real family.
They get things wrong sometimes.
They deal with their own past mistakes and regrets.
But that's what makes them lovable.
Their relationship is full of funny banter, stubborn loyalty, and genuine care.
Readers can’t help but cheer for them as they stumble, learn, and outsmart the bad guys in clever and surprising ways.
Plus, Osman fills the story with witty observations about village life, aging, ambition, love, and forgiveness all wrapped inside a brilliant mystery plot.
And just when you think you’ve figured it out bam! another twist leaves you stunned.
🧠 Why It’s So Addictive
Relatable characters: Steve and Amy feel like real people you could meet at a local pub.
Engaging mysteries: The case keeps you guessing, but never feels too complicated.
Warm, witty writing: Even in serious moments, Osman’s style keeps it light and enjoyable.
Feel-good moments: Amid the crime solving, there’s lots of heartwarming family bonding and second chances.
It’s a perfect book if you love mysteries that are smart, fun, and full of surprises, but still easy to read.
💡 Moral of the Story
We Solve Murders reminds us that:
Second chances are always possible. No matter how broken or tired you feel, you can start fresh.
Family is not just about blood it’s about loyalty, patience, and understanding.
Truth often hides in plain sight, but only if you look carefully and trust your instincts.
You’re never too old to find purpose, excitement, or even new adventures.
In short, the story shows that with courage, teamwork, and a little humor, you can tackle anything life (or a murder mystery) throws at you. 🔍💙
About the Creator
Muhammad Hayat
"Hello, I'm Muhammad Hayat | Welcome to my profile"
"Embracing the journey | Learning from failures | Growing stronger"
"Passionate learner | Enthusiastic writer | Sharing insights on [industry/field]"
"Bringing ideas to life"
Keep reading
More stories from Muhammad Hayat and writers in Criminal and other communities.
Gone Girl
🌟 Meet Nick and Amy Dunne Nick and Amy Dunne are a married couple who, on the surface, seem to have a perfect life. Nick is charming, easy going, and handsome. Amy is beautiful, intelligent, and famous for being the inspiration behind her parents' successful children’s book series, “Amazing Amy.”
By Muhammad Hayat9 months ago in Criminal
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi 6 days ago in Criminal
Federal Law Enforcement Shooting in Minneapolis Sparks National Debat
## **Federal Law Enforcement Shooting in Minneapolis Sparks National Debate** In early 2026, a serious incident unfolded in Minneapolis when federal law enforcement officers shot a civilian during a large-scale operation in the city. The event immediately drew public attention and ignited widespread discussion about the role of federal agencies, public safety, and accountability. The shooting occurred in a residential area, creating fear and confusion among residents and prompting strong reactions from local leaders and community groups.
By America today 7 days ago in Criminal
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.