Latest Stories

Most recently published stories in Criminal.

How Bao Xiong Built a $75B Shadow Empire - Financial/Business Analysis
A deep investigation into the Chinese-Cambodian businessman at the center of the world's most sophisticated fraud empire
By Dena Falken Esq3 days ago in Criminal
Boosie Badazz Will Not Go To Prison Over His Federal Gun Case
In 2023, law enforcement authorities sought to have Boosie Badazz locked down for gun charges. Because he is a convicted felon, he may not possess any firearms. At a traffic stop, officials found multiple guns following seeing a handgun in the waistline of Boosie’s trousers.
By Skyler Saunders3 days ago in Criminal
Duminda Hulangamuwa: The Corrupt Advisor Undermining President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s Economic Recovery
Duminda Hulangamuwa, the Country Managing Partner of Ernst & Young (EY) for Sri Lanka and the Maldives, has emerged as a lightning rod for controversy within the ruling National People’s Power (NPP) coalition, with growing resistance from powerful factions who view him as a liability to the government’s economic recovery agenda.
By Dena Falken Esq4 days ago in Criminal
THE ISLAND OF SHADOWS: WHEN THE GODS SIN, THE CHILDREN PAY
They say the truth sets you free. But in the case of Jeffrey Epstein and the nightmare he built on Little St. James, the truth hasn't brought freedom. It has only brought a sickening realization: We are too late. For years, it was a whisper. A rumor shared in dark corners of the internet. But now, the Pandora’s Box has been smashed open. A flood of videos, court depositions, and flight logs has hit the public consciousness, and the contents are more horrific than any horror movie script. We are seeing the faces of the victims—women who are now adults, recounting the days when their childhoods were stolen. "I was fourteen," one victim sobs in a video that is currently trending across every uncensored platform. "I was sixteen," says another. They talk about being flown to a tropical paradise that turned into a prison. They talk about "massages" that weren't massages. They talk about a house where the doors didn't lock from the inside, and where the most powerful men on Earth came to play. The Roll Call of the Untouchables What makes this reopen wound so terrifying isn't just the crimes; it’s the cast of characters. We aren't talking about back-alley criminals. We are talking about the architects of our reality. The list reads like a Who’s Who of the 21st century. There is Donald Trump, the titan of industry and politics, a man who has walked through fire a thousand times and never been burned. His name appears in the logs, a ghost haunting the margins of the investigation, always present but never pinned down. But then, there are the names that stop your heart. The ones that defy logic. Reports and documents have pointed to a figure that seems impossible to place in such a house of horrors: The Man in the Chair. The world knew him as a genius, a physicist who unlocked the secrets of the universe while trapped in a broken body. He communicated through a computer, his eyes darting across a screen, his robotic voice defining the cosmos. Stephen Hawking. To think of him—immobile, universally respected, the symbol of pure intellect—on that island, surrounded by exploited children? It breaks the mind. It suggests that the rot didn't just infect the greedy; it infected the brilliant. It suggests that on that island, moral laws didn't apply to anyone. The Delayed Scream Why are we seeing this now? Why, in 2026, are these testimonials finally catching fire? The cynic would say it’s because the danger has passed. The ringmaster is dead. The "Madam," Ghislaine Maxwell, is locked away. The powerful men who visited the island have either died of old age or are too insulated by wealth to be touched. The timing feels calculated. It feels like a controlled demolition. They let the truth out only when it can no longer hurt the people who matter. The victims are screaming into a void, their pain used as clickbait, while the perpetrators sip champagne on new yachts, safe in the knowledge that the statute of limitations—or the grave—protects them. But the biggest question isn't about the living. It is about the dead. It is about the man who knew where all the bodies were buried, and how he was conveniently silenced before he could speak the names that would have toppled governments. The Impossible Suicide Let’s go back to that night in the Metropolitan Correctional Center. Jeffrey Epstein was the most high-profile prisoner in the world. He was the man who could destroy the British Monarchy, the American Presidency, and the global financial elite with a single testimony. He was in a maximum-security federal facility. And yet, we are told to believe in a cascade of "coincidences" that defy statistical probability. Checkmate. The cameras? Malfunctioned. The guards? Asleep. The cellmate? Transferred out hours before. The check-ins? Skipped. The narrative they fed us is that a man who loved his life of luxury suddenly decided to end it with a bedsheet. But anyone who understands the machinery of power knows that Jeffrey Epstein didn't commit suicide. Jeffrey Epstein was decommissioned. Think about it. If he had taken the stand... if he had opened his mouth and started listing dates, times, and specific acts involving Presidents and Princes... the system would have collapsed.
By Wellova 4 days ago in Criminal
Navy Shipman "Unidentifiable" After He Was Beaten to Death Because He Was Gay. Content Warning.
Before the military created the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy in 1993, gay and lesbian individuals were forbidden to serve. Commanders were legally required to report any members they suspected of being homosexual. An investigation would occur, and the individual could be dismissed from service, even if they had an otherwise impeccable record.
By Criminal Matters4 days ago in Criminal
Shadows on the Arkansas – A Mechanic's Fight for Justice
It was in a tranquil place called Muskogee, Oklahoma, where the Arkansas River took its sweet time flowing through cotton fields, and the sound of freight trains far away mixed with the warm air, that a certain man, Jack Harlan, made his residence. Jack was a mechanic whose activity responded to the demands of the farmers living in the area by working on old pickups and tractors. He could endure hard labor, but life sometimes presented him with challenges in a straightforward manner, and that night marked one such occasion when he got a curveball hurled directly at him.
By CEO A&S Developers4 days ago in Criminal
Shooting Involving ICE Agents in Portland: What We Know So Far
## Shooting Involving ICE Agents in Portland: What We Know So Far A shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, commonly known as ICE, took place in Portland, Oregon and quickly drew national attention. The incident raised serious questions about federal law enforcement operations, use of force, and the relationship between federal agencies and local communities. As details emerged, the event became a focal point for public debate, political reaction, and calls for transparency.
By America today 4 days ago in Criminal
Donald Trump Threatens to Strike Mexico: A New Escalation in Political Rhetoric
Donald Trump Threatens to Strike Mexico: A New Escalation in Political Rhetoric Recent statements attributed to former US President Donald Trump have sparked widespread debate after he suggested the possibility of military action against Mexico. The comments, framed around combating drug cartels and cross-border crime, immediately drew attention from media outlets, political analysts, and the public. While such remarks are not entirely new in Trump’s political style, the idea of striking a neighboring sovereign nation has raised serious concerns about diplomacy, international law, and regional stability.
By America today 5 days ago in Criminal
Iran Protests: Causes, Dynamics, and Their Impact on Society and Politics
**Iran Protests: Causes, Dynamics, and Their Impact on Society and Politics** Iran has experienced recurring waves of protests over the past years, reflecting deep social, economic, and political tensions within the country. These demonstrations are not isolated events but part of a broader pattern of public frustration that has emerged as Iranians respond to rising living costs, restrictions on personal freedoms, political grievances, and dissatisfaction with governance. The protests vary in size, intensity, and duration, yet they share common roots that reveal much about the challenges facing Iranian society today.
By America today 5 days ago in Criminal
"Mean Nadean". Content Warning.
This tale of a bully and her motherly love will leave you wondering what’s in the drinking water out here in Gans, Oklahoma. It’s been said by many mothers, including myself, that we would do anything for our children. I would like to point out that not all mothers are bullies. This was a woman so mean in high school they called her “mean Nadeen”. How much of a bully was she?
By Cassie Moore5 days ago in Criminal
Geronimo Bank Robbery. Content Warning.
There is a little town in Oklahoma called Geronimo. Just like the Indian Warrior. Yes, I know. I either find ones I cannot pronounce, or I find ones that sound like they were made up for a 1970’s cop show. I can assure you that Geronimo is a real town. Just a little southeast of Lawton, Oklahoma. Oklahoma is rich in these little towns and odd histories.
By Cassie Moore5 days ago in Criminal
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates. AI-Generated.
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi 5 days ago in Criminal