Trump Is Expected to Announce Kevin Warsh as Federal Reserve Chair
A pivotal decision that could reshape U.S. monetary policy, markets, and the Federal Reserve’s independence
A Potential New Era for the Fed
President Donald Trump is widely expected to announce former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh as his nominee for Federal Reserve chair, a move that would replace current Chair Jerome Powell when his term ends in May 2026. �
Reuters +1
The selection could have major implications for U.S. monetary policy, financial markets, and the ongoing debate over the Fed’s independence from political influence.
Who Is Kevin Warsh? A Profile of the Likely Nominee
Kevin Warsh is a seasoned financial policymaker with deep experience inside the Federal Reserve system:
He served as a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors from 2006 to 2011, including throughout the global financial crisis. �
Wikipedia
After leaving the Fed, Warsh took on academic and advisory roles, including at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution and Graduate School of Business. �
Wikipedia
He also serves on boards of major corporations and advises on economic strategy. �
Wikipedia
Known historically as a monetary policy hawk, Warsh has in recent public commentary signaled support for lower interest rates — reflecting an alignment with Trump’s economic priorities. �
euronews
Why Trump Is Leaning Toward Warsh
Trump has been openly critical of Jerome Powell, who he previously appointed but later rebuked for resisting aggressive cuts in interest rates. �
Reuters
According to multiple reports:
Trump told reporters he would make his Fed chair announcement Friday morning. �
finance.yahoo.com
Prediction markets shifted sharply in Warsh’s favor over the past week, indicating broad expectations he will be chosen. �
finance.yahoo.com
Trump and Warsh met at the White House shortly before the expected announcement. �
Reuters
What This Choice Signals About Monetary Policy
Warsh’s nomination suggests several potential priorities:
1. Interest Rates and Growth
Trump has repeatedly called for lower interest rates to stimulate economic growth, arguing that the Fed has been too cautious. Warsh’s recent commentary appears more receptive to this approach than Powell’s tenure. �
euronews
2. Central Bank Independence at Stake
Critics argue that the nomination illustrates pressure from the executive branch on the Federal Reserve — a traditionally independent institution charged with balancing inflation and economic stability. �
Reuters
Any move perceived as politicizing central banking could affect confidence in U.S. monetary policy over the long term.
Market Reaction So Far
Global financial markets have already shown signs of sensitivity:
The U.S. dollar strengthened as betting markets weighted Warsh’s prospects, reflecting expectations of either steady or less dovish monetary policy. �
Reddit
Treasury yields also rose, suggesting traders are adjusting expectations for future rate paths. �
Reddit
These shifts reflect how closely markets monitor central bank leadership decisions long before formal confirmation.
Controversies and Senate Dynamics
Warsh’s potential nomination arrives amid broader tension over Fed leadership:
A Justice Department investigation into Powell has fueled political scrutiny over the central bank’s actions. �
Reuters
Some lawmakers — including Republicans — have suggested they may withhold support until ongoing inquiries are resolved. �
finance.yahoo.com
Senate confirmation will be required for Warsh to assume the chairmanship, and opposition could influence the timeline or outcome.
The Broader Context: Economic Policy and Politics
This leadership decision comes at a time of economic uncertainty and political polarization in the United States. Key factors shaping the debate include:
Inflation concerns
Wage stagnation pressures
Trade and tariff dynamics
Uncertainty in global markets
A Fed chair aligned with the presidential agenda may ease political friction — but could also raise questions about the bank’s institutional autonomy.
Why This Matters Beyond Washington
The Federal Reserve’s chair influences:
Interest rates affecting mortgages, loans, and savings
Inflation expectations for households and businesses
Stock and bond market stability
Global confidence in the U.S. economy
A change in leadership invites fresh strategies and interpretations of the Fed’s dual mandate: stabilizing prices and maximizing employment.
Conclusion: A Moment of Transition
As President Trump prepares to announce Kevin Warsh’s nomination as the Federal Reserve chair, the world watches a consequential decision unfold — one with ripple effects across markets, politics, and everyday economic life.
Whether Warsh’s leadership will steer the Fed toward lower rates, balance independence with political pressure, or reshape central banking practices remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the choice of Fed chair is not just about the next four years — it’s about the future direction of the U.S. economy.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Zahid Hussain and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Iran Warns of ‘Hazardous Consequences’ After EU Designates Revolutionary Guard as a Terrorist Organization
On January 29, 2026, the European Union formally designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization — a dramatic escalation of diplomatic pressure rooted in Iran’s suppression of domestic protests and its role in regional security dynamics. The move provoked an immediate and forceful condemnation from Tehran, which warned of “hazardous consequences” that could reverberate across European capitals and potentially destabilize broader regional relations. � Reuters +1 What the EU Decision Entails In a rare consensus among the EU’s 27 member states, foreign ministers in Brussels approved the terrorist designation of the IRGC — placing it alongside groups such as al-Qaeda, Hamas, and ISIL in terms of legal categorization. � The Guardian EU officials, including EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, framed the decision as a response to human rights abuses — specifically the IRGC’s role in violently suppressing widespread protests in Iran, which authorities and human rights groups say resulted in thousands of deaths. “Repression cannot go unanswered,” Kallas wrote on social media, arguing that actors who engage in systematic brutality must face consequences. � News-Press NOW The designation also triggered sanctions: asset freezes on individuals and entities travel bans within the EU criminalization of material support or collaboration with the IRGC under EU law While largely symbolic in terms of direct economic impact, it intensifies legal and political pressure and aligns the EU with similar classifications by the United States, Canada, and Australia. � The Guardian +1 Iran’s Immediate Response: ‘Hazardous Consequences’ Iran’s reaction was swift and vehement. In statements carried by state media, including the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA), senior Iranian military authorities denounced the EU’s decision as “illogical, irresponsible, and spiteful,” accusing European leaders of acting under pressure from the United States and Israel rather than on objective grounds. They warned that the “hazardous consequences of this hostile and provocative decision will fall directly on the European policymakers.” � News-Press NOW Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi echoed these sentiments on social media, calling the move a “major strategic mistake” that escalates tensions in the Middle East and undermines diplomatic engagement. He argued that European governments were “fanning the flames” rather than working to avert regional conflict and suggested that any future instability — including spikes in global energy prices — would be linked to this decision. � News Channel 3-12 Why the IRGC’s Designation Matters 1. A Shift in European Policy For years, major EU countries were divided on labeling the IRGC as a terrorist organization. Some governments feared such a move would sever diplomatic channels and undermine negotiations on other critical issues. That this designation was ultimately approved signals a major shift in EU attitudes toward Iran’s domestic repression and regional behavior. � Reuters 2. Human Rights as a Catalyst The crackdown on anti-government protests in Iran — triggered by economic grievances and rapidly expanding into broader calls for political change — has drawn unprecedented international condemnation. Rights groups have claimed death tolls far exceeding official figures, arguing that security forces, including the IRGC, have been disproportionately lethal. � www.ndtv.com 3. Legal and Diplomatic Implications While the designation may not immediately change on-the-ground dynamics within Iran, it empowers EU law enforcement and financial regulators to act against IRGC affiliates. It also creates a deeper rift in EU-Iran relations, complicating any future efforts at diplomacy. � Auswärtiges Amt Tehran’s Warning: What ‘Hazardous Consequences’ Could Mean Iran’s rhetoric has hinted at several possible areas of fallout: Political and diplomatic strain: Tehran may reduce cooperation with European states on nuclear discussions, regional diplomacy, or prisoner negotiations. � News-Press NOW Energy market implications: Iran suggested that conflict escalation could affect energy prices, a sensitive issue for European economies heavily dependent on global supplies. � News Channel 3-12 Heightened military posturing: While Iran has not clarified specific countermeasures, previous escalations have included military exercises and public shows of force — moves that risk miscalculation. � Gulf Today Analysts caution that unspecified “hazardous consequences” may ultimately be rhetorical signaling rather than concrete threats — but in a region already fraught with tensions involving the U.S., Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other actors, even ambiguous warnings can fuel uncertainty. Broader Geopolitical Context The EU’s designation does not occur in isolation. It follows a pattern of Western powers aligning their posture toward Tehran: The U.S. has listed the IRGC as a terrorist group since 2019. Canada and Australia followed with similar designations. The EU’s move is the most significant by a major multilateral bloc. � News-Press NOW At the same time, pressures over Iran’s nuclear program, regional influence, and proxy conflicts continue to shape international engagement. The Biden administration, Trump administration, and other global leaders have varied approaches — but consensus on adding the IRGC to a terrorist list reflects shared concern over both human rights abuses and regional stability. Can Diplomacy Still Work? Despite the sharp rhetoric, some officials — including those within Europe and the United Nations — emphasize the need for diplomatic channels to remain open. Without dialogue, tensions risk spiraling into unintended confrontations with broader consequences for global security. UN Secretary-General António Guterres urged restraint and diplomacy to “avoid a crisis that could have devastating consequences in the region,” emphasizing that escalatory moves on both sides could undercut efforts toward negotiated solutions. � The Guardian Conclusion: A Dangerous Turning Point The European Union’s terrorist designation of the IRGC marks a significant escalation in Western policy toward Iran, grounded in human rights concerns and broader geopolitical contestation. Iran’s warnings of “hazardous consequences” underscore how deeply this decision has aggravated Tehran and could influence diplomatic, economic, and security dynamics in the months ahead. Whether this leads to tangible retaliation or remains largely rhetorical, the episode highlights the fragility of international efforts to balance accountability, negotiation, and stability in an already complex Middle East landscape.
By Zahid Hussainabout 5 hours ago in The Swamp
Silver Is Putting Gold To Shame
In the world of precious metals, gold has traditionally been considered the safe haven, a store of value in turbulent times. But recently, silver has been stealing the spotlight, outperforming gold by a wide margin and attracting investors, traders, and industrial users alike. Market watchers are increasingly saying that silver’s unique combination of financial and industrial characteristics is giving it an edge, creating a rare scenario where this often-overlooked metal is outshining its more famous counterpart.
By Salaar Jamali3 days ago in The Swamp
How Trump Became a Liability for Europe’s Far Right
For much of the past decade, Donald Trump was viewed by Europe’s far-right movements as a symbol of possibility. His rise to power proved that anti-establishment politics, nationalist rhetoric, and open hostility toward liberal institutions could win at the highest level. Across Europe, populist leaders praised Trump’s defiance of political norms and saw him as proof that their own ambitions were achievable.
By Aqib Hussain3 days ago in The Swamp
Whiskey At Dusk
Guess the whiskey was more important to you in the end, wasn’t it? It was more than the well-being of your friends; more vital than showing up to the places you promised you would and could come to; more critical of a matter than fulfilling your damn responsibilities and getting the press off your back.
By Snarky Lisa6 days ago in Humans
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.