Rachel Reeves: Blistering Attack on Jeremy Corbyn.
Rachel's Rant on Corbyn.
The founding of "YourParty", the yet unnamed political party founded by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, has so far garnered 600,000 sign-ups. Some say "YourParty" could unseat Sir Keir Starmer in his seat. The party is offering an alternative to Labour, which many think has failed in its duty to protect and help those struck by the Tories. Instead, Labour has cut back on welfare and is using the same language about "Making Work Pay" as the Tories did, if not the same actual phrase. Nothing wrong with making work pay, but it is how Labour is going about it. To many Labour leftists, this Starmer-led government has been a massive disappointment. However, to add a caveat here, Starmer did warn before he was elected that if he became the denizen of N0. 10, there would be tough times ahead.
Voters, however, did not heed Starmer's warning; people voted for him and gave him a bigger landslide than his fellow Labour leader, Tony Blair. At the time, however, people were desperate to get rid of the Tories. So Labour were the beneficiaries of this. Since Sir Keir won the election, it's been a hard road for him and an even harder road for the country. I am not going to write off Starmer here. There have been other leaders who have gone through tough times, and they have come through. Whatever the fate of Starmer, be it inwardly or outwardly, for now, he is the Prime Minister. And in the political reality of real time, now that's what counts.
Labour is mindful of the threat "Your Party" could potentially pose. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has launched a blistering attack on Corbyn. Whether it's because she is scathing of Corbyn or genuinely worried cannot be said. However, Ms. Reeves said, "Jeremy Corbyn had 2 chances to become prime minister and I think the country gave their verdict, most recently in 2019 when Labour had its worst result since 1935", she said. Ms. Reeves continued, "If he wants to give it a go, be my guest. I think the voters will have the same reaction". Following it up with: "He tried to destroy my party".
The Unite Union is being asked, persuaded, cajoled, and told to fund "YourParty". And if this were to happen, it would enable Corbyn and Sultana to field candidates for town halls. Beyond that, their sights would be on further local elections. If the next local elections were successful for them, it would be a foundation for them to build on. In local elections and also in by-elections and the general election in 2029.
Rachel Reeves is correct to point out that JC had his chance to become Prime Minister. However, the phrase third time lucky has been said. This new party could be Mr. Corbyn's launch pad, along with Ms. Sultana. This time, Corbyn is free of Labour. Many of Corbyn's ilk have been kicked out of the party, purged, you might say, including Corbyn himself. Labour tried to destroy Corbyn in his seat, but they failed. Corbyn, as the MP for Islington, was returned as the MP for the area. Now he is the co-founder and co-leader of a party that will either rise or fall. A week, as someone once said, is a long time in politics.
In politics right now, with Reform UK on the right and "YourParty" on the left, these parties are challenging the political narrative. The Tories are on a downer thanks to Reform UK, and there is potential for "YourParty" to do the same to Labour. Yes, to quote a Chinese saying, we do indeed "Live in interesting times".
About the Creator
Nicholas Bishop
I am a freelance writer currently writing for Blasting News and HubPages. I mainly write about politics. But have and will cover all subjects when the need arises.
Keep reading
More stories from Nicholas Bishop and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Taiwan: Is It Ready?
Taiwan has always been that rogue runaway island that gets under China's skin. The island of the Chinese Nationalists who fled the mainland when Mao and his Communists took over. Ever since then, China has regarded the island as a runaway province that must be brought back under China's boot.
By Nicholas Bishop6 months ago in The Swamp
Shock and Anger in Minneapolis: Protests Erupt After Woman Killed by U.S. Immigration Agent
The city of Minneapolis once again found itself at the center of national attention after protests erupted following the fatal shooting of a woman by a U.S. immigration agent. Demonstrators poured into the streets demanding answers, accountability, and justice, as grief and anger spread through communities already sensitive to issues of policing and federal enforcement. The incident has not only shaken the local community but has also reopened broader debates about the role of immigration authorities, the use of force, and the fragile trust between law enforcement and the public in the United States. What Happened? According to preliminary official statements, the woman was shot during an encounter involving a U.S. immigration enforcement officer. Authorities have confirmed her death but have released limited details about the circumstances, citing an ongoing investigation. Witness accounts and early reports vary, contributing to public frustration and suspicion. What is clear, however, is that the involvement of a federal immigration agent — rather than local police — has intensified scrutiny and raised urgent questions about jurisdiction, oversight, and operational conduct. In the hours following the shooting, news of the woman’s death spread rapidly through Minneapolis, triggering spontaneous gatherings that soon grew into organized protests. Protests Fill the Streets By evening, demonstrators had taken to major intersections and public spaces across Minneapolis. Protesters carried signs reading “Justice Now,” “No More Killings,” and “End Violent Enforcement,” while chanting demands for transparency and the release of body-camera footage. Community organizers emphasized that the protests were not only about one incident but about longstanding fears surrounding immigration enforcement practices, particularly in communities of color. While the demonstrations were largely peaceful, the emotional weight was undeniable. For many residents, the shooting reopened wounds left by previous high-profile deaths involving law enforcement in the city. Why Immigration Enforcement Is Under the Spotlight U.S. immigration agencies, such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), primarily focus on civil enforcement — detentions, deportations, and investigations related to immigration status. Unlike local police departments, they often operate with less public visibility. Critics argue that this lack of transparency creates dangerous gaps in accountability, especially when enforcement actions intersect with everyday community life. The fatal shooting in Minneapolis has intensified concerns about: Rules governing the use of deadly force by immigration agents Oversight of federal officers operating within cities Coordination — or lack thereof — between federal and local authorities The psychological impact of aggressive enforcement on immigrant communities Supporters of strict enforcement counter that agents face unpredictable and sometimes dangerous situations, but protesters argue that this cannot justify loss of civilian life. A City Shaped by History Minneapolis carries a unique historical context when it comes to police violence and public protest. The city became a global symbol of racial justice movements following the 2020 killing of George Floyd. That history has shaped how residents respond to incidents involving law enforcement. There is deep public sensitivity, a heightened expectation of accountability, and little patience for delayed or incomplete explanations. For many protesters, the shooting by an immigration agent felt like a continuation of a broader pattern, rather than an isolated tragedy. Official Responses and Investigations Federal authorities have stated that the shooting is under investigation and that standard procedures are being followed. Local officials have called for calm while acknowledging the community’s right to protest. Civil rights groups, however, are urging an independent investigation, arguing that internal reviews alone are insufficient to restore public trust. Elected officials at both city and state levels have demanded clarity on: Whether the agent was acting alone or as part of a task force What threat, if any, prompted the use of lethal force Whether body cameras or surveillance footage exist So far, the lack of detailed information has only fueled speculation and anger. Immigration Policy Meets Public Safety The incident arrives at a time when immigration policy remains one of the most divisive issues in American politics. Debates over border security, deportations, and federal enforcement powers dominate national discourse. For immigrant communities, the presence of federal agents is often associated with fear rather than protection. Advocates argue that aggressive enforcement strategies discourage people from cooperating with authorities, even in emergencies. The Minneapolis shooting underscores how immigration enforcement is no longer just a policy issue — it is a public safety issue with real human consequences. Community Voices and Grief Vigils have been held in honor of the woman who was killed, with candles, flowers, and handwritten messages lining sidewalks. Speakers at these gatherings emphasized compassion for the victim’s family and called for systemic change rather than temporary outrage. Faith leaders, activists, and local residents have urged authorities to listen rather than react defensively. “This isn’t just about one woman,” one protester said. “It’s about whether our lives are treated as disposable.” What Comes Next? As investigations continue, the future impact of the shooting remains uncertain. Protests are expected to continue until authorities provide clearer answers and demonstrate accountability. Legal experts note that the case could influence future policy discussions about: Limits on federal enforcement operations in cities Mandatory body cameras for immigration agents Stronger civilian oversight mechanisms Whether meaningful reform follows will depend largely on transparency — and on whether officials respond to public demands with action rather than rhetoric. Final Thoughts The death of a woman at the hands of a U.S. immigration agent has once again forced Minneapolis — and the nation — to confront difficult questions about power, accountability, and human dignity. In a city already shaped by protest and pain, the message from the streets is clear: justice delayed is justice denied. As demonstrators continue to march, one truth remains unavoidable — without trust, enforcement becomes fear, and without accountability, tragedy repeats itself.
By Muhammad Hassan6 days ago in The Swamp
Comments (1)
Superb! Shocking