Last Kurdish Forces Leave Aleppo After Ceasefire Deal Reached
A Major Shift in Syria’s Conflict as Kurdish Forces Exit Aleppo Under New Ceasefire Agreement”
In a significant development in the long-running conflict in Syria, the last remaining Kurdish forces have left the city of Aleppo, following a newly negotiated ceasefire deal. The withdrawal marks a pivotal moment in the city’s complex war history, reshaping local power dynamics and leaving many observers to wonder what comes next for Aleppo — once a symbol of the brutal devastation of the Syrian civil war.
A Long and Bitter Struggle
Aleppo, Syria’s largest city before the war, has been one of the most contested battlegrounds since the conflict began in 2011. Fierce clashes between the Syrian government, Kurdish forces, rebel groups, and extremist organizations such as ISIS have left entire neighborhoods in ruins and thousands of civilians displaced or dead.
For years, Kurdish militia forces — primarily affiliated with the People’s Protection Units (YPG) and allied groups — controlled strategic parts of northern and eastern Aleppo province. They became key partners in the fight against ISIS, drawing support from international coalitions, including the United States. However, their presence was controversial: while some locals supported them as defenders against extremists, others saw them as occupiers or extensions of broader regional rivalries.
The Ceasefire Deal
Amid shifting alliances and a desire to reduce open hostilities, Kurdish leaders and representatives of the Syrian government — with mediation from external actors including Russia and Turkey — negotiated a ceasefire agreement that ultimately called for the withdrawal of remaining Kurdish forces from Aleppo’s city limits.
Under the terms of the deal:
Kurdish fighters agreed to pull back from urban positions
Syrian government forces and allied militias would reassert control
Security and administrative arrangements for the local population would be subject to negotiation
The agreement was seen as a face-saving compromise: the Kurds avoided a full military confrontation with Syrian government forces backed by Russia, while Damascus regained territorial control without costly urban fighting.
The Final Departure
On the morning of the last scheduled withdrawal, columns of Kurdish fighters and support units moved out of Aleppo amid a tense but orderly atmosphere. Images and footage shared on social media showed armored vehicles and personnel carriers exiting key checkpoints as residents watched, some silently, others expressing mixed emotions.
For many Aleppo civilians, the Kurdish exit is bittersweet. Some view it as the end of a chapter that brought relative stability and protection against extremist threats. Others fear uncertainty under renewed government authority, especially considering reports of reprisals against dissenters and former rebel sympathizers in other recaptured areas of Syria.
One Aleppo resident told local journalists, “We are relieved that heavy fighting has ended, but we are not sure what comes next. We’ve lived through years of upheaval, and there is still fear in the air.”
Regional Implications
The withdrawal also carries broader regional implications:
Turkey: The Ankara government has long opposed Kurdish military presence near its southern border, viewing groups like the YPG as extensions of Kurdish separatist movements at home. Turkey welcomed the withdrawal as a reduction of what it terms a “security threat,” though Ankara continues operations in other parts of northern Syria.
Russia and Iran: Both nations — key backers of the Syrian government — have seized the moment to strengthen Damascus’s control and reassert sovereignty over previously contested areas. Their role in brokering the ceasefire underscores their influence in shaping Syria’s post-conflict political landscape.
United States: The Kurdish withdrawal also highlights the recalibration of U.S. involvement in Syria. After years of military support to Kurdish units in the fight against ISIS, Washington’s influence appears diminished in the wake of evolving alliances and strategic priorities.
Humanitarian Concerns
While the ceasefire brings a relative lull in large-scale combat, humanitarian concerns remain urgent. Aleppo still bears deep scars from years of siege, bombardment and deprivation.
International aid organizations caution that ongoing needs — including shelter, medical care, sanitation and food security — have not disappeared. With displaced populations returning to damaged neighborhoods, rebuilding infrastructure will require massive investment and long-term commitment from both domestic authorities and global partners.
Uncertain Future for Aleppo
The departure of Kurdish forces from Aleppo symbolizes a turning point in the city’s wartime history, but it is not an end to the challenges facing its people. The past decade has left wounds that go far beyond crumbling buildings — social trust, political inclusion and economic survival are all on fragile ground.
Some experts argue that Aleppo may now enter a phase of uneasy coexistence, where stability is enforced at the price of political freedoms. Others believe that a negotiated settlement could eventually lay the groundwork for broader national reconciliation — if international actors commit to supporting a peaceful transition.
Conclusion: A City in Transition
The withdrawal of the last Kurdish fighters from Aleppo is historic not only because it reflects shifting military control but also because it highlights the complexity of Syria’s political future. Whether this moment ushers in lasting peace or merely a new phase of strategic realignment remains to be seen.
For Aleppo’s residents, the most immediate concern is safety and survival: the hope that the next chapter will bring peace, stability, and the chance to rebuild lives long disrupted by war.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Fiazahmedbrohi and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Senegalese Navy Conducted Historic First Anti-Ship Missile Launch
In a significant milestone for West African maritime security, the Senegalese Navy has successfully conducted its first ever anti-ship missile launch during a carefully planned naval exercise. The announcement — confirming that Senegal’s naval forces have now demonstrated capability to fire advanced surface-to-surface missiles — represents a landmark achievement in the nation’s military evolution and raises the profile of security cooperation across the Atlantic coast of Africa. This historic event is about far more than a single weapons test; it symbolizes a shift in how West African nations are preparing to defend their territorial waters, protect economic interests, and engage in multinational security efforts across a region increasingly challenged by piracy, criminal networks, and geopolitical competition. A Strategic Upgrade for Senegal Senegal’s coast spans some of the busiest maritime routes in the world. The country’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) — rich in fisheries, oil, gas prospects, and vital shipping lanes — has grown in economic importance over the past decade. But these riches also present security challenges. Illegal fishing, maritime smuggling, piracy, and the growing sophistication of criminal networks have put pressure on national navies in the region to modernize and expand their capabilities. The Senegalese Navy’s successful anti-ship missile launch — conducted under the supervision of high-ranking naval officers and with the support of foreign partners — reflects Dakar’s intention to play a more proactive role in the security of the Gulf of Guinea and beyond. What the Milestone Entails Anti-ship missiles are designed to engage and destroy hostile surface vessels at significant distances, giving naval forces a long-range defensive and deterrent capability. By successfully launching such a weapon, the Senegalese Navy has demonstrated that it can now respond more assertively to threats at sea, rather than relying solely on patrol boats, light armaments, or foreign military support. During the exercise, Senegalese naval crews reportedly tracked a designated sea target and launched the missile with precision, showcasing coordination between sensors, radar systems, communication networks, and the missile platform itself. While specific details about the missile system used have not been fully disclosed for security reasons, military analysts say that such systems typically require rigorous training, disciplined operational procedures, and a deep understanding of modern naval warfare principles. Regional Ramifications The Gulf of Guinea — stretching from Senegal in the west to Angola in the south — has become one of the globe’s most troubled maritime regions in recent years. According to international watchdogs, piracy, kidnapping at sea, and armed robbery against vessels surged in the early 2020s, prompting coastal states to pursue stronger defense mechanisms. By successfully demonstrating anti-ship missile capability, Senegal is sending a message to both allies and potential adversaries: it is investing in strategic defense and expanding its role in regional security. Neighboring nations, including Nigeria, Ghana, and Côte d’Ivoire, have similarly increased their naval capabilities through international cooperation and equipment modernization. Senegal’s successful launch may encourage further collaboration and shared training programs, strengthening collective security frameworks in West Africa. International Partnerships and Support Senegal’s naval achievement did not happen in isolation. Over the years, Dakar has worked closely with international partners — including France, the United States, and European Union navies — to train personnel, modernize equipment, and engage in joint naval exercises. Many Western partners view Senegal as a key security partner in Africa due to its relative political stability, strategic Atlantic location, and commitment to democratic governance. The anti-ship missile exercise, therefore, also underscores how global military cooperation can enhance the capabilities of emerging navies, enabling them to meet evolving security challenges more effectively. A Boost for National Defense For Senegal, the successful missile launch carries both symbolic and practical importance. It boosts national confidence in the navy’s role, affirms Dakar’s defense investments, and signals to citizens and global observers alike that Senegal is ready to protect its maritime interests. In a world where maritime security is increasingly interconnected — affecting trade, energy infrastructure, fisheries, and global supply chains — Senegal’s move toward modern naval deterrence reflects a broader trend among coastal nations that seek greater autonomy in defending their waters. Balancing Capability With Responsibility While the milestone is notable, experts stress the importance of responsible use of such capabilities. Senegal has emphasized that the exercise was strictly defensive, conducted in controlled conditions, and intended to enhance maritime safety rather than escalate tensions. International law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), enshrines the right of coastal states to protect their territorial waters. Senegal’s missile launch falls within this context of sovereign defense — not offensive posture — and reinforces its commitment to lawful maritime conduct. What Comes Next Following the successful launch, analysts expect further developments in Senegal’s naval strategy, including: Expanded naval training programs Possible acquisition of additional defense platforms Increased joint exercises with regional and global partners Enhanced maritime surveillance and intelligence capacity These steps would help Senegal play a central role in regional maritime security and contribute more broadly to Atlantic and Gulf of Guinea stability. Conclusion: A New Era on the Waves Senegal’s historic anti-ship missile launch marks a watershed moment for the country’s navy and for West African maritime defense. In strengthening its deterrent capability, Senegal is responding to real and evolving threats to its waters and economic interests. As navies around the world adjust to changing security environments, Dakar’s achievement highlights how even regional forces can leverage technology, training, and international cooperation to shift the narrative — from vulnerability to capability — in the world’s oceans.
By Fiazahmedbrohi about 22 hours ago in The Swamp
‘An Incomprehensible Nightmare’: Grief Turns to Anger Over Swiss Bar Fire as Le Constellation Owner Arrested
New Year’s Eve is meant to symbolize hope, renewal, and fresh beginnings. In the Swiss Alpine resort town of Crans-Montana, however, the arrival of 2026 became a moment of unimaginable horror. A devastating fire at the popular nightclub Le Constellation claimed 40 lives and injured more than a hundred others, transforming a place of music and celebration into the epicenter of one of Switzerland’s deadliest peacetime disasters in decades. What followed was a wave of national mourning — and then something more powerful. As details emerged, grief began to turn into anger, and a collective question echoed across Switzerland and beyond: How could this have happened? A Night That Changed Everything Shortly after midnight on January 1, Le Constellation was packed with young people celebrating the New Year. Witnesses recall a festive atmosphere, champagne flowing, music pulsing, and crowds pressed close together. Within minutes, everything changed. Investigators believe that sparkler-style fireworks attached to champagne bottles ignited flammable soundproofing material on the ceiling. Flames spread rapidly through the confined basement space, filling the venue with smoke and heat before many people could react. Panic followed. Survivors described a desperate rush for exits, poor visibility, and crushing crowds as people tried to escape. Some broke windows. Others were trapped. Emergency services arrived quickly, but the fire’s speed and intensity left little chance for many inside. By dawn, the scale of the tragedy was clear. A Community in Mourning Crans-Montana, better known for ski holidays and postcard-perfect views, became a town united by sorrow. Many of the victims were teenagers and young adults, some as young as 14. Families from Switzerland, France, and Italy gathered in hospitals, churches, and temporary shelters, searching for answers and clinging to hope. A national day of mourning was declared. Bells rang across the country. Vigils were held, candles lit, and names read aloud. Swiss leaders were joined by foreign dignitaries in remembrance ceremonies, underscoring the international impact of the loss. But even as memorials continued, troubling information began to surface. From Grief to Outrage Public emotion shifted dramatically when authorities revealed that Le Constellation had not undergone a mandatory fire safety inspection since 2019, despite regulations requiring regular checks for venues hosting large crowds. For many families, this disclosure felt like a second shock. How could a nightclub operate for years without inspection? Who was responsible for ensuring safety standards were met? And why were obvious risks — such as indoor fireworks — allowed at all? The mayor of Crans-Montana acknowledged failures in oversight, admitting that inspections simply had not taken place. That admission sparked widespread anger, not only toward the bar’s owners but also toward local authorities and regulatory bodies. On social media and in public forums, the tone changed from mourning to demand: someone must be held accountable. The Arrest That Changed the Investigation That demand intensified when Swiss prosecutors announced the arrest of Jacques Moretti, co-owner of Le Constellation. Authorities placed him in pre-trial detention, citing concerns that he could leave the country and potentially evade justice. Prosecutors are now investigating possible charges including involuntary homicide, negligence, and causing bodily harm. His wife and business partner was questioned separately and placed under house arrest. For many families, the arrest offered a measure of reassurance — a sign that the tragedy was being taken seriously. For others, it raised further questions about how responsibility would ultimately be shared between private owners and public institutions. Voices of the Survivors Amid legal developments, survivors continue to process their trauma. Some remain hospitalized with severe burns and smoke inhalation injuries. Others are physically safe but psychologically scarred. Several have described recurring nightmares, survivor’s guilt, and a sense of disbelief that they lived while friends did not. Parents of victims have spoken of empty bedrooms, unfinished dreams, and futures erased in minutes. Their testimonies have become a powerful reminder that behind every statistic is a human life — and that accountability is not abstract, but deeply personal. A National Reckoning on Safety The fire has triggered a sweeping review of fire safety standards across Switzerland. Authorities have launched inspections of nightclubs, bars, and event spaces nationwide. Indoor pyrotechnics are being restricted or banned, and enforcement mechanisms are under renewed scrutiny. Yet critics argue that inspections alone are not enough. They are calling for: Clearer responsibility between municipalities and venue owners Transparent public records of safety inspections Stronger penalties for non-compliance Faster intervention when risks are identified If a disaster of this scale can happen in a country renowned for precision and regulation, many ask, what does that mean for public safety elsewhere? An Incomprehensible Nightmare — and a Turning Point The phrase repeated by grieving families — “an incomprehensible nightmare” — captures the emotional weight of the tragedy. But as legal proceedings move forward, that nightmare may also become a turning point. The Le Constellation fire has exposed systemic weaknesses, forced uncomfortable truths into the open, and sparked a nationwide conversation about responsibility, prevention, and justice. Whether those conversations lead to lasting reform remains to be seen. What is certain is this: the 40 lives lost on that New Year’s night will not be forgotten — and for many, justice will mean ensuring that such a tragedy never happens again.
By Muhammad Hassan2 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.