Kenyan News outlets scramble to delete stories of Charlene Ruto Lying about 'Office of First Daughter'
The many lies she told about her fake food business are also being hidden or removed as well
Thursday, 5 January 2023
The many tales coming from the first daughter of Kenya's President William Ruto are being purged and removed. As this author tried to report on Ruto calling his daughter a liar without ever mentioning the word 'LIAR!"
In an interview with journalists who asked about the 'Office of the First Daughter', Ruto called his 32 year old daughter a KID. He [Ruto] said there is no office of first daughter and that she was following her friends and they were being children.
Kenyans were quickly and understandably upset because there is no office of First Daughter. There never has been and there is no such office in the Kenyan constitution either. She also said that in her university days she sold smokies.
Charlene Ruto attended a small religious college with only 4,000 students and before her father was president he was the deputy president of Kenya for 10 years. Kenyans asked why would the child of one of Kenya's wealthiest men and property owners be selling food on the streets.
After public outrage Charlene Ruto then said that the funding for this office was not from tax money belonging to Kenyans.
Charlene has been hush the entire time her father was in office and suddenly in late October 2022 she decided to 'play' political roles. She was sent on a political trip to Morocco and Spain as well. She met with Moroccan leaders and floated photos of her touring the country.
According to news sources the only employment Charlene Ruto has had was an internship and working for her father at his Weston Hotel. There are no other types of employment and sources also say her degree is in communications. She has yet to work in any communications positions as of yet outside of drumming up customers for her father's hotel.
Charlene Ruto selling smokies Addressing student leaders at the University of Nairobi on Thursday, December 7, the first daughter claimed her father offered words of advice to her on the business.
“I used to be in the business of selling smokies and kachumbari at Daystar University as they were on demand.
He then said to leave his daughter alone because she's just a kid. William Ruto is redefining what a lie is as well as what the ages of a child actually are.
He's told lies himself that were pointed out by the Kenyan media.William Ruto first said that his head of DCI Kinoti had resigned. Now he's saying he fired him for crimes he went out to list in his interview. No ones question why Ruto lied or why his daughter made up the story of the office of first daughter.
President William Ruto has now revealed that he fired former Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) boss George Kinoti.
This comes in contrast to President Ruto’s own announcement on September 27, 2022 that the DCI boss had tendered his resignation.
The President, speaking during a joint interview at State House on Wednesday, disclosed that he relieved Kinoti of his duties for overseeing a team accused of multiple extrajudicial killings.
The Head of State also added that he has since tasked the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA) with probing and getting to the bottom of the said killings with the aim of bringing the perpetrators to book.
“I had a thorough meeting with IPOA and we have agreed that it is not necessary for us to establish another taskforce when IPOA is there and it is squarely within their mandate to tell us how Kenyans ended up being killed in this manner and it was business as usual,” he stated.
Much of the behavior of William Ruto, mirror that of American former president Donald Trump. Right down to his fake religious stick which many have called him on.
There have been stories in the Kenya media of Ruto ALLEGEDLY cheating on his wife, ALLEGEDLY having children outside of his marriage. ALLEGEDLY beating his wife Racheal Ruto sending her to a hospital in South Africa for treatment. ALLEGEDLY stealing land from Kenyan widows.
Clearly there has been nepotism and he's barely been in office. As well as now claiming Kenya as a Christian nation. He's already spoken of his distain for the gay and lesbian community. even though they cause no harm or issues with in Kenya as much as Kenyan men have caused.
©️TB Obwoge 2023 All Rights Reserved
About the Creator
IwriteMywrongs
I'm the president of a nonprofit. I've lived in 3 countries, I love to travel, take photos and help children and women around the world! One day I pray an end to Child Marriages, Rape and a start to equal Education for ALL children 🙏🏽
Keep reading
More stories from IwriteMywrongs and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Cameroons | Cameroun - Two Independence Days Neither Celebrated & A Civil War
Cameroon has been embroiled in a civil war 6 years. Prior to this there has always been 2 Independence days yet none are celebrated. One which is the 1 January 1960. The second one being 1 October 1961.
By IwriteMywrongs3 years ago in The Swamp
The Questions Trump Must Ask Before Striking Iran
Why any decision to use force must navigate strategy, law, and unintended consequences As tensions rise between the United States and Iran against the backdrop of sweeping protests and violent crackdowns inside Tehran, speculation has grown that U.S. President Donald Trump may order military action against Iran. Statements from the White House suggest Trump is prepared to consider “very strong options” that could include military force if Iran continues to violently suppress dissent or threatens U.S. interests abroad. Yet before any decision to strike, there are crucial questions that must be asked — and answered — about the risks, legality, and ultimate effectiveness of such action. � The Guardian +1 1. What Is the Objective of a Strike? Leaders contemplating military force must first define clear goals. Is the aim to deter Tehran from killing protesters, to degrade Iran’s missile or nuclear capabilities, or to instigate regime change? Without a specific goal, military action risks becoming an open‑ended conflict with no clear end point. Historical operations — such as the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites — were narrowly framed around undermining nuclear infrastructure, not restructuring Iran’s political system. � DAWN If the objective is solely humanitarian — to protect demonstrators — policymakers must consider whether strikes would actually ease repression or instead strengthen the government’s narrative of foreign interference. If Iran’s leadership portrays foreign strikes as unprovoked aggression, it could unify segments of the population behind the regime, counteracting U.S. intentions. 2. Is Military Action Legal Under International Law? Any military strike must withstand scrutiny under both U.S. constitutional law and the rules of international engagement. Under the U.S. Constitution’s Article II, the president has authority over the armed forces but does not have unlimited power to begin hostilities — especially if they escalate into war. There are legal interpretations suggesting that substantial military campaigns may require Congressional authorization, particularly if U.S. forces are at risk over a prolonged period. � pbs.org International law also matters. The United Nations Charter prohibits the use of force except in self‑defense or with Security Council approval. If a strike cannot be justified as immediate self‑defense — for example, if Iran has not attacked U.S. territory — then it could be viewed as a breach of international norms, with diplomatic fallout lasting decades. � LinkedIn 3. What Are the Risks of Regional Escalation? Iran’s military capabilities, including thousands of ballistic missiles and proxy forces across the Middle East, remain significant. A U.S. strike could prompt retaliation not just from Iran directly but through allied militias in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Lebanon. Even if Tehran’s leadership is internally weakened by protests, its military apparatus is capable of responding unpredictably. Arab Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, have publicly cautioned against military action, warning that it could destabilize regional security, disrupt global oil markets, and generate unintended chaos. � wsj.com 4. How Would Civilian Populations Be Affected? Proportionality and civilian protection are essential under the laws of armed conflict. Striking military targets in Iran — a country with civilian infrastructure and major urban areas — could result in significant noncombatant casualties if not carefully planned. The principles of proportionality under humanitarian law require that incidental loss of civilian life not be excessive relative to the anticipated military advantage. This calculation must be made before action is taken, not after. � Just Security If civilians are harmed, the humanitarian rationale for intervention collapses, turning international sympathy against the United States and potentially fueling further regional instability. 5. Are There Viable Alternatives to Military Action? Before resorting to force, diplomatic or economic avenues must be fully explored. Reports suggest that calls for negotiations between the U.S. and Iranian officials remain on the table — though Trump has signalled a hardening position, the possibility of talks has not completely disappeared. � Anadolu Ajansı Economic pressure, such as tariffs on nations doing business with Iran, was already enacted by the U.S. as a way to isolate Tehran and increase leverage without resorting to violence. � AP News Non‑military options, including intensified sanctions, cyber operations against specific military assets, or diplomatic coalition building, should be weighed for their potential to achieve strategic objectives without broad conflict. 6. What Happens After the First Strike? Perhaps most importantly, policymakers must consider what comes after the first bomb drops. Military action rarely ends conflicts; it often shifts them into new phases. An airstrike could provoke prolonged tit‑for‑tat responses from Iran or its proxies, draw in regional powers, and entangle the U.S. in years of instability. This was seen in other prolonged Middle Eastern conflicts where initial tactical strikes did not achieve strategic peace. Conclusion — More Questions Than Answers The choice to strike Iran is not one to be made lightly. Unlike a narrowly scoped unilateral missile attack on a specific target, a significant military operation against a sovereign nation involves deep legal, moral, strategic, and humanitarian considerations. Before committing to force, Trump and his advisors must weigh what success looks like, how legitimacy will be maintained under international law, how to minimize civilian harm, and whether non‑military tools have been fully exhausted. In the high‑stakes world of international geopolitics, military action may be one option — but whether it is the right one depends on answering these tough questions honestly, comprehensively, and with the long‑term interests of global stability in mind.
By Fiaz Ahmed Brohi6 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.