What History Was Meant To Leave Out
An Essay and Vocal Challenge Entry
“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.”
Genesis 1:1-2
You probably know where I’m going with this. But hear me out.
Science and God have always been at odds. From Eden to Einstein, science and God have long walked parallel paths, rarely meeting, yet always circling the same origin. But I don’t believe history tried to erase God. The idea of ‘a god’ still exists, just rebranded.
“God” a being to be worshipped. And there are many gods now, scattered across minds and media.
What I believe history has tried to leave out isn’t even Jesus. His name earmarks the very timeline we base the order of history on—B.C. and A.D. revolve around the reckoning of his life. We can acknowledge who he was, where he came from, what he stood for. We’ll even give credit to the miracles, the teachings, the betrayal, and the brutal crucifixion.
It would sound absurd, wouldn’t it? To teach students that the grave where his body was laid now lies empty. That after three days, a man resurrected from the dead. Like the first science fiction story except, not fiction. Terrifying, actually.
And sure, that sounds wild. Too much to write down in a history book without setting off alarms. But if we’re willing to teach that a man named Jesus lived and died, why not go the full mile?
Because three days later, he came back.Witnesses saw him. Talked to him. Walked with him.
And then he ascended, leaving us with a grand finale of words, mic-dropping a message that promises a next time. That the next time we’d see him would be when he returns not as a carpenter, not as a teacher. But as a King.
And maybe, we’ve never really been ready for that truth.
History stops where faith begins.
Because if we accept the resurrection, we have to accept the rest of the story. That he’s coming back. And that terrifies people, more than death itself, more than suffering, the idea of being seen by a living God. A God who returns to face us.
So we cherry-pick the parts of the Bible that feel safe. The comforting verses or the gentle parables. But the rest? We toss. We mock or ignore. That, to me, is denial. If Genesis 1:1 “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” feels too far-fetched, why pretend to embrace anything at all?
Meanwhile, our history books present their own creation ideologies. Big Bang, evolution, apes to man. And look, I’m not even saying those ideas are crazy. In fact, some of it kind of makes sense. But then again… what actually makes sense?
We are floating on a rock that spins around a burning star, in the middle of pitch-black infinity. And somehow, we invented the stock market and BBLs.
Sometimes it all feels fake. Like I could blink and none of this is even real.But here I am. Still breathing. Still existing. In an orange shirt, typing this with my thumbs. Me, a creature with a lap-creature that we domesticated for pleasure.
We’re the only species that contemplates the soul. That feels this ache of something more. That questions why we’re here at all.
And maybe this isn’t just what history leaves out, but what history was meant to leave out. Maybe, the whole operation of God and man was designed to be hidden, veiled, bypassed, for the sake of choice. Faith is not forced. It’s invited. It was never supposed to be printed in a textbook, decoded like a scientific formula. From the moment sin corrupted our autonomy, this story was meant to be sought out, not spoon-fed. To find Him, you have to choose Him. That’s the point.
We are just specs in a grander scheme of things.
Our solar system alone is one colossal phantom of reality. The earth orbits the Sun at 93 million miles away, a distance we call one astronomical unit. Light takes just over eight minutes to reach us. But that’s child’s play in cosmic terms.
Ready, for this ..( puts on nerd glasses and tin foil hat)…
The edge of our solar system, the Oort Cloud, may extend 100,000 times that distance. Beyond that, the next closest star, Proxima Centauri is over 24 trillion miles away. Even the fastest spacecraft we’ve built would take 70,000 years to reach it.
And that’s just the next star over.
The Milky Way galaxy we live in is over 100,000 light-years wide. That’s 587 quadrillion miles across. And there are an estimated two trillion galaxies in the observable universe. The full scope of existence is at least 93 billion light-years across and still expanding.
This is all in our history books- for lack of better words, we are dust.
Floating dust. With feelings.
And yet, out of all this, we are the only known beings who can look up and ask, Why? To wonder! To create.
We invented mathematics to measure the stars, then wrote poetry about how they made us feel. We are the only species that mourns, dreams, and believes.
The primates can’t come close to that.
We are atoms made conscious. Stardust that dares to hope. The universe observing itself.
And still, we hide this from young minds. We teach formulas but not wonder. We give facts but erase the mystery. We acknowledge Jesus the man but ignore the possibility of Jesus the Deity.
Is it too far-fetched, to believe in a God and a fallen angel? A depraved humanity? We already see pure hatred run feral in our vains. Such wickedness has got to come from somewhere. Monkeys?
A hell not even made for us, but for the devil and his demons, drags down souls with them one by one.
People ask, how could a good God send anyone to hell?
But that’s just it. He doesn’t. He pulls them out of it.
He could send us there. And if you’re a God, you need no reason to quarrel among your creation.
But that’s not what brings Him glory.
What brings Him glory is letting His right hand man, Lucifer, rise up with enough power granted heaven-side to challenge the Almighty and still lose.
He doesn’t force anyone.
He’s not interested in programming mindless, robotic obedience.
His promise is plainly this, “Prepare to lose.” In other words,
“And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen.”
Romans 16:20
That’s the whole point of the resurrection.
To show us, the battle’s already over. The tomb is empty. Death is defeated. Not just his but yours too.
The decision is yours and so does the escort that comes with it, that will take you to your eternal destination of your choosing, based off your final belief.
If real, that can really suck if you based every core of your being on the hope to return as a butterfly. I would really hope you are more certain, than the sun is on schedule.
If it’s not real, you’d lose nothing but if it is, you’d lose everything.
This war will come to its end.
And if this Jesus King is returning, it’s not to argue, or to beg you to come with him. But to reign.
Because if the grave is empty, then everything changes.
And we’re not ready for that. Everyone who has died this far, had plans.
Is anyone ready to die?
About the Creator
Natasha Collazo
Selected Writer in Residency, Champagne France ---2026
The Diary of an emo Latina OUT NOW
https://a.co/d/0jYT7RR




Comments (6)
I am a highly spiritual person and believe in possibilities. I believe in angels, I believe in miracles, I believe in otherworldly things, and I believe much of mankind isn't ready to go that route solely based on fear. Our world needs more believers, however, and your piece challenges the reader to consider, to explore, to step aside from the fear of the unknown. Fantastic work, Natasha!!!
Even as a child brought up with religion, the stars have called to me. I wondered what is really out there, why are we even alive, we are but specks in a vast dimension. Your story begs us to ask questions.
We’re the only species that contemplates the soul. That feels this ache of something more. That questions why we’re here at all.Faith is not forced, it's invited...loved these lines, the thought of being floating dust with feelings...epic! Your last two lines drew tears....remembering the lives my loved ones lived and they were ready when their time came...waiting for the promise of what was to come....exciting
I am. I am ready to trust me being into the hands of the Almighty whose glory, power, love, grace & very essence are beyond my ken. I know not what it will look like or whether I will even recognize anything I have ever believed, but I trust that it will be well & as it should be. I'll admit, there are some days I'm more anxious to get there than others. Patience has never been an easy virtue for me. Still, I have faith. I trust you are the same in that regard, my friend. When I was younger I was thoroughly engrossed in apologetics, those philosophical/theological/mathematical/scientific proofs of God's existence & that our faith is justified. With scholarship monies I received upon high school graduation I picked up everything I could find on the subject. Most of them, e.g. Josh McDowell's "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" & Jerry Lucas' "Theomatics" I figured out pretty quickly were fatally flawed in their logic. (McDowell has a statistician take the probability of a prophecy being fulfilled & then lauds its fulfillment. The problem is that once you've declared a prophecy has been fulfilled in a specific manner, the odds are not astronomically against that fulfillment, they are in fact 1:1, not even taking into account that he gets to decide what the prophecies mean, what events have fulfilled those prophecies, &, if he can't find anything that fits, then they simply haven't been fulfilled yet. Lucas likes to find proof that scripture is divinely composed by taking the numerical values of all the letters in the biblical Hebrew & koine Greek, finding the values of passages & demonstrating that those values consistently end up as multiples of various theologically/scripturally significant numbers. For example, all passages dealing with spiritual matters end up in multiples of 111, sometimes reduced further to the factors of 37x3. Since 3 represents divinity & 4 represents earthly, 3+3=6=human beings attempted to be God, 3+4=7=proper balance or relationship between human & divine, thus 666 represents evil spirituality while 777 represents godly. The problem is that he gets to decide the length of the passage, whether words should have their full spelling or shorter spelling, & he gets allows for a margin of error of 2 on either side, meaning he has five consecutive but separate chances to hit upon his target. Again, if he doesn't succeed, he simply hasn't found it for that passage. That's not a proof, that's a puzzle that's not even worth the NY Times Mini Crossword.) All of that having been said, I still find the first mover or first cause argument quite compelling. (While I was in grade school & junior high I would contemplate who or what created God &/or what came before God. Typically I would drive myself so deeply into the subject that my mind would, as I liked to describe it, blow a fuse. For ten or fifteen minutes I would simply be on autopilot, completely unaware of my surroundings. One afternoon as I was delivering newspapers I heard a voice, not audibly but in my mind/heart/spirit/soul, saying, "Randy, think about it." In that moment it finally occurred to me that I was thinking in terms of cause & effect, the way things tend to work in this world. But stepping aside to observe the world from outside of its existence & all its unending causality, I realized that for the world to exist there had to be something that caused it to exist & that it had to be outside of material causality--in other words, God. It's still not an absolute proof, unless we simply label God as that which we do not or cannot understand. But like I said, I continue to find it persuasive.) Now at the tender age of 65, I have to admit that I find it all moot. I cannot prove God's existence or the veracity of scriptures & my faith to anyone who does not wish to believe them, not even by pointing out that atheism is just as much an unprovable believe system as theism is. (Agnosticism, on the other hand is easily defended on philosophical grounds, even if those grounds are to be acknowledged as being as unstable as the shifting sands of any knowledge we might believe we have at the time.) What I can do is share my faith, mostly through my actions, for without those any words I might speak are meaningless. All that having been said, obviously I love your article. It's taken me back to fond memories & exciting within me those theological/spiritual juices which are always good to have churning. Blessings, my friend, & may God's peace abide with you always.
Very thoughtful piece on the relationship between science and religion, Natasha. Well argued. Good luck in the challenge.
This is a really interesting take on the relationship between science and God. You make some good points about how the idea of God has changed over time. But I'm not sure I agree that history has tried to leave out Jesus. There are plenty of historical records that mention him. I'm curious though, how do you think we should approach teaching about Jesus in schools? Should it be part of a religious studies class or integrated into history lessons? And how do we reconcile the idea of the resurrection with scientific understanding?