Latest Stories

Most recently published stories in Education.

Choosing a Capstone Project Writing Service
When you are somebody, it can be attainable to make the most of capstone project writing services to preserve you time, electricity, and nerves though publishing your last job. Although deciding on a capstone project writing service, it really is critical to grasp that top quality and professionalism and believe in are quite possibly the most sizeable factors when finding a company. Take into consideration looking at testimonies or traveling to the firm's web-site to search out a creator who fits your requirements and also your spending plan if you are uncertain of whatever you require.
By Clare Greene4 years ago in Education
I Quit Academia
Ever since I can remember, I have been obsessed with learning. My parents instilled a love of reading in me, allowed me to read what I wanted, and that was all it took. Because of my bookworm nature, teaching seemed like a natural career path for me. There is nothing like the warm fuzzy feeling of seeing that spark of understanding in a student's eyes when they get that concept they were struggling with.
By Ana Lucia Chaves Barquero4 years ago in Education
Embrace the Christian Grad School Experience
Graduate school is not a trivial endeavor. It is an experience that can be either amazing or disappointing. Attending collegiate schools can be a grueling experience, full of long hours and intense studying. However, you can make the process easier and more enjoyable with a little effort. Graduate schools offer a time of reflection, growth, and change, which can be incredibly beneficial to one's spiritual journey. Moreover, they are an immensely rewarding experience for Christians.
By Karen Bradford4 years ago in Education
The Adolphus’ Plight
Wolves have an atrocious reputation amongst the human population. People don’t understand why exactly we, and other creatures, need them around. Granted, they aren’t the sweetest creatures to roam the earth, but that’s what evolution intended for them. Wolves are extraordinary creatures, they play a key role in balancing out the ecosystem in which they live, they were killed off by people, and yet, the ecosystems they were taken from weren’t saved. Wolves shouldn’t be eradicated, they should be saved.
By Bryttnie Chaffin4 years ago in Education
What does Back to School Mean To You?
It is back to school time or close to it. What does this time of year mean to you. To me it is a time to look forward to seeing old friends and maybe making some new ones as well. It was a time of getting some new clothes and new supplies from notebooks, folders and binders along with pens and pencils, even though the schools at the time I was in school supplied at least a paper tablet and in the earlier grades a box of crayons along with a pencil along with all the old and maybe new textbooks pertaining to your new grade. I was a student of the 1970's and I remember having textbooks from the 1950's and 1960's to study from at least till I got to fifth grade when the school district bought new textbooks.
By Mark Graham4 years ago in Education
How to evaluate the Three-Body Problem series?
The Three-Body Problem is one of the most wonderful novels I've read recently. Although I can't fully understand and understand a lot of physics principles, it is quite excellent in terms of structure and plot. The plot development is unexpected, and there are many places worth exploring and recalling. The power of love? In Harry Potter, the invincible Lord Voldemort is defeated because he knows nothing about love. The book's motto is that love is the greatest power. Of course, Rowling is no virgin of love, the book is deeply realistic and the characters are not stereotyped as good guys and bad guys. However, in the Three-Body Problem, Cheng Xin is a loving person who, with noble motives, strives for a better human being, but twice pushes human civilization to a place of no return, eventually leading to the destruction of the earth. But the real ability and in the right way to save the earth vader, but again and again in the hands of Cheng Xin, let people think, in the moment of life and death, is it rational action or love can save the earth? In the three fairy tales that Yuntianming takes the adventure to let Cheng Xin bring back, what can truly save the earth is the speed of light spaceship, but this requires human society to make a huge sacrifice, involving the right to survival, social class and all kinds of complex moral ethics. Is it to preserve the civilization of the earth at the expense of the majority of people's right to exist, or rather to die together? Cheng Xin became the sword bearer because of democratic vote. As it turned out, she was not a proper sword-bearer. Vader was better. Democracy is often inefficient and irrational at such critical moments. Should the fate of humanity be left to democracy or to a few? Why should a few decide the fate of all mankind? Again, it's worth arguing about. The paradox is that if human society were to move towards absolute sanity, it would indeed be able to overcome technological difficulties and perhaps avoid extinction. But is the human civilization that has survived the world of love that we expected, or has it gone dark? "Give time to life, give years to civilization." The four wallbreakers are the best of the best, each with a clear vision of the true future, the inevitability of failure, and all plans are built on that foundation. The first three failed, and their plans were widely despised; Luo Ji's successful plan was actually based on the top three. In terms of story, the Three-Body Problem 2 is arguably the best. While the First film begins with a somewhat dry depiction of the Cultural Revolution, the third film hints at fantasy rather than science fiction. Zhang Beihai was the fifth person to face the wall. His great skill lies in deceiving not only tomoko/Trisaran world, but also the entire human society; Not only did it keep earth technology moving in the right direction, but it also kept us alive for thousands of years. A lot could be rewritten if he had the resources to face the Wall. "Weakness and ignorance are not obstacles to survival, arrogance is." Strictly speaking, the book is a history of the universe without leading characters. The reason why Luo Ji and Cheng Xin use more ink is that the author wants to observe the rise and fall of the earth from their perspectives, and they play a significant role in several key turning points of the earth. Many supporting characters, such as Yun Tianming, Wei De and Zhang Beihai, left a deep impression on readers. They are all doing their best to save civilization on Earth, using different methods and with different results. The question is, what is right and what is wrong? Who can make such a judgment? Zhang Beihai murders five people in order to make mankind develop in the right direction. After lifting hibernation, he directly hijacked the spaceship, which can be said to be a betrayal of the entire human society, but his efforts enabled the continuation of human civilization. Is this true or false? Of course, his move was a risky one, and the last two ships would have been doomed had he not stumbled into the fourth dimension. Zhang beihai said, "As soldiers, do you know what is the biggest difference between us? You decide on your actions based on possible outcomes; And we had to do our duty, regardless of the outcome. That was the only hope, so I did it." Vader murders Vadim in order for the Ladder project to proceed smoothly; He knew he was the right sword bearer and attempted to murder Cheng Xin; In order to build the speed of light spaceship, not hesitate to fight against the entire human society... And his real motive and all efforts, are to change the fate of human destruction, he led the development of the speed of light spacecraft has become the cornerstone of the continuation of human civilization. Is that right or wrong? "Space is like a magnifying glass, which can magnify the dark side of humanity to its maximum in an instant. When humans are in space, totalitarianism takes five minutes." Yuntianming is less skeptical. The three-body body does not support useless people, he can survive there and get a higher status, must give them a lot of advice, even the three body's several important attacks on the earth, may be from the plan of Yuntianming. But this is for his own survival, and he also tries to get Cheng Xin to bring back three precious stories that show the way out for humanity. "Humans are used to seeing black and white in everything, but unfortunately reality is grey." 4. Childish and genius, the accidental and inevitable Wall plan and the ladder Plan have all come under great attack as extremely childish decisions made in a time of extreme panic in human society. As a matter of fact, the plan of facing the wall threatened the three-body world and won precious time for human society to breathe and develop. The Ladder project offered the only hope of saving human society, though the Last hope had been destroyed by the Virgin. As plans go, these two plans are really pretty weak and can't stand much scrutiny, but they turned out to be a huge game-changer. So how to judge these two plans? Naive or genius? Can a few individuals change the course of civilization on Earth? Is it cheng Xin's irrationality and the flood of love that destroyed the earth civilization, or the joint efforts of the whole human society that led to the destruction of the earth civilization? Is it accidental or inevitable? "By choosing you, the human world has chosen to treat life and everything with love, though at a great cost. You fulfill the aspirations of that world, you fulfill the values of that world, you fulfill their choices, and you really are not wrong." The reason why human beings have not been able to see through the dark forest of the universe is not because of the lack of cosmic consciousness due to the immature evolution of civilization. Although cheng Xin was naively chosen as the bearer of the sword, cheng Xin was not wrong, and neither was mankind. The value of being a civilization on earth is to treat life and everything with love. So it's the values of earth civilization that are wrong? Chose love over reason, so the demise of civilization on Earth is inevitable? This is an important lesson of the MBA. It used to be the law of the jungle. The strongest would survive. However, as modern society changes, it is replaced by the law of the rainforest, that is, in a society, who can coordinate and use the most resources, who can establish the most cooperative relations with others, who is the most powerful. On this basis, a series of disciplines have been developed, such as communication, influence, leadership, negotiation and so on. Originally, I accept this view, but the three-body dark forest law and chain of suspicion makes people deeply see, from the perspective of the universe, is still the law of the jungle. Weak civilizations, once discovered, would be dealt a fatal blow rather than friendly communication. Higher civilization casually casually throw a piece of paper, weak civilization on everything. "Survival is the first necessity of civilization." However, this point is against our morality. In our values, many things are higher than survival, such as faith, freedom, love... To return to the question at the beginning, if we accept the dark Forest law with survival as our first need, is this still the civilization we know on Earth? In terms of time, in the long river of history, everything is dust; Spatially speaking, in the universe, the earth is not even dust. This is just two dimensions, and if I zoom in to twelve dimensions, forgive me if I can't imagine what a brilliant world it would be. If you look at it in the long sweep of history, from the cosmic point of view, it makes no sense. Perhaps this is where nihilism and hedonism come in. "That night when the lighthouse was built, as I watched it glow from a distance at sea, it suddenly dawned on me that death is the only lighthouse that always lights. Wherever you sail, you must eventually turn to the direction it leads. Everything dies, and only death lives.
By Ma Kevin4 years ago in Education
Is Liu Cixin's novel the Three-Body Problem worth reading?
Many years later, I still remember the wee morning when I finished reading Liu Cixin's The Three-Body Problem. The east was white then, and I could not sleep. Inside, I felt a strange calm, awed by the universe and re-examined my human nature. I arrogantly thought it was a spiritual experience with a religious tinge, peace, openness. Recently, there is a very popular online video about the Three-Body Problem, called Han Lu Teaches the Three-Body Problem. I stumbled upon it, clicked in, and spent 52 minutes listening to Han Lu's explanation of "Once upon a Time on Earth," the first part of the "Three-Body Problem" trilogy. I have to admit, Han-ro is really good, it has been many years since I finished reading the Three-Body Problem, and I have forgotten much of the plot. But Hanlu's concise, logical explanations brought me back to the great three-body world. In particular, he used a very simple example to explain the concept of "quantum entanglement" in the first issue, which was quite enlightening. I saw people constantly brushing on the bullet screen, "JUST can't read the original work, listen to Han Lu's talk is enough", "talk as wonderful as the original work". I was instinctively alarmed by such comments. I strongly object to the "listen to me, you don't need to read" argument. Although Hanro himself does not claim to do so, many in his audience do. Again, the classic question -- can the storyteller read for me? I've always said no, but this time I have a little doubt. "For the three-body problem, which is not known for literature, can we just listen to the explanation?" . The storyteller could even explain the concept of "quantum entanglement" to me in a way that I couldn't do on my own. With this question in mind, I re-read the Three-Body Problem: Once upon a Time on Earth. After reading the book, I felt ashamed that I had ever had such doubts. The gap between Han lu's explanation and liu Cixin's original work may be the gap between earth technology and three-body technology. Hanlu's explanation begins with the earth's basic science being locked up by the three-body technology, and a large number of scientists committing suicide. Then it turns to the story of wang Miao, a nanomaterial researcher, who is constantly staring at a strange countdown. I looked at it, and it happened on page 20 of the book. But in fact, on page 12, there is a conversation that I think is the cornerstone of the book that Hanlu does not mention. "Wang, do you have any significant changes in life... for you, the world overnight become completely different" "no," "your life is a kind of coincidence, then, the world there are so many unpredictable factors, your life is nothing changes" "most people are so" "that most people life is accidental" "but... Generations of people have come along like this..." "All by chance." "Don't you say..." "Yes, the whole of human history is also accidental. There have been no major changes from the Stone Age to this day, and that's lucky... Now I tell you, it's over..." It is through this dialogue between Chang Weisi and Wang Miao that Liu Cixin makes clear the theoretical foundation of the book -- the objective world is full of uncertainty, which is also the foreshadowing of the unpredictable three-body world. If not read in person, this conversation is omitted in the one-sentence background that "Earth's basic science is locked up and scientists commit suicide." Listening to a book does have many advantages. It allows you to grasp the outline of the story in the shortest time. The downside is that a lot of detail is lost, and the emotions simmering in the book are less likely to reach you. Han lu explains at length how Wang Miao kills a huge ship with nanomaterials, which is fascinating, but he doesn't have room for the following plot. On the Panama Canal, as the great ship of earth rebels sails in, the blade rises, ready to send the whole ship to hell. Scientist Wang Miao and General Stanton look on. "The second time I came to Panama in 1999, I attended the ceremony for the handover of sovereignty over the canal... When we arrived at the authority building, we saw the stars and stripes coming down... I thought we were witnessing a historic moment, but now I think how small these things are," Stanton said. This is the biggest charm of science fiction. It allows you to view real life and human history from a higher perspective. Many events that we think have changed the world are actually so "insignificant" in front of the vast universe. And this kind of emotion can not be obtained in the book, can only be experienced slowly through the countless details described in the book. Even when I read the Three-Body Problem again, I found that my previous impression that the three-Body Problem is not good at literature may not be correct. As a science fiction novel, the writing of Liu Cixin, an engineer by training, is certainly not flashy, but it is still full of literary beauty. For example, in describing the time when Ye Wenjie lived in Qijiatun, Liu wrote: "In Ye Wenjie's memory, this time did not seem to belong to her, as if it were a piece of someone else's life, flying into her own life like a feather. This memory is condensed into a series of European classical oil paintings. It is strange that there are either Chinese paintings or oil paintings. There are too many blanks in Chinese paintings, but there are no blanks in qijiatun's life, just like classical oil paintings, full of rich colors that cannot be melted. Everything was strong and warm: the heated kang covered with thick urchins, the kato and moho smoke in a copper pot, the thick sorghum rice, the 65-degree kaoliang liquor... But all this flowed away in silence and peace, like a camp stream. To compare life to painting, can only be rich oil painting, such description is beautiful and warm, lifting a heavy weight as light. This paragraph alone, even if put in pure literature works, is not to mention much let the excellent work. This is why we always insist on reading the original book. No matter how well the storyteller tells it, it is only seasoning, which can make the aroma of the dish stronger and the color more attractive, but only the real paper, ink and words are the dinner. When "Han Lu tell the three-body" played over, I think Han Lu speak good. But I still remember that early morning, all those years ago, when I finally closed the Three-Body Problem, I felt the whole universe winking at me.
By Ma Kevin4 years ago in Education
5 Benefits Showing Why Education Is Important to Our Society
Being educated means being open-minded and being able to contribute to the society in which you live. Education is considered an essential component of the progress of society. Educated people can significantly contribute to the development of the community in different fields depending on what they are educated for. In this way, a stable community will be created that will have good conditions for progress.
By eve.anderson4 years ago in Education
Top Schools in Pune - Best Schools in Pune CBSE
Top schools in Pune have always attracted students from all over the country and abroad, and in such an environment The Orbis Schools are the preferred choice of parents seeking admission to good schools in Pune.
By marketing tech4 years ago in Education
Habits are more important than goals
Success is the product of the accumulation of daily habits. Habits are self-improvement compounded. Just as money multiplies through compound interest, the effect of your habits multiplies as the habit is repeated.
By dazhi4 years ago in Education
How to read life, read life, read society?
Reading Life and Society This big book is just a metaphor, life and society unfold before our eyes at any time, but it is not a book, so how to read it? I also started to think about this matter, and have a few ideas. I hope that through the exchange and discussion with you, I can gain some results:
By Waiting4 years ago in Education
What occupations are more exposed to the dark side of human nature?
You all love to listen to stories, so I'll tell stories, too. It's all true, so it's hidden. I am a girl. I once studied in a key primary school. In fact, there is no point in primary school. All primary schools are the same. However, some parents have to spend money to send their children to the so-called key primary schools in order not to let their children lose at the starting line, just because they are said to "be able to go to a good junior high school". My family spent 5000 yuan to send me to this primary school. I have been doing well in primary school, and I am very popular with all teachers. But I have a disadvantage, that is, the singing is out of tune, which is very unpleasant. The music class requires the whole class to play the flute, and I can't play the flute well. So I was often punished to stand in music class.
By Ratcliff Hudson4 years ago in Education