Powdered paints take flight in the month of March as people throw gulal (hindi) or rang (Nepali) at each other, filling the air with a phantasmagoric and kaleidoscopic display of unimaginable beauty. It is the festival of love.
The Festival Of Colors has begun. Inspired by the traditional Hindu festival Holi, which usually takes place in March and marks the coming of spring. For one day the distinctions between castes, religions and gender are set aside and everyone is equal. The festival is primarily observed in India and Nepal, but also in many other countries with a large Hindu population.
The festival signifies the victory of good over evil, the arrival of spring, end of winter and for many a festive day to meet others. A day to play and laugh, forgive and forget and repair broken relationships. It is also celebrated as a thanksgiving for a good harvest.
Festival Of Colours is a concert like event with music taking flight along with the coloured powder filling the air like magical fairy dust. It takes place on 4 different continents. The event usually takes place on a Saturday from 12 noon to 10 pm, or it may last for a day and a night, starting on the eve of the Purnima (Full moon day) Falling Vikram Samvat Hindu calendar month of Falguna, which falls somewhere between the end of February and the middle of March in the Gregorian calendar.
The first evening is known as Holika Dahan, or Chhoti Holi, and the following day as Holi, Rangwali Holi, Dhuleti, Dhulandi, or Phagwah.
Holi first came to Europe on 29 June 2012. The first Festival was held in Berlin on the grounds of the Postbahnhof. Some of the 'guests' complained about incorrect information from the organizer. It was not sold out despite free tickets being given away. Not much of the Holi symbolism was felt at the Berlin Holi Festival.
Holi is an ancient Hindu religious festival which has become popular with non-Hindus in many parts of South Asia, as well as people of other communities outside of Asia. In recent years the festival has spread to parts of Europe and North America as a spring celebration of love, frolic and colors. It is a wonderful festival with the flight of colors and sounds filling the air in a continuous show of togetherness and unity.
There were three more Festivals Of Color concerts in 2012 in Munich, Hannover and Dresden. Munich was the biggest with 10,000 guests. In 2013 the Festival Of Colors Tour went global, starting in Berlin on 10 May and hitting 3 continents and 7 different countries. The focus of the 2013 tour was Germany with 14 cities and 15 events (Berlin had two events in 2013). However, there were events in many big Cities, like Vienna, Amsterdam, Barcelona, London, Mexico City and Cape Town. Overall the total number of events in 2013 was 25. 2013 was also the first time that the Festival Of Colours was held on two consecutive days. London hosted a total of nearly 30,000 people at the Battersea Power Station on 10 and 11 August. The biggest single-day festival took place in Mannheim with 20,000 guests. 2014 the expansion is set to continue with new countries and cities joining the list, including Italy (Rome), France (Paris), New Zealand (Auckland), Ireland (Dublin), Tunisia (Hammamet) and Switzerland (Zurich).
Everyone comes together for the many simultaneous color throw of flying paint and festive music as the day dances on. This is then repeated every hour until the end draws nigh.
The flight of paint and sound represents the release of emotions and the welcoming of pure and complete freedom.
Everyone should have a festive flight of fancy every year.
About the Creator
Novel Allen
You can only become truly accomplished at something you love. (Maya Angelou). Genuine accomplishment is not about financial gain, but about dedicating oneself to activities that bring joy and fulfillment.
Keep reading
More stories from Novel Allen and writers in Earth and other communities.
Trump’s Venezuela Gambit Tests Investor Appetite for Geopolitical Risk
Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s renewed hardline posture toward Venezuela has reopened a familiar—but newly volatile—front in global geopolitics. By signaling tougher enforcement of sanctions and hinting at a recalibration of U.S. policy toward Caracas, Trump has injected uncertainty into energy markets and emerging-market assets, forcing investors to reassess how much geopolitical risk they are willing to absorb. For Wall Street and global funds alike, Venezuela has long been a paradox: a country with some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, yet burdened by sanctions, political instability, and institutional collapse. Trump’s gambit is testing whether investors believe opportunity can outweigh risk—or whether capital will once again retreat at the first sign of escalation. Why Venezuela Is Back on the Radar Venezuela’s reemergence in U.S. political discourse is not accidental. Energy security has climbed back to the top of global priorities, driven by conflicts, sanctions, and supply chain disruptions. With oil prices sensitive to geopolitical shocks, even marginal producers can influence sentiment. During Trump’s previous term, the United States imposed sweeping sanctions aimed at pressuring President Nicolás Maduro to step down. Those measures sharply curtailed Venezuela’s oil exports and isolated its financial system. While later policy adjustments under subsequent administrations allowed limited easing—particularly to stabilize energy markets—Trump’s rhetoric suggests a return to maximum pressure. For investors, this raises a critical question: are sanctions about to tighten again, and if so, what does that mean for oil flows, regional stability, and risk premiums? Markets React to Policy Signals, Not Just Policy Financial markets are forward-looking. They react not only to decisions but to signals—and Trump’s statements are powerful signals. Even without immediate policy changes, the prospect of tougher sanctions or diplomatic confrontation can shift investor behavior. Oil traders are watching closely. Venezuela’s production remains far below its historical peak, but incremental barrels matter in a tight market. Any hint that U.S. policy could disrupt exports—even indirectly—tends to push volatility higher. Beyond oil, Venezuela-linked assets are thinly traded but symbolically important. Bonds, energy service contracts, and regional equities can swing sharply on geopolitical headlines, reinforcing the perception that politics, not fundamentals, drives outcomes. Investor Appetite Meets Political Reality The core test posed by Trump’s Venezuela gambit is whether investors are prepared to price in elevated geopolitical risk for potential upside. Some funds specialize in distressed assets, betting on political shifts or partial normalization. Others prefer stability and predictability, steering clear of jurisdictions where policy can change overnight. In recent months, there has been cautious interest in Venezuela-related opportunities, fueled by limited sanctions relief and the prospect—however remote—of political dialogue. Trump’s stance complicates that calculus. A harder U.S. line could reverse fragile gains, leaving investors exposed to sudden losses. For institutional investors with strict compliance requirements, even the perception of heightened sanctions risk can be enough to stay away. The Energy Dimension: Oil as Leverage Energy sits at the center of this drama. Venezuela’s oil sector has deteriorated after years of underinvestment and mismanagement, but it still represents strategic leverage. For Washington, sanctions are a tool to influence behavior; for Caracas, oil is both lifeline and bargaining chip. Trump’s approach historically framed sanctions as pressure mechanisms rather than negotiating tools. If that philosophy returns, markets may expect less flexibility and more confrontation. That expectation alone can deter capital, slow production recovery, and amplify price swings. Ironically, tighter sanctions could also strengthen Venezuela’s reliance on non-Western partners, reshaping trade routes and complicating enforcement—another layer of uncertainty investors must weigh. Regional Spillovers and Emerging Market Risk Venezuela does not exist in isolation. Its instability has ripple effects across Latin America, from migration pressures to regional energy dynamics. For investors, this means contagion risk. A sharper U.S.–Venezuela standoff could elevate risk premiums for neighboring markets, particularly those with political fragility or economic ties to Caracas. Currency volatility, capital outflows, and equity selloffs often follow periods of heightened regional tension. In this sense, Trump’s gambit tests not just appetite for Venezuela-specific risk, but for emerging markets broadly—especially at a time when global interest rates and macro uncertainty already weigh on sentiment. Election-Year Calculations and Uncertainty Trump’s Venezuela rhetoric also carries a domestic political dimension. Hardline foreign policy positions can resonate with certain voter blocs, particularly in an election context. For investors, election-year geopolitics are notoriously difficult to model. Policy announcements may serve political messaging rather than economic strategy, increasing the likelihood of abrupt shifts. Markets dislike surprises, and Trump’s unpredictability—whether admired or criticized—adds a premium to uncertainty. As a result, investors may demand higher returns to compensate for risk, or simply choose to allocate capital elsewhere. What Investors Are Watching Next Several indicators will shape market reaction in the months ahead: Sanctions enforcement: Any concrete moves to tighten or expand restrictions would have immediate market impact. Oil export data: Changes in Venezuelan output or shipment patterns will signal whether rhetoric is translating into reality. Diplomatic posture: Engagement—or lack thereof—with allies and regional partners will influence how isolated or escalatory U.S. policy becomes. Corporate exposure: Energy companies and service providers will reassess involvement, offering clues about private-sector confidence. Together, these signals will determine whether Trump’s gambit remains a headline risk or becomes a material market driver. A Calculated Risk—or a Warning Shot? It remains unclear whether Trump’s stance is a negotiating tactic, a campaign message, or a preview of future policy. For investors, the distinction matters less than the risk it introduces. Venezuela’s story has taught markets a hard lesson: political risk can overwhelm fundamentals. Even the promise of vast resources cannot compensate for uncertainty when rules change without warning. Conclusion Trump’s Venezuela gambit is testing investor appetite for geopolitical risk at a time when markets are already navigating inflation, interest rate shifts, and global instability. By reopening the question of sanctions and U.S. policy toward Caracas, Trump has reminded investors that politics remains a powerful market force. Whether capital retreats or selectively engages will depend on how rhetoric translates into action. But one thing is clear: in today’s interconnected world, geopolitical gambits do not stay confined to diplomacy—they ripple through markets, portfolios, and risk calculations worldwide.
By Muhammad Hassan7 days ago in Earth
Comments (2)
I learn something new ,thanks 🌈
this article has piqued my interest in the Festival of Colors and I would love to learn more about it.