Elly De La Cruz
Reds AMAZING YOUNG STARS!! Elly De La Cruz, Matt McLain, Will Benson and Spencer Steer lead the way!
Anticipation to see what oh goodness [Applause] first home run the hardest hit ball by a red this year that was nearly 115. it brought everyone to their feet Lark stapcast projected that ball to go nearly 460 feet that ball is destroyed that Hong nice backhand McLean and the rookies combined to cut him down John did you just dial that up I don't know what I'm saying you're sitting here talking about this guy that backhands this ball what a play by Maddie McLean and then Spencer steer at first base oh steer to left yes on the track and that's gone Spencer steer claims the team lead outright his sixth home runs and the two-run shot has the Reds ahead once more you can see maybe a little out in front but he maintained his position bad speed and a nice catch in the first row daily Cruz passes to Right Center is he for real he's gonna go three easily has a triple folks you better come down to the ballpark you better come down here to Cincinnati and watch this young man play he is not yet homered in the big leagues [Applause] oh my goodness there is some specialness Happening Here with this ball club and everyone is partaking in the party [Applause] down 6-2 ninth inning Magic the Reds 19th comeback win of the year only the Orioles have more McLean in the air great carry the left Center that's down on the track that'll do it Fairchild to the plate come back complete they mob McLean he wears the bubble gum bucket as a helmet a red strike again razzabon more authoritatively attacks runner from first goes and that's belted down the left field line that's a fair ball child scores friendly United Brown's third windmill on relay to the plate fairly slide safe to run knocked by steer and the reds are right back in it it's for all the hanging breaking ball the slider right there Spencer steer it's been on fire and a well-executed relay but the speed of Jake Fraley and a really nice slide to get away from the tag of Stallings breaking ball bench bench Center he drives in a couple of Reds it's a 5-1 Cincinnati lead we've seen some really good at bats here by Reds hitters in this inning they have not chased a lot of breaking balls a bilak threw up there McLean clocks it to left Center bad angle bull Gary Off the Wall Newman scores Fredo flies to the play Matt McLean bangs that is four extra base hits for the rookie McLean becomes the second Reds rookie to post four extra base hits of the game ever the first since Chris Sabo in 1988 steer in the air bubbles it to left Center home run over the monster and the Reds first lead of the night steers team leading eighth bomb this team is locked in for what a good swing by smear he's got plenty of power but never really tries to overpower the baseball just a good level of swing and it gets plenty of elevation to get out of here he's off Pitch away throw down no another steal well he had a huge lead and a huge break in fact Wainwright really never did make him stop out there he went to the plate very quickly Ellie had a big jump right here an hour keep in mind Contreras has got a really good arm but he just threw that ball high Ellie did not slide over the bag and get tagged out on a second time swings away drives it to Right Center Santander back it's over his head windmill on for Newman Benson flying through second Newman to the plate he scores it's an RBI triple for will Benson who erupts as he pops up and the Reds lead 8-7 wow a hanging breaking ball that really was on the outer part of the plate but it was up about thigh high and just lined it right over the head of the right fielder drill to Center push him back attack [Applause] get it done young man Spencer steer was singled once walked twice he is also struck out [Applause] thank you [Applause] well we're talking about the play at the plate and certainly there's some frustration on the red side but Spencer steer does what he's been doing pretty much the entire season whatever's going on around him he is capable of really locking in on the moment Ellie De La Cruz stands in and as he does the entire Reds Dugout is gathering [Applause] oh this rookie in two weeks of the big leagues post the first cycle for a red since 1989 Ellie Mania Hammer deep left Center by McLean he crushes a three-run homer that's a grown man Homer right there home run number three is a no doubter oh my goodness like I said the other night you hit a home run in between the bull pins and this ballpark you've got something going on and Matt McLean would qualify Ayla Cruz just missed a home run as last time up and a long Fly ball to right that has driven hard ER awkward read by India Furious windmill on De La Cruz shoots up to Second throw to Second head first punch ending a scores tied really double people are going to start could stop pitching to this young man right here this is a change up out over the plate
About the Creator
Inside Trump's $11 Billion Health Plan to Replace “Neo-Colonial” USAID
In the landscape of global health aid, few proposals have stirred as much debate as former President Donald Trump’s ambitious plan to restructure American assistance abroad. Dubbed an $11 billion health initiative aimed at replacing USAID’s current framework, the plan seeks to pivot away from what Trump and his allies have criticized as the “neo-colonial” approach of U.S. foreign aid. While the plan promises greater efficiency and impact, experts are split on whether it is a practical solution or a politically driven gamble. Trump’s Critique of USAID The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a central pillar of American foreign assistance, distributing billions in aid annually to address health crises, food insecurity, and development challenges worldwide. However, Trump’s administration and its supporters have often described USAID’s approach as bureaucratic, inefficient, and reflective of a “neo-colonial” mindset. In public statements, Trump argued that the U.S. was spending taxpayer dollars on programs that benefited foreign governments or contractors more than the intended local communities. Critics of the plan say that while USAID has flaws—as any large bureaucracy does—its extensive networks and decades of experience provide an unmatched capacity to deliver aid efficiently and safely. The Core of the $11 Billion Proposal At the heart of Trump’s proposal is an $11 billion fund designed to consolidate, modernize, and streamline U.S. health aid. Unlike the traditional USAID model, which relies heavily on long-term partnerships with governments and NGOs, the new plan emphasizes: Direct Impact Funding: Allocating resources to frontline health workers and local initiatives rather than intermediaries. Data-Driven Investments: Using real-time health data to target outbreaks and crises more efficiently. Private Sector Partnerships: Leveraging U.S. pharmaceutical companies, tech firms, and healthcare startups to deliver vaccines, treatments, and medical infrastructure. Shorter Program Cycles: Moving away from multi-year funding commitments in favor of more flexible, results-oriented programs. Proponents argue that this approach could reduce bureaucratic overhead and ensure U.S. aid reaches communities faster. By “cutting out the middlemen,” Trump supporters claim, America can avoid the pitfalls of slow-moving aid programs that sometimes fail to adapt to crises. Reactions from the Global Health Community Global health experts, however, have expressed concern about both the logistics and philosophy of the plan. Dr. Melissa Ortega, a senior researcher at the Global Health Policy Institute, explained, “The idea of bypassing established structures like USAID may sound appealing on paper, but in practice, it risks undermining decades of institutional knowledge. Health systems are complex, and short-term projects cannot replace long-term capacity building.” Some critics have also questioned the characterization of USAID as “neo-colonial.” While U.S. foreign aid has historically been tied to geopolitical interests, many programs today are designed collaboratively with recipient countries and local organizations. Reducing oversight could unintentionally increase the risk of misuse, corruption, or health inequities. On the other hand, supporters of Trump’s plan point to examples of inefficiency in USAID programs, citing cases where aid was delayed or mismanaged. By introducing more direct funding models, they argue, U.S. taxpayer dollars could achieve a higher “return on health outcomes.” Political Implications Trump’s health aid overhaul proposal is not just about international development—it is also deeply political. Framing USAID as a “neo-colonial” institution resonates with a populist narrative that America should prioritize its own citizens and assert greater control over how taxpayer money is spent abroad. Domestically, the $11 billion plan faces scrutiny from Congress. Lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether dismantling USAID’s systems could destabilize ongoing health programs in countries where the U.S. has long-term commitments. The potential impact on global health security—including the fight against pandemics like COVID-19—adds another layer of concern. Internationally, U.S. allies and partner nations are watching closely. Sudden shifts in aid delivery could disrupt health programs in low- and middle-income countries, many of which rely on predictable funding cycles to maintain vaccination campaigns, maternal health services, and disease surveillance. Possible Benefits and Risks If executed carefully, the Trump-backed model could bring several benefits: Faster Response Times: Direct funding could accelerate delivery of vaccines, treatments, and emergency support. Innovation Boost: By partnering with private sector companies, the plan could accelerate development of new health technologies. Accountability: With performance-based metrics, the plan may better measure the impact of U.S. aid. However, the risks are equally significant: Disruption of Existing Programs: Abrupt changes could destabilize ongoing health projects. Loss of Expertise: USAID’s decades of experience in navigating local governance, supply chains, and community engagement may be hard to replace. Geopolitical Fallout: Allies accustomed to collaborating with USAID might see the move as destabilizing, reducing cooperation on global health initiatives. Looking Ahead As Trump and his allies continue to advocate for this $11 billion overhaul, the debate over the future of U.S. health aid is intensifying. Proponents view it as a necessary modernization of an outdated system, while critics fear it could undercut decades of carefully built infrastructure and global partnerships. Ultimately, the success of this plan will hinge on its ability to balance efficiency with stability, innovation with oversight, and political objectives with humanitarian needs. For now, the proposal remains controversial, representing a dramatic departure from traditional approaches to U.S. foreign aid. Whether it will reshape global health for the better—or simply create more uncertainty—remains to be seen. In the end, the Trump health plan is as much about ideology as it is about dollars. It challenges the conventional wisdom of international development and asks whether a more streamlined, results-focused approach can truly replace a system built over decades. As the world watches, the stakes could not be higher: the future of U.S. global health aid—and the lives it touches—hangs in the balance.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in Earth
Nitrogen is necessary for young tropical rain forests to combat climate change.
By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in wood, tropical rainforests contribute to the slowing of climate change. Forests that develop quickly are even more important because they absorb carbon more quickly.
By Francis Dami2 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.