Best Mysterious Places To Visit In India
Mysterious Places still exist
- The Haunted Tunnel No. 33 of Barog in India: A Tale of Tragedy and Mystery
India is a land of ancient culture and rich history, full of stories and legends that have been passed down through generations. Among these tales, there is one that has captured the imagination of many - the story of the haunted Tunnel No. 33 in Barog.
Located in the Solan district of Himachal Pradesh, Tunnel No. 33 is part of the Kalka-Shimla Railway line that was built in the early 20th century by the British. The tunnel is named after Colonel Barog, the chief engineer of the project, who was tasked with constructing it.
According to local folklore, the tunnel is haunted by the ghost of Colonel Barog himself, who was said to have committed suicide inside the tunnel after making a grave error in its construction. Legend has it that the tunnel was initially designed to be straight, but due to a miscalculation, it ended up being slightly curved.
The error was discovered during the construction, and Colonel Barog was publicly humiliated and fined by the British authorities for wasting government resources. Unable to bear the shame, he shot himself inside the tunnel, which was then named after him.
Over the years, many people have claimed to have seen the ghost of Colonel Barog inside the tunnel. Some have reported hearing strange noises, footsteps, and whispers, while others have seen a ghostly figure walking through the tunnel at night.
Despite the legends and stories, there is no concrete evidence to support the existence of the ghost of Colonel Barog. The Indian Railways, which operates the Kalka-Shimla Railway line, has never reported any incidents of paranormal activity in Tunnel No. 33.
However, the tunnel does have a tragic history. During its construction, over 1,000 workers died due to accidents and illnesses. The harsh working conditions, combined with the difficult terrain and extreme weather, took a heavy toll on the workers.
Today, Tunnel No. 33 is a popular tourist attraction, drawing visitors from all over the world who are curious to explore its mysteries and experience its haunting atmosphere. Despite the rumors of ghosts and paranormal activity, the tunnel remains an engineering marvel and a testament to the human spirit.
In conclusion, the haunted Tunnel No. 33 of Barog in India is a tale of tragedy and mystery that has captured the imagination of many. While the existence of the ghost of Colonel Barog remains unproven, the tunnel's dark history and eerie atmosphere continue to fascinate and intrigue visitors to this day.
- The Bhangarh Fort – Ghost Fort of Rajasthan: A Haunting Tale of Love and Tragedy
Rajasthan is a land of vibrant colors and rich history, dotted with ancient forts and palaces that speak of its royal past. Among these architectural marvels, there is one that stands out for its eerie reputation - the Bhangarh Fort, also known as the Ghost Fort of Rajasthan.
Located in the Alwar district of Rajasthan, the Bhangarh Fort is believed to be one of the most haunted places in India. The fort was built in the 17th century by Raja Bhagwant Singh for his younger son Madho Singh, and it was known for its grandeur and beauty.
According to legend, the fort was cursed by a sorcerer named Singhia, who was in love with Princess Ratnavati, the daughter of Raja Bhagwant Singh. When the princess rejected his advances, Singhia decided to curse the fort and the surrounding area, causing its downfall and devastation.
The curse came true, and the fort was abandoned and left in ruins for centuries. Today, visitors to the Bhangarh Fort report strange occurrences and paranormal activity, including the sounds of ghostly footsteps, whispers, and eerie apparitions that seem to vanish into thin air.
Despite the rumors of ghosts and supernatural activity, the Bhangarh Fort is a popular tourist attraction, drawing visitors from all over the world who are curious to explore its mysteries and experience its haunting atmosphere. However, visitors are not allowed to enter the fort after sunset, as it is believed to be dangerous and haunted by malevolent spirits.
In conclusion, the Bhangarh Fort - Ghost Fort of Rajasthan is a haunting tale of love and tragedy that has captured the imagination of many. While the curse of Singhia may be just a legend, the eerie atmosphere and ghostly sightings at the fort continue to fascinate and intrigue visitors to this day. Whether you believe in ghosts or not, the Bhangarh Fort is a testament to the power of folklore and the enduring allure of the unknown.
About the Creator
HEMA MALINI
"Wordsmith extraordinaire and content creator with a passion for storytelling and a commitment to delivering quality. Always striving to inform and inspire through the written word."
Keep reading
More stories from HEMA MALINI and writers in Earth and other communities.
Inside Trump's $11 Billion Health Plan to Replace “Neo-Colonial” USAID
In the landscape of global health aid, few proposals have stirred as much debate as former President Donald Trump’s ambitious plan to restructure American assistance abroad. Dubbed an $11 billion health initiative aimed at replacing USAID’s current framework, the plan seeks to pivot away from what Trump and his allies have criticized as the “neo-colonial” approach of U.S. foreign aid. While the plan promises greater efficiency and impact, experts are split on whether it is a practical solution or a politically driven gamble. Trump’s Critique of USAID The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a central pillar of American foreign assistance, distributing billions in aid annually to address health crises, food insecurity, and development challenges worldwide. However, Trump’s administration and its supporters have often described USAID’s approach as bureaucratic, inefficient, and reflective of a “neo-colonial” mindset. In public statements, Trump argued that the U.S. was spending taxpayer dollars on programs that benefited foreign governments or contractors more than the intended local communities. Critics of the plan say that while USAID has flaws—as any large bureaucracy does—its extensive networks and decades of experience provide an unmatched capacity to deliver aid efficiently and safely. The Core of the $11 Billion Proposal At the heart of Trump’s proposal is an $11 billion fund designed to consolidate, modernize, and streamline U.S. health aid. Unlike the traditional USAID model, which relies heavily on long-term partnerships with governments and NGOs, the new plan emphasizes: Direct Impact Funding: Allocating resources to frontline health workers and local initiatives rather than intermediaries. Data-Driven Investments: Using real-time health data to target outbreaks and crises more efficiently. Private Sector Partnerships: Leveraging U.S. pharmaceutical companies, tech firms, and healthcare startups to deliver vaccines, treatments, and medical infrastructure. Shorter Program Cycles: Moving away from multi-year funding commitments in favor of more flexible, results-oriented programs. Proponents argue that this approach could reduce bureaucratic overhead and ensure U.S. aid reaches communities faster. By “cutting out the middlemen,” Trump supporters claim, America can avoid the pitfalls of slow-moving aid programs that sometimes fail to adapt to crises. Reactions from the Global Health Community Global health experts, however, have expressed concern about both the logistics and philosophy of the plan. Dr. Melissa Ortega, a senior researcher at the Global Health Policy Institute, explained, “The idea of bypassing established structures like USAID may sound appealing on paper, but in practice, it risks undermining decades of institutional knowledge. Health systems are complex, and short-term projects cannot replace long-term capacity building.” Some critics have also questioned the characterization of USAID as “neo-colonial.” While U.S. foreign aid has historically been tied to geopolitical interests, many programs today are designed collaboratively with recipient countries and local organizations. Reducing oversight could unintentionally increase the risk of misuse, corruption, or health inequities. On the other hand, supporters of Trump’s plan point to examples of inefficiency in USAID programs, citing cases where aid was delayed or mismanaged. By introducing more direct funding models, they argue, U.S. taxpayer dollars could achieve a higher “return on health outcomes.” Political Implications Trump’s health aid overhaul proposal is not just about international development—it is also deeply political. Framing USAID as a “neo-colonial” institution resonates with a populist narrative that America should prioritize its own citizens and assert greater control over how taxpayer money is spent abroad. Domestically, the $11 billion plan faces scrutiny from Congress. Lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether dismantling USAID’s systems could destabilize ongoing health programs in countries where the U.S. has long-term commitments. The potential impact on global health security—including the fight against pandemics like COVID-19—adds another layer of concern. Internationally, U.S. allies and partner nations are watching closely. Sudden shifts in aid delivery could disrupt health programs in low- and middle-income countries, many of which rely on predictable funding cycles to maintain vaccination campaigns, maternal health services, and disease surveillance. Possible Benefits and Risks If executed carefully, the Trump-backed model could bring several benefits: Faster Response Times: Direct funding could accelerate delivery of vaccines, treatments, and emergency support. Innovation Boost: By partnering with private sector companies, the plan could accelerate development of new health technologies. Accountability: With performance-based metrics, the plan may better measure the impact of U.S. aid. However, the risks are equally significant: Disruption of Existing Programs: Abrupt changes could destabilize ongoing health projects. Loss of Expertise: USAID’s decades of experience in navigating local governance, supply chains, and community engagement may be hard to replace. Geopolitical Fallout: Allies accustomed to collaborating with USAID might see the move as destabilizing, reducing cooperation on global health initiatives. Looking Ahead As Trump and his allies continue to advocate for this $11 billion overhaul, the debate over the future of U.S. health aid is intensifying. Proponents view it as a necessary modernization of an outdated system, while critics fear it could undercut decades of carefully built infrastructure and global partnerships. Ultimately, the success of this plan will hinge on its ability to balance efficiency with stability, innovation with oversight, and political objectives with humanitarian needs. For now, the proposal remains controversial, representing a dramatic departure from traditional approaches to U.S. foreign aid. Whether it will reshape global health for the better—or simply create more uncertainty—remains to be seen. In the end, the Trump health plan is as much about ideology as it is about dollars. It challenges the conventional wisdom of international development and asks whether a more streamlined, results-focused approach can truly replace a system built over decades. As the world watches, the stakes could not be higher: the future of U.S. global health aid—and the lives it touches—hangs in the balance.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in Earth
Nitrogen is necessary for young tropical rain forests to combat climate change.
By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in wood, tropical rainforests contribute to the slowing of climate change. Forests that develop quickly are even more important because they absorb carbon more quickly.
By Francis Damia day ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.