Criminal logo

When Custody Becomes Commerce

Draining the Swamp

By SunshineChristinaPublished about 6 hours ago 5 min read

Prison Blood, Political Access, and the Quiet Economy of Discretion (1960–2026)

There is a moment that comes in long investigations when the facts stop behaving like isolated events and begin to line up. Not because someone is forcing them into a theory, but because they keep repeating the same shape.

That is what happens when the history of the prison blood plasma industry is placed alongside the business and legal careers of Tony Rodham, Hugh Rodham, Dan Lasater, and the broader Clinton family access network. On the surface, these look like different stories: one about prisoners and plasma, another about bonds, pardons, and international ventures. But beneath that surface is a shared structure — a system that turns custody and discretion into commodities.

This is not a story about secret conspiracies. It is a story about how power works when it is routinized, monetized, and rarely forced to explain itself.

I. The Prison Blood Plasma System: Cummins Was the Hub, Not the Exception

For decades, the public narrative treated the Cummins Unit in Arkansas as if it were the whole scandal. Cummins became shorthand for excess — an outlier, a bad apple, a relic of a rougher time.

But by 2026, the historical record no longer supports that framing.

What existed was not a rogue program but a multi-state, multi-facility system that treated incarcerated people as a renewable biological resource. Cummins was simply the most visible node.

Within the Arkansas Department of Correction, plasma collection occurred not only at Cummins Unit, but also at facilities such as the Pine Bluff Diagnostic Unit, the Wrightsville Unit, and Tucker State Farm. Together, these sites formed a statewide extraction infrastructure.

Outside Arkansas, the same model appeared again and again:

   •   At Louisiana State Penitentiary, once home to the largest inmate donor program in the country, prisoners were reportedly bled around the clock in the 1970s and 1980s.

   •   Mississippi State Penitentiary and Florida state prisons appear in the Canadian Krever Inquiry as part of the same risk environment.

   •   In the urban North, Cook County Jail ran a commercial plasmapheresis program documented in a 1982 medical-ethics case study. Inmates were paid $6.25 per session plus fresh fruit and juice, while the jail itself received $1.00 per inmate per session. The author, R. L. Cohen, described the arrangement as “ethically suspect” and “implicitly coercive.”

The geography changed. The logic did not.

II. From Blood to Markets: How the System Sustained Itself

This system survived because it was normalized through contracts, language, and institutional distance.

Private firms such as Health Management Associates, founded by Dr. Francis Henderson, and later Pine Bluff Biologicals, managed extraction in Arkansas. In Louisiana, Sara Inc operated the Angola program. Plasma moved outward through brokers like Continental Pharma Cryosan Ltd, which purchased tainted product, relabeled it, and sold it internationally.

This is how a blood draw inside a U.S. prison entered hospitals in Canada, the UK, and Japan.

At the center were administrators and officials who spoke openly about the logic of extraction. John Byus, medical director of the ADC, was famously quoted saying they would sell plasma “till the last drop.”

Custody made consent malleable. Paperwork made responsibility diffuse.

III. A Different Kind of Prison Industry: Clemency, Bonds, and Access

When people talk about the “prison industry,” they often imagine private prison corporations. But the Clinton-era access economy reveals a subtler, more durable mechanism: control of exit points and financing, not ownership of cells.

Hugh Rodham: Clemency as a Monetized Outcome

Hugh Rodham built a long legal career in South Florida, first as an assistant public defender in Dade County and later as a private attorney. He helped develop Miami’s first drug courts — placing him at the intersection of punishment, rehabilitation, and judicial discretion.

In 2001, Hugh became nationally known for accepting approximately $434,000 to lobby for presidential clemency for two convicted felons: Carlos Vignali and Glenn Braswell. The money was returned after public backlash, but no criminal charges followed.

This was not prison ownership. It was gatekeeping the exit.

Tony Rodham: From Process Work to Global Deal-Making

Tony Rodham’s South Florida career followed a different path. Early on, he worked as a process server and private investigator, learning the mechanics of courts and enforcement from the ground up. He occasionally shared housing with his brother Hugh, underscoring how intertwined their professional worlds were.

Tony later became president and CEO of Gulf Coast Funds Management, a firm deeply involved in the EB-5 visa program, which grants U.S. residency to foreign investors. EB-5 sits in the same gray zone seen elsewhere in this story: legal, discretionary, and dependent on political relationships.

While based in Florida, Tony pursued increasingly ambitious international ventures — a $118 million hazelnut deal in Georgia, a gold mining concession in post-earthquake Haiti, and later work tied to GreenTech Automotive with Terry McAuliffe. Each relied less on technical expertise than on introductions, credibility, and access.

IV. Dan Lasater: Bonds, Law Enforcement, and Executive Protection

The clearest paper trail connecting political access to public finance belongs to Dan Lasater.

In 1985, Lasater & Co. was selected as part of a syndicate to underwrite $30.2 million in bonds for a statewide Arkansas police radio communications system. At the time, Lasater was under investigation for cocaine trafficking. Despite controversy, then-Governor Bill Clinton personally lobbied the legislature to approve the bond issue. Reporting later indicated Lasater’s firm earned approximately $750,000 from the deal.

Lasater was subsequently convicted of a drug felony — and later received a gubernatorial pardon from Bill Clinton.

This sequence matters. It shows how bond markets, like clemency, operate as access-dependent systems. Executive discretion does not just forgive wrongdoing; it can reset reputations and reopen markets.

V. South Florida: The Continuity Zone

South Florida is not incidental in this story. It is where these careers overlapped, matured, and continued after scrutiny intensified elsewhere.

Hugh Rodham built his legal practice there. Tony Rodham based his consulting and EB-5 work there. Clinton-adjacent figures, donors, and intermediaries passed through the same social and professional spaces. Florida offered distance from Arkansas politics, proximity to international finance, and a permissive environment for lobbying and deal-making.

It functioned as a buffer zone — a place where access could be monetized quietly.

VI. The Pattern That Emerges

When prison plasma extraction and the access economy are viewed together, the shared structure becomes visible:

   •   In prisons, the state controlled bodies.

   •   In clemency, the state controlled freedom.

   •   In bonds and visas, the state controlled capital flows and residency.

In each case:

1. There is a state-controlled chokepoint.

2. Private intermediaries position themselves nearby.

3. Access is monetized.

4. Harm or controversy surfaces later — often somewhere else.

The prison blood scandal shows how custody can be turned into a supply chain. The Rodham-Lasater network shows how discretion can be turned into a service.

They are not the same operation. They are the same logic.

Conclusion: Why This Still Matters

By 2026, the danger is not that these stories are forgotten. It is that they are remembered as curiosities — as scandals of another era.

But systems rarely disappear. They adapt.

When custody, discretion, and access are allowed to become commodities, the human cost is always paid first by those with the least leverage: prisoners, patients, migrants, and communities far from the decision-makers’ offices.

Cummins was not the end of the story. It was the beginning of understanding how custody becomes commerce — and why it keeps happening.

investigation

About the Creator

SunshineChristina

I am a social and criminal justice reform advocate and researcher. I love true crime and also fighting to help bring and spread awareness to the myriad of troubling issues that are effecting American society.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.