Mahim khan
Stories (8)
Filter by community
Her Feelings for Me: A Journey of Connection and Understanding
quiet whisper in the middle of a storm, where you sense something deeper than just surface-level interactions. One such experience is when you begin to feel that someone—specifically, a woman—has feelings for you. It’s not just the little signs and gestures that give it away, but the subtlety, the warmth, and the weight of her presence in your life. These feelings evolve, sometimes slowly, sometimes rapidly, and can become a complex, intertwined narrative of emotions, actions, and unspoken words. ### The First Signs: Subtle Yet Powerful When you first meet someone, it's often the little things that make you wonder if it's more than just a friendship or a casual acquaintance. She might laugh a little longer at your jokes, or touch her hair when she talks to you. Either she makes excuses to be near you or her eyes linger for an excessive amount of time. These are easy to dismiss at first as minor quirks, but when they occur frequently, they take on a new meaning. You begin to sense a shift in the silence between her words and her body language. There’s an energy around her when she’s near you—a certain softness in her gestures and a warmth in her gaze. These are the nudges that point to something more substantial. It's not just about attraction in the physical sense; it’s the way she opens up to you, the way she trusts you with parts of her life that she doesn't share with everyone. Even though she may not be fully aware of it at the time, it becomes evident in these moments that her feelings for you are developing and becoming more intense. ### Emotional Intensity: The Unspoken Connection As time goes on, the feelings she has for you can grow more intense, though she might not always express them overtly. Women, in particular, can be adept at hiding or downplaying their emotions, often out of fear of vulnerability or rejection. She frequently covers up the emotional depth she feels for you with layers of self-control and careful language. Her affection may not always be verbalized, but it’s evident in the way she checks in on you, asks about your day, and genuinely cares about your well-being. There’s a level of emotional investment that she begins to place in your interactions. It's not just about the fun times or the lighthearted moments anymore. She starts to consider your needs, your feelings, and how her actions impact you. This emotional depth can be both beautiful and overwhelming. She’s trying to understand you on a deeper level, and at times, her desire to connect can feel like it carries a weight, as if her feelings are growing stronger but are hard for her to fully express. ### Her Actions Speak Louder than Words Perhaps the most telling aspect of her feelings for you isn’t always in the things she says, but in the things she does. The way she takes extra time to listen to you, to support your dreams, or to just be present when you need someone to lean on—all of these actions speak volumes about the way she feels. It’s in the small, thoughtful gestures that demonstrate she’s thinking of you even when you're not around. Maybe she remembers details about your life that you didn’t even realize you shared, or she surprises you with something you mentioned in passing, showing that she’s paying attention in a way that’s meaningful. It’s often said that actions speak louder than words, and in the context of her feelings for you, this couldn’t be more true. When words fail her, her actions fill in the gaps. If she’s truly interested in you, she’ll show it by prioritizing your happiness, making time for you, and ensuring that you feel supported and appreciated. Even when she doesn’t explicitly say "I like you" or "I care about you," her actions will leave no doubt in your mind that her feelings are genuine. ### The Fear of Vulnerability Despite the growing closeness, there can be moments when her feelings are tempered by fear and hesitation. Vulnerability is a powerful thing, and opening up to someone can feel like an enormous risk. She may be afraid of rejection, of putting her heart on the line and having it dismissed. There might be times when she pulls back, uncertain about how to move forward or unsure whether her feelings are reciprocated. This push and pull—the closeness followed by distance—is often a reflection of her internal conflict. She may want to be open, to express everything she feels for you, but the fear of being hurt or misunderstood holds her back. In these moments, it’s important to recognize that her feelings are not fleeting; they’re simply wrapped in layers of self-protection, waiting for the right moment to emerge fully. ### Communication: A Way to Be Clear Communication that is open and sincere is one of the most important aspects of understanding her feelings for you. Without it, the assumptions and uncertainties can lead to confusion. If you’re aware of the signs, it’s important to address them, to have conversations where both of you can share your thoughts and emotions. It’s through these dialogues that deeper understanding can be achieved, where both parties can explore their feelings without the weight of unspoken tension. In those moments of clarity, where you can both speak freely about your thoughts, her feelings may begin to come to the surface. She might confess things that she’s been holding back or reveal how much she values your connection. And from there, the relationship can take on new dimensions, either toward something more romantic or simply a stronger, more profound friendship. ### Conclusion: The Beauty of Her Feelings In the end, her feelings for you are not just about attraction or desire—they’re about connection. They are about those times when you feel like you are being seen, heard, and understood. The quiet, powerful forces that bring you together, sometimes without words and sometimes in spite of them, are her feelings. As you navigate this emotional landscape, it’s important to embrace both the moments of intensity and the moments of hesitation, for in both lies the beauty of a bond that has the potential to grow and deepen into something meaningful.
By Mahim khan9 months ago in Humans
The sayko killing in the city
The Sayfullo Saipov attack in New York City is covered in detail in the sections that follow. At the outset, key details are summarized, and background, the attack's events, the subsequent legal proceedings, and its lasting impact are discussed in depth. Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov, a Uzbek immigrant, carried out a lone act of vehicle ramming on October 31, 2017, when he drove a rented pickup truck into cyclists and pedestrians along Manhattan's Hudson River Park bike path, killing eight people and wounding fourteen others over the course of approximately one mile. The assailant, who had been inspired by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), got out of the vehicle and yelled "Allahu Akbar" while waving a paintball and pellet gun before being shot and taken into custody by NYPD officers. He was later indicted on 22 counts by a federal grand jury for murder in aid of racketeering, attempted murder in aid of racketeering, providing material support to a terrorist organization, and vehicular homicide. Saipov was found guilty on all counts in a 2023 trial, and after a penalty phase in which there was no consensus on the death penalty, he was given multiple consecutive life terms and additional years. Background Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov was born in Uzbekistan and entered the United States in 2010 through the Diversity Immigrant Visa program, commonly known as the “green card lottery” . He moved to Paterson, New Jersey, where he worked for Uber as a truck driver and rideshare driver while also attending a community college nearby. Over time, U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies determined that Saipov had become radicalized, consuming ISIL propaganda online and expressing a desire to commit an act of jihad in the West . He practiced driving a big truck and prepared handwritten notes that celebrated the extremist ideology of ISIL in the months before the attack. The Threat Saipov drove across the George Washington Bridge into Manhattan in a dark-colored Ford Super Duty pickup truck that he had rented from a Home Depot in Passaic, New Jersey, on Halloween 2017 afternoon. In the neighborhood of 3:04 p.m. He swerved onto the Hudson River Park bike path at Houston Street at approximately 6:00 p.m. EDT and accelerated to speeds that were estimated to be between 30 and 66 mph as he crashed into cyclists and pedestrians along a one-mile section of the path. The rampage left eight people dead—among them two Americans, a Belgian woman, and five friends visiting from Argentina—and injured fourteen others, several of whom suffered amputations and life-altering injuries . Saipov exited the truck and shouted "Allahu Akbar" before being shot in the abdomen by NYPD Officer Ryan Nash and taken into custody after sideswiping a school bus and scattering debris. First responders and bystanders provided immediate aid, while nearby hospitals treated victims for severe trauma and psychological shock.
By Mahim khan9 months ago in Criminal
The Dream-Making Farmer
The Dream-Making Farmer In a world racing toward modernization, where skyscrapers replace fields and technology dominates daily life, the image of a farmer often feels like a relic of the past. Yet, among the rolling hills and golden fields, a new kind of farmer is rising — the dream-making farmer, a figure who redefines agriculture as not just a profession but a profound journey of hope, resilience, and creation.
By Mahim khan9 months ago in Earth
The War That Was Started Over a Pig
The War That Was Started Over a Pig The Pig War of 1859, a conflict between the United States and Great Britain that remarkably did not result in human casualties, is one of the most peculiar conflicts in history. Sparked by the shooting of a pig, this incident underscores how minor events can escalate into international disputes. The Causes of the Disagreement The Oregon Treaty of 1846, which was meant to settle territorial disputes between the United States and Great Britain in the Pacific Northwest, is where the Pig War got its start. Although the treaty stated that the line would continue "through the middle of the channel which separates the continent from Vancouver Island," it was unclear where exactly the boundary would go. It was established along the 49th parallel. The United States favored the Haro Strait, while Britain supported the Rosario Strait as the proper boundary, as a result of this ambiguous language. The San Juan Islands, which are located in the middle of these straits, became the center of contention. The Case of the Pig On June 15, 1859, American settler Lyman Cutlar discovered a pig rummaging through his potato patch on San Juan Island. Frustrated by repeated incidents, Cutlar shot the pig. The animal belonged to Charles Griffin, an Irishman employed by the British Hudson's Bay Company. When Cutlar offered $10 in compensation, Griffin demanded $100, asserting the pig's value. American settlers sought military protection when British authorities threatened to arrest Cutlar, escalating the disagreement. Military Escalation. Responding to the settlers' plea, Brigadier General William S. Harney dispatched Captain George E. to San Juan Island with Pickett and 66 soldiers. The British government responded by sending three warships commanded by Captain Geoffrey Hornby. The United States had increased its presence to 461 troops and 14 cannons by August, while the British had 2,140 men on five warships. Despite the military buildup, both sides were instructed to avoid initiating conflict . Diplomatic Resolution. Recognizing the potential for war, U.S. President James Buchanan sent General Winfield Scott to negotiate with British officials. Scott proposed a joint military occupation of the island, with each nation maintaining a token force. This arrangement lasted for 12 years, during which time relations between the camps were amicable, with soldiers attending each other's social events and even sharing church services . Final Settlement In 1871, the dispute was submitted to international arbitration under the Treaty of Washington. The German king Kaiser Wilhelm I served as the arbitrator. On October 21, 1872, the arbitration commission ruled in favor of the United States, designating the Haro Strait as the boundary. Consequently, the San Juan Islands became U.S. territory. British forces withdrew in November 1872, and American troops followed suit by July 1874 . Legacy The Pig War exemplifies the effectiveness of diplomacy and the significance of clear treaty language. The American and British camp sites are now preserved in the San Juan Island National Historical Park, which serves as a reminder of this unusual period in history. The conflict, devoid of human casualties, highlights how measured responses can prevent escalation, even when tensions run high over seemingly trivial matters. Military Escalation Brigadier General William S. responded to the plea of the settlers by Captain George E. was dispatched by Harney. to San Juan Island with Pickett and 66 soldiers. In retaliation, British authorities sent three warships under Captain Geoffrey Hornby. The United States had increased its presence to 461 troops and 14 cannons by August, while the British had 2,140 men on five warships. Both sides were instructed not to start a fight despite the military buildup.
By Mahim khan9 months ago in History
Trump writes ‘Vladimir, STOP!’ after Russia launches deadliest strikes on Kyiv since last summer
US President Donald Trump said he is “not happy” after Russia launched its deadliest wave of attacks on Kyiv in nine months, telling President Vladimir Putin to “STOP!” as he attempts to push Ukraine to agree on a contentious ceasefire proposal. Moscow sent 70 missiles and 145 drones toward Ukraine, mainly targeting Kyiv, in an attack that leader Volodymyr Zelensky said was aimed at pressuring the United States. “I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and the timing is terrible. Vladimir, STOP! Every week, 5,000 soldiers are dying. Let's finish the peace agreement! On Thursday, Trump wrote on Truth Social. According to Ukraine's emergency services, the strikes resulted in the deaths of at least 12 people and the injuries of 90 others. Additional casualties may be buried under the rubble. Moscow's assault, according to the emergency services, hit 13 places in Kyiv, including residential buildings and civilian infrastructure. It was the most expensive attack on the city since an aerial bombardment in July 2024 that killed 33 people and targeted a hospital and residential areas. Zelensky said during a trip to South Africa that the bombardment was “first and foremost” aimed at “pressuring the US.” He sought to push back against Trump’s efforts to corral Kyiv into making concessions, telling reporters: “The fact that Ukraine is ready to sit down at a negotiating table after (a) full ceasefire with terrorists… is a big compromise.” On the night of April 24, Russian forces unleashed an hours-long barrage of missiles and drones against Kyiv, killing at least 12 civilians and injuring over 90—its deadliest assault on the Ukrainian capital since July 2024. According to reports from Ukrainian emergency services, the strikes struck residential buildings, critical infrastructure, and public spaces in 13 locations throughout the city, trapping several individuals beneath the rubble as rescue workers attempted to reach them. According to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, one of the ballistic missiles was identified as a North Korean–manufactured KN-23, underscoring growing cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang in their military supplies . In a public rebuke that was unusually blunt, former U.S. President Donald Trump took to his Truth Social platform shortly after the strikes to issue a direct plea to Russian President Vladimir Putin. “I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and the timing is terrible. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!” His posts on social media were characterized by his use of all capital letters. One of the rare occasions in which Trump has directly criticized Putin by his first name rather than using the more formal "Mr. President” and illustrating his preference for punchy, informal messaging even in matters of global diplomacy . According to analysts, Trump's use of Truth Social as a kind of diplomatic channel is indicative of a larger shift in the manner in which state leaders communicate. Historically, appeals between heads of state have been conveyed through formal letters, phone calls or mediated statements; Trump’s approach—immediate, public and conversational—breaks with protocol and raises questions about its efficacy in influencing Kremlin decision-making . While some observers view the move as an attempt to inject urgency into U.S.-backed peace negotiations, others caution that social-media entreaties may carry little weight with a leader long accustomed to Western pressure campaigns
By Mahim khan9 months ago in History
Supreme Court Divided Over FDA Block on Kid-Friendly Flavored Vapes. AI-Generated.
The FDA's refusal to approve flavors for vapes that are safe for children divides the Supreme Court. The U.S. A crucial case that has the potential to reshape federal regulation of flavored e-cigarettes, particularly those deemed appealing to children and adolescents, has divided the Supreme Court. The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) decision to prevent millions of flavored vape products from entering the market is at the heart of the case. The FDA cited concerns about the products' appeal to minors and the potential for nicotine addiction. The vape companies Triton Distribution and Vapetasia have filed a lawsuit to contest the FDA's decision to deny their marketing applications. The businesses argue that the FDA shifted regulatory expectations midway through the process and failed to clearly communicate the approval standards. They claim that the FDA's sudden insistence on long-term scientific data to demonstrate that flavored e-cigarettes aid adult smokers in quitting was unexpected. The companies claim that they were never informed that this data was required. The justices appeared divided during oral arguments. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, among others, questioned whether the FDA provided businesses with sufficient clarity regarding its requirements, suggesting that due process might have been overlooked. These concerns were echoed by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who suggested that the agency might have shifted the targetposts in a manner that was unfair to manufacturers. On the other hand, other justices appeared to be more in favor of the FDA's position. Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson stated that the agency's decisions were justified by the need to safeguard public health, particularly the health of children. The future of flavored vaping products as well as the extent of federal agencies' regulatory authority are at stake. The FDA's ability to swiftly respond to emerging threats to public health may be hindered by a ruling in their favor. Additionally, it might make room for a broader challenge to agency authority in a variety of industries. The FDA has received support from advocates for public health, citing studies indicating that the majority of young e-cigarette users prefer flavored products that frequently resemble candy or fruit. They argue that the FDA's ban would be reversed, undoing years of progress toward reducing youth tobacco use. In the meantime, vape manufacturers insist that their products are important tools for adult smokers who want to quit smoking cigarettes. They argue that the FDA's refusal to approve their applications was arbitrary, lacked a consistent scientific framework, and could encourage consumers to return to more harmful tobacco products. The final decision of the Supreme Court, which is expected later this year, could have wide-ranging repercussions, not only for the vaping industry but also for the extent to which government agencies can protect public health. The balance between innovation, regulation, and child safety is on the line as both sides wait for the verdict.
By Mahim khan9 months ago in History
Trump's world of tariffs is shaking up time-tested investing strategies. AI-Generated.
Time-tested investment strategies are being reshaped by Trump's world of tariffs. Traditional investing strategies have heavily relied on the concept of stable trade relationships and globalization over the past decade. But investors are being forced to reevaluate long-standing strategies that were once regarded as fundamental in the political and economic landscape following Trump, where tariffs have emerged as a preferred method of economic leverage. A shift in global competition During his time as president of the United States, Donald Trump introduced a more combative approach to international trade, particularly with members of the European Union, China, and Mexico. Trump transformed trade policy into a high-stakes game of economic brinkmanship by imposing tariffs on solar panels, washing machines, steel, and aluminum. Although many of these tariffs were initially presented as short-term bargaining chips to bring trading partners to the table, some have remained in place or been modified, still having an impact on the market. Investors are once again preparing for disruption as Trump runs again and proposes even more severe tariffs, including a universal import tax of 10% and a 60% tariff on Chinese goods. The Decline of Worldwide Supply Chains A direct blow has been dealt to global supply chains, which have long been praised for their effectiveness and cost savings. Costs have gone up and there has been more uncertainty for businesses like Apple, Ford, and Caterpillar that rely on manufacturing across borders. Investors, on the other hand, have been forced to reevaluate the risk-reward profiles of businesses that are deeply entwined with global trade networks. Multinational corporations and diversified international exposure are at odds with conventional investing strategies. Reshoring plays, domestic-focused companies, and "tariff-proof" industries are some of the new priorities of some portfolio managers. Winners and losers in the sector All industries are not affected equally by tariffs. Agriculture and manufacturing, which frequently rely on both imports and exports, are particularly vulnerable. For instance, U.S. farmers were disproportionately affected by China's retaliatory tariffs, which resulted in a realignment of agricultural exports and brought investor attention to the political volatility of food markets. On the other hand, some businesses have benefited. When competition was limited by tariffs on foreign steel, producers of American steel saw short-term gains. Investors looking for protection from global shocks have also shown increased interest in infrastructure, energy, and defense sectors. An Increase in the Cost of Geopolitical Risk Many investments now carry a geopolitical risk premium as a result of the unpredictability of tariff policy, especially when it is driven by executive action rather than long-term policy frameworks. Long-term wealth accumulation vehicles like index funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that were once stable are now more susceptible to sudden trade-related swings. Markets plunged sharply within minutes, for instance, when Trump tweeted about escalating tariffs on Chinese goods in 2019. High-frequency strategies and algorithmic trading models have become more reactive, if not more cautious, as a result of this level of market sensitivity. The Playbook Reconsidered Numerous analysts and advisors have advocated for a shift in strategy as tariffs have grown to become a persistent economic lever. That could imply: focusing more on investments that are based in the United States rather than other countries. focusing on industries that are most likely to gain from protectionist policies. concentrating on businesses with adaptable supply chains or the capacity to pass on higher costs to customers. incorporating political analysis into financial modeling as an essential component. It's a turning point for investors who hold long-term positions. Global diversification and sector balance are being rewritten as old rules. Regardless of whether Trump retains his presidency, his influence on trade has altered investor behavior—possibly permanently. The Conclusion Investing now faces a new level of complexity thanks to Trump's tariffs. Geopolitical risk, supply chain uncertainty, and policy-driven volatility have replaced once-dependable strategies. Investors are being forced to adapt as protectionism becomes a more prevalent theme in global economics or risk being left behind in a world where disruption is the only constant. ---
By Mahim khan9 months ago in Fiction
At Least 10 Billion Stars in Our Milky Way Galaxy Can Support Habitable Planets. AI-Generated.
Habitable planets can be found in our Milky Way Galaxy with at least 10 billion stars. One of humanity's oldest and most intriguing questions has been pondered by astronomers for decades: Are we the only ones in the universe? An answer that piques the imagination has been found through recent research. Numerous surveys and studies using data from the Kepler Space Telescope and other instruments have found that at least 10 billion stars in our Milky Way galaxy could have planets that could be habitable. How to Define Habitability Understanding what scientists mean when they say "habitable" is essential before delving into the numbers. A planet that resides in the star's habitable zone, also known as the "Goldilocks zone," where temperatures are just right for liquid water to exist, is typically referred to as a "habitable planet." Water is regarded as an essential component of life as we know it. A planet's atmosphere, size, and geological activity all play a role in its habitability, but the fundamental requirement is the presence of liquid water. The Discovery Made by Kepler The 2009 launch of NASA's Kepler Space Telescope revolutionized our understanding of the galaxy. Over the course of its mission, Kepler saw more than 150,000 stars and discovered thousands of exoplanets, many of which were in habitable zones. Astronomers were able to extrapolate how common Earth-sized planets in habitable zones might be throughout the Milky Way by analyzing this data. According to these extrapolations, approximately one in five Sun-like stars may have a planet in the habitable zone that is comparable to Earth's size. The estimate of 10 billion potentially habitable planets becomes a conservative but astonishingly large number when one takes into account the Milky Way's approximately 100 to 400 billion stars and the 10% to 20% that are similar to our Sun. Consequences for Life The implications would be staggering if even a small fraction of those 10 billion planets support life. There may be an abundance of life not only where you are. Simple microbial life may exist on some of these worlds, while intelligent civilizations or even complex ecosystems may exist on others. Additionally, in cosmic terms, many of these potentially habitable planets could be located within a few dozen to hundreds of light-years of Earth. The search goes on. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and upcoming missions like LUVOIR and HabEx are both aimed at directly studying the atmospheres of exoplanets. Biosignatures, which are chemical signs of life such as oxygen, methane, or water vapor, will be looked for by these instruments. Additionally, efforts like SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) and the Breakthrough Listen Initiative continue to look for signals in the sky that could point to technological civilizations. Conclusion
By Mahim khan9 months ago in History
