When USCIS Questions a Specialty Occupation Petition
Why job descriptions and educational requirements often come under closer review in employment based visa cases

For many employment based visa applicants, the term “specialty occupation” becomes central to the approval process. When U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issues a Request for Evidence questioning whether a role qualifies, it can feel like the entire case is at risk. In reality, these RFEs are common and often stem from how a position is described rather than whether it truly meets the legal standard.
A specialty occupation generally requires specialized knowledge and at least a bachelor’s degree in a specific field. While this definition sounds straightforward, applying it in practice can be more complicated. USCIS officers review thousands of petitions across many industries, and not every job title clearly communicates the level of expertise involved.
Why Specialty Occupation RFEs Happen
One frequent issue involves job descriptions that are too broad. When duties are written in general terms, they may resemble roles that do not require a degree, even if the actual position is more complex. Officers may then ask for clarification to understand why specialized education is necessary for the role.
Another common concern arises when the degree requirement appears flexible. If a petition lists multiple fields of study without explaining how each one relates to the job, USCIS may question whether the position truly requires specialized knowledge. The absence of context can make an otherwise legitimate role seem less defined.
Industry variation also plays a role. Some fields are well understood within the immigration system, while others are newer or more specialized. In those cases, officers may request additional evidence simply to gain a clearer picture of how the role fits within the broader professional landscape.
The Importance of Clear Explanation
Specialty occupation RFEs often highlight the difference between what an employer knows internally and what an officer can see on paper. Without detailed explanations, assumptions fill the gaps. Clear documentation helps bridge that divide.
Effective responses tend to focus on connecting the dots. This includes explaining how daily responsibilities require specialized knowledge, how the role fits within the organization’s structure, and why a specific educational background is relevant. The goal is not to overwhelm with volume, but to provide clarity.
RFEs as a Review Step, Not a Verdict
While receiving a specialty occupation RFE can be unsettling, it is rarely the final word on a case. Many approved petitions include at least one request for additional evidence during the review process. These notices reflect the procedural nature of immigration adjudication rather than a judgment about an applicant’s qualifications.
When approached thoughtfully, an RFE can serve as an opportunity to present a more complete picture of a role and its requirements. Clear explanations and well organized documentation often resolve the questions raised and allow the case to move forward.
About the Creator
Sheila Danzig
Executive director of TheDegreePeople.com and a leading expert in foreign degree evaluations. Recognized for her innovative approach to difficult cases, helping thousands of clients successfully obtain visa approvals even facing RFEs.




Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.