Trump’s Board of Peace: Several Leaders Invited — But How Will It Actually Work

Donald Trump is at it again. In early 2026, the former U.S. president unveiled a new initiative that’s turning heads around the world: the Board of Peace. Designed to oversee the next phase of his Gaza peace plan, this board promises to bring together world leaders to “rethink” global conflict resolution. But the big question on everyone’s mind: How will it actually work?
Let’s break it down.
What Is the Board of Peace?
Trump describes the Board of Peace as a “bold new approach” to conflict resolution. At its core, it’s meant to supervise the Gaza peace plan, focusing on disarmament, reconstruction, and long-term stability.
Unlike traditional institutions like the United Nations, this board is Trump’s vision of a more hands-on, fast-moving diplomatic body. He hopes it can tackle Gaza — and maybe even other global hotspots — with more flexibility than existing international organizations allow.
Who’s Been Invited?
Trump’s outreach is ambitious. The invitations have gone to a mix of nations from different continents, including:
Europe: European Union executives, Hungary
Asia: Thailand, Vietnam
Eurasia: Russia, Belarus
South America: Argentina
Africa & Middle East: Morocco
Some countries have already accepted. Others, like France, are hesitant. Russia is reviewing its invitation, and China has confirmed it received one but hasn’t declared a decision. Even Israel has mixed reactions, with some officials supportive and others openly critical.
The diversity of invited nations makes for a diplomatic puzzle — and raises questions about how decisions will be made.
The Controversy
Unsurprisingly, not everyone is thrilled. Critics argue that the Board could undermine existing global frameworks. Some of the biggest concerns include:
Relationship with the U.N.: By creating a new body, Trump’s Board might challenge the U.N.’s traditional peacekeeping role.
Funding & membership: A proposed $1 billion contribution for permanent membership raises questions about equity and influence.
Diverse interests: Countries with conflicting priorities could clash on policy, making decision-making complicated.
France has already declined to participate, citing these concerns. Israeli politicians are also wary, worried about security and influence in Gaza.
How Will It Work?
Details are still emerging, but a few structural elements are clear:
Countries that contribute $1 billion may secure permanent membership.
Others can participate on shorter, renewable terms.
The board will oversee an executive committee responsible for implementing the second phase of the Gaza plan: disarmament, security deployment, and infrastructure rebuilding.
Trump calls this a “new model” of international cooperation — one that he hopes is more practical and responsive than existing institutions. But questions about legitimacy, governance, and enforcement remain.
What’s Next?
The big reveal is expected at the World Economic Forum in Davos later this month. That’s when the official membership list and operational charter will likely be announced.
For now, countries are weighing their participation. How many will commit? Who will be left on the sidelines? And will the board actually be able to influence peace in Gaza? These are questions that will shape the Board’s credibility — and its future.
Why It Matters
Beyond Gaza, the Board of Peace could signal a shift in global diplomacy. If it works, it might emerge as an alternative or complement to the U.N., offering a new way for countries to collaborate on conflicts.
But it’s also a gamble. Success depends on broad participation and clear rules. Without that, the Board risks being symbolic rather than transformative.
Final Thoughts
Trump’s Board of Peace is ambitious, controversial, and still largely undefined. It could be a breakthrough in diplomacy or another example of high-profile political theater.
What’s clear is that the world is watching — and the reactions of invited leaders will likely determine whether this new initiative is a historic experiment in peacebuilding or just another headline.