Trump Is Briefed on Options for Striking Iran as Protests Continue
Amid nationwide unrest in Iran, Washington weighs military responses as tensions escalate and global fears rise
As anti-government protests erupt across Iran and tensions escalate between Tehran and Washington, U.S. President Donald Trump has been officially briefed on a range of potential military options, including the possibility of striking Iranian targets if the situation worsens. The discussions reflect a dramatic moment in international relations, as unrest in Iran merges with long-standing disputes over its political system, nuclear ambitions and regional influence. �
archive.ph +1
A Nation on the Brink
What began months ago as protests over a collapsing currency and rising economic hardship has quickly morphed into one of the largest waves of dissent Iran has seen in years. Demonstrations have erupted in cities from Tehran to Mashhad, with many Iranians openly calling for sweeping political change and greater freedoms under a theocratic government long dominated by clerical rule. �
Gulf News
In response, Iran’s authorities have imposed widespread internet and communications blackouts, making it difficult for both citizens and outside observers to track events in real time. Security forces have used live ammunition, tear gas and arrests to suppress unrest, with rights groups reporting dozens of deaths and thousands of detentions. �
Newsmax
Trump’s Escalating Rhetoric
From Washington, President Trump has repeatedly weighed in on the protests, issuing public statements on social media and through government channels. On one platform, he wrote that Iran is “looking at FREEDOM, perhaps like never before” and declared that the United States stands ready to help. �
Geo News
Trump and his advisers have framed the turmoil not just as a domestic Iranian crisis but as part of a broader confrontation with a government they see as oppressive, destabilizing and hostile to U.S. interests. In recent days, the president has warned Iranian leadership against further violence, suggesting that continued crackdowns on civilians could trigger a U.S. military response. �
archive.ph
Military Options on the Table
According to senior U.S. officials, Trump has been briefed on a menu of potential military options ranging from targeted airstrikes on key Iranian military or security infrastructure to cyberattacks designed to disrupt Tehran’s ability to coordinate repression. These contingency plans are being weighed carefully, with no final decisions made yet. �
archive.ph
One of the complications in such plans is the risk of escalation. U.S. strategists are acutely aware that any direct strike on Iranian soil — even limited — could provoke retaliation against American forces in the region or destabilize other parts of the Middle East. Some options under discussion include precision strikes against elements of Iran’s security services that have been involved in violent suppression of protesters, without targeting civilian areas. �
archive.ph
A Pattern of Assertive Foreign Policy
The focus on military options comes against the backdrop of an already assertive Trump foreign policy. In recent months, the United States has conducted offensive military actions against other state and non-state actors in multiple regions. Notably, in June 2025, the U.S. carried out an extensive strike campaign against Iranian nuclear facilities, which involved B-2 stealth bombers and cruise missile launches from naval platforms. That attack, dubbed Midnight Hammer by the military, was portrayed as a preemptive effort to degrade Tehran’s nuclear capabilities. �
Wikipedia
However, officials caution that the world is not currently on the brink of another large-scale conflict. Discussions in the White House involve a balance between supporting human rights and civil liberties — such as the right to protest — and avoiding a spiraling confrontation that could draw the U.S. into a protracted war. �
archive.ph
Mixed Signals and Global Alignments
Trump’s rhetoric has been amplified by supportive voices within his own administration and among allied leaders. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has publicly expressed backing for Iranian demonstrators, emphasizing their courage in facing violent suppression. At the same time, some former military analysts have warned that Tehran should take American warnings seriously, arguing that any further brutality could trigger a forceful response. �
Reuters +1
Iranian officials, for their part, have denounced U.S. threats, labeling them as reckless interference in sovereign affairs. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has vowed not to yield to external pressure and accused foreign powers of exploiting the protests for political purposes. �
The Washington Post
The Human Toll
Amid all the high-level strategizing and diplomatic posturing, it remains the Iranian people who are most affected by the unrest. Families across the country have been impacted by violence, arrests and economic hardship. Calls for political reform, better living conditions and increased freedoms continue to echo through city streets despite severe risks. �
Gulf News
The Path Forward
Whether Trump ultimately opts for a military strike — or confines U.S. action to diplomatic pressure and targeted sanctions — remains uncertain. National security advisors stress that any decision must carefully consider the geopolitical consequences, the likelihood of Iranian retaliation and the potential impact on civilian lives.
For now, the world is watching a highly volatile moment unfold: a domestic uprising inside one of the Middle East’s most powerful states, met by international leaders weighing some of the toughest decisions in global diplomacy and security.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Fiazahmedbrohi and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Russian Warship Escorts Sanctioned Ship Near NATO—Days After US Seized a Similar One
A Russian warship escorting a sanctioned cargo vessel through sensitive waters near NATO territory has reignited global tensions, coming just days after the United States seized a similar ship accused of violating international sanctions. The incident underscores the growing risks at sea as global powers increasingly enforce economic pressure through naval presence, turning commercial shipping lanes into geopolitical flashpoints. A Show of Force at Sea According to defense observers, the Russian Navy deployed a surface combat vessel to accompany a merchant ship flagged for alleged sanctions violations. The escorted vessel reportedly passed close to NATO-monitored waters, triggering heightened surveillance by alliance forces. While no direct confrontation occurred, the message was unmistakable: Moscow is willing to use military power to protect its economic lifelines. The timing is critical. Only days earlier, U.S. authorities seized a ship suspected of transporting sanctioned oil, an action Washington framed as lawful enforcement of international restrictions. Moscow, however, views such seizures as economic warfare. By sending a warship to escort a sanctioned vessel, Russia appears to be signaling that it will not allow similar actions against its interests without resistance. Sanctions and the Shadow Fleet Since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict, Western nations have imposed sweeping sanctions on Russian energy exports, targeting oil tankers, shipping companies, and financial networks. In response, Russia and its partners have relied increasingly on what analysts call a “shadow fleet” — aging tankers operating under opaque ownership structures and alternative insurance arrangements to bypass restrictions. These vessels often sail through strategically vital maritime corridors, including the Baltic Sea, Black Sea, and Mediterranean routes. NATO navies closely monitor such movements, creating a tense environment where miscalculation could quickly escalate. The Russian escort suggests a new phase in this maritime standoff: sanctions enforcement backed not just by law, but by naval power on both sides. NATO’s Delicate Balancing Act For NATO, the situation presents a serious challenge. Alliance forces are tasked with monitoring suspicious shipping while avoiding direct clashes with Russian military assets. Any aggressive move against a convoy protected by a Russian warship could spark an international crisis. NATO officials have emphasized restraint, noting that international waters remain open to lawful navigation. Still, surveillance aircraft, naval patrols, and intelligence assets were reportedly deployed to track the Russian escort mission closely. “This is about deterrence without provocation,” one defense analyst noted. “Both sides are testing boundaries, but neither wants to be the one blamed for igniting a wider conflict.” Echoes of Cold War Naval Tensions The incident has drawn comparisons to Cold War-era naval brinkmanship, when U.S. and Soviet warships routinely shadowed each other across the world’s oceans. Then, as now, maritime encounters carried enormous symbolic weight. However, today’s environment is arguably more complex. Unlike Cold War standoffs, modern confrontations involve commercial vessels, sanctions law, and economic warfare intertwined with military posturing. A misstep involving a civilian ship could have legal, humanitarian, and strategic consequences. Russia’s Strategic Message By escorting a sanctioned ship so visibly, Russia is sending several messages at once. Domestically, it signals strength and defiance against Western pressure. Internationally, it warns that enforcement actions against Russian-linked shipping may face armed resistance. The move also reassures partners and buyers that Moscow is committed to keeping its trade routes open, even under sanctions. For countries still purchasing Russian energy, naval escorts may offer a form of security—albeit one that raises the stakes considerably. A Dangerous Precedent? Western analysts worry that such escorts could normalize the militarization of sanctions evasion. If more sanctioned states begin using warships to shield commercial vessels, the world’s busiest shipping lanes could become zones of permanent tension. The United States and its allies have so far avoided intercepting vessels under direct military escort, preferring legal seizures when ships are isolated. But as escorts become more common, the room for enforcement narrows. What Comes Next? While the immediate incident ended without confrontation, it highlights a troubling trend: economic disputes increasingly playing out at sea, backed by naval power. As sanctions tighten and enforcement grows bolder, similar encounters are likely to become more frequent. The challenge for global powers will be preventing these encounters from spiraling into open conflict. For now, warships shadowing sanctioned tankers serve as a stark reminder that the world’s oceans are no longer just trade routes—they are front lines in a widening geopolitical struggle.
By Fiazahmedbrohi about 11 hours ago in The Swamp
'20/20'
"Do It Again" the track that would ultimately open the Beach Boys final album on Capitol Records which was released on February 10th 1969 had originally been released as a single in August of 1968. The track was the first of many post-Pet Sounds era throwbacks to the early Beach Boys sound which would become continually more cliched and eventually lead the Beach Boys to the level of self-parody they would eventually succumb to in the 1980s while their closest contemporaries The Beatles nearing the end of their run in 1969 would go on to be viewed as the most influential band of all time. However, the song itself is not bad on its surface, and it opens with a futuristic sounding (for 1969) drumbeat captured by then-Beach Boys engineer Stephen Desper using tape delays on the drums performed by Dennis Wilson and John Guerin. The song has been re-recorded numerous times over the years on various Beach Boys-related projects most notably the 2011 re-recording at Capitol studios featuring the five surviving Beach Boys at the time backed instrumentally by various members of both the Brian Wilson Band and Mike Loves touring "Beach Boys" to promote the then upcoming Beach Boys 50th Anniversary reunion tour in 2012. The hammering and power drill sound at the end of the song was an excerpt from a track called "Workshop" that was to be a part of the uncompleted "SMiLE" album.
By Sean Callaghan6 days ago in Beat
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.