Telegram Leak Exposes RAW's Role in Pahalgam False Flag

In recent developments, a Telegram-leaked document has shed light on an alleged false flag operation tied to India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) in the Pahalgam region of Jammu and Kashmir. The revelations, combined with conflicting narratives, have sparked heated debates about the truth behind the Pahalgam incident and its broader implications.

The Pahalgam Incident: What Happened?

The Pahalgam attack, which occurred in April 2025, immediately garnered international attention. According to initial reports, the attack was attributed to a militant group, with The Resistance Front (TRF) claiming responsibility. TRF, an offshoot of the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, stated that the attack was a response to Indian policies in the region. However, just hours after the claim, TRF retracted its statement, alleging that the attack was part of a larger conspiracy orchestrated by Indian intelligence agencies.

What followed was a wave of media coverage that suggested the attack was not a simple terrorist act but a carefully planned operation aimed at undermining Pakistan’s reputation. The leaked Telegram document purportedly ties India’s RAW to the attack, alleging that it was a false flag operation designed to serve multiple strategic purposes. These included discrediting Pakistan and justifying increased military operations in the disputed Kashmir region.

The Telegram Leak: RAW’s Alleged Involvement

The leaked Telegram document, first surfaced by Pakistani defense analysts, presents a detailed analysis of the Pahalgam attack. It claims that RAW was directly involved in orchestrating the false flag operation. According to the leak, the attack was timed to coincide with significant diplomatic developments, including the visit of U.S. Vice President JD Vance to India. This alleged timing suggests that India may have used the attack as a way to raise international pressure on Pakistan.

Moreover, the document points to certain inconsistencies in the media’s coverage of the attack. These inconsistencies, according to the leak, suggest that the Indian media was complicit in fabricating the narrative around the attack. The Telegram leak specifically mentions the use of manipulated images and videos from unrelated incidents, including a 2018 photo of a child in Kashmir and a 2022 image from Afghanistan, which were misrepresented as evidence of the Pahalgam attack.

The Reaction from Pakistani Media and Analysts

Pakistani media outlets and defense experts have been quick to capitalize on the leak, presenting it as evidence of India’s covert actions in Kashmir. According to some reports, the Pahalgam attack is being compared to previous incidents like the 2000 Chattisinghpora massacre, where similar accusations of false flag operations were leveled against Indian agencies.

The Pakistani press has also pointed to the timing of the attack as a significant red flag. Just as the attack unfolded, Indian authorities were already preparing for diplomatic talks with the United States, and analysts believe that the attack was strategically used to stoke tensions and justify further military actions against Pakistan.

Discrepancies in the Investigation

In the aftermath of the attack, Indian authorities wasted no time in pointing fingers at Pakistan. Investigations by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and Jammu and Kashmir Police suggested links between the attackers and Pakistan-based militant groups, particularly Lashkar-e-Taiba. However, critics have questioned the credibility of these claims, pointing out that much of the evidence is circumstantial.

The Indian government’s quick assumption of Pakistani involvement in the attack has been met with skepticism by several international observers. Leaked WhatsApp messages from prominent Indian journalists, including Arnab Goswami, have also added fuel to the fire. These messages suggest that Indian authorities may have had prior knowledge of the Balakot airstrikes in 2019, leading to suspicions that India could have orchestrated the Pahalgam attack as part of a broader disinformation campaign.

The Role of International Media

As the controversy continues to unfold, international media outlets have been caught between the conflicting narratives. Indian media, on one side, has strongly defended its position, denouncing the claims of a false flag operation as baseless. On the other hand, media from Pakistan and other international outlets have amplified the leaked documents and questioned India’s role in orchestrating the attack.

The international community remains divided, with some arguing that the leaked documents are part of a wider disinformation campaign aimed at undermining India’s credibility, while others believe that the revelations point to a much deeper conspiracy.

What Does This Mean for Kashmir?

The Pahalgam incident has once again brought the spotlight on Kashmir, a region that has been the focal point of decades of conflict between India and Pakistan. Whether or not the attack was a false flag operation, its impact on the ongoing situation in Kashmir is undeniable. The attack has reignited tensions in the region, fueling distrust and further complicating efforts for peace.

Conclusion: The Need for Transparency and Accountability

As the situation continues to evolve, one thing remains clear: the need for transparency and independent verification of the facts. Both India and Pakistan have their own narratives surrounding the Pahalgam attack, and only a thorough, impartial investigation will provide the truth. In a region as sensitive as Kashmir, the stakes are high, and misinformation can have far-reaching consequences.

As the debate rages on, the world watches closely, hoping for a resolution that brings peace to a region long plagued by violence and distrust.