Queen Elizabeth II Statue Will Be Standing and Not on Horseback
“New Queen Elizabeth II statue will depict the monarch standing, emphasizing dignity, service, and public connection”
Plans for a new statue of Queen Elizabeth II have confirmed that the monarch will be depicted standing, rather than on horseback, sparking discussions about the design, symbolism, and legacy of the late Queen. The statue is part of a broader effort to commemorate her 70-year reign and provide a lasting tribute to her life and contributions.
The Design Announcement
Sculptors and planners behind the project have revealed that the decision to depict Queen Elizabeth II standing reflects a desire to focus on her humanity, grace, and connection with the public rather than a traditional equestrian portrayal often associated with monarchs.
An official statement from the design team explained:
“A standing figure allows viewers to relate to the Queen as a person, emphasizing her presence, dignity, and leadership throughout her reign. It’s a modern approach that aligns with how she connected with her people.”
The statue is intended to be installed in a prominent public space, ensuring accessibility for visitors and admirers to pay tribute.
Why Not on Horseback?
Historically, many royal statues depict monarchs on horseback as a symbol of power, authority, and military prowess. However, planners argue that Queen Elizabeth II’s legacy was defined more by service, diplomacy, and continuity than by battlefield heroics.
The decision reflects an evolving perspective on public monuments, which increasingly focus on:
Humanizing figures of historical importance
Highlighting leadership qualities and civic contributions rather than solely military strength
Creating accessible and relatable public art
Sculptor Jane Thompson, involved in the project, noted:
“While equestrian statues are impressive, they can create a distance between the public and the figure being commemorated. A standing Queen invites reflection, interaction, and recognition of her decades of service.”
Symbolism in the Standing Statue
The standing pose is rich in symbolism. Observers have noted that the statue may convey:
Stability and continuity, reflecting her long and steady reign
Approachability, showing a monarch in a relatable, human posture
Strength through presence, emphasizing dignity without grandiose displays
Artists are considering additional design elements such as hands positioned in a thoughtful gesture, robes reflecting her royal office, and subtle detailing in attire that nods to her personal style and historical legacy.
Public and Expert Reactions
The announcement has sparked discussion online and in the media. Some historians and art critics support the standing depiction, citing its modern relevance and approachability. They argue that it reflects a society that values leadership, compassion, and service.
Others have debated whether a more traditional equestrian statue might have better captured the majesty of her reign. Social media reactions range from admiration for the thoughtful design to nostalgic calls for classical representations.
Commemorating Queen Elizabeth II’s Legacy
Queen Elizabeth II, who passed away in September 2022, was Britain’s longest-reigning monarch, overseeing decades of cultural, political, and social change. Statues and memorials are important ways to honor her legacy, ensuring future generations recognize her role in shaping modern Britain.
The standing statue aims to commemorate:
Her dedication to public service
Her role in uniting the nation during periods of change
Her personal qualities such as dignity, resilience, and empathy
By focusing on her as a person rather than a distant figure of authority, the statue seeks to inspire both respect and connection.
Location and Installation
While the exact location has not been finalized, authorities have indicated that the statue will be placed in a central, highly accessible area, likely in London, where it can be visited by locals, tourists, and admirers. Plans include:
A pedestal with inscriptions highlighting her life and reign
Landscaping and public seating to encourage reflection and visitation
Accessibility features for all members of the public
Officials hope that this statue will become a focal point for public commemoration, particularly during anniversaries, national celebrations, and events honoring her memory.
Modern Trends in Monuments
The decision to depict Queen Elizabeth II standing rather than on horseback reflects modern trends in public monuments:
Emphasis on relatability and human qualities
Inclusive designs that encourage public engagement
Shifting away from symbols of power toward symbols of service and leadership
Art critics argue that this approach ensures monuments remain relevant and meaningful to contemporary audiences, while still respecting historical significance.
Conclusion
The forthcoming statue of Queen Elizabeth II, standing proudly rather than riding a horse, is more than a tribute to her reign—it is a reflection of her character, values, and enduring connection with the public. By choosing a modern, approachable design, the statue aims to celebrate a monarch who was not only a figurehead but also a symbol of dedication, resilience, and service.
As the statue nears completion, it is expected to become an iconic landmark for Britain, offering a space for reflection, admiration, and remembrance for generations to come.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Aarif Lashari and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Saipan Was Not ‘Jolly’ – The Infamous Keane v McCarthy Row
The 2002 FIFA World Cup qualifier in Saipan is remembered as one of the most dramatic and controversial moments in English football history. It was a period when tensions boiled over between Roy Keane, the fiery Manchester United midfielder, and Mick McCarthy, the manager of the Republic of Ireland national team. The fallout from this infamous row would dominate headlines and continue to spark debates among football fans for decades.
By Aarif Lashariabout 18 hours ago in The Swamp
It’s All About the Land”: Zelensky Says Ukraine to Talk to US and Russia
As the war in Ukraine stretches into another exhausting phase, President Volodymyr Zelensky has made a blunt and revealing statement: “It’s all about the land.” With these words, Zelensky signaled a shift toward pragmatic diplomacy as Ukraine prepares to engage in talks involving both the United States and Russia. His remark underscores the core issue driving the conflict—territory—and highlights the difficult choices that may shape Ukraine’s future.
By Fiaz Ahmed a day ago in The Swamp
Despite Greenland, France’s Macron and NATO’s Head Make Nice With Trump Behind the Scenes
Even as Greenland captured global attention for a brief moment of diplomatic tension, world leaders have quietly continued working behind the scenes to maintain important alliances. French President Emmanuel Macron and NATO Secretary-General have reportedly maintained cordial relations with former U.S. President Donald Trump, emphasizing stability and cooperation in transatlantic affairs. While public disputes made headlines, private diplomacy appears to tell a different story—one of pragmatism and continuity over personal disagreements. Greenland Controversy: A Brief Recap The Greenland standoff began when the United States expressed interest in purchasing the Arctic island, a strategic territory under Danish sovereignty. While the idea was quickly rejected, it sparked public and media outcry, casting a spotlight on the U.S. approach to foreign territories. In Europe, reactions were mixed. Leaders like Macron criticized the proposal publicly, emphasizing diplomacy and sovereignty. NATO allies, wary of disruptions to alliance cohesion, worked to downplay the tensions. Despite these high-profile disagreements, sources report that formal and informal channels of communication remained open, signaling that political strategy often diverges from public statements. Behind-the-Scenes Diplomacy According to multiple reports, both Macron and the NATO Secretary-General engaged in private discussions with Trump to ensure that broader cooperation on defense, security, and strategic priorities continued uninterrupted. Experts say these behind-the-scenes efforts are typical of international diplomacy, where public disagreements often mask ongoing collaboration. For NATO, maintaining unity is crucial, especially as the alliance navigates challenges from Russia, China, and shifting geopolitical dynamics. Macron’s private engagements with Trump reportedly focused on: Defense and military cooperation Coordination on NATO initiatives Economic and trade discussions Maintaining alignment on Arctic security issues While public remarks emphasized sovereignty and critique, private diplomacy sought to prevent long-term damage to strategic relationships. Why Leaders Maintain Dialogue Despite Tensions Political analysts point out that high-level diplomacy requires balancing domestic political messaging with long-term international relationships. For Macron, taking a strong public stance on Greenland resonated with constituents and European audiences, while private discussions ensured that strategic ties with the U.S. remained intact. Similarly, NATO leaders must manage alliance cohesion. Public criticism of Trump or the U.S. could undermine member confidence, but quiet diplomacy allows coordination on shared priorities without escalating media narratives. This dual approach reflects the complexity of modern international relations, where leaders navigate public perception and private negotiation simultaneously. The Role of NATO in Maintaining Stability The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is tasked with ensuring collective defense and strategic coordination among member states. Tensions over Greenland had the potential to strain these commitments, especially in Arctic operations, which involve both military presence and resource monitoring. By engaging Trump privately, NATO leadership aimed to avoid public friction turning into operational challenges. For instance, joint exercises, intelligence sharing, and defense planning all rely on trust and cooperation between leaders, even when media coverage highlights disagreements. Macron’s Balancing Act French President Emmanuel Macron’s handling of the situation illustrates a key principle of diplomacy: the ability to project firmness publicly while remaining flexible privately. In public, Macron criticized the idea of U.S. acquisition of Greenland, asserting European and Danish sovereignty. Behind closed doors, however, he engaged in discussions with Trump to: Reassure him about France’s commitment to transatlantic defense Coordinate on global security threats Preserve trade and military partnerships This approach allows Macron to maintain domestic credibility while preventing disruptions in critical international relationships. Trump’s Perspective From the U.S. side, Trump’s Arctic interest was viewed as part of a broader strategic approach to global influence and resource access. While the purchase proposal drew public ridicule and skepticism, officials note that Trump continued to prioritize defense and trade partnerships in private interactions with European allies. By engaging with NATO leadership and Macron behind the scenes, Trump ensured that alliances remained functional, even if public statements appeared confrontational or sensationalized. Lessons for International Relations The Greenland episode underscores a fundamental truth in global politics: public disagreements often coexist with private cooperation. Analysts note several lessons: Diplomacy is multi-layered: Media coverage reflects only part of the story. Leaders often negotiate quietly to prevent disputes from harming long-term goals. Public posturing does not equal rupture: Political leaders may need to signal strength or assert sovereignty domestically while maintaining dialogue internationally. Alliance management requires patience and discretion: NATO and EU leaders balance member interests, ensuring operational stability even amid sensational headlines. These lessons reinforce the importance of understanding diplomacy beyond surface-level narratives. Looking Forward While Greenland may have faded from global headlines, the implications for U.S.-European relations continue. Leaders remain engaged, negotiating behind closed doors to: Address Arctic security and climate concerns Coordinate military and intelligence efforts Manage trade and strategic alliances Observers note that the episode highlights how personal and national politics intersect with long-term international strategy, and why alliances like NATO continue to function despite occasional public disagreements. Conclusion The Greenland standoff offered a rare glimpse into potential tensions between the U.S., European leaders, and NATO. Yet behind the headlines, diplomacy has persisted. Macron and NATO leadership’s continued engagement with Trump demonstrates the careful balance between public messaging and private negotiation. In an era dominated by media narratives and viral headlines, the Greenland example serves as a reminder: international relations are rarely simple. Leaders must navigate complex intersections of domestic politics, alliance obligations, and strategic interests—all while maintaining channels of communication that prevent temporary disputes from becoming permanent fractures. In this delicate balance, the art of diplomacy often proves more powerful than public posturing. Greenland may have made the news, but the real story lies in the quiet rooms where leaders keep alliances alive and strategy intact.
By Muhammad Hassan4 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.