Deposed Maduro Pleads Not Guilty After Capture in Shock US Attack on Venezuela

In a stunning escalation of Venezuela’s long-running political crisis, deposed President Nicolás Maduro has pleaded not guilty following his capture during what U.S. officials described as a “targeted and decisive” operation inside Venezuela. The shock U.S. attack, which reportedly led to Maduro’s arrest and transfer into American custody, has sent tremors through Latin America, Washington, and global diplomatic circles.

The unprecedented operation marks one of the most dramatic interventions in the region in decades and raises urgent questions about sovereignty, international law, and the future of Venezuela’s leadership.

The Capture That Shook the Region

According to U.S. officials, Maduro was captured during a coordinated operation aimed at dismantling what Washington calls a “narco-state leadership network.” The mission, carried out with precision and secrecy, reportedly targeted key locations linked to Venezuela’s security apparatus before Maduro was taken into custody.

Images and reports of the operation spread rapidly, sparking protests in Caracas and condemnation from Maduro loyalists. Supporters of the former president described the attack as an “illegal invasion,” while opposition figures called it the end of an era marked by economic collapse, repression, and international isolation.

Plea of Not Guilty in US Custody

Shortly after his arrival in the United States, Maduro appeared before a federal court, where he pleaded not guilty to a range of charges. These include allegations of drug trafficking, conspiracy, corruption, and narco-terrorism—charges that U.S. authorities have pursued for years.

Maduro’s legal team rejected the accusations, arguing that the case is politically motivated and represents an abuse of U.S. judicial power. They maintain that Maduro was the legitimate president of Venezuela at the time of his arrest and therefore should be protected under international law.

Prosecutors, however, insist that the charges are based on years of intelligence and investigations and that no individual is above the law.

US Justifies the Operation

Washington has defended the operation as a necessary step to protect regional security and combat transnational crime. U.S. officials claim Maduro oversaw networks that destabilized neighboring countries and fueled drug trafficking routes into North America.

In a statement, U.S. authorities said the operation was conducted to “support the Venezuelan people and restore accountability.” They emphasized that the goal was not occupation but the removal of individuals accused of criminal activity.

Still, the lack of prior international authorization has drawn criticism, even from some U.S. allies, who worry about the precedent such an action sets.

International Reaction: Praise, Condemnation, and Alarm

Global reaction has been sharply divided. Several Latin American governments welcomed Maduro’s removal, describing it as an opportunity for democratic renewal in Venezuela. Opposition leaders within the country echoed those sentiments, calling for free elections and international oversight.

In contrast, Russia, China, Iran, and Cuba condemned the U.S. action as a violation of Venezuelan sovereignty. Moscow warned that the attack could destabilize the region and undermine international norms, while Beijing called for restraint and dialogue.

The United Nations has urged all parties to avoid further escalation, stressing the importance of international law and peaceful resolution.

Impact on Venezuela’s Fragile Stability

Inside Venezuela, the situation remains volatile. Security forces loyal to Maduro have vowed resistance, while opposition groups are pushing for a transitional authority. Protests have erupted in major cities, with clashes reported between rival factions.

Years of economic collapse, hyperinflation, and mass migration have left the population exhausted and divided. For many Venezuelans, Maduro’s capture represents hope for change. For others, it fuels fear of chaos, retaliation, and foreign domination.

Analysts warn that without a clear and inclusive political roadmap, the power vacuum could lead to instability rather than reform.

Legal and Sovereignty Questions

Maduro’s capture has sparked intense debate among legal experts. Critics argue that arresting a head of state through military action violates international law and could encourage similar actions elsewhere. Supporters counter that Maduro’s alleged crimes strip him of any legitimate claim to immunity.

The case is expected to test the limits of international legal frameworks governing sovereignty, extradition, and accountability for alleged crimes committed by state leaders.

What Comes Next?

As Maduro’s trial proceeds, attention is shifting to Venezuela’s future. The United States has signaled support for a transitional process but insists that Venezuelans must ultimately decide their leadership.

Whether the country moves toward democratic elections or sinks deeper into instability will depend on internal unity, international coordination, and the ability to rebuild shattered institutions.

Conclusion

The capture of Nicolás Maduro in a shock U.S. attack marks a defining moment in Venezuela’s history. His not-guilty plea sets the stage for a legal and political battle with global implications, while his removal from power opens an uncertain chapter for a nation already scarred by years of crisis.

As the world watches closely, one thing is clear: the consequences of this dramatic intervention will reverberate far beyond Venezuela’s borders, reshaping debates about power, accountability, and the future of international order.