"DARK REALITY OF AN AUTHORITARIAN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT 2025"
"AMERICA WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?"
This is written from my heart. I am concerned about freedom. I grew up in a time of freedom and now MAGA elected the orange buffoon. I am a warrior for freedom.
A specter is haunting the world. It wears many masks, speaks in many tongues, but its voice is unmistakable, the guttural growl of authoritarianism. From the heart of Europe to the shores of America, far right movements are gaining ground. They promise stability, order, a return to a mythical past. But their true agenda is power.
Raw, unchecked, and absolute. This is not a drill, folks. This is a five alarm fire, and democracy is trapped inside.
Let's be clear. America's flirtation with dictators is not new. This isn't a Tinder date gone wrong. It's a long term committed relationship. From Kaiser Wilhelm to Mussolini, from Pinochet to Putin, the American right has a soft spot for strongmen. They see in these iron fisted rulers a reflection of their own yearning for a simpler time, a time when men were men, women knew their place, and minorities, well, let's just say diversity wasn't exactly celebrated.
And then came Trump, the man who looked at the Constitution and saw a to do list of things to ignore. He praised dictators, cozied up to autocrats. and treated democratic norms like suggestions from a waiter he wasn't planning on tipping. He didn't just normalize authoritarianism, he weaponized it. He made it okay to be openly hostile to democracy.
And the GOP? They stood by and watched, their silence speaking volumes.
Now we have J. D. Vance, the poster boy for the late Republic movement. This isn't just some fringe group of internet trolls, folks. These guys are playing chess while the rest of us are still setting up checkers. They believe democracy is broken, and their solution is to hit the reset button. Hard. They long for a Caesar, a strongman who will sweep away the old order and usher in a new era.
And guess what? They think Vance is their guy.
Section 5, The Seduction of Power, Why Strong Men Appeal to the American Right. So why are so many Americans drawn to these authoritarian figures? Simple fear. They're afraid of change, afraid of the future, afraid of anyone who doesn't look, think, or pray like them. Strong men offer them a seductive promise, a return to a mythical past where everything was simpler, whiter, and supposedly greater.
They promise to crush the other, to restore order, to make America, well, you know the rest.
Section 6. Democracy on the precipice. Conservative support for dictators and the erosion of freedom. But here's the thing about authoritarianism. It never stops with the other. First, they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out. Because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out.
Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out. Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me. And there was no one left to speak for me.
Section 7, The Nightmare Scenario, a second Trump term in the unraveling of America. Imagine, if you will, a second Trump term. The guardrails of democracy, already weakened, crumble completely. The Constitution becomes a quaint historical document like the Magna Carta or your Uncle Earl's bowling trophy.
The courts are packed with Trump loyalists, rubber stamping his every whim. The free press is silenced. Dissent is met with violence. This isn't hyperbole, folks. This is the logical conclusion of the path we're on.
Section 8. Normalizing the unthinkable. The mainstreaming of far right ideology. What's perhaps most terrifying is how normal this all seems now. We've become desensitized to the outrageous. The unthinkable has become the everyday. We see far right ideologies creeping into the mainstream disguised as patriotism or common sense.
We see it in the demonization of immigrants. The attacks on LGBTQ plus rights, the attempts to whitewash history. This slow creep towards authoritarianism is perhaps the most insidious threat of all.
Section 9, History's Echoes. Recognizing the warning signs of authoritarianism. But here's the good news. We've seen this movie before. We know how it ends. And we have a chance to change the script. The warning signs are all around us. We just need to open our eyes and see them. We need to listen to the voices of those who are most vulnerable.
Those who are already feeling the heat. We need to remember that democracy is not a spectator sport. It requires active participation, constant vigilance, and a willingness to fight for what's right.
Section 10, the urgency of now, a call to action for democracy and equality. This is a call to action, folks. A call to stand up and be counted. A call to defend the very soul of our nation. We need to channel the spirit of our founding fathers, the courage of our civil rights heroes, the tenacity of generations past who fought and died for the freedoms we hold dear.
We need to vote like our lives depend on it, because they do. We need to speak out against injustice, even when it's uncomfortable. We need to organize, mobilize, and resist.
Section 11. The future we choose. A world defined by freedom or tyranny. The choice is ours. We can choose the path of fear, division, and authoritarianism. Or we can choose the path of hope, unity, and democracy. We can choose a future where everyone has a seat at the table. Where diversity is celebrated.
Where the government works for the people, not the other way around. The time for complacency is over. The time for action is now. Let's get to work.
WRITTEN BY
VICKI LAWANA TRUSSELLI
TRUSSELLI ART
COPYRIGHT 2024
I wrote this today, created a video, and now publishing my opinion.
I am a liberal progressive Californian. I did not vote for a dictatorship, but many peeps did vote for an authoritarian regime. MAGA people are brainwashed and have been subdued to full blown mind control. There is a group of NAZIS running around all over the world promoting strong mean politics. Their intention is to create an authoritarian one world government. America is not the only democracy to vote ion NAZIS. The Netherlands voted in a dictatorship. The world has gone crazy!
VIDEO CREATEDV IN INVIDEO AI
MUSIC COMPOSED BY VICKI
FINAL VIDEO EDITING BY VICKI
COPYRIGHT 2024
TRUSSELLI ART
About the Creator
Vicki Lawana Trusselli
Welcome to My Portal
I am a storyteller. This is where memory meets mysticism, music, multi-media, video, paranormal, rebellion, art, and life.
I nursing, business, & journalism in college. I worked in the film & music industry in LA, CA.
Keep reading
More stories from Vicki Lawana Trusselli and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
‘End of Western Alliance’ Means UK Must Be Bolder, Says Chatham House Director
The director of Chatham House, the UK’s leading foreign policy think tank, has warned that the era of a cohesive Western alliance may be coming to an end, arguing that Britain must adopt a bolder and more independent approach to global affairs. The remarks come amid growing geopolitical fragmentation, strained transatlantic relations, and the rise of new power centers challenging long-standing Western dominance. The warning reflects a broader debate in British foreign policy circles about how the UK should position itself in a world where traditional alliances can no longer be taken for granted. What Is Meant by the ‘End of the Western Alliance’? For decades, the Western alliance—anchored by NATO, close US-European cooperation, and shared democratic values—has shaped global security and economic policy. According to the Chatham House director, that framework is now under severe strain. Differences over defense spending, trade, climate policy, and responses to conflicts have exposed deep divisions between the United States and its European partners. Political polarization within Western democracies has further complicated consensus-building, weakening the sense of shared purpose that once defined the alliance. The Impact of US Unpredictability A key factor in the perceived decline of the Western alliance is the unpredictability of US foreign policy. Shifts between administrations have led allies to question Washington’s long-term commitments, particularly to NATO and multilateral institutions. The Chatham House director pointed to recent years in which US leadership appeared more inward-looking, prioritizing domestic concerns over global coordination. For the UK, which has historically relied on close ties with the US, this uncertainty has created strategic anxiety. Europe’s Strategic Awakening Europe, meanwhile, has begun reassessing its own role on the global stage. The war in Ukraine, rising tensions with China, and concerns over energy security have forced European nations to confront their dependence on external partners. The director argued that while European cooperation remains essential, Europe cannot simply replace the US as a unified strategic leader. Instead, individual countries—including the UK—must develop clearer national strategies that complement, rather than rely entirely on, collective action. Why the UK Must Be Bolder According to Chatham House, the UK faces a critical choice: cling to outdated assumptions about the Western alliance or adapt to a more fragmented world. Being “bolder,” the director said, does not mean abandoning allies, but rather redefining how Britain engages internationally. This could involve taking more independent diplomatic initiatives, strengthening ties beyond traditional Western partners, and investing in areas where the UK has comparative advantages, such as diplomacy, intelligence, and soft power. The Post-Brexit Reality Brexit has fundamentally reshaped the UK’s foreign policy environment. Outside the European Union, Britain has greater autonomy but fewer formal mechanisms to influence European decision-making. The Chatham House director suggested that post-Brexit Britain must work harder to remain relevant, building flexible partnerships with both European and non-European countries. This includes deeper engagement with Indo-Pacific nations, Africa, and the Middle East. Defense and Security Implications Defense policy is another area where boldness is required. While the UK remains a key NATO member, reliance on NATO alone may no longer be sufficient. Increased investment in defense capabilities, cyber security, and emerging technologies was highlighted as essential. At the same time, the director cautioned against militarization without diplomacy. Security, he argued, must be paired with strong diplomatic engagement to manage conflicts and prevent escalation. Economic and Trade Considerations The erosion of the Western alliance also has economic consequences. Global trade is increasingly shaped by competition between blocs, protectionism, and strategic supply chains. The UK, as a major financial and trading nation, must navigate these shifts carefully. The Chatham House director urged policymakers to pursue trade relationships that balance economic opportunity with ethical considerations, including labor standards and environmental protection. Climate and Global Challenges Climate change, pandemics, and technological disruption are challenges that transcend traditional alliances. The director emphasized that global cooperation remains vital, even as political alliances weaken. The UK, he argued, can play a leadership role in climate diplomacy and global governance, leveraging its scientific expertise and international networks. Boldness, in this context, means shaping agendas rather than reacting to them. Critics and Counterarguments Not everyone agrees that the Western alliance is ending. Some analysts argue that recent crises have actually reinforced cooperation among Western nations, particularly in response to security threats. Others caution that moving too far from established alliances could leave the UK isolated. The Chatham House director acknowledged these concerns but maintained that adaptation does not equal abandonment. A Moment for Strategic Clarity The director’s remarks have reignited debate within Westminster and beyond. Policymakers across parties are grappling with how to balance loyalty to allies with the need for strategic independence. The UK’s next steps will likely shape its global role for decades, determining whether it remains a central player or struggles to find its footing in a multipolar world. Conclusion: Redefining Britain’s Global Role The warning from Chatham House underscores a profound shift in global politics. As the Western alliance evolves—or potentially fragments—the UK faces both risks and opportunities. Being bolder, as the director suggests, means embracing realism, investing in capabilities, and engaging globally with confidence and purpose. In an era of uncertainty, Britain’s challenge is not simply to adapt, but to lead where it can, forging partnerships that reflect the realities of a changing world.
By Aarif Lashari4 days ago in The Swamp
The Devil's Cut
“Comrade, finally you’re awake.” The voice was smooth, sensual. A flickering incandescent bar was all that lit the white, sterile room. All Vladimir remembered was everything going black. He tried to move his arms and found them strapped to the gurney.
By Matthew J. Fromm4 days ago in Fiction
Comments (2)
This is so frightening, the Democrats saw this coming and did nothing. I hope that the USA can do something about this but I do not know what. The UK finally voted out their right wing, but the USA may not get a chance to do that
Spot on, Vicki! It’s like you have a degree in political science.