Canada at a Crossroads: Rethinking the F-35 Deal Amid Rising Costs and Shifting Alliances

Canada at a Crossroads: Rethinking the F-35 Deal Amid Rising Costs and Shifting Alliances

In a pivotal moment for Canadian defense policy, the newly appointed government under Prime Minister Mark Carney has launched a sweeping review of the country’s $19 billion fighter jet deal with Lockheed Martin. The contract, finalized in early 2023, promises 88 next-generation F-35A Lightning II stealth fighters to replace the aging CF-18 Hornets. However, with ballooning costs, rising geopolitical friction, and increasing domestic scrutiny, Canada finds itself questioning whether this major investment aligns with its long-term strategic interests.

The initial enthusiasm surrounding the F-35 deal stemmed from the aircraft’s advanced stealth capabilities, interoperability with NATO allies, and unmatched aerial combat potential. For a nation seeking to modernize its air force, the F-35 appeared to offer the gold standard. Yet, two years later, the gold has begun to look like lead.

A Deal Under Pressure

What was initially pegged at C$19 billion is now projected to cost taxpayers between C$27.7 billion and C$33.2 billion, according to a recent government audit. The spike reflects infrastructure upgrades, training complexities, volatile currency exchange rates, and cost overruns tied to global supply chains. While the first 16 aircraft are already funded and slated for delivery by 2026, the fate of the remaining 72 hangs in limbo.

Defense Minister Bill Blair has confirmed that the government is actively reviewing the deal and evaluating “cost-effective and sovereignty-focused” alternatives. This comes amid a broader effort by Prime Minister Carney to pivot Canada’s defense and economic strategy away from heavy reliance on U.S. suppliers.

Eyeing European Alternatives

If Ottawa moves to cancel or modify the deal, it will likely revisit bids from European defense manufacturers. The Saab Gripen E, a Swedish-made fighter that ranked second in Canada’s original competition, has resurfaced as a leading alternative. Not only does the Gripen come with significantly lower lifetime costs, but its manufacturer has also promised local assembly, technology transfer, and full sovereignty over data — a major win for domestic aerospace industries and national security autonomy.

Other potential contenders include:

• Dassault Rafale (France)
• Eurofighter Typhoon(UK, Germany, Italy, Spain)
• Boeing Super Hornet (U.S., but previously disqualified due to trade disputes)

Each of these options would signal a dramatic shift in Canada's defense procurement priorities — particularly if Ottawa chooses a mixed fleet approach, combining a smaller number of F-35s with other aircraft more tailored for patrol and sovereignty missions rather than deep-strike warfare.

Politics, Pressure, and Patriotism

This decision is not just about aircraft — it’s about identity. Canada’s evolving role in NATO, its ambitions for greater sovereignty, and its desire to strengthen domestic industries are all central to this defense dilemma.

Some analysts argue that opting out of the full F-35 fleet would alienate allies like the United States and weaken Canada’s interoperability with NATO forces, especially as threats from Russia and China mount. Others counter that a one-size-fits-all approach to air defense is both costly and outdated — and that Canada’s unique geography and mission profile justify a customized fleet.

There’s also a political undercurrent: Carney’s administration, fresh from the campaign trail, has vowed to tighten spending, reform procurement processes, and promote economic nationalism. Scaling back the F-35 deal could help fulfill all three promises.

A Timeline in Flux

Though deliveries of the first jets are expected in 2026, full operational capability isn’t slated until 2032–2034. This long timeline gives Canada a rare opportunity to reassess the plan and avoid deeper entanglements.

Behind the scenes, Canada has already opened informal talks with the European Union, signaling its intent to diversify future military and industrial partnerships. This includes joint defense projects, aerospace research initiatives, and possible co-production agreements — efforts that could reshape the nation’s defense ecosystem for decades to come.

What Comes Next?

No final decision has been made, but all signs point to a significant policy announcement by mid-2025, possibly timed around the upcoming NATO summit. Whether Canada proceeds with all 88 F-35s, shifts toward a mixed fleet, or cancels part of the order entirely, one thing is clear: the country stands at a defining crossroads.

Will Canada remain tied to the American military-industrial complex, or will it chart a more independent course — one that favors flexibility, cost-efficiency, and national autonomy?

The skies above may hold the answer, but for now, all eyes remain firmly fixed on Parliament Hill.

“I write sharp, insightful narratives on global defense, politics, and strategy. With a passion for turning headlines into compelling stories, I bring clarity to complex issues that shape our world. Let's dive into the facts — and the future.”