The Swamp logo

"The Streets of Defiance: Los Angeles vs. Federal Force"

As anti‑ICE protests erupt in LA, clashes with federal troops ignite a new battleground over civil rights, immigration, and executive power.

By Saboor Brohi Published 7 months ago 4 min read
National Guard troops confront protesters in downtown Angeles during sweeping ICE raids,

1. Catalyst: Federal Immigration Raids (June 6–7)

On June 6, 2025, a series of coordinated federal raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) swept through the Los Angeles Fashion District, a clothing warehouse, a Home Depot parking lot, and a doughnut shop

At least 44 arrests occurred that day, adding to the 118 already made over the prior week . These enforcement actions triggered swift backlash.

Protesters—including union leaders like SEIU California president David Huerta—converged on the locations. Federal agents, some marked with patches from FBI, DHS, and ATF, clashed with activists after protestors reportedly “hurled chunks of broken concrete”

By the evening, LAPD declared an unlawful assembly as tear gas, pepper balls, flash‑bangs, and other “less‑lethal” munitions dispersed crowds into surrounding streets

On June 7, in Paramount, protesters obstructed streets with shopping carts and bins. Federal agents responded with flash‑bangs and pepper spray, injuring several individuals

By nightfall, President Trump invoked Title 10, deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles—marking the first time since 1965 that a president has federalized a state’s Guard without the governor’s consent

2. Explosion of Protests and National Guard Presence (June 8–9)

On June 8, protest organizers called for continued demonstrations, gathering near Los Angeles City Hall. Around 300 National Guard troops were stationed in three city locations, particularly around federal buildings and the Metropolitan Detention Center, Roughly 500 US Marines from Twentynine Palms were placed on alert, Tensions rose as federal forces used smoke and pepper spray to create entry paths for DHS and Border Patrol vehicles

In turn, border czar Tom Homan warned, “someone’s going to lose their life” if the protests continued—and even suggested that Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass might face federal charges

On June 9, with protests persisting and estimated attendance around 2,000, at least 56 arrests were reported over the weekend

That same day, President Trump ordered another 2,000 National Guard troops, expanding the federal force in Los Angeles to over 4,000, alongside 700 active‑duty Marines

3. Scenes from the Streets: Clashes and Chaos

Downtown L.A. morphed into a tense battleground. Protesters chanted slogans and carried Mexican and Central American flags, setting fire to barricades and igniting at least one vehicle near Home Depot

Federal forces responded with an array of crowd-control tools: tear gas, flash-bangs, rubber bullets, pepper spray, and smoke devices . Protesters retaliated by hurling rocks, bits of broken concrete, and bottles at law enforcement

In one notable moment, journalists—clearly marked as press—were struck. A New York Post photographer was hit by a rubber bullet to the forehead, while an Australian reporter was also injured .

Meanwhile, Waymo suspended its robo-taxi service downtown after five of its autonomous vehicles were torched during the unrest

4. Political Quagmire: Federal vs. State Power

Governor Gavin Newsom responded vehemently. He filed a lawsuit challenging the federal deployment, calling it unconstitutional and "deranged," and alleging troops were left idle, "with no food or water"

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass expressed alarm, saying L.A. was being treated as a “political test case,” and accusing the Trump administration of fueling chaos

Both officials demanded troop withdrawal and encouraged peaceful protest, while condemning both violence and federal heavy-handedness .

In sharp contrast, President Trump defended his actions, labeling the protesters as “radical,” promising stricter controls, and even threatening to “arrest” Governor Newsom

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused local leaders of lax enforcement, and FBI Director Kash Patel described the situation as cities “under siege by marauding criminals,” hinting at federal law enforcement intervention.

5. Ripples Beyond L.A.: Nationwide & Global Reactions

What began in L.A. quickly spread. Smaller solidarity demonstrations occurred in San Francisco, Santa Ana, Houston, San Antonio, New York, and Boston . In San Francisco, transportation disruptions, vandalism, and over 150 arrests were reported .

Internationally, Mexico’s consul general in L.A. highlighted that at least 35 Mexican nationals had been detained, urging for the humane treatment of due-process rights

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and global observers condemned the escalation as authoritarian and dangerous

6. Deeper Significance: Constitutional Fault Lines

The Title 10 deployment has drawn fierce legal scrutiny. Critics warn it risks undermining the principle of civilian domestic protest, setting a precedent for federal militarization of protests

Others trace echoes to the 1965 use of federal troops in Selma, noting the unprecedented nature of a president overriding a governor's refusal .

Supporters argue the federal intervention was necessary to protect federal property, maintain order, and fill gaps in local responses

7. Human Stories Amid Turmoil

  • David Huerta, arrested during the Home Depot raid, became a potent symbol of the labor-immigration nexus—his detention galvanized many protesters
  • Journalists hit in the crossfire—especially the New York Post photographer—raised red flags about press safety when military force is deployed domestically .
  • Community members, especially students, flocked to protest. Fueled by wartime-like visuals, networks of mutual aid and legal coaching emerged on the streets .

8. Where It Stands Now & What Comes Next

As of June 10, 2025, L.A. remains tense. Federal forces—now exceeding 4,000 personnel—continue their show of force . California’s lawsuit proceeds, asserting an overreach of federal power

Protests are expected to resurge—whether in L.A. or in solidarity across the U.S.—as civil-rights and immigrant-justice groups coalesce. The danger of renewed violence or increased militarization looms, especially as political rhetoric escalates.

9. Final Reflection

This confrontation in Los Angeles is more than unrest triggered by immigration policy—it lays bare deep constitutional tensions over authority, the line between order and repression, and the very nature of democratic dissent. The peaceful and the militant coexist on downtown streets. Community leaders and allies confront tear gas and troop presence. At its heart is a community resisting displacement and crackdowns—and voicing unwavering defiance at the residing power it says no longer shields its people.

This moment could define the limits of federal authority or, conversely, normalize the presence of militarized responses to domestic protests. The outcome will reverberate far beyond L.A.’s boulevards—shaping how America strikes the balance between national security and civil liberties.

congresshistorytradetrumppolitics

About the Creator

Saboor Brohi

I am a Web Contant writter, and Guest Posting providing in different sites like techbullion.com, londondaily.news, and Aijourn.com. I have Personal Author Sites did you need any site feel free to contact me on whatsapp:

+923463986212

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.