Buffy, a Slayer of Vampires
Exploring Buffy the Vampire Slayer Pt: 1
When I was just a little girl I discovered a show. Little did I know how much that show would change my life. -Chasiti Jones
Buffy the Vampire Slayer premiered on March 10th, 1997 on The WB. It was created by Joss Whedon and stared Sarah Michelle Geller as Buffy, Alyson Hannigan as Willow, Nicholas Brendon as Xander, and Anthony Stewart Head as Giles. These were to be the four main cast of the show. They were dubbed "the scoobies." The show starts off in season one about one girl in all the world. This girl is to have the special abilities deemed necessary to fight off some of earth's most hellstruck forces of darkness. She has increased senses, speed, strength, and agility. As the story goes on, we learn the first girl acquired these special abilities from the essence of a pure demon, put there by a group of men to defend their lands. And thus the line of the Slayer began.
Our particular story begins in 1997, in Sunnydale. A fictional "one Starbucks town" in California. A year prior, Buffy was called to be the next slayer. As the story goes, when one slayer dies the next one is called. A "Watcher" is sent to teach and train them (if they have not already grown up with a watcher being trained their entire lives). Buffy's watcher, Merrick, was killed in Los Angeles before Buffy came to Sunnydale. Upon arriving in her new town, Buffy meets the librarian Rupert Giles. When she goes to request school books, he shows her the "Vampyr" book instead. Buffy runs out. She later returns and tells him she wants nothing to do with vampire slayage and is "retired." She tells Giles to kill the vampires and he explains he cannot because he is a watcher and lacks the skill. It is at that moment we discover who is to be Buffy's watcher.
Willow Rosenberg and Alexander "Xander" Harris are Buffy's two best friends. She meets them along with season regular, Cordelia Chase, portrayed by Charisma Carpenter, on her first day at Sunnydale High. Charisma leaves the series after season three to be a regular on the spin off show, Angel. Throughout the series, we watch as trouble, betrayal, anguish, and mercy follow Buffy and her friends throughout seven years of their lives. Each season has a "big bad," or main villain. Along with the big bad, the series also has plots concerning the said villain as well as filler episodes. Each season also appears to have specific life themes as well as themed episodes. For example, in season four, Buffy has her first college roommate. This episode does to demonstrate the trials faced with living with someone of non family origin. These themes are not explicitly stated but they are easy to understand throughout. For example, season one can be seen as being the new kid, season two first love, three as graduation, four college, five family, loss of a loved one, responsibility and sacrifice. Season six is overcoming addiction, and life changing events. Season seven can be seen as moving on with life, growing up, and truly becoming an adult. These themes are not definitive, and other themes are recognizable. The series itself promotes feminism, acceptance, responsibility and sacrifice.
Buffy is a series about growing up and experiencing life, the writers just happen to write that with a twist. A young girl saving the world. If you decide to read further in my "Exploring Buffy the Vampire Series" or maybe even by watching the show, you will learn, "She saved the world. A lot."
About the Creator
Chasiti Jones
26 years young.
Married.
North Georgia.
Buffy fanatic.
SVU.
Slytherin.
Sagittarius.
UGA Alum.
Psychology.
Sociology.
Marine Life.
Safari.
Owls.
Mermaid.
Naturist.
Woodsy.
"The hardest thing in this world, is to live in it. Be brave. Live."
Keep reading
More stories from writers in Geeks and other communities.
10 Times Rotten Tomatoes and I Disagreed
***Disclaimer*** I will be ranking these movies in the following manner: The greater the divide between Rotten Tomatoes and I, the higher up on the list (and I am referring to the critic's score, not the audience score). I will also show Rotten Tomatoes' score on each one in addition to my score. I am curious to know what everyone thinks, please let me know in the comments below!
By Madison "Maddy" Newton2 days ago in Geeks
Washington Signals Readiness for Dialogue with Tehran
In a development that may reshape diplomatic calculations in a volatile region, a senior United States official recently informed reporters that Washington remains “open for business” should Iran decide to pursue negotiations with the Trump administration. The statement, while cautious, reflects a distinct shift in tone from confrontation to conditional engagement, underscoring a complex interplay of domestic politics, regional security dynamics, and long‑term strategic interests. For years, U.S.‑Iran relations have been marked by deep mistrust, competing geopolitical aims, and periodic escalations that have threatened broader instability. The 2015 Iran nuclear deal — formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — represented a rare point of cooperation between Tehran and a group of world powers including the United States. Yet under former President Donald Trump, the United States withdrew from the agreement in 2018, reimposing sanctions and adopting an “maximum pressure” campaign intended to compel Iran to accept broader limitations on its nuclear and missile programs. That policy, while aimed at curtailing Iran’s strategic capabilities, also contributed to increased tensions, including proxy conflicts in Yemen and Iraq, attacks on commercial shipping in the Gulf, and the U.S. killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020. In this context, any signal of willingness to talk — even one carefully framed — is notable and merits careful analysis. A Calculated Offer, Not a Promise The U.S. official’s comment that Washington is “open for business” with Iran is deliberately nuanced. It stops short of announcing a formal offer of negotiations or outlining specific terms. The phrasing suggests that the United States is prepared to engage if Iran takes the initiative, but it leaves the responsibility for starting dialogue on Tehran. This approach provides Washington with strategic flexibility while signaling seriousness to both domestic and international audiences. Such diplomatic language serves multiple purposes. It reassures U.S. allies in the region — who are wary of sudden shifts in American Middle East policy — that engagement will not come at the expense of their security. It also conveys to Iran that opportunities for dialogue remain available, even amid ongoing disagreements over nuclear activities, ballistic missile development, and regional influence. Iran’s Response: Cautious but Interested? So far, Iranian officials have offered mixed reactions. Some hardliners in Tehran continue to reject engagement with the United States outright, insisting that Western powers cannot be trusted. Others, particularly voices within Iran’s diplomatic corps, have expressed pragmatic interest in negotiations that could ease economic sanctions and improve conditions for the Iranian public. Iran’s economy has struggled under heavy sanctions that limit oil exports, foreign investment, and access to global financial systems. For many Iranians, the economic impact of these policies has translated into unemployment, inflation, and constrained access to essential goods. Against this backdrop, the prospect of negotiations that could lead to sanctions relief holds significant appeal — provided such talks respect national sovereignty and core strategic interests. Strategic Patience and Global Perceptions The United States’ willingness to appear open to negotiation reflects a broader strategy of patient diplomacy. Rather than demanding immediate concessions or imposing unrealistic preconditions, Washington appears ready to create an environment where Iran can engage without fear of precipitous escalation. This stance aligns with broader American interests in managing regional conflicts, ensuring the free flow of commerce through key waterways like the Strait of Hormuz, and fostering stability that benefits global markets. From a global perspective, the United States’ statement may also be aimed at reassuring other actors — including the European Union, China, and Russia — that Washington is not abandoning diplomatic avenues in favor of perpetual confrontation. Following the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA, European signatories endeavored to preserve the agreement while maintaining channels of communication with Iran. The latest U.S. position may complement those efforts by demonstrating that engagement remains a viable option for all parties. Domestic Political Calculations Domestic U.S. politics play a significant role in shaping foreign policy. For the Trump administration, which is preparing for an election year, foreign policy achievements — or at least the avoidance of new conflicts — carry political weight. By signaling openness to negotiation without committing to specific terms, the administration may be attempting to appeal to a broad constituency that favors strength tempered with diplomacy. This approach also allows Washington to manage expectations at home. Hardline critics of engagement with Iran remain vocal in American political discourse, insisting that Tehran must first demonstrate substantive changes in behavior. By framing the offer as contingent on Iranian willingness to negotiate, the administration can address domestic concerns about appearing weak or overly conciliatory. Regional Implications and Security Considerations For Middle Eastern countries, particularly U.S. allies such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Israel, the notion of U.S.‑Iran negotiations prompts both hope and apprehension. On one hand, reduced tensions between Washington and Tehran could lessen the likelihood of wider conflict and create space for cooperative security arrangements. On the other, these countries fear that negotiations might sideline their own concerns or lead to compromises that do not adequately address Iran’s regional activities. In the security realm, issues such as Iran’s ballistic missile program and support for non‑state armed groups remain top concerns for the United States and its allies. Any future negotiations would likely need to address these issues alongside nuclear constraints, requiring careful balancing of priorities and pragmatic expectations on all sides. The Path Forward: Opportunities and Obstacles The path toward meaningful negotiations between the United States and Iran is strewn with challenges, but it is not impassable. Key factors that will influence the trajectory include: Political Will in Tehran: Iran’s leadership must decide whether engaging with Washington is more advantageous than continued resistance. Internal debates between pragmatists and hardliners will shape this decision. International Support and Mediation: Third‑party actors, particularly European countries, may facilitate dialogue by offering forums, confidence‑building measures, or incentives for both sides. Clear Objectives and Phased Engagement: Both parties will need to establish realistic goals. A phased approach that begins with limited, confidence‑building measures could pave the way for broader negotiations. Managing Regional Stakeholders: Ensuring that Middle Eastern allies feel included or at least heard in negotiations will be critical to maintaining regional stability. Conclusion: Diplomacy Remains on the Table The recent U.S. official’s comment that Washington is “open for business” if Iran wishes to negotiate is more than a simple soundbite. It reflects a deliberate diplomatic posture aimed at preserving options, reducing risk, and signaling to a wary world that engagement remains possible even amid complex disagreements. While the path to substantive negotiations will not be straightforward, this moment offers a reminder that diplomacy, even when cautious and conditional, remains a vital tool in addressing some of the most entrenched international conflicts of our time. Whether Iran chooses to take the first step toward dialogue will be a decision with far‑reaching implications — not just for Tehran and Washington, but for the broader Middle East and global security alike.writing...
By Saboor Brohi about 5 hours ago in Geeks
One Hard Thing
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: You have the number, you know your schedule- you’ve even picked out the perfect day and time to make this appointment. Shoot, you’ve even picked out alternative days and times just in case their schedules can’t accommodate you!
By Taylor Rigsbya day ago in Motivation
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.