Importance of CAPM in the Light of Recent Developments in Area

Essay: ‘The Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is very useful and it is used widely in the industry even though it is based on very strong assumptions. Discuss in the light of recent developments in the area.’

A. Introduction

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is a key tool in financial analysis. It helps to understand the cost of assets and manage risk better (Rossi, 2016; Brealey et al., 2023). Even though CAPM is widely used in business, it depends on ideas that may not always match real-life situations (Kolari et al., 2021). This essay looks at the important ideas of a notion called CAPM. It reviews its theory and real use in many areas. The analysis attempts to measure the importance of this model. It does this by looking at novel concepts emerging in the financial domain and their effect on changing economic areas. The later sections of this essay focuses on what makes the CAPM work and how it can be used in practical field and highlight key issues that come with its assumptions. This essay will look at how the financial business has reacted or questioned conventional ideas of CAPM.

B. Main Concepts and Discussion

Theoretical Foundation of CAPM

The CAPM is made from simple ideas that are the foundation of modern portfolio theory. The CAPM says that the expected gain from an asset depends on a safe rate and extra risk cost linked with its whole group. This is measured by beta (O'Sullivan, 2018). This easy but powerful tool helps people who put money in investments to see how much they need for taking more risk with the business. The CAPM suggests that a mix of bonds and shares helps to lower the risk in investments. Beta shows how much an asset's worth goes up or down with market changes (Hundal et al., 2019). Finding out if market changes make asset risk go up or down is highly important. CAPM helps in understanding and measure how risk affects income. Maiti (2018) says it is needed to gain financial knowledge for learning and making choices about investing.

CAPM is a helpful tool, but it needs some rules that help make it work well. A common idea is market efficiency, which says that share prices quickly and rightly include all important information (Kristoufek & Ferreira, 2018). This idea assumes that investors have and quickly use all the information they can get, so making sure prices exactly show how important assets are. However, in reality, markets may show different levels of effectiveness because of aspects like slow information delivery and other errors (Bai & Green, 2020). These obstacles make it hard to quickly use all data from the market at once as expected by theory.

One important idea of CAPM is thinking that the risk-free rate, usually shown by government bonds, stays the same (French, 2018). The plan uses a constant safe rate all through the time businesses invest funds. This is used as measure to check how much risk there is in owning stocks or bonds compared with this low-risk option. But changes in finance situations, policies or global political events can cause differences in the risk-free rate. In fast-moving finance places, considering the safe rate stays same might not truly show how interest rates really change (Kostin et al., 2022). This can cause possible mistakes in the calculations regarding CAPM. Recognizing and closely examining these ideas is highly important for understanding the model's limits. It helps to make sense of when it can be used in real life investing situations (Bai & Green, 2020).

Widely used CAPM Applications

CAPM is often used in many fields as a basic tool to evaluate required returns and handle finance risk strategically (Maiti, 2018). In the field of finance management, banking and investment tasks use a method called CAPM to analyse effective investments and set up minimum return rates for projects needing cash. The CAPM is used by areas like energy, telecommunications and technology to assess the cost of finance. This aids in measuring the worth of tasks and making important choices (Kostin et al., 2022). Property builders and finance companies use a model called CAPM to find the right return rates for buying land or buildings. The CAPM model is highly popular in many businesses because it is easy to use ( Fama & French, 2012; Hundal et al., 2019). It gives a standard way of linking risk and return when deciding if an investment will be beneficial or not (Brealey et al., 2023).

CAPM has benefits and disadvantages that change in different situations (Bai & Green, 2020). The simple way to use it makes it a smart choice for quickly checking future earnings, especially in low-risk businesses. The model needs beta to check different things like money and businesses (Cho & Polk, 2020). But, there are boundaries when this is done in cases where thoughts like market efficiency or always risk-free rates do not match the actual situations. Since markets change all the time and often their situations move, it could be hard for CAPM to track all growing risk factors correctly. Additionally, the model may raise questions. This could happen when it is not known how much the market will earn and estimates of beta, which are key parts for reacting; hence, they might change its response (Kristoufek & Ferreira, 2018).

Critique

The truth and possibility of the ideas behind a model called Capital Asset Pricing (CAPM) have been discussed by people in finance studies. The idea of market efficiency means that stock prices quickly and accurately include all available information. However, real-world evidence shows that market problems happen. This happens because of biases in behavior plus uneven knowledge and trading barriers. Markets might not right away react to new details, and people who invest may act differently than what is expected by the CAPM (Cho & Polk, 2020).

The main idea of the CAPM is that there is a steady and safe rate without risk, usually shown by government bonds. The risk-free rate, often used to measure the extra reward needed for taking a chance, can change with events that affect the financial system (Apergis & Rehman, 2018). This might make it less secure in real life situations. The idea that there is a safe rate without considerable moves can be made less true by changing business times, up and down interest rates and world events. This makes it hard to use in situations where the finance market is not easy to predict (Cho & Polk, 2020). Considering these ideas in real life, it is clear that there is a problem between how simple CAPM works on paper and the complexity of changing financial markets. Even though ideas can be helpful for thinking, always following them without question might make activities too simple and not real enough about finance markets (Markowski, 2020).

Both experts and people who perform tasks have said many issues about the CAPM. They point out that it does not get market complexities right well. A serious complaint is about the idea that everyone can think clearly, which is hidden in CAPM. Experts in finance behavior say that investors might not always make smart decisions like the CAPM does. Instead, they are open to thinking errors and feelings that hurt the model's ability to predict what will occur (Maiti, 2018).

Another reason of disagreement is that beta, a number measuring how much an asset changes with market ups and downs, depends on outdated information (Ferson, 2019). Critics argue that this looking back method might not properly cover changes in an asset's risk factors over time, especially when it comes to fields undergoing fast change. People have problems when they use CAPM because the model is highly sensitive to how accurate their input details are (Apergis & Rehman, 2018). It is hard to correctly measure beta and predict future market gains. This leads to confusion in real uses of it. Furthermore, the model's usefulness is questioned in cases where assumptions like market efficiency and steady risk-free rates are greatly different from real situations in the world.

Usually, both experts and people who do the work stress how important it is to know well about CAPM's limits. This has led to ongoing arguments between finance experts. This caused them to make new ways and methods that try to solve known problems and give clearer pictures of the complex parts present in financial markets (Galea and Giménez, 2019).

Recent Developments

Over time, people who know about finance and work in the finance industry have realized that the conventional CAPM has limitations (Markowski, 2020). A major change is the addition of aspects outside the market into the model. The Fama-French three-factor model adds extra parts of size and value into the CAPM model. It realizes their effect on asset cost and danger. The Capital Market Line and the Security Market Line help make it easier and more accurate to see how risk connects with return. Investment models are being made better because of progress in behavioural finance. These new models think about how investors make wrong choices and psychological factors can affect ones perception, making them more true to life (Hundal et al., 2019). Moreover, improvements have been made in changing the standard beta calculation. These include methods such as conditional beta and downside beta which aim to show a more detailed view of an asset's risk. These new ideas and changes show that there is a growing change in finance models. They are trying to make these traditional ways of looking at markets better so they work more with how real finance problems happen (Kristoufek & Ferreira, 2018).

To overcome the problems with the CAPM, experts keep making changes and improvements. They do this to make sure it works better over time. Combining aspects like size and value within the models with more than one factor, such as the Fama-French model helps deal directly with oversimplification that comes from CAPM. These models know how important these factors are in setting the value of assets. These changes try to give a better understanding of where risk and reward come from in finance markets. Also, adding in ideas from behavioural finance makes the CAPM model's belief that investors are rational a problem. Models that include mistakes in thought and bad choices lead to a more realistic picture of people buying and selling. It might give a right idea about what causes prices for assets to change. Even though these improvements make financial models better at explaining concepts, they also create problems (Galea and Giménez, 2019). The complexity caused by extra situations needs careful thinking and strong info. Moreover, because there are many types of models possible that need to be chosen the ones that fit with the available assets and marketplaces have. Basically, making financial models better all the time shows that it is always tried to mix real life with better sense. This allows an accurate image of how financial markets operate (Markowski, 2020).

C. Conclusions

In conclusion, CAPM shows both opportunities as well as possible challenges in its application. This essay looked at the model's theory, focusing on its simple and important results. The paper showed how businesses use CAPM to figure out needed return rates and handle finance risks. Even though some people criticize its ideas, CAPM has been changed to make it work better. Models that use more than one factor, ideas from behavioral finance and measures called "alternative beta" keep working to make the model better. They also help us understand how asset prices change over time in a clearer way. Despite these improvements, CAPM is still significant. Its simplicity helps to estimate the likely return in many common situations. CAPM adjusts for changing finance markets and stays a useful tool. The business uses CAPM to show the balance between theory and practice in financial modeling. The model stresses the important need for standard ways of making decisions, even when its ideas might not match the complicated real world. CAPM's long life shows how financial theories and actions in the business work together. This demonstrates a great balance between important ideas from literature and real-world practices.

References

Andrei, D., Cujean, J., & Wilson, M. (2023). The lost capital asset pricing model. Review of Economic Studies, 90(6), 2703-2762.

Apergis, N., & Rehman, M. U. (2018). Is CAPM a behavioral model? Estimating sentiments from rationalism. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 19(4), 442-449.

Bai, Y., & Green, C. J. (2020). Country and industry factors in tests of Capital Asset Pricing Models for partially integrated emerging markets. Economic Modelling, 92, 180-194.

Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Marcus, A. J. (2023). Fundamentals of corporate finance. McGraw-Hill.

Cho, T., & Polk, C. (2020). Asset pricing with price levels. London School of Economics working paper.

Fama, E. F. and K.R.French (2012) “Size, Value, and Momentum in International Stock Returns”,

Ferson, W. (2019). Empirical asset pricing: Models and methods.

French, J. (2018). A practitioner’s guide to the CAPM: an empirical study. In Global Tensions in Financial Markets (pp. 1-18). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Galea, M., & Giménez, P. (2019). Local influence diagnostics for the test of mean–variance efficiency and systematic risks in the capital asset pricing model. Statistical Papers, 60(1), 293-312.

Hundal, S., Eskola, A., & Tuan, D. (2019). Risk–return relationship in the Finnish stock market in the light of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). Journal of Transnational Management, 24(4), 305-322.

Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 3, 457 - 472

Kolari, J. W., Liu, W., & Huang, J. Z. (2021). A new model of capital asset prices: Theory and evidence. Springer Nature.

Kostin, K. B., Runge, P., & Charifzadeh, M. (2022). An analysis and comparison of multi-factor asset pricing model performance during pandemic situations in developed and emerging markets. Mathematics, 10(1), 142.

Kristoufek, L., & Ferreira, P. (2018). Capital asset pricing model in Portugal: Evidence from fractal regressions. Portuguese economic journal, 17(3), 173-183.

Maiti, M. (2018). A six factor asset pricing model (Doctoral dissertation).

Markowski, L. (2020). Further evidence on the validity of CAPM: The Warsaw Stock Exchange application. Journal of Economics and Management, 39(1), 82-104.

O’Sullivan, P. (2018). The capital asset pricing model and the efficient markets hypothesis: The compelling fairy tale of contemporary financial economics. International Journal of Political Economy, 47(3-4), 225-252.

Rossi, M. (2016). The capital asset pricing model: a critical literature review. Global Business and Economics Review, 18(5), 604-617.

Important Notes:

This essay looks at the important ideas of a notion called CAPM. It reviews its theory and real use in many areas. The analysis attempts to measure the importance of this model. The later sections of this essay focuses on what makes the CAPM work and how it can be used in practical field and highlight key issues that come with its assumptions. This essay will look at how the financial business has reacted or questioned conventional ideas of CAPM.

Analysing and writing a finance assignment requires a thorough understanding of financial concepts and real-world applications. Assignment writing services UK offers the best finance assignment help in developing comprehensive and engaging finance assignments.

Are you facing trouble in writing your finance dissertation as you don’t have enough time in your schedule for writing a finance dissertation? Then this is the right time to hire an online finance dissertation writing service in the UK.