Why have some animals barely changed since the time of the dinosaurs?
Find Out Why
Why have some animals barely changed since the time of the dinosaurs?
The fossil record is full of animals that have changed very little over millions of years. These animals are sometimes called "living fossils," and they provide us with a fascinating glimpse into the past.
There are a number of factors that can contribute to an animal's ability to survive for millions of years without changing significantly. These factors include:
A stable environment. Animals that live in stable environments are less likely to need to evolve in order to survive. For example, crocodiles have lived in relatively stable freshwater environments for over 85 million years. As a result, they have not needed to change much in order to survive.
A simple lifestyle. Animals that have a simple lifestyle are less likely to need to evolve than animals that have a complex lifestyle. This is because animals with a simple lifestyle have fewer needs, and they are less likely to be faced with challenges that require them to change. For example, the platypus is a mammal that lays eggs. It has a very simple lifestyle, and it does not have many predators. As a result, the platypus has not evolved much in over 150 million years.
The ability to adapt to change. Even animals that live in stable environments may need to adapt to change over time. For example, the horsetail plant has been around for over 400 million years. However, it has been able to adapt to changes in the environment, such as the rise and fall of the dinosaurs. As a result, the horsetail plant has not changed significantly over time.
In addition to these factors, there are also a number of genetic factors that can contribute to an animal's ability to survive for millions of years without changing significantly. These factors include:
A large population size. Animals with large population sizes are more likely to survive changes in the environment. This is because they are more likely to have individuals who are genetically suited to the new environment.
A high rate of genetic mutation. Animals with a high rate of genetic mutation are more likely to produce new variations that can help them survive in changing environments.
The combination of these factors has allowed some animals to survive for millions of years without changing significantly. These animals are a testament to the power of evolution and the ability of life to adapt to change.
Here are some more examples of animals that have barely changed since the time of the dinosaurs:
Lizards: Lizards have been around for over 200 million years, and they have changed very little in that time. They are well-adapted to their environment, and they have a simple lifestyle.
Tardigrades: Tardigrades are microscopic animals that are known for their ability to survive in extreme environments. They have been around for over 500 million years, and they have changed very little in that time.
Coelacanths: Coelacanths are fish that were thought to be extinct until they were rediscovered in 1938. They have been around for over 400 million years, and they have changed very little in that time.
Tuataras: Tuataras are reptiles that are found in New Zealand. They are the only surviving members of a group of reptiles that existed over 200 million years ago.
These are just a few examples of animals that have barely changed since the time of the dinosaurs. These animals are a reminder of the amazing diversity of life on Earth, and they provide us with a fascinating glimpse into the past.
In conclusion, there are a number of factors that can contribute to an animal's ability to survive for millions of years without changing significantly. These factors include a stable environment, a simple lifestyle, the ability to adapt to change, a large population size, and a high rate of genetic mutation.
The animals that have survived for millions of years without changing significantly are a testament to the power of evolution and the ability of life to adapt to change.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Peter Chiron and writers in Earth and other communities.
Greenland: New Shipping Routes, Hidden Minerals – and a Frontline Between the US and Russia?
Once seen as a remote and largely isolated Arctic territory, Greenland is rapidly emerging as a focal point of global geopolitics. Climate change, melting ice, and technological advances are transforming the island into a strategic hub defined by new shipping routes, vast mineral resources, and growing rivalry between major powers, particularly the United States and Russia. As the Arctic opens up, Greenland’s geographic position and untapped potential are pushing it to the center of international attention, raising questions about security, sovereignty, and sustainable development. Melting Ice and the Opening of New Shipping Routes One of the most visible impacts of climate change in the Arctic is the reduction of sea ice, which is making previously inaccessible waters navigable for longer periods each year. New Arctic shipping routes, including passages near Greenland, promise shorter travel times between Europe, Asia, and North America. Compared to traditional routes like the Suez Canal, Arctic pathways can reduce shipping distances by thousands of kilometers, cutting fuel costs and emissions. For global trade, this could be transformative. Greenland’s coastal waters are increasingly important as potential transit corridors and support hubs for these routes. However, the expansion of Arctic shipping also raises concerns about environmental risks, maritime safety, and the lack of robust emergency infrastructure in the region. Hidden Mineral Wealth Beneath the Ice Beyond shipping, Greenland holds significant reserves of critical minerals, many of which are essential for modern technologies and the global energy transition. These include rare earth elements, lithium, graphite, uranium, and other strategic resources used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, batteries, and defense systems. As demand for these materials grows, Greenland is being viewed as a potential alternative to existing supply chains dominated by a small number of countries. This has increased interest from Western governments seeking to diversify mineral sourcing and reduce strategic dependencies. However, mining in Greenland is controversial. Local communities and policymakers must balance economic opportunities with environmental protection and cultural preservation. Greenland’s harsh climate and fragile ecosystems make resource extraction both technically challenging and politically sensitive. The United States’ Strategic Interest in Greenland The United States has long considered Greenland strategically vital, largely due to its location between North America and Europe. The US already maintains a military presence at Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base), which plays a key role in missile warning systems and space surveillance. In recent years, Washington has renewed its focus on Greenland, emphasizing Arctic security, infrastructure investment, and cooperation with Denmark, which oversees Greenland’s foreign and defense policy. US interest is driven by several factors: protecting transatlantic security routes, countering rival powers in the Arctic, and ensuring access to critical minerals. Greenland is increasingly viewed as a frontline in maintaining Western influence in the High North. Russia’s Arctic Ambitions Russia, meanwhile, sees the Arctic as central to its economic and military strategy. It has invested heavily in Arctic military bases, icebreaker fleets, and energy projects, particularly along its northern coastline. Although Greenland is geographically distant from Russia’s main Arctic territories, Moscow closely monitors developments there. The island’s proximity to key Arctic sea lanes and North Atlantic routes makes it strategically relevant in any broader confrontation between Russia and NATO. As tensions between Russia and the West remain high, Greenland’s location places it near the intersection of competing security interests, increasing its geopolitical significance. Greenland Between Global Powers The growing attention from major powers puts Greenland in a delicate position. While the island seeks greater economic independence and development, it must navigate complex relationships with Denmark, the United States, and other international actors. Greenland’s government has emphasized the importance of maintaining control over its resources and ensuring that development benefits local populations. At the same time, geopolitical competition risks turning Greenland into a strategic chessboard rather than a partner in decision-making. This balancing act is becoming more difficult as Arctic competition intensifies. Environmental and Social Challenges Greenland is on the front lines of climate change. Melting ice sheets contribute to global sea-level rise, while local communities face changes to traditional livelihoods such as fishing and hunting. The expansion of shipping and mining could bring jobs and infrastructure, but it also threatens fragile ecosystems and raises concerns about pollution, habitat disruption, and long-term sustainability. Any future development in Greenland will require careful regulation, international cooperation, and meaningful engagement
By Aarif Lashari2 days ago in Earth
Top Australian Writers’ Festival Cancelled After Palestinian Author Barred
One of Australia’s most respected literary festivals has been cancelled following a fierce backlash over the decision to bar a Palestinian author from participating. What began as a programming dispute quickly escalated into a national debate about free speech, cultural inclusion, and political pressure in the arts. The cancellation has sent shockwaves through Australia’s literary community, raising urgent questions about whose voices are allowed on public platforms and at what cost.
By Aarif Lashari4 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.