Virtually Pitch Inventions To These Shark Tanks
Scientists and innovators with great ideas and solutions can pitch them online to industries and earn money to execute or grow them!
Shark Tank on ABC is today the choice TV show for inventors and budding businesses seeking investment to boost their growth. Due to its success it has spawned copycat shows around the world that follow its model.
Entrepreneurs and inventors show up before a panel of “menacing” sharks, to pitch business ideas, and the successful ones give up a percentage of their venture in return for the investment money they were looking for.
But to be honest not everyone is made for TV fame. It can be a daunting prospect, and due to jitters one can fumble before the sharks especially if public speaking is not your forte.
For the introverted ideators and creators who love creating and growing in anonymity, there are websites for you to pitch or contribute your ideas from the comfort of your home. I have profiled a few below.
Ideaconnection.com
Ideaconnection is a crowdsourcing website where conglomerates like Kraft Foods, Bayer, Nike, PepsiCo, Syngenta, Johnson and Johnson, Aveleda, Covanta Energy, Wrigley and others post their challenges and over 20,000 skilled scientists or inventors provide solutions to them. All you need to do is register a free profile to become a solver to get started.
According to the website problem solvers earn an average of $5000 for every solution but I’ve seen one Artificial Intelligence (AI) challenge worth $5000,000. Also if you got an invention you can post it there and crowdsell it. If you are not an inventor but a marketer you can earn a cool $500 after referring a solver who eventually wins a challenge they enter.
There are other opportunities open for challenge team facilitators and technology scouts to take advantage of.
MindSumo.com
MindSumo is another crowdsourcing website for inventors or scientists. They post challenges from conglomerates and invite problem solvers who have registered a profile to provide solutions. Dell, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Shell, Delta, IBM, Citigroup, BFGoodrich, Unilever, Nestle and others have used MindSumo to find solutions for challenges.
Over 200,000 ideas have been solved on this crowdsourcing platform that also encourages college students to participate. Solvers can collaborate on the challenges and those that win share the prize loot.
The money paid for challenges varies but is mostly not astronomical. I have seen challenges worth $350, $400, $800, $1600, $2600, and $10,000. Inventors or scientists with a creative mind can register their profile here to get started.
OpenIDEO.com
OpenIDEO is targeted at innovators passionate about creating solutions for today’s major global challenges. The solutions address problems in health, food, water education, environment and other critical sectors.
Most solutions created by innovators and scientists registered on the platform seek to improve the lives of those living in poverty around the world. Innovators and scientists registered on the platform from around the world collaborate to create solutions to the challenges and the organizations running the challenges select the best ideas and reward them with funding.
The funding helps them to develop the ideas in phases as fully fledged solutions. Funding here is not limited but I have seen challenges worth $1000, $5000, $55,000, $100,000 and $1 million.
WazokuCrowd.com
Wazoku Crowd is a crowdsourcing platform for problem solvers that can create solutions to address prevailing global challenges or improve current technologies. Challenges posted address issues like soil health, sanitation, safety systems, motoring, pollution, green energy, recycling, health and digital technology.
To be a problem solver you register a profile and submit your proposed solutions. Humanitarian organizations like World Vision, Habitat for Humanity, International Rescue Committee post these challenges calling for problem solvers to develop solutions.
Aramco Oil, AstraZeneca, Enel Energy, Novartis, NASA, the US Air force and others seek innovators for their challenges. Funding varies but I have seen challenges worth $7,500, $25,000 and $30,000.
Jovoto.com
Jovoto is a German crowdsourcing platform that is open to writers, innovators, branding strategists, product designers, graphic designers, or any creative mind. The platform posts various challenges that can be accessed by first registering a profile.
After registering a profile one uploads portfolio samples of their niche skills to showcase their skills. There are open challenges, but others are locked and are by invitation only. I believe the invitations depend on your portfolio’s strength.
The challenges pay depending on the level of expertise needed. I have seen challenges pay €150, €14,300 and even €37,500.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from James Karuga and writers in Earth and other communities.
To Write A Novel Or A Screenplay
As I type this, the film and TV industry in America is currently paralyzed by the 2023 Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike. The industry of A-list actors and actresses strutting the red carpet at glamorous premiers clad in bizarre clothes in the name of fashion, has been gridlocked by a bunch of obscure scribes we never even know.
By James Karuga2 years ago in Art
Britain in Talks With NATO to Boost Arctic Security
The Arctic Is No Longer a Frozen Backwater For decades, the Arctic sat quietly on the margins of global politics—remote, frozen, and largely ignored. That era is over. Britain is now in talks with NATO to strengthen Arctic security, acknowledging growing risks posed by Russia and China. In a notable shift, London’s assessment aligns closely with warnings long emphasized by Donald Trump, particularly as he continues to express strategic interest in Greenland. What once sounded like an eccentric fixation has evolved into a serious geopolitical conversation. The Arctic is rapidly becoming one of the world’s most contested regions, and Britain is positioning itself to play a larger role. Why Britain Is Paying Attention Now Although the UK is not an Arctic nation, it is an Arctic-adjacent power with significant strategic interests. British officials increasingly view the High North as critical to national and allied security. Melting ice is opening new shipping routes, exposing untapped natural resources, and making military movement easier than ever before. Britain’s talks with NATO focus on intelligence sharing, joint exercises, surveillance capabilities, and protecting undersea infrastructure such as communication cables and energy pipelines. These are not abstract concerns. Any disruption in the Arctic could have immediate consequences for European security and global trade. In short, what happens in the Arctic does not stay in the Arctic. Russia’s Expanding Arctic Footprint Russia is the dominant military power in the Arctic, and it is not slowing down. Moscow has reopened Soviet-era bases, deployed advanced missile systems, expanded its icebreaker fleet, and increased patrols across the region. The Arctic coastline represents a core part of Russia’s nuclear deterrent, making it strategically vital to the Kremlin. From NATO’s perspective, this military buildup creates both risk and uncertainty. Britain, which has long been vocal about Russian aggression—from Ukraine to cyber warfare—sees the Arctic as another front where deterrence must be strengthened before tensions spiral. The concern is not necessarily an immediate conflict, but miscalculation. In a region with harsh conditions and limited communication infrastructure, even minor incidents could escalate rapidly. China’s Quiet but Steady Arctic Ambitions While Russia’s presence is overt, China’s Arctic strategy is more subtle—and equally concerning to Western planners. Beijing calls itself a “near-Arctic state,” a label that has raised eyebrows in Europe and North America. Through investments, research stations, and partnerships, China is laying the groundwork for long-term influence. Britain shares NATO’s concern that China could use civilian projects for dual-use purposes, blending scientific research with intelligence gathering and infrastructure control. As Arctic shipping routes become commercially viable, China’s interest in controlling parts of the supply chain only grows. London’s alignment with these concerns reflects a broader shift in UK foreign policy: China is no longer viewed solely as an economic partner, but as a strategic competitor. Trump, Greenland, and Strategic Reality Donald Trump’s repeated interest in Greenland—most famously his suggestion that the United States should buy it—was widely mocked at the time. Yet behind the headlines was a strategic logic that many Western governments now openly acknowledge. Greenland sits at the heart of the Arctic, hosting vital air and naval routes between North America and Europe. It is also rich in rare earth minerals critical for modern technology and defense systems. As ice recedes, Greenland’s strategic value only increases. Britain’s current position, which aligns with Trump’s warnings about Arctic vulnerabilities, shows how quickly political perceptions can change. What once seemed unconventional now appears prescient. NATO’s Arctic Awakening NATO has traditionally focused on Eastern Europe and the North Atlantic. The Arctic, despite its importance, received less coordinated attention. That is changing. Britain’s talks with NATO reflect a broader alliance effort to integrate Arctic defense into its core strategy. This includes: Increased joint military exercises in cold-weather environments Enhanced monitoring of Russian and Chinese activity Strengthening cooperation with Arctic nations like Norway, Canada, and Denmark Protecting critical undersea and satellite infrastructure For Britain, this is also about credibility. As a leading NATO member and a key military power, the UK wants to demonstrate that it can contribute meaningfully beyond its immediate geography. Climate Change as a Security Multiplier One of the most striking aspects of Arctic security is how closely it is tied to climate change. Melting ice is not just an environmental issue—it is a strategic one. New sea lanes shorten travel between Asia and Europe, while access to oil, gas, and minerals becomes easier. This transformation increases competition and reduces natural barriers that once limited military movement. Britain’s involvement reflects recognition that climate-driven changes are reshaping the security landscape faster than traditional institutions were designed to handle. In this sense, Arctic security is a preview of future global challenges where environmental change and geopolitics collide. Domestic and Diplomatic Balancing Acts Britain’s Arctic engagement is not without challenges. Increased military involvement raises questions about defense spending, priorities, and escalation risks. Diplomatically, London must balance deterrence with dialogue, avoiding actions that could unnecessarily provoke Russia while still protecting allied interests. There is also the question of public awareness. Arctic security lacks the visibility of conflicts like Ukraine, making it harder to sustain political attention. Yet policymakers increasingly argue that prevention is cheaper—and safer—than crisis response. What This Means Going Forward Britain’s talks with NATO mark an important shift in how the Arctic is viewed: not as a distant frontier, but as a central arena in 21st-century security. Agreement with Trump-era assessments on Russia, China, and Greenland underscores how geopolitical realities can outlast political controversies. As competition intensifies, the Arctic will likely become a testing ground for cooperation, deterrence, and strategic foresight. Britain’s involvement signals that mid-sized powers are no longer content to watch from the sidelines. Final Thoughts The Arctic is warming faster than any other region on Earth—and so are the geopolitical tensions surrounding it. Britain’s move to boost Arctic security with NATO reflects a growing consensus that ignoring the High North is no longer an option. Whether driven by Russia’s militarization, China’s quiet expansion, or lessons drawn from Trump’s blunt warnings, one truth stands out: the future of global security may well be shaped at the top of the world, where ice, ambition, and power now intersect.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.