Unlocking the Hidden Potential
Investing in Water for Profit and Impact
When we think of commodity investing, our minds often wander to the flashy and controversial resources that dominate the headlines - crude oil, natural gas, gold, or wheat. These commodities have captivated investors for years, but there's one vital resource that often flies under the radar: water.
Water, covering most of the globe and constituting a significant portion of our bodies, is an invaluable asset. Yet, it remains elusive when it comes to investment opportunities. Apart from stockpiling water bottles in preparation for emergencies or delving into water futures contracts, the average investor finds limited avenues for water investment.
However, there is a hidden gem in the Canadian market that provides exposure to the water industry through a unique exchange-traded fund (ETF). Today, we explore the compelling case for water investment and take a closer look at this intriguing ETF.
Why should you consider investing in water? The answer lies in the fundamental supply-demand dynamic. As the global population continues to surge and agricultural needs rise, the demand for water intensifies. Simultaneously, climate change and pollution exert mounting pressure on our finite supply. This simple yet powerful imbalance sets the stage for water-related investments to appreciate over time.
But there's more. Water stocks, particularly those in the utility sector, offer stability during turbulent times. Unlike many other industries, water utilities display lower volatility during recessions. After all, water is an essential and inelastic commodity that remains in demand, regardless of economic conditions. Investors can thus view these stocks as a potential harbor in the storm during economic downturns.
Additionally, the dire need for global water infrastructure improvement and expansion presents a lucrative market for companies operating in this space. Such infrastructure spending acts as a shield against inflation; as prices rise, so does the value of the tangible assets these companies hold or produce. For investors, this provides a valuable layer of protection against the eroding effects of inflation.
While the case for water investment is strong, navigating this intricate landscape can be daunting. That's where water ETFs come into play.
These innovative investment vehicles offer a diversified portfolio of water stocks, mitigating company-specific risks and providing a broader exposure to the entire water supply chain. They serve as convenient, transparent, and accessible instruments for harnessing the potential of this essential resource.
One water ETF that stands out from the crowd is the iShares Global Water Index ETF (TSX:CWW). With shares trading around $50 at the time of writing, this ETF tracks the S&P Global Water Index, which comprises 50 leading global water industry companies. These companies span utilities, infrastructure, equipment, and materials sectors, creating a comprehensive and diverse investment opportunity.
Investors in CWW can enjoy a modest 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.47%, adding an attractive income stream to their portfolios. With an expense ratio of 0.66%, this ETF provides a cost-effective solution for investors seeking exposure to the water theme.
But don't just take our word for it! The Motley Fool, renowned for its expert stock picks, offers some exceptional Canadian dividend stock recommendations that pair seamlessly with a water-themed portfolio. By combining the stability of water utilities with the growth potential of carefully selected dividend stocks, investors can maximize their returns while diversifying their holdings.
Investing in water isn't merely an opportunity for financial gain. It's a chance to contribute to a greater cause. By supporting companies that are driving water infrastructure improvement and conservation efforts, investors can align their portfolios with their values and make a positive impact on the world.
As the global demand for water continues to rise, seizing the opportunity to invest in this vital resource could prove to be a game-changer. With water ETFs like iShares Global Water Index ETF (TSX:C
WW) simplifying the investment process, now is the time to dive into the deep waters of water investing. Don't miss out on the potential profits and the chance to be part of a solution that will shape the future.
Take the plunge and explore the untapped potential of water investment today.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Alex Greyson and writers in Earth and other communities.
Beyond Borders
In an era of interconnectedness and shared responsibility, addressing global environmental challenges has become more crucial than ever. The impact of climate change, deforestation, pollution, and biodiversity loss knows no boundaries. It affects every corner of our planet and demands collaborative efforts from all nations. In this article, we will explore the significance of working together beyond borders to tackle these challenges head-on. Through engaging examples and inspiring initiatives, we will discover how collective action can pave the way for a sustainable and resilient future.
By Alex Greyson 3 years ago in Earth
Europe Draws a Red Line on Greenland After a Year of Trying to Pacify Trump
For nearly a year, European leaders walked a diplomatic tightrope. They tried calm language, quiet reassurance, and strategic patience as former U.S. President Donald Trump repeatedly revived his controversial interest in Greenland. What began as provocative rhetoric gradually evolved into something Europe could no longer ignore. Now, after months of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, Europe has drawn a clear red line on Greenland — signaling that compromise has its limits when sovereignty and regional security are at stake. This shift marks more than a response to one leader’s remarks. It reflects Europe’s growing determination to defend territorial integrity, manage Arctic competition, and assert strategic autonomy in an increasingly unpredictable geopolitical environment. How Greenland Became a Flashpoint Again Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, has long held strategic importance. Rich in rare earth minerals, located along key Arctic routes, and home to critical U.S. military infrastructure, the island sits at the crossroads of security, climate change, and great-power rivalry. Donald Trump’s original proposal in 2019 to “buy” Greenland was widely mocked in Europe. But as his political influence resurged, so did concerns that his renewed interest was not just symbolic. Over the past year, Trump’s rhetoric — framed around U.S. security, resource access, and countering China and Russia in the Arctic — became more persistent. European capitals initially chose restraint. Officials hoped that de-escalation, quiet diplomacy, and alliance solidarity would prevent the issue from spiraling into a transatlantic rift. A Year of European Pacification For much of the past year, Europe adopted a strategy of pacification rather than confrontation. Denmark emphasized its close defense cooperation with Washington. EU leaders reiterated NATO unity and the importance of Arctic stability. Diplomats avoided public criticism, choosing private channels instead. The goal was clear: prevent Trump’s Greenland narrative from becoming official U.S. policy while preserving transatlantic relations. However, this approach had limits. As Trump’s language grew sharper — hinting at leverage, pressure, or “strategic necessity” — European patience began to erode. What once sounded like political theater increasingly resembled a challenge to European sovereignty norms. Why Europe Finally Drew the Line Europe’s tougher stance did not emerge overnight. It was driven by several converging realities. 1. Sovereignty Is Non-Negotiable At the heart of Europe’s response is a firm principle: territorial sovereignty cannot be bargained away. Greenland is not a commodity, and its future cannot be dictated by external powers — regardless of alliance ties. European leaders made it clear that any attempt to apply pressure on Denmark or Greenland would cross a red line, undermining international law and democratic self-determination. 2. Arctic Competition Is Intensifying The Arctic is no longer a frozen backwater. Melting ice has opened new shipping routes and intensified competition over resources. Russia has militarized large parts of its Arctic territory, while China has declared itself a “near-Arctic state.” Against this backdrop, Europe fears that normalizing aggressive rhetoric over Greenland could set a dangerous precedent, encouraging other powers to challenge borders under the guise of security or economic necessity. 3. Europe’s Strategic Confidence Has Grown Compared to 2019, Europe today is less willing to absorb geopolitical shocks quietly. The war in Ukraine accelerated Europe’s defense integration and sharpened its sense of strategic responsibility. Standing firm on Greenland is part of a broader shift: Europe is signaling that being a U.S. ally does not mean surrendering political agency. Greenland’s Own Voice Matters One crucial difference between past debates and today is the prominence of Greenlandic leaders themselves. Officials in Nuuk have repeatedly emphasized that Greenland’s future will be decided by its people, not by foreign capitals. Calls for respect, partnership, and economic development — rather than transactional geopolitics — have resonated strongly in Europe. By drawing a red line, European leaders are also amplifying Greenland’s right to self-determination, reinforcing the idea that Arctic communities are stakeholders, not strategic prizes. What This Means for Transatlantic Relations Europe’s firmer stance does not signal a break with the United States. NATO cooperation in the Arctic remains strong, and U.S. military presence in Greenland continues with Danish consent. However, the message is unmistakable: allies must respect boundaries. European officials are increasingly willing to publicly disagree with Washington when core principles are threatened. This reflects a maturing alliance — one where unity does not require silence. In the long run, this clarity may actually strengthen transatlantic relations, reducing ambiguity and preventing future misunderstandings. A Signal Beyond Greenland Europe’s red line on Greenland sends a message far beyond the Arctic. It signals to Russia and China that Europe will defend its territorial order, even under pressure from powerful actors. It reassures smaller states that sovereignty remains a foundational norm. And it underscores that Europe is learning to balance diplomacy with firmness in an era of great-power competition. Conclusion: From Pacification to Principle After a year of cautious diplomacy, Europe has chosen principle over placation. The red line drawn around Greenland is not an act of hostility — it is an assertion of values. In a world where power politics are returning, Europe is making one thing clear: sovereignty is not negotiable, alliances are not blank checks, and Arctic stability requires respect — not rhetoric. Greenland may be vast and sparsely populated, but the message Europe is sending from its icy shores is unmistakably global.
By Muhammad Hassan6 days ago in Earth
Stanislav Kondrashov on the Quiet Power Driving the Energy Transition: Electrification
In the global conversation about the future of energy, it's often the loudest innovations that capture attention—new technologies, sweeping policy changes, and major infrastructure projects. Yet beneath the surface, a quieter revolution is taking place. One that Stanislav Kondrashov believes may ultimately prove to be the backbone of the entire energy transition: electrification.
By Stanislav Kondrashov6 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.