This undersea creature has a far greater IQ than humans, so why didn't it get to the top of the food chain?
This undersea creature has far more intelligence than humans
This undersea creature has a far greater IQ than humans, so why didn't it get to the top of the food chain?
There are countless biological bottles on the earth, some of which have been understood by human beings, and some human beings may have never seen. No matter what kind of animals appear, in our hearts, human beings are the ones with the highest IQ, and we are the masters of the earth. .
But recently, some scientists discovered that there is another kind of creature on the earth. They are much more powerful than humans, regardless of their IQ or body. What is the reason why such creatures finally lost to humans and failed to become the overlord of the earth.
This creature not only has three hearts, but also has more than 500 million neurons all over its body, and its IQ is also quite high. This legendary animal is the octopus.
Octopus exists as food in the human world. It has 8 claws that look full of flesh. Whether it is eaten dried or fried, the taste is very good. Who would have thought that the intelligence quotient of this underwater creature has been far away. far beyond people's imagination.
Next, let us see what is so special about this animal. There are many different species of this mollusk on the ocean floor, and only a small number are currently used as food.
A large part of the remaining groups have lived in the deep sea for many years. Humans have no chance to see them. They have high requirements for the living environment. If the temperature and ecology are not suitable, they will die.
The octopuses we usually see in our daily life are very small. There are giant octopuses on the seabed. These octopuses even look similar to monsters. They usually walk back and forth on the seabed with 8 legs and dare to eat any powerful opponent they encounter. Go down, but Zhang Yu is also quite pitiful.
In this world, many human beings are their biggest opponents, and if they are not careful, they may be caught and eaten.
Many scientific researches are carried out with octopuses, because their movements are quite dexterous, they can flexibly open bottle caps, solve various scientific problems, and even drill into some small spaces.
Therefore, people have some doubts. If such a powerful octopus continues to develop, it gradually has more wisdom than human beings on the seabed, and finally it is possible to rule the entire world and become the overlord of the earth.
The real reason for all of this lies in the level of intelligence of this undersea creature. After many studies, scientists have found that their IQ has a lot in common with humans, and even think that these creatures do not exist on earth. They are from aliens.
They not only have three hearts, but also more than 500 million neurons. They are quite sensitive to the surrounding environment and have strong learning ability. They can master it immediately after a little teaching.
Because octopuses are soft-bodied, they are likely to be made into meat sauce if they are not protected during the movement, so many octopuses will put other creatures' shells or coconuts on their heads.
Moving slowly on the coast in this way can not only prevent the enemy from being suddenly attacked, but also ensure that it will not be harmed by the outside world. This kind of IQ is infinitely close to that of humans, and other fish can't take it into account at all. Others have found that octopuses can survive even after their legs have been chopped off.
The nerves in the leg can even ensure that the broken leg will live longer. Unfortunately, the lifespan of octopuses is too short, and this alone makes them only available as food, not as hosts.
About the Creator
suzanne darlene
Take you to understand scientific knowledge
Keep reading
More stories from suzanne darlene and writers in Earth and other communities.
The Starlink project wants to allow humans to use WiFi in space, but astronomical observations are disturbed. Can it be done?
Have you ever been in the wild and encountered the dilemma that your mobile phone traffic is not enough, and there is no WiFi around? It is really called the sky, the sky should not be, it is called the earth, the earth is not working! If only we could easily connect to WiFi wherever we are. In fact, someone in the world is already implementing this grand plan. He is the star of the technology industry, known as the Elon Musk of Silicon Valley's Iron Man.
By suzanne darlene3 years ago in Earth
Britain in Talks With NATO to Boost Arctic Security
The Arctic Is No Longer a Frozen Backwater For decades, the Arctic sat quietly on the margins of global politics—remote, frozen, and largely ignored. That era is over. Britain is now in talks with NATO to strengthen Arctic security, acknowledging growing risks posed by Russia and China. In a notable shift, London’s assessment aligns closely with warnings long emphasized by Donald Trump, particularly as he continues to express strategic interest in Greenland. What once sounded like an eccentric fixation has evolved into a serious geopolitical conversation. The Arctic is rapidly becoming one of the world’s most contested regions, and Britain is positioning itself to play a larger role. Why Britain Is Paying Attention Now Although the UK is not an Arctic nation, it is an Arctic-adjacent power with significant strategic interests. British officials increasingly view the High North as critical to national and allied security. Melting ice is opening new shipping routes, exposing untapped natural resources, and making military movement easier than ever before. Britain’s talks with NATO focus on intelligence sharing, joint exercises, surveillance capabilities, and protecting undersea infrastructure such as communication cables and energy pipelines. These are not abstract concerns. Any disruption in the Arctic could have immediate consequences for European security and global trade. In short, what happens in the Arctic does not stay in the Arctic. Russia’s Expanding Arctic Footprint Russia is the dominant military power in the Arctic, and it is not slowing down. Moscow has reopened Soviet-era bases, deployed advanced missile systems, expanded its icebreaker fleet, and increased patrols across the region. The Arctic coastline represents a core part of Russia’s nuclear deterrent, making it strategically vital to the Kremlin. From NATO’s perspective, this military buildup creates both risk and uncertainty. Britain, which has long been vocal about Russian aggression—from Ukraine to cyber warfare—sees the Arctic as another front where deterrence must be strengthened before tensions spiral. The concern is not necessarily an immediate conflict, but miscalculation. In a region with harsh conditions and limited communication infrastructure, even minor incidents could escalate rapidly. China’s Quiet but Steady Arctic Ambitions While Russia’s presence is overt, China’s Arctic strategy is more subtle—and equally concerning to Western planners. Beijing calls itself a “near-Arctic state,” a label that has raised eyebrows in Europe and North America. Through investments, research stations, and partnerships, China is laying the groundwork for long-term influence. Britain shares NATO’s concern that China could use civilian projects for dual-use purposes, blending scientific research with intelligence gathering and infrastructure control. As Arctic shipping routes become commercially viable, China’s interest in controlling parts of the supply chain only grows. London’s alignment with these concerns reflects a broader shift in UK foreign policy: China is no longer viewed solely as an economic partner, but as a strategic competitor. Trump, Greenland, and Strategic Reality Donald Trump’s repeated interest in Greenland—most famously his suggestion that the United States should buy it—was widely mocked at the time. Yet behind the headlines was a strategic logic that many Western governments now openly acknowledge. Greenland sits at the heart of the Arctic, hosting vital air and naval routes between North America and Europe. It is also rich in rare earth minerals critical for modern technology and defense systems. As ice recedes, Greenland’s strategic value only increases. Britain’s current position, which aligns with Trump’s warnings about Arctic vulnerabilities, shows how quickly political perceptions can change. What once seemed unconventional now appears prescient. NATO’s Arctic Awakening NATO has traditionally focused on Eastern Europe and the North Atlantic. The Arctic, despite its importance, received less coordinated attention. That is changing. Britain’s talks with NATO reflect a broader alliance effort to integrate Arctic defense into its core strategy. This includes: Increased joint military exercises in cold-weather environments Enhanced monitoring of Russian and Chinese activity Strengthening cooperation with Arctic nations like Norway, Canada, and Denmark Protecting critical undersea and satellite infrastructure For Britain, this is also about credibility. As a leading NATO member and a key military power, the UK wants to demonstrate that it can contribute meaningfully beyond its immediate geography. Climate Change as a Security Multiplier One of the most striking aspects of Arctic security is how closely it is tied to climate change. Melting ice is not just an environmental issue—it is a strategic one. New sea lanes shorten travel between Asia and Europe, while access to oil, gas, and minerals becomes easier. This transformation increases competition and reduces natural barriers that once limited military movement. Britain’s involvement reflects recognition that climate-driven changes are reshaping the security landscape faster than traditional institutions were designed to handle. In this sense, Arctic security is a preview of future global challenges where environmental change and geopolitics collide. Domestic and Diplomatic Balancing Acts Britain’s Arctic engagement is not without challenges. Increased military involvement raises questions about defense spending, priorities, and escalation risks. Diplomatically, London must balance deterrence with dialogue, avoiding actions that could unnecessarily provoke Russia while still protecting allied interests. There is also the question of public awareness. Arctic security lacks the visibility of conflicts like Ukraine, making it harder to sustain political attention. Yet policymakers increasingly argue that prevention is cheaper—and safer—than crisis response. What This Means Going Forward Britain’s talks with NATO mark an important shift in how the Arctic is viewed: not as a distant frontier, but as a central arena in 21st-century security. Agreement with Trump-era assessments on Russia, China, and Greenland underscores how geopolitical realities can outlast political controversies. As competition intensifies, the Arctic will likely become a testing ground for cooperation, deterrence, and strategic foresight. Britain’s involvement signals that mid-sized powers are no longer content to watch from the sidelines. Final Thoughts The Arctic is warming faster than any other region on Earth—and so are the geopolitical tensions surrounding it. Britain’s move to boost Arctic security with NATO reflects a growing consensus that ignoring the High North is no longer an option. Whether driven by Russia’s militarization, China’s quiet expansion, or lessons drawn from Trump’s blunt warnings, one truth stands out: the future of global security may well be shaped at the top of the world, where ice, ambition, and power now intersect.
By Muhammad Hassan8 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.