The Fascinating World of Fractals
Why Nature Love Repeating Patterns
Hey, smart people, Joe here!
Ever noticed how the branches of a tree can look remarkably like the whole tree? And why do the roots of a tree often resemble the branches? It’s almost as if there’s a hidden design that links various elements of nature in an uncanny way. But it doesn’t stop at trees. Look at our veins, lightning bolts, rivers, or even broccoli, and you’ll start to see a similar branching pattern everywhere. This phenomenon isn’t just a quirky coincidence; it’s a deep, underlying pattern in nature known as fractals.
What Are Fractals?
So, what’s the deal with fractals? At its core, a fractal is a geometric shape that looks the same at any scale. In other words, if you zoom in or out on a fractal, you’ll keep seeing a similar pattern repeat itself, whether you’re looking at the whole shape or just a part of it. This idea of self-similarity is a hallmark of fractals.
Mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot, who coined the term "fractal," discovered that these shapes exist in a fascinating middle ground between dimensions. For instance, a perfect fractal shape can be infinitely detailed, which means you could zoom in forever and keep finding new, similar patterns. Mandelbrot found this concept incredibly compelling because it revealed an unexpected way to understand complex, repeating patterns in nature.
Dimensions and Fractals
When most people think about dimensions, they imagine the three spatial dimensions we live in, or maybe even the two dimensions of a piece of paper. But Mandelbrot’s idea of dimension relates to how shapes fill space as they scale up or down. For simple shapes like lines, squares, and cubes, this idea matches our usual concept of dimensions:
A line scales up linearly, so doubling its length doubles its size.
A square scales up in two directions, so doubling its length and width quadruples its area.
A cube scales up in three dimensions, so doubling its size in all directions increases its volume by eight times.
Fractals, however, are different. When you scale up a fractal, you don’t just see more of the same; you see a complex pattern that doesn’t fit neatly into our usual dimensions. For example, a fractal might scale up by a factor of 2 but only increase in complexity by 1.585 dimensions. This makes fractals both intriguing and elusive, as they don’t fit perfectly into our traditional notions of dimensionality.
Fractals in Nature
The beauty of fractals lies in their presence across various aspects of nature. Trees, for instance, exhibit fractal-like branching, which is an efficient way to maximize surface area for sunlight absorption. Trees don’t just grow larger; their branches replicate the same structure at different scales, making them incredibly efficient in capturing light and carbon dioxide.
Similarly, the roots of a tree exhibit fractal patterns. They branch out to maximize surface area for nutrient and water absorption, which helps the tree thrive without expending excessive energy on growing a massive, bulky root system.
But fractals aren’t limited to plants. Our own bodies are full of fractal patterns. For example, our lungs use fractal branching to maximize surface area for oxygen absorption while staying compact inside our chest. Our circulatory system is another example, with its vast network of blood vessels efficiently distributing oxygen and nutrients throughout the body using fractal patterns.
Fractals Beyond Living Systems
Fractals extend beyond the realm of the living. Rivers, for instance, branch out in a fractal manner to efficiently drain water from landscapes and distribute sediment. Lightning bolts and cracks in surfaces like ceilings also exhibit fractal-like branching as they dissipate energy in the most efficient way possible.
The Universal Appeal of Fractals
While fractals are fascinating and appear in various natural and non-natural phenomena, there isn’t a single underlying rule or gene responsible for their presence. Instead, as different systems evolved to solve specific challenges, they independently arrived at similar fractal solutions. This remarkable convergence demonstrates how efficient design can lead to the same outcome across different contexts.
Conclusion
Fractals offer a unique lens through which we can explore and understand the world around us. They reveal a hidden order in seemingly chaotic patterns and provide insight into how efficiency and complexity can coexist. Whether in the branching of a tree, the structure of our lungs, or the course of a river, fractals help us appreciate the elegant solutions nature has developed over time.
Stay curious and keep exploring the infinite patterns that shape our world!
Hey everyone, just a quick announcement! If you’re as fascinated by these patterns as I am, you might enjoy my other show, “Overview,” which delves into stories from a fresh perspective. Check it out on the PBS Terra channel. And if you’re interested in supporting our work and getting exclusive content, consider joining our community on Patreon
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Mercia Wippenaar Davids and writers in Earth and other communities.
The Formation of the Atlantic Ocean:
At the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean lies a geological marvel: the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. This immense chain of volcanoes stretches almost the entire north-south length of our planet and forms the longest mountain range in the world. While the eruptions from these volcanoes are usually benign today, they were once responsible for monumental changes that reshaped our world. The story of how these eruptions gave birth to the Atlantic Ocean, and the profound impacts they had on life on Earth, is a fascinating chapter in our planet's history.
By Mercia Wippenaar Davidsabout a year ago in Earth
Water Scarcity Crisis in a Mountainous Region
The mountains had once been generous. Old villagers used to say that streams sang through the valleys and the soil never cracked under the sun. But seasons changed, and so did the land. Now the mountains stood quiet and dry, their rocky faces watching over a village that struggled to survive.
By Bilal Mohammadi6 days ago in Earth
“Greenland Belongs to Its People”: European Leaders Unite Over Trump’s Threats to Annex Territory
When former U.S. President Donald Trump once again floated the idea of the United States taking control of Greenland, the reaction from Europe was swift, unified, and unmistakably firm. European leaders rallied around a simple but powerful message: Greenland belongs to its people. What might sound like a provocative comment or political theater has instead evolved into a serious international debate about sovereignty, international law, and the future of Arctic geopolitics. This moment has revealed not only Europe’s commitment to defending territorial integrity but also the growing strategic importance of Greenland in a rapidly changing world. A Familiar Idea That Refuses to Disappear Trump’s interest in Greenland is not new. In 2019, he publicly suggested that the United States could purchase the island from Denmark, a proposal that was widely ridiculed and swiftly rejected. Yet years later, similar rhetoric has resurfaced, with Trump arguing that U.S. control of Greenland is essential for national and global security. This renewed discussion came at a sensitive time, amid rising global tensions and growing competition in the Arctic. While Trump has framed the issue as a strategic necessity, European leaders interpreted his remarks as a troubling challenge to long-standing principles of sovereignty and self-determination. Europe’s United Front: An Uncommon Consensus One of the most striking aspects of this episode has been Europe’s collective response. Leaders from major European nations — including France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Poland, the United Kingdom, and Denmark — publicly closed ranks to support Greenland’s autonomy. Their message was unambiguous: borders cannot be changed by pressure, threats, or unilateral ambition. The joint stance emphasized that Greenland’s future is a matter for Greenland and Denmark alone, not external powers. This rare display of unity reflects broader European concerns about preserving the rules-based international order at a time when it feels increasingly fragile. For many European governments, allowing even the suggestion of territorial acquisition to go unchallenged would set a dangerous precedent. Denmark’s Position: Firm, Calm, and Clear Denmark, which governs Greenland as an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, responded with particular clarity. Danish officials reiterated that Greenland is not for sale and never has been. Denmark’s leadership stressed that Greenland already enjoys extensive self-governance and that any future decisions — including full independence — belong to the Greenlandic people. From Copenhagen’s perspective, the U.S. already benefits from strategic cooperation in the region through NATO and existing defense agreements, making the idea of annexation both unnecessary and inappropriate. The Most Important Voice: Greenland Itself While global powers debated Greenland’s strategic value, Greenlandic leaders were quick to assert their own agency. Greenland’s government firmly rejected Trump’s remarks, describing them as unacceptable and dismissive of the island’s democratic rights. Greenland’s population, numbering just under 60,000, has long navigated the complexities of autonomy, identity, and post-colonial history. Although there is internal debate about eventual independence from Denmark, there is little appetite for becoming part of another foreign power. For Greenlanders, the issue is not just about geopolitics — it is about dignity, self-determination, and respect. Why Greenland Matters More Than Ever Greenland’s rising prominence on the world stage is not accidental. As climate change accelerates Arctic ice melt, the region is becoming more accessible and economically attractive. Greenland is believed to hold vast reserves of rare earth minerals, oil, and gas — resources critical for modern technology and the global energy transition. Strategically, Greenland occupies a vital position between North America and Europe. It plays a key role in missile defense systems, Arctic surveillance, and emerging shipping routes. As competition intensifies between the United States, Russia, and China in the Arctic, Greenland has become a focal point of strategic calculations. Yet European leaders argue that strategic value does not override international norms. In their view, security cooperation must be based on partnership, not ownership. A Test for NATO and Western Alliances Trump’s comments have also sparked uncomfortable conversations within NATO. Denmark and the United States are long-standing allies, and Greenland already hosts important U.S. military facilities. The idea that one NATO member could publicly entertain annexing territory associated with another ally has raised questions about trust and cohesion within the alliance. For Europe, defending Denmark and Greenland is not only about geography — it is about ensuring that alliances are built on respect rather than coercion. What This Moment Really Represents At its core, the Greenland controversy is about more than one island. It reflects the broader struggle between power politics and principles. Europe’s response signals that, despite internal differences, it remains committed to defending sovereignty, democratic choice, and international law. In a world increasingly shaped by competition over resources and strategic positions, this episode serves as a reminder that smaller nations and territories cannot be treated as bargaining chips. Final Thoughts By standing firm and declaring that “Greenland belongs to its people,” European leaders have sent a message that resonates far beyond the Arctic. It is a statement about values, about history, and about the kind of global order Europe wants to defend. As geopolitical tensions continue to rise, the Greenland debate may prove to be a defining moment — one that shows whether the principles of sovereignty and self-determination still hold weight in an era of strategic rivalry. For now, Europe’s answer is clear: Greenland’s future will be decided in Greenland, not Washington.
By Muhammad Hassan6 days ago in Earth
A Failed Artist, A Disillusioned Poet, An Underpaid Game Show Host
I took my son and niece to Gori, a small town in Georgia where Joseph Stalin was born. They talked me into visiting the Stalin's Museum, the largest in the post-Soviet space. I had resisted going there because I just can't stand the monster and know enough about him, or so I thought.
By Lana V Lynx6 days ago in FYI
Comments (1)
Excellent piece