Saint Kitts and Nevis vs USA
USA vs Saint Kitts 6-0 Hіghlіghts & All Goals CONCACAF Gold Cup 2023 HD - Ferriera Hat trick today
Foreign in this country and it plays host tonight in the Gold Cup to the game between the United States of America and Saint Kitts and Nevis the 100th opponents for the United States and kids and Nevis this is how they line up Giuliani Archibald will be in goal played five games for them in World Cup qualifying starting goalkeeper number three Gerald Williams in the back partnership with Andre Burley Jamil IBO gets the start at left back he scored an on goal unfortunately in their first match against Trinidad and Tobago Tobago which saw them lose 3-0 up front Keith Roy Freeman that's the danger man he's gonna look to run in behind he was their top scorer in World Cup qualifying four goals in six games six goals in 14 caps that's the man the United States have to look for when Saint Kitts and Nevis try to break well who's going to be stopping them in the Nets in his fifth Gold Cup number 18. Shawn Johnson of Toronto FC what a milestone that is for him BJ Callahan saying look the guy has been with us through everything he deserves this opportunity once again you're gonna have Brian Reynolds on that right hand side Matt miasco getting to start again alongside Jalen Neal who came on at halftime of the first match against Jamaica James Sands playing his Alone six in the Midfield in front of him that means you're going to see a change in shape Georgia mihilovich and John Luca boozio are looking to join the attack and really for that front three you're gonna have a deep block from Saint Kitts and Nevis trying to defend how can they be dynamic how can they combine been a big opportunity for Cade Cowell who gets the start on that left-hand side after impressing in 35 minutes the other night one of the advantages of waiting until nine o'clock local time to kick a game off is the conditions it's going from the 90s to the 80s the air quality index has gone from unhealthy to moderate as the wind has come in and a wonderful crowd here at city park and that's going to drop deeper and deeper but they're trying to keep somewhat of a higher line here as the Cal is not going to be able to get to that one so as I said look the challenge for the United States is when you have the ball don't just settle into a comfortable making the easy passes and making it easy Powell has it now how will the return joke isn't quite ready for it and that's going to be whistled as a foul there Juan Calderon of Costa Rica one backs in day off side steps one cut off by the second tangle of legs with Birch blocked how about Ken Cowell now a lot of traffic that was blocked they're shouting for a handball Selvin Brown of Honduras is the video assistant referee that's nice work first of all from Sans and just some of the composure in the build up even Jesus Ferreira trying to lay it off for the strike from mahilovich looking for an angle but how about the last ditch defending and sure it bounces up and it hits his arm there but that's not a hail ball in the Box hits his legs on the underside first and then you get the contact there so two great challenges from Saint Kitts and Nevis in the Box the first one stopping the strike from the high level it's where it looked like maybe a little head faint trying to come back on the left foot and block it away and you're gonna need a lot more of that to keep some out tonight but Lucio is going to get there from Reynolds cuts it back there he's into the top corner and the U.S breaks through inside 12 minutes well this is all about the running off the ball from John Lou gabrizio you have a deep-line midfielder that recognizes the space now just watch this and kitchen Nevis to squeeze a little bit when Zendejas drops all the way through and outside bouncing balls Reynolds his first ever for the United States it's an absolute Beauty that's right Brian Reynolds the Gold Cup is about seizing opportunities in the 10th row Ferrera gonna get on the end of it from an angles three here we go all right well Soccer City USA is getting a show tonight oops and the U.S are taking advantage Lucio wants a piece of the action it's over the bar take kids to me was all of them had a team huddle we were looking at the replays there after that third goal I mean they're searching for any sort of an answer right now yeah what you want to do is just need to slow the game down for a minute and everybody forward here it gets clipped up the top of the box here after miasca hooked it into a bad area given an opportunity Sean Johnson happened to see that one flying over into the box Ferrara save by RJ just got out another fingertip on that one well you can see some of what Alexi Wallace helovich a little will cross this one in Sans was thinking about it Clarence Sands for Cowell Cowell driving and uses his strength and that's a third early save from July Archibald to win on the passer from Sans is so good that means that kid you saw it that's it is foreign when the U.S drought ends after nine minutes foreign thinking about it curled shot through traffic comes down from Malik Roberts kind of settles across but it's gonna work a little into the middle nuzio was there to clear it out wide they can play those balls quickly over the top to find some of the direct running you're gonna see gaps opening up like that one remember Stewart on goal or steered into the path of Jesus Ferreira for his actress it's a perfect example you get now just look at Maynard the center back and stepping off him to deny him his hat triggers part of these U.S teams since foreign
About the Creator
Inside Trump's $11 Billion Health Plan to Replace “Neo-Colonial” USAID
In the landscape of global health aid, few proposals have stirred as much debate as former President Donald Trump’s ambitious plan to restructure American assistance abroad. Dubbed an $11 billion health initiative aimed at replacing USAID’s current framework, the plan seeks to pivot away from what Trump and his allies have criticized as the “neo-colonial” approach of U.S. foreign aid. While the plan promises greater efficiency and impact, experts are split on whether it is a practical solution or a politically driven gamble. Trump’s Critique of USAID The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a central pillar of American foreign assistance, distributing billions in aid annually to address health crises, food insecurity, and development challenges worldwide. However, Trump’s administration and its supporters have often described USAID’s approach as bureaucratic, inefficient, and reflective of a “neo-colonial” mindset. In public statements, Trump argued that the U.S. was spending taxpayer dollars on programs that benefited foreign governments or contractors more than the intended local communities. Critics of the plan say that while USAID has flaws—as any large bureaucracy does—its extensive networks and decades of experience provide an unmatched capacity to deliver aid efficiently and safely. The Core of the $11 Billion Proposal At the heart of Trump’s proposal is an $11 billion fund designed to consolidate, modernize, and streamline U.S. health aid. Unlike the traditional USAID model, which relies heavily on long-term partnerships with governments and NGOs, the new plan emphasizes: Direct Impact Funding: Allocating resources to frontline health workers and local initiatives rather than intermediaries. Data-Driven Investments: Using real-time health data to target outbreaks and crises more efficiently. Private Sector Partnerships: Leveraging U.S. pharmaceutical companies, tech firms, and healthcare startups to deliver vaccines, treatments, and medical infrastructure. Shorter Program Cycles: Moving away from multi-year funding commitments in favor of more flexible, results-oriented programs. Proponents argue that this approach could reduce bureaucratic overhead and ensure U.S. aid reaches communities faster. By “cutting out the middlemen,” Trump supporters claim, America can avoid the pitfalls of slow-moving aid programs that sometimes fail to adapt to crises. Reactions from the Global Health Community Global health experts, however, have expressed concern about both the logistics and philosophy of the plan. Dr. Melissa Ortega, a senior researcher at the Global Health Policy Institute, explained, “The idea of bypassing established structures like USAID may sound appealing on paper, but in practice, it risks undermining decades of institutional knowledge. Health systems are complex, and short-term projects cannot replace long-term capacity building.” Some critics have also questioned the characterization of USAID as “neo-colonial.” While U.S. foreign aid has historically been tied to geopolitical interests, many programs today are designed collaboratively with recipient countries and local organizations. Reducing oversight could unintentionally increase the risk of misuse, corruption, or health inequities. On the other hand, supporters of Trump’s plan point to examples of inefficiency in USAID programs, citing cases where aid was delayed or mismanaged. By introducing more direct funding models, they argue, U.S. taxpayer dollars could achieve a higher “return on health outcomes.” Political Implications Trump’s health aid overhaul proposal is not just about international development—it is also deeply political. Framing USAID as a “neo-colonial” institution resonates with a populist narrative that America should prioritize its own citizens and assert greater control over how taxpayer money is spent abroad. Domestically, the $11 billion plan faces scrutiny from Congress. Lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether dismantling USAID’s systems could destabilize ongoing health programs in countries where the U.S. has long-term commitments. The potential impact on global health security—including the fight against pandemics like COVID-19—adds another layer of concern. Internationally, U.S. allies and partner nations are watching closely. Sudden shifts in aid delivery could disrupt health programs in low- and middle-income countries, many of which rely on predictable funding cycles to maintain vaccination campaigns, maternal health services, and disease surveillance. Possible Benefits and Risks If executed carefully, the Trump-backed model could bring several benefits: Faster Response Times: Direct funding could accelerate delivery of vaccines, treatments, and emergency support. Innovation Boost: By partnering with private sector companies, the plan could accelerate development of new health technologies. Accountability: With performance-based metrics, the plan may better measure the impact of U.S. aid. However, the risks are equally significant: Disruption of Existing Programs: Abrupt changes could destabilize ongoing health projects. Loss of Expertise: USAID’s decades of experience in navigating local governance, supply chains, and community engagement may be hard to replace. Geopolitical Fallout: Allies accustomed to collaborating with USAID might see the move as destabilizing, reducing cooperation on global health initiatives. Looking Ahead As Trump and his allies continue to advocate for this $11 billion overhaul, the debate over the future of U.S. health aid is intensifying. Proponents view it as a necessary modernization of an outdated system, while critics fear it could undercut decades of carefully built infrastructure and global partnerships. Ultimately, the success of this plan will hinge on its ability to balance efficiency with stability, innovation with oversight, and political objectives with humanitarian needs. For now, the proposal remains controversial, representing a dramatic departure from traditional approaches to U.S. foreign aid. Whether it will reshape global health for the better—or simply create more uncertainty—remains to be seen. In the end, the Trump health plan is as much about ideology as it is about dollars. It challenges the conventional wisdom of international development and asks whether a more streamlined, results-focused approach can truly replace a system built over decades. As the world watches, the stakes could not be higher: the future of U.S. global health aid—and the lives it touches—hangs in the balance.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in Earth
Nitrogen is necessary for young tropical rain forests to combat climate change.
By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in wood, tropical rainforests contribute to the slowing of climate change. Forests that develop quickly are even more important because they absorb carbon more quickly.
By Francis Dami2 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.