Plastics in Electronics
Smart Material Choices for Performance and Sustainability
Plastics are everywhere in electronics, from smartphone casings to circuit board insulation. But choosing the right polymer is about much more than just convenience. It requires a careful balance between performance, safety, cost, and environmental responsibility. The Enviropass article, “Plastics in Electronics: A Guide for Engineers,” explores how different plastics shape the design and sustainability of electronic products.
Understanding the Most Common Plastics
Different plastics serve different functions in electronics. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is widely used in enclosures for its strength and moldability. Polycarbonate (PC) offers excellent impact resistance and transparency, making it ideal for covers and displays. Blends like PC+ABS combine the advantages of both materials, making them a go-to for designers needing both strength and flexibility.
High-performance plastics like PEEK (polyetheretherketone) are used in demanding environments, such as aerospace systems, due to their resistance to heat and chemicals. PVC (polyvinyl chloride) remains common in cable insulation and connectors thanks to its durability and flame resistance, although it raises concerns regarding toxic emissions during disposal.
Safety and Environmental Concerns
Material selection impacts product safety, user health, and environmental compliance. Some plastics, like PC, may contain bisphenol A (BPA), a substance under scrutiny due to its endocrine-disrupting properties. Similarly, styrene, found in ABS and PS (polystyrene), is regulated due to its health hazards when inhaled as a vapor at high temperatures.
Flame retardants used in plastic components can also pose risks. While halogenated compounds are effective and widely used, they are increasingly restricted by regulations such as RoHS and REACH due to their environmental persistence and toxicity.
At the product’s end of life, plastics like PVC can release harmful substances if incinerated improperly. Therefore, recycling and safe disposal practices are critical considerations in material selection.
The Role of Engineering Tools
Engineers now rely on advanced tools to guide their plastic choices. Multi-criteria decision-making methods allow for evaluating materials based on factors like thermal resistance, impact strength, weight, cost, and environmental impact. Finite element analysis (FEA) helps predict material behavior under stress, improving product reliability and reducing the need for physical prototyping.
Material selection has also evolved to include sustainability as a key factor. Bioplastics such as PLA (polylactic acid) and PHAs (polyhydroxyalkanoates) offer biodegradable alternatives for specific applications. Recycled plastics and nanocomposites are also gaining traction, although they present technical and cost challenges.
Compliance and Design Strategy
Material choice directly affects compliance with global regulations. Designers must ensure their selections meet the requirements of RoHS, REACH, and Proposition 65. This includes staying updated on restricted substances, understanding supplier documentation, and ensuring transparency across the supply chain.
Incorporating sustainability from the design phase can also support circular economy goals. Choosing recyclable or low-impact materials contributes to a product’s environmental profile and can help companies align with ESG goals and emerging customer expectations.
Final Thoughts
The world of plastics in electronics is complex. It requires technical knowledge, regulatory awareness, and an increasing emphasis on sustainability. Whether designing consumer gadgets or industrial systems, engineers must weigh multiple factors to select the right materials. Fortunately, with the right tools and knowledge, it’s possible to create high-performing, compliant, and environmentally responsible electronic products.
For those navigating these decisions, the Enviropass guide offers a valuable starting point. As regulations evolve and demand for greener electronics grows, informed material selection will remain a cornerstone of responsible product design.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Mahgol Nikpayam and writers in Earth and other communities.
Hazardous Products Are Everywhere
Most companies don’t intend to sell hazardous products. They design something useful, source parts from reputable suppliers, and assume that if the product looks fine and works, it’s “safe.” But chemical compliance doesn’t work like that. A product can be perfectly functional and still be considered “hazardous” in a regulatory sense—because it contains restricted substances above legal limits, triggers consumer exposure risks without required warnings, or lacks the documentation needed to prove compliance during an inspection.
By Mahgol Nikpayam13 days ago in Earth
Britain in Talks With NATO to Boost Arctic Security
The Arctic Is No Longer a Frozen Backwater For decades, the Arctic sat quietly on the margins of global politics—remote, frozen, and largely ignored. That era is over. Britain is now in talks with NATO to strengthen Arctic security, acknowledging growing risks posed by Russia and China. In a notable shift, London’s assessment aligns closely with warnings long emphasized by Donald Trump, particularly as he continues to express strategic interest in Greenland. What once sounded like an eccentric fixation has evolved into a serious geopolitical conversation. The Arctic is rapidly becoming one of the world’s most contested regions, and Britain is positioning itself to play a larger role. Why Britain Is Paying Attention Now Although the UK is not an Arctic nation, it is an Arctic-adjacent power with significant strategic interests. British officials increasingly view the High North as critical to national and allied security. Melting ice is opening new shipping routes, exposing untapped natural resources, and making military movement easier than ever before. Britain’s talks with NATO focus on intelligence sharing, joint exercises, surveillance capabilities, and protecting undersea infrastructure such as communication cables and energy pipelines. These are not abstract concerns. Any disruption in the Arctic could have immediate consequences for European security and global trade. In short, what happens in the Arctic does not stay in the Arctic. Russia’s Expanding Arctic Footprint Russia is the dominant military power in the Arctic, and it is not slowing down. Moscow has reopened Soviet-era bases, deployed advanced missile systems, expanded its icebreaker fleet, and increased patrols across the region. The Arctic coastline represents a core part of Russia’s nuclear deterrent, making it strategically vital to the Kremlin. From NATO’s perspective, this military buildup creates both risk and uncertainty. Britain, which has long been vocal about Russian aggression—from Ukraine to cyber warfare—sees the Arctic as another front where deterrence must be strengthened before tensions spiral. The concern is not necessarily an immediate conflict, but miscalculation. In a region with harsh conditions and limited communication infrastructure, even minor incidents could escalate rapidly. China’s Quiet but Steady Arctic Ambitions While Russia’s presence is overt, China’s Arctic strategy is more subtle—and equally concerning to Western planners. Beijing calls itself a “near-Arctic state,” a label that has raised eyebrows in Europe and North America. Through investments, research stations, and partnerships, China is laying the groundwork for long-term influence. Britain shares NATO’s concern that China could use civilian projects for dual-use purposes, blending scientific research with intelligence gathering and infrastructure control. As Arctic shipping routes become commercially viable, China’s interest in controlling parts of the supply chain only grows. London’s alignment with these concerns reflects a broader shift in UK foreign policy: China is no longer viewed solely as an economic partner, but as a strategic competitor. Trump, Greenland, and Strategic Reality Donald Trump’s repeated interest in Greenland—most famously his suggestion that the United States should buy it—was widely mocked at the time. Yet behind the headlines was a strategic logic that many Western governments now openly acknowledge. Greenland sits at the heart of the Arctic, hosting vital air and naval routes between North America and Europe. It is also rich in rare earth minerals critical for modern technology and defense systems. As ice recedes, Greenland’s strategic value only increases. Britain’s current position, which aligns with Trump’s warnings about Arctic vulnerabilities, shows how quickly political perceptions can change. What once seemed unconventional now appears prescient. NATO’s Arctic Awakening NATO has traditionally focused on Eastern Europe and the North Atlantic. The Arctic, despite its importance, received less coordinated attention. That is changing. Britain’s talks with NATO reflect a broader alliance effort to integrate Arctic defense into its core strategy. This includes: Increased joint military exercises in cold-weather environments Enhanced monitoring of Russian and Chinese activity Strengthening cooperation with Arctic nations like Norway, Canada, and Denmark Protecting critical undersea and satellite infrastructure For Britain, this is also about credibility. As a leading NATO member and a key military power, the UK wants to demonstrate that it can contribute meaningfully beyond its immediate geography. Climate Change as a Security Multiplier One of the most striking aspects of Arctic security is how closely it is tied to climate change. Melting ice is not just an environmental issue—it is a strategic one. New sea lanes shorten travel between Asia and Europe, while access to oil, gas, and minerals becomes easier. This transformation increases competition and reduces natural barriers that once limited military movement. Britain’s involvement reflects recognition that climate-driven changes are reshaping the security landscape faster than traditional institutions were designed to handle. In this sense, Arctic security is a preview of future global challenges where environmental change and geopolitics collide. Domestic and Diplomatic Balancing Acts Britain’s Arctic engagement is not without challenges. Increased military involvement raises questions about defense spending, priorities, and escalation risks. Diplomatically, London must balance deterrence with dialogue, avoiding actions that could unnecessarily provoke Russia while still protecting allied interests. There is also the question of public awareness. Arctic security lacks the visibility of conflicts like Ukraine, making it harder to sustain political attention. Yet policymakers increasingly argue that prevention is cheaper—and safer—than crisis response. What This Means Going Forward Britain’s talks with NATO mark an important shift in how the Arctic is viewed: not as a distant frontier, but as a central arena in 21st-century security. Agreement with Trump-era assessments on Russia, China, and Greenland underscores how geopolitical realities can outlast political controversies. As competition intensifies, the Arctic will likely become a testing ground for cooperation, deterrence, and strategic foresight. Britain’s involvement signals that mid-sized powers are no longer content to watch from the sidelines. Final Thoughts The Arctic is warming faster than any other region on Earth—and so are the geopolitical tensions surrounding it. Britain’s move to boost Arctic security with NATO reflects a growing consensus that ignoring the High North is no longer an option. Whether driven by Russia’s militarization, China’s quiet expansion, or lessons drawn from Trump’s blunt warnings, one truth stands out: the future of global security may well be shaped at the top of the world, where ice, ambition, and power now intersect.
By Muhammad Hassana day ago in Earth
Milo Manheim
Milo Manheim has steadily built a reputation as one of Disney’s most recognizable young stars, thanks to his charm, musical talent, and approachable screen presence. Known widely for his breakout role in Disney Channel’s Zombies franchise, Manheim has now found himself at the center of online discussions surrounding Disney’s ambitious slate of live-action adaptations. Among these, the idea of a Tangled live action film has sparked intense fan curiosity, with Milo Manheim frequently mentioned in speculative casting conversations. While Disney has not officially confirmed every detail, the growing buzz around a Disney Tangled live action project reflects the enduring popularity of the animated classic and the excitement surrounding its potential cast. Milo Manheim’s Rise in Disney Entertainment Milo Manheim entered the spotlight with a natural ease that made him instantly relatable to younger audiences. As the son of actress Camryn Manheim, he inherited a strong foundation in performance, but his success has been distinctly his own. His work blends humor, sincerity, and musical confidence—qualities that align closely with Disney’s storytelling style. Beyond Disney Channel films, Manheim has expanded his range through stage performances and competitive television, proving he is more than a one-note actor. This versatility is one reason his name continues to appear in conversations about major Disney roles, including speculation around Tangled. Why Tangled Remains a Perfect Live-Action Candidate Released in 2010, Tangled reimagined the story of Rapunzel with humor, heart, and stunning animation. Over a decade later, it remains one of Disney’s most beloved modern fairy tales. The blend of adventure, romance, and self-discovery makes it especially suited for a live-action retelling. A live action Tangled film would follow Disney’s recent trend of revisiting animated favorites, offering a more grounded visual style while preserving the emotional core of the original. Fans are particularly interested in how the tangled live action cast would bring iconic characters to life, especially Rapunzel and Flynn Rider. Milo Manheim and the Flynn Rider Conversation One of the most common fan-driven theories places Milo Manheim in the role of Flynn Rider. The character’s mix of roguish confidence and underlying vulnerability aligns well with Manheim’s on-screen persona. Flynn Rider is not a traditional prince—he’s witty, flawed, and ultimately sincere, traits that Manheim has demonstrated across his performances. While Disney has not confirmed casting details, the speculation alone highlights how strongly audiences associate Manheim with roles that require both charisma and emotional depth. If chosen, he would join the broader tangled cast legacy that fans already adore. Rapunzel Live Action Casting Speculation Just as much attention surrounds the potential rapunzel live action cast. Rapunzel is a character defined by curiosity, resilience, and warmth, making her one of Disney’s most relatable heroines. Recently, online discussions have connected actress Teagan Croft to the role, leading to widespread interest in teagan croft tangled fan concepts. Croft, known for her compelling performances, brings a balance of strength and sensitivity that could translate well to a rapunzel live action portrayal. Interest in teagan croft movies and tv shows has grown alongside these casting rumors, as audiences imagine how she might embody the iconic princess. Building the Disney Tangled Live Action Cast A successful disney tangled cast live action would rely on chemistry as much as individual talent. Rapunzel and Flynn Rider’s relationship is central to the story, evolving from mistrust to mutual respect and love. Casting actors who can convincingly portray that journey will be key. Beyond the leads, characters like Mother Gothel and the supporting ensemble would also shape the film’s tone. Disney’s challenge lies in honoring the animated original while allowing actors to bring fresh interpretations. This balance has defined the success—or failure—of past live-action adaptations. The Importance of Staying True to the Story One reason Tangled has endured is its emotional honesty. At its heart, the film is about freedom, identity, and the courage to step into the unknown. A disney tangled live action adaptation must preserve these themes while adapting them for a new visual medium. Fans aren’t simply looking for a scene-by-scene remake; they want a story that feels familiar yet alive. With the right creative team and casting choices, the transition from animation to live action could deepen the emotional impact rather than dilute it. Milo Manheim’s Future Beyond Speculation Whether or not Milo Manheim becomes officially linked to tangled live action, the speculation itself reflects his growing influence in the industry. He represents a generation of actors shaped by Disney but not limited by it. His career choices suggest a desire to explore diverse roles while staying connected to the audience that supported his rise. As Disney continues to develop its live-action portfolio, actors like Manheim remain central to the conversation—not because of confirmed roles, but because audiences can already imagine them stepping into iconic characters. A Story Fans Are Ready to Revisit The excitement surrounding tangled live action cast discussions shows just how deeply the story still resonates. Rapunzel’s journey, Flynn Rider’s transformation, and the vibrant world of Tangled continue to inspire new generations of viewers. If and when Disney officially unveils its plans, the anticipation will only grow. Until then, the combination of Milo Manheim’s rising star power and the enduring magic of Tangled keeps fans engaged, hopeful, and eager to see how this beloved fairy tale might shine in live action.
By Saboor Brohi 5 days ago in Earth
Day 4 of Quitting
If this is how sobriety feels, maybe it’s better to go through life a little buzzed… this, along with other hits like, I want to kill myself, I wish I was dead, and I’m going to throw myself off a bridge have been the only thoughts on rotation these past few days. I promise myself that if, in a month, I still feel like this (‘this’ meaning despondent, full of rage, and simultaneously numb) I can go back to smoking. Until mid-February though? Nicotine is off the table.
By sleepy drafts6 days ago in Longevity
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.