"From Ally to Accused: Could U.S. Soldiers Face War Crimes Trials Over Gaza?"
"Human rights groups warn that Washington’s deep involvement in Israel’s Gaza war may one day put American service members before international courts."
"From Ally to Accused: Could U.S. Soldiers Face War Crimes Trials Over Gaza?"
The Gaza war has entered its 22nd month, and while the devastation has been most deeply felt by Palestinians, the shadow of accountability is beginning to stretch far beyond Israel. Human rights organizations now argue that American soldiers and intelligence officials, who have played a direct role in supporting Israel’s military campaign, could themselves be subject to war crimes charges.
This development reflects a growing recognition: the United States is not a bystander to the war—it is a participant.
U.S. Support: More Than Weapons
For decades, Israel has relied on U.S. funding and military aid. But since October 2023, the level of support has reached unprecedented levels. Billions of dollars in arms sales and transfers have continued despite rising civilian deaths in Gaza.
Yet, Human Rights Watch (HRW) emphasizes that the most serious issue is not the money or the weapons—it is the operational role of U.S. personnel.
American troops have reportedly shared intelligence, advised on military targeting, and been embedded within Israeli operational planning. According to Omar Shakir, HRW’s director for Israel and Palestine:
“If you assisted in an Israeli strike that turned out to be a war crime, you are not just complicit—you are responsible.”
Strikes That Raise Red Flags
Hospitals, refugee camps, and press offices have all been hit in Israeli airstrikes since the war began. The most recent example was a missile attack on al-Nasser hospital, killing doctors, journalists, and patients.
International humanitarian law is clear: medical facilities are protected, unless used for military purposes. Even then, strict proportionality rules apply. If U.S. intelligence helped Israel target such facilities, American personnel could be accused of aiding an unlawful strike.
The precedent is not new. During the Yemen conflict, U.S. refueling of Saudi warplanes—though indirect—was seen as enabling mass civilian casualties. In Gaza, the cooperation appears far more direct.
A Dangerous Legal Reality
International law recognizes
criminal responsibility. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) says anyone who “aids, abets, or otherwise assists” in the commission of a war crime can be prosecuted.
That means U.S. personnel—from drone operators to intelligence officers—may be exposed to legal jeopardy.
While the United States itself has not signed the Rome Statute, the ICC has jurisdiction over crimes committed in Gaza because Palestine is a recognized member. Countries such as Germany and Belgium, which apply universal jurisdiction, could also take up cases.
Public Boasts, Private Consequences
Ironically, it is not only leaks that reveal U.S. involvement—American leaders have openly spoken about it.
President Biden in 2024 bragged about U.S. special operations forces helping Israel track down Hamas commanders.
Earlier this year, the Trump administration admitted that Israel consulted Washington before launching strikes that killed hundreds of Palestinians in a single night.
What might have been framed as “proof of alliance” could now serve as evidence of direct participation.
Politics vs. Justice
Despite the legal risks, few expect to see American soldiers in The Hague any time soon. The ICC faces enormous backlogs, and the U.S. has historically bullied the court, even threatening sanctions when it considered investigating U.S. actions in Afghanistan.
Politically, Washington remains firmly supportive of Israel, and many of its allies, such as Germany, are unlikely to challenge this stance. Still, the mere possibility of accountability changes the narrative—especially in the eyes of activists and victims.
The Scale of U.S. Commitment
The scale of American involvement is staggering:
$39.2 billion in ongoing foreign military sales to Israel as of April 2025.
$4.17 billion in additional weapons transfers since October 2023.
Intelligence sharing and operational consultations before major strikes.
Taken together, this is not passive support—it is active participation.
A Call for Accountability
Rights groups insist the American public deserves transparency. Taxpayer money funds the weapons, and U.S. personnel provide the intelligence. Yet many Americans remain unaware of how deeply their country is tied to Gaza’s destruction.
Sarah Yager, HRW’s Washington director, put it sharply:
“The U.S. is a party to this conflict. The public is paying for it, but most don’t realize what’s being done in their name.”
Conclusion
Whether prosecutions ever happen or not, the warning is clear: U.S. soldiers are no longer shielded by distance. Their actions in Gaza could someday follow them into courtrooms abroad.
The United States has always defended Israel as a loyal ally. But as the civilian death toll mounts, loyalty may come at a heavy cost—not only for Palestinians, but for American service members who may carry the burden of international law on their shoulders.
The Gaza war has already transformed politics, alliances, and public opinion. It may yet transform the meaning of accountability itself.
About the Creator
Wings of Time
I'm Wings of Time—a storyteller from Swat, Pakistan. I write immersive, researched tales of war, aviation, and history that bring the past roaring back to life
Keep reading
More stories from Wings of Time and writers in Earth and other communities.
"Echoes of World War II: How Today’s Conflicts Reshape Our World"
"Echoes of World War II: How Today’s Conflicts Reshape Our World" The world in 2024 stands at a troubling crossroads. For many decades after World War II, humanity hoped that such large-scale devastation would never repeat itself. International institutions were formed, peace treaties signed, and global leaders often spoke of “never again.” Yet, almost eighty years later, the globe is witnessing a wave of violent conflicts that has reached levels unseen since the end of the Second World War.
By Wings of Time 5 months ago in Earth
Greenland: New Shipping Routes, Hidden Minerals – and a Frontline Between the US and Russia?
Once seen as a remote and largely isolated Arctic territory, Greenland is rapidly emerging as a focal point of global geopolitics. Climate change, melting ice, and technological advances are transforming the island into a strategic hub defined by new shipping routes, vast mineral resources, and growing rivalry between major powers, particularly the United States and Russia. As the Arctic opens up, Greenland’s geographic position and untapped potential are pushing it to the center of international attention, raising questions about security, sovereignty, and sustainable development. Melting Ice and the Opening of New Shipping Routes One of the most visible impacts of climate change in the Arctic is the reduction of sea ice, which is making previously inaccessible waters navigable for longer periods each year. New Arctic shipping routes, including passages near Greenland, promise shorter travel times between Europe, Asia, and North America. Compared to traditional routes like the Suez Canal, Arctic pathways can reduce shipping distances by thousands of kilometers, cutting fuel costs and emissions. For global trade, this could be transformative. Greenland’s coastal waters are increasingly important as potential transit corridors and support hubs for these routes. However, the expansion of Arctic shipping also raises concerns about environmental risks, maritime safety, and the lack of robust emergency infrastructure in the region. Hidden Mineral Wealth Beneath the Ice Beyond shipping, Greenland holds significant reserves of critical minerals, many of which are essential for modern technologies and the global energy transition. These include rare earth elements, lithium, graphite, uranium, and other strategic resources used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, batteries, and defense systems. As demand for these materials grows, Greenland is being viewed as a potential alternative to existing supply chains dominated by a small number of countries. This has increased interest from Western governments seeking to diversify mineral sourcing and reduce strategic dependencies. However, mining in Greenland is controversial. Local communities and policymakers must balance economic opportunities with environmental protection and cultural preservation. Greenland’s harsh climate and fragile ecosystems make resource extraction both technically challenging and politically sensitive. The United States’ Strategic Interest in Greenland The United States has long considered Greenland strategically vital, largely due to its location between North America and Europe. The US already maintains a military presence at Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base), which plays a key role in missile warning systems and space surveillance. In recent years, Washington has renewed its focus on Greenland, emphasizing Arctic security, infrastructure investment, and cooperation with Denmark, which oversees Greenland’s foreign and defense policy. US interest is driven by several factors: protecting transatlantic security routes, countering rival powers in the Arctic, and ensuring access to critical minerals. Greenland is increasingly viewed as a frontline in maintaining Western influence in the High North. Russia’s Arctic Ambitions Russia, meanwhile, sees the Arctic as central to its economic and military strategy. It has invested heavily in Arctic military bases, icebreaker fleets, and energy projects, particularly along its northern coastline. Although Greenland is geographically distant from Russia’s main Arctic territories, Moscow closely monitors developments there. The island’s proximity to key Arctic sea lanes and North Atlantic routes makes it strategically relevant in any broader confrontation between Russia and NATO. As tensions between Russia and the West remain high, Greenland’s location places it near the intersection of competing security interests, increasing its geopolitical significance. Greenland Between Global Powers The growing attention from major powers puts Greenland in a delicate position. While the island seeks greater economic independence and development, it must navigate complex relationships with Denmark, the United States, and other international actors. Greenland’s government has emphasized the importance of maintaining control over its resources and ensuring that development benefits local populations. At the same time, geopolitical competition risks turning Greenland into a strategic chessboard rather than a partner in decision-making. This balancing act is becoming more difficult as Arctic competition intensifies. Environmental and Social Challenges Greenland is on the front lines of climate change. Melting ice sheets contribute to global sea-level rise, while local communities face changes to traditional livelihoods such as fishing and hunting. The expansion of shipping and mining could bring jobs and infrastructure, but it also threatens fragile ecosystems and raises concerns about pollution, habitat disruption, and long-term sustainability. Any future development in Greenland will require careful regulation, international cooperation, and meaningful engagement
By Aarif Lashari5 days ago in Earth
Top Australian Writers’ Festival Cancelled After Palestinian Author Barred
One of Australia’s most respected literary festivals has been cancelled following a fierce backlash over the decision to bar a Palestinian author from participating. What began as a programming dispute quickly escalated into a national debate about free speech, cultural inclusion, and political pressure in the arts. The cancellation has sent shockwaves through Australia’s literary community, raising urgent questions about whose voices are allowed on public platforms and at what cost.
By Aarif Lashari6 days ago in Earth
How, Too
Many people wonder how, too. You are not alone, and I am an expert. I will teach you how, too! First, you need to remit a small application fee and fill out an application describing the nature of your financial situation and how often payments will be made, as this will have great bearing on how well I teach you how, too.
By Harper Lewis3 days ago in Fiction
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.