A mystery story between multiverse and universe
The Vanishing Paradox.
Detective Aria Langley had solved many impossible cases, but none as baffling as this.
It started with a call from Dr. Elias Carter, a theoretical physicist at the Institute for Advanced Research. "Detective, I need you to come immediately. A man has disappeared... and I think it has something to do with the multiverse."
Aria arrived at the lab, where a group of scientists stood in shock. "Who vanished?" she asked.
Dr. Carter adjusted his glasses. "Dr. Philip Reed. He was testing our quantum entanglement machine when he simply... ceased to exist. There was no sound, no disturbance—just an empty lab coat on the floor."
Aria examined the lab, her mind racing. "Was he alone when this happened?"
"Yes," Dr. Carter said. "But the machine was active. It was designed to momentarily peek into parallel universes. We believe something went wrong."
Aria frowned. "And you think he fell into another universe?"
Carter hesitated. "Perhaps. Or something pulled him through."
The detective turned to the control panel, where a screen displayed a fluctuating wave pattern. "What’s this?"
"A residual energy signature," Carter said. "It indicates that something from another universe interacted with our reality."
Suddenly, the machine flickered back to life. A static hum filled the room, and a shadowy figure began to materialize. Aria reached for her gun, but Carter stopped her. "Wait—look closer."
The figure solidified into Dr. Philip Reed. But his eyes held something different. Something... off.
"Philip?" Carter asked hesitantly.
Reed turned to them, confused. "Where am I?"
Aria stepped forward. "You vanished an hour ago. What happened?"
Reed hesitated before whispering, "I saw it. The other side. The other me. And he didn’t want to come back alone."
Carter paled. "You mean—?"
Suddenly, the machine pulsed, and another figure emerged—identical to Reed but with a sinister smile. "Well, well," the doppelgänger mused. "This universe does feel... cozier."
Aria raised her gun. "Step away from the machine."
The other Reed chuckled. "I don't think so, Detective. You see, in my universe, we figured out how to replace people. And now, your Philip is there... permanently."
The real Reed gasped. "No—he’s lying!"
The imposter smirked. "Am I?"
Aria had seconds to decide. She glanced at Carter, who was subtly adjusting the machine’s controls. The detective made her move—lunging toward the imposter just as Carter activated the device.
A burst of energy erupted. When the light faded, only one Reed remained.
Aria gripped her gun. "Are you the real Philip?"
Reed swallowed hard. "I... I think so."
Carter sighed. "Let’s shut this machine down. Some mysteries are better left unsolved."
As Aria left the lab, she couldn’t shake the feeling that something wasn’t right. Had they really sent the imposter back—or had they made the wrong choice?
The mystery remained. And in the vast multiverse, the answer might never be found.
It started with a call from Dr. Elias Carter, a theoretical physicist at the Institute for Advanced Research. "Detective, I need you to come immediately. A man has disappeared... and I think it has something to do with the multiverse."
Aria arrived at the lab, where a group of scientists stood in shock. "Who vanished?" she asked.
Dr. Carter adjusted his glasses. "Dr. Philip Reed. He was testing our quantum entanglement machine when he simply... ceased to exist. There was no sound, no disturbance—just an empty lab coat on the floor."
Aria examined the lab, her mind racing. "Was he alone when this happened?"
"Yes," Dr. Carter said. "But the machine was active. It was designed to momentarily peek into parallel universes. We believe something went wrong."
Aria frowned. "And you think he fell into another universe?"
About the Creator
Badhan Sen
Myself Badhan, I am a professional writer.I like to share some stories with my friends.
Keep reading
More stories from Badhan Sen and writers in Earth and other communities.
The sun’s dying words
The sun was nearing its final moments, its once brilliant glow now a dim, fading ember in the vast black canvas of the universe. The universe had been its companion for eons, and now, as it burned through the last of its fuel, the sun began to speak, its words no longer a radiant roar but a whisper, as if it had finally grown tired of the relentless dance of time.
By Badhan Sen11 months ago in Earth
Inside Trump's $11 Billion Health Plan to Replace “Neo-Colonial” USAID
In the landscape of global health aid, few proposals have stirred as much debate as former President Donald Trump’s ambitious plan to restructure American assistance abroad. Dubbed an $11 billion health initiative aimed at replacing USAID’s current framework, the plan seeks to pivot away from what Trump and his allies have criticized as the “neo-colonial” approach of U.S. foreign aid. While the plan promises greater efficiency and impact, experts are split on whether it is a practical solution or a politically driven gamble. Trump’s Critique of USAID The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a central pillar of American foreign assistance, distributing billions in aid annually to address health crises, food insecurity, and development challenges worldwide. However, Trump’s administration and its supporters have often described USAID’s approach as bureaucratic, inefficient, and reflective of a “neo-colonial” mindset. In public statements, Trump argued that the U.S. was spending taxpayer dollars on programs that benefited foreign governments or contractors more than the intended local communities. Critics of the plan say that while USAID has flaws—as any large bureaucracy does—its extensive networks and decades of experience provide an unmatched capacity to deliver aid efficiently and safely. The Core of the $11 Billion Proposal At the heart of Trump’s proposal is an $11 billion fund designed to consolidate, modernize, and streamline U.S. health aid. Unlike the traditional USAID model, which relies heavily on long-term partnerships with governments and NGOs, the new plan emphasizes: Direct Impact Funding: Allocating resources to frontline health workers and local initiatives rather than intermediaries. Data-Driven Investments: Using real-time health data to target outbreaks and crises more efficiently. Private Sector Partnerships: Leveraging U.S. pharmaceutical companies, tech firms, and healthcare startups to deliver vaccines, treatments, and medical infrastructure. Shorter Program Cycles: Moving away from multi-year funding commitments in favor of more flexible, results-oriented programs. Proponents argue that this approach could reduce bureaucratic overhead and ensure U.S. aid reaches communities faster. By “cutting out the middlemen,” Trump supporters claim, America can avoid the pitfalls of slow-moving aid programs that sometimes fail to adapt to crises. Reactions from the Global Health Community Global health experts, however, have expressed concern about both the logistics and philosophy of the plan. Dr. Melissa Ortega, a senior researcher at the Global Health Policy Institute, explained, “The idea of bypassing established structures like USAID may sound appealing on paper, but in practice, it risks undermining decades of institutional knowledge. Health systems are complex, and short-term projects cannot replace long-term capacity building.” Some critics have also questioned the characterization of USAID as “neo-colonial.” While U.S. foreign aid has historically been tied to geopolitical interests, many programs today are designed collaboratively with recipient countries and local organizations. Reducing oversight could unintentionally increase the risk of misuse, corruption, or health inequities. On the other hand, supporters of Trump’s plan point to examples of inefficiency in USAID programs, citing cases where aid was delayed or mismanaged. By introducing more direct funding models, they argue, U.S. taxpayer dollars could achieve a higher “return on health outcomes.” Political Implications Trump’s health aid overhaul proposal is not just about international development—it is also deeply political. Framing USAID as a “neo-colonial” institution resonates with a populist narrative that America should prioritize its own citizens and assert greater control over how taxpayer money is spent abroad. Domestically, the $11 billion plan faces scrutiny from Congress. Lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether dismantling USAID’s systems could destabilize ongoing health programs in countries where the U.S. has long-term commitments. The potential impact on global health security—including the fight against pandemics like COVID-19—adds another layer of concern. Internationally, U.S. allies and partner nations are watching closely. Sudden shifts in aid delivery could disrupt health programs in low- and middle-income countries, many of which rely on predictable funding cycles to maintain vaccination campaigns, maternal health services, and disease surveillance. Possible Benefits and Risks If executed carefully, the Trump-backed model could bring several benefits: Faster Response Times: Direct funding could accelerate delivery of vaccines, treatments, and emergency support. Innovation Boost: By partnering with private sector companies, the plan could accelerate development of new health technologies. Accountability: With performance-based metrics, the plan may better measure the impact of U.S. aid. However, the risks are equally significant: Disruption of Existing Programs: Abrupt changes could destabilize ongoing health projects. Loss of Expertise: USAID’s decades of experience in navigating local governance, supply chains, and community engagement may be hard to replace. Geopolitical Fallout: Allies accustomed to collaborating with USAID might see the move as destabilizing, reducing cooperation on global health initiatives. Looking Ahead As Trump and his allies continue to advocate for this $11 billion overhaul, the debate over the future of U.S. health aid is intensifying. Proponents view it as a necessary modernization of an outdated system, while critics fear it could undercut decades of carefully built infrastructure and global partnerships. Ultimately, the success of this plan will hinge on its ability to balance efficiency with stability, innovation with oversight, and political objectives with humanitarian needs. For now, the proposal remains controversial, representing a dramatic departure from traditional approaches to U.S. foreign aid. Whether it will reshape global health for the better—or simply create more uncertainty—remains to be seen. In the end, the Trump health plan is as much about ideology as it is about dollars. It challenges the conventional wisdom of international development and asks whether a more streamlined, results-focused approach can truly replace a system built over decades. As the world watches, the stakes could not be higher: the future of U.S. global health aid—and the lives it touches—hangs in the balance.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in Earth
Nitrogen is necessary for young tropical rain forests to combat climate change.
By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in wood, tropical rainforests contribute to the slowing of climate change. Forests that develop quickly are even more important because they absorb carbon more quickly.
By Francis Dami2 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.