7 most wonderful natural phenomena in the world
phenomena
There are many natural phenomena around the world that leave people in awe and wonder. From the Northern Lights to the Grand Canyon, these incredible natural wonders have fascinated people for generations. In this article, we will explore the seven most wonderful natural phenomena in the world.
01. Aurora Borealis - Northern Lights
The Aurora Borealis, also known as the Northern Lights, is a natural phenomenon that occurs in the polar regions. This spectacular light show is caused by charged particles from the sun colliding with the Earth's magnetic field. The resulting interaction creates beautiful, multicolored lights that dance across the sky.
The best time to see the Northern Lights is during the winter months in the northern hemisphere, between September and March. The best places to see them include Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland, and Canada.
02. Grand Canyon
The Grand Canyon is a natural wonder that is located in the state of Arizona, USA. It is a steep-sided canyon that was formed by the Colorado River over millions of years. The canyon is 277 miles long, up to 18 miles wide, and over a mile deep. The Grand Canyon is considered one of the most stunning natural wonders of the world.
03. Victoria Falls
Victoria Falls is a waterfall located on the border between Zambia and Zimbabwe in Africa. The waterfall is over a mile wide and 354 feet high, making it one of the largest waterfalls in the world. The water falls into a gorge below, creating a mist that can be seen from miles away. The sound of the waterfall can be heard from over 20 miles away, making it an incredible natural wonder.
04. Mount Everest
Mount Everest is the highest mountain in the world, located in the Himalayas in Nepal. It stands at 29,029 feet tall and is considered one of the greatest natural wonders of the world. Climbing Mount Everest is a challenge that only a few people have ever accomplished. The view from the top is breathtaking, with the snow-capped mountains stretching out for miles in every direction.
05. The Great Barrier Reef
The Great Barrier Reef is located off the coast of Australia and is the largest coral reef system in the world. It spans over 1,400 miles and is home to a diverse range of marine life, including over 1,500 species of fish and 600 types of coral. The Great Barrier Reef is a must-see natural wonder for any diver or snorkeler.
06. Yellowstone National Park
Yellowstone National Park is located in the western United States and is home to a variety of natural wonders. It features geysers, hot springs, and other geothermal features that are unlike anything else in the world. The park is also home to a diverse range of wildlife, including grizzly bears, wolves, and bison.
07. The Great Migration
The Great Migration is a natural phenomenon that takes place in East Africa every year. It is the largest animal migration in the world and involves over a million wildebeest, zebras, and gazelles moving from the Serengeti in Tanzania to the Masai Mara in Kenya. The migration is a spectacle to behold and attracts visitors from all over the world.
In conclusion, the world is filled with natural wonders that leave us in awe and wonder. From the Northern Lights to the Great Migration, these seven natural phenomena are truly breathtaking and should be on everyone's bucket list. Whether you are a nature lover or just looking for a new adventure, these natural wonders are sure to leave you with memories that will last a lifetime.
About the Creator
ANEESHA RIZWAN
Iam writting article
Keep reading
More stories from ANEESHA RIZWAN and writers in Earth and other communities.
top 10 most beautiful islands in the world
Islands are some of the most stunning and captivating destinations in the world. With their pristine beaches, crystal clear waters, lush greenery, and unique culture, islands offer a perfect escape from the hustle and bustle of everyday life. From the turquoise waters of the Caribbean to the lush greenery of the Pacific, there's something for everyone to appreciate in the world's most beautiful islands. In this article, we will take a look at the top 10 most beautiful islands in the world that are sure to take your breath away.
By ANEESHA RIZWAN3 years ago in Earth
Inside Trump's $11 Billion Health Plan to Replace “Neo-Colonial” USAID
In the landscape of global health aid, few proposals have stirred as much debate as former President Donald Trump’s ambitious plan to restructure American assistance abroad. Dubbed an $11 billion health initiative aimed at replacing USAID’s current framework, the plan seeks to pivot away from what Trump and his allies have criticized as the “neo-colonial” approach of U.S. foreign aid. While the plan promises greater efficiency and impact, experts are split on whether it is a practical solution or a politically driven gamble. Trump’s Critique of USAID The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a central pillar of American foreign assistance, distributing billions in aid annually to address health crises, food insecurity, and development challenges worldwide. However, Trump’s administration and its supporters have often described USAID’s approach as bureaucratic, inefficient, and reflective of a “neo-colonial” mindset. In public statements, Trump argued that the U.S. was spending taxpayer dollars on programs that benefited foreign governments or contractors more than the intended local communities. Critics of the plan say that while USAID has flaws—as any large bureaucracy does—its extensive networks and decades of experience provide an unmatched capacity to deliver aid efficiently and safely. The Core of the $11 Billion Proposal At the heart of Trump’s proposal is an $11 billion fund designed to consolidate, modernize, and streamline U.S. health aid. Unlike the traditional USAID model, which relies heavily on long-term partnerships with governments and NGOs, the new plan emphasizes: Direct Impact Funding: Allocating resources to frontline health workers and local initiatives rather than intermediaries. Data-Driven Investments: Using real-time health data to target outbreaks and crises more efficiently. Private Sector Partnerships: Leveraging U.S. pharmaceutical companies, tech firms, and healthcare startups to deliver vaccines, treatments, and medical infrastructure. Shorter Program Cycles: Moving away from multi-year funding commitments in favor of more flexible, results-oriented programs. Proponents argue that this approach could reduce bureaucratic overhead and ensure U.S. aid reaches communities faster. By “cutting out the middlemen,” Trump supporters claim, America can avoid the pitfalls of slow-moving aid programs that sometimes fail to adapt to crises. Reactions from the Global Health Community Global health experts, however, have expressed concern about both the logistics and philosophy of the plan. Dr. Melissa Ortega, a senior researcher at the Global Health Policy Institute, explained, “The idea of bypassing established structures like USAID may sound appealing on paper, but in practice, it risks undermining decades of institutional knowledge. Health systems are complex, and short-term projects cannot replace long-term capacity building.” Some critics have also questioned the characterization of USAID as “neo-colonial.” While U.S. foreign aid has historically been tied to geopolitical interests, many programs today are designed collaboratively with recipient countries and local organizations. Reducing oversight could unintentionally increase the risk of misuse, corruption, or health inequities. On the other hand, supporters of Trump’s plan point to examples of inefficiency in USAID programs, citing cases where aid was delayed or mismanaged. By introducing more direct funding models, they argue, U.S. taxpayer dollars could achieve a higher “return on health outcomes.” Political Implications Trump’s health aid overhaul proposal is not just about international development—it is also deeply political. Framing USAID as a “neo-colonial” institution resonates with a populist narrative that America should prioritize its own citizens and assert greater control over how taxpayer money is spent abroad. Domestically, the $11 billion plan faces scrutiny from Congress. Lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether dismantling USAID’s systems could destabilize ongoing health programs in countries where the U.S. has long-term commitments. The potential impact on global health security—including the fight against pandemics like COVID-19—adds another layer of concern. Internationally, U.S. allies and partner nations are watching closely. Sudden shifts in aid delivery could disrupt health programs in low- and middle-income countries, many of which rely on predictable funding cycles to maintain vaccination campaigns, maternal health services, and disease surveillance. Possible Benefits and Risks If executed carefully, the Trump-backed model could bring several benefits: Faster Response Times: Direct funding could accelerate delivery of vaccines, treatments, and emergency support. Innovation Boost: By partnering with private sector companies, the plan could accelerate development of new health technologies. Accountability: With performance-based metrics, the plan may better measure the impact of U.S. aid. However, the risks are equally significant: Disruption of Existing Programs: Abrupt changes could destabilize ongoing health projects. Loss of Expertise: USAID’s decades of experience in navigating local governance, supply chains, and community engagement may be hard to replace. Geopolitical Fallout: Allies accustomed to collaborating with USAID might see the move as destabilizing, reducing cooperation on global health initiatives. Looking Ahead As Trump and his allies continue to advocate for this $11 billion overhaul, the debate over the future of U.S. health aid is intensifying. Proponents view it as a necessary modernization of an outdated system, while critics fear it could undercut decades of carefully built infrastructure and global partnerships. Ultimately, the success of this plan will hinge on its ability to balance efficiency with stability, innovation with oversight, and political objectives with humanitarian needs. For now, the proposal remains controversial, representing a dramatic departure from traditional approaches to U.S. foreign aid. Whether it will reshape global health for the better—or simply create more uncertainty—remains to be seen. In the end, the Trump health plan is as much about ideology as it is about dollars. It challenges the conventional wisdom of international development and asks whether a more streamlined, results-focused approach can truly replace a system built over decades. As the world watches, the stakes could not be higher: the future of U.S. global health aid—and the lives it touches—hangs in the balance.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in Earth
Nitrogen is necessary for young tropical rain forests to combat climate change.
By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in wood, tropical rainforests contribute to the slowing of climate change. Forests that develop quickly are even more important because they absorb carbon more quickly.
By Francis Damia day ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.