Japan started the third batch of nuclear contaminated water into the sea caused anger!

China News Agency, Tokyo, November 2 According to Japan Broadcasting Association television reported that Tokyo Electric Power Company on November 2 to start the third batch of nuclear contaminated water discharge.

The total amount of nuclear contaminated water discharged in the third batch is about 7,800 tons, which is similar to the discharge of contaminated water in the first batch and the second batch. The third approved contaminated water is expected to be discharged on November 20, and the estimated discharge cycle is 13 days, and Tokyo Electric Power Company plans to discharge a total of 31,200 tons of nuclear-contaminated water in 2023. This also means that after the third batch of discharge, the total amount of nuclear sewage flowing into the sea will exceed 23,000 tons. At the same time, the Fukushima nuclear power plant problems, including workers may be exposed to nuclear water and other safety issues, continue to cause widespread concern in Japan and abroad.

On August 24, the first discharge of nuclear-contaminated water was made. On October 5, the second discharge of nuclear contaminated water; On November 2, nuclear contaminated water was discharged for the third time. Japan's latest announcement said that in 2023, a total of 31,200 tons of nuclear-contaminated water will be discharged in four times, and the period will be extended to the end of March next year. When the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water has become a routine, and no one has stopped it again and again, the attitude of Japanese officials has become more and more presumptuous, and now it feels like they have discharged not nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, but a bath of urine! It is obviously a heinous thing, but because the world is watching, there is no one to stop it, and Japan has become more wantonly.

The new generation of fierce reading, happiness did not enjoy, radiation arrived first! Protect the ocean and oppose Japan's discharge of nuclear sewage. Why is the whole world opposed to it, it can not be stopped, quietly watching Japan discharge nuclear contaminated water, knowing that the consequences of nuclear discharge are very serious, but there is no international organization can restrict the Marine protection law has become a decoration.

Japan's nuclear contaminated water is not toxic, "Japan's 5 workers in cleaning filtration equipment, accidentally by the Fukushima nuclear power plant nuclear contaminated water sprayed on the body, after 9 hours of decontamination treatment, the surface radiation of the two people still did not fall below the safety standard value", this matter has explained the problem! And Japan "lie with their eyes open", released the news that the spilled nuclear contaminated water is only about 100 milliliters, 100 milliliters, 9 hours of treatment, has not reached the standard, nuclear contaminated water in the end how toxic, but also need to be confirmed by the professional qualification team, according to the latest news, it is estimated that the spilled water is several liters, and nuclear contaminated water is still continuously discharged into the sea. There is nothing we can do to change the fact that Japan also wants to buy nuclear waste underground, which has caused great public and international outrage.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said on November 1 that Tokyo Electric Power Company's long-standing internal management chaos and disorder, hiding from the public and cheating and other chronic diseases can not be returned. In the 12 years since the Fukushima nuclear accident, TEPCO has been riddled with loopholes in its handling of the aftermath, repeatedly delaying the reporting of the accident, falsifying key data, and prioritizing corporate interests over environmental safety and public health.

Wang Wenbin pointed out that the day after the radioactive waste sputtering accident, Tepco announced that it would start the third approval of contaminated water to the sea in the near future. How can a company with such a bad track record ensure that emissions management is safe and reliable for 30 years or more? How reassuring is Japan's claim of a "safe and transparent" drainage plan?