Jail Journal: Page 11
Lobbying
I am pretty sure Yuuichirou would think I am bat shit crazy if I told him my theories of what happened to Yumiko. I started overthinking and coming up with dumb shit. Even if it is spiritually true, the tangible implications is too hard to bear at times. It doesn't always equate to fair relations in the corporeal.
I m thinking about Kai, we saw each other the same day Janelle came to visit me, I felt bad because it was probably female but the venom in their eyes was too much to fathom they also ended up shaving their head and eyebrows so I don't even know what they're in for.
My mom embarrassed me a my first trial when she decided to talk. I fucking hate her right now. I was too upset to go back to sleep, I think maybe a cold shower might calm me down. I guess it is fair enough to let them assume I am retarded or whatnot. Though the whole campaign to make me invalid makes me want to just stay in jail.
I had a dream I was in the car with Jahon, I was in the back seat of the car and the lady driving in front was sort of trying to tell me via sign language that he wasn't good. I guess it was a breaking motion.
I sort of believed it was Drew's deceased mother trying to warn me not to go to him, but I am not sure.
I came across the infamous IPS drink that that one lady on Youtube was warning people not to drink. I don't know about all the theories around it, but the taste alone is enough for me to not touch the stuff.
I want my world to expand but it always feels like it is shrinking. I guess that's my fult for letting my cautiousness take over for so long. Being force-fed the fear of impulsiveness has lead me to suppress my intuition for so long, the fear has become the self fulfilling prophecy.
This Jail cell might be the safest place for me right now though. I know we're already out of Venus in Neptune but I don't remember what are some of the next astrological events coming up.
I am so tired of living in my head sometimes. I mean for now it is fine since I have nothing else to do, but outside of here it has brought me too much grief and missed opportunities; what if I did accept Jahon's proposal? What if I went with Yuuichirou to live in his grandma's house? I didn't have any dreams with Drew, we just met. But hell, I even had a fantasy of visiting Gio which probably won't amount to anything.
I am aware enough to know Gio is just a shadow of Yuuichirou, who is just a shadow of my first boyfriend, Kenta. This place has taught me to evaluate that aspect and realize the patterned I fall into. Another thing it has taught me is that I have to memorize more phone numbers, haha.
I mean sure, I can connect with people through the ether, but talking directly to people right now is more preferred. I mean, what is the point of me being here at all? I suddenly remembered a time I played with my little dog, Wilkins. I presented him with two toys, when he took one, I took the other. He'd be jealous and want the other one and we'd switch around a few times. Maybe that was the start of Pixie Road.
About the Creator
Kayla McIntosh
Personal tell-all pieces: Word of the Day and Jail Journal. Secret poet on the side. ( I don't use Ai to write any posts, everything is done manually. )
Keep reading
More stories from Kayla McIntosh and writers in Criminal and other communities.
Jail Journal: Page 10
That vision really frightened me, I was cycling through different realities and dimensions from the overload. It made me pray over the whole ordeal for the first time in my life. I was crying in the blankets, not wanting to deal with any of it.
By Kayla McIntoshabout a year ago in Criminal
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi 7 days ago in Criminal
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.