First Time – A Bitter Truth
A minor quarrel that turned into a deadly conflict – the serious consequences of a lack of tolerance and patience
First time
I am X CRIME and today we will shed light on an incident that is not only a sad accident but also reflects our social attitudes. This incident took place in the Kelpur Musa Market in Attock where a bitter argument between a renowned tailor Sajid and his customer Mosar turned into a tragedy.
The beginning of the incident
It was March 10, which was the ninth day of Ramadan. The market was bustling with shoppers, and everyone was busy preparing for Eid. On the same day, a 22-year-old young Mosar came to the shop of the famous tailor master Sajid with a shopping bag.
Sajid was considered one of the best tailors in the area, and that is why his shop was always crowded. Mosar entered the shop, greeted Sajid and requested him to make an Eid suit for him.
Sajid, who was already very busy, replied softly: “Sorry brother, all my bookings are complete and I don’t have any more time.”
Moser was disappointed to hear this. He knew that Sajid’s hand stitching was amazing and he was not ready to get the work done by another tailor. He insisted again, “But Eid is still 20 days away, you can do my work somehow.”
Sajid apologized once again and said, “Brother, I don’t have enough craftsmen and if I can’t do the work as promised, your Eid will be ruined. It’s better that you see another tailor.”
The intensity of the dispute
Hearing this, Moser got angry. He said in a stern tone, “I have always had my sewing done by you. You should find a way for me.”
Sajid replied softly, “Brother, I am forced. There is too much work.”
But Moser's ego had been hurt. He said in a stern tone, "If you don't do my job, I won't get anyone else to do it either."
Hearing this, Sajid also said in a somewhat sharp tone, "Look brother, there is no use in forcing me. If you care about my friendship, then understand my compulsion as well."
A bitter argument started between the two, and the matter escalated to abusive language. Sajid's student Ehsan, who was present in the shop, was also watching all this. He tried to mediate, "Both are brothers, it is the month of Ramadan, talk calmly."
But Moser's anger did not subside. He got angry and pushed Sajid and walked out of the shop. At that time, no one had any idea that this incident would take such a serious turn.
The bloodshed
An hour later, Moser returned again. But this time he was angry and had a pistol in his hand. As soon as he stepped into the shop, he opened fire on Sajid without saying a word.
Sajid was hit twice in the chest and fell to the ground. When Ehsan went forward and tried to hold Sajid, Moser fired at him too. Everyone in the shop ran out in fear.
The sound of gunfire echoed throughout the market and people started hiding here and there. Within minutes, the police were informed. Moser had fled the scene before the police arrived.
The case and the search for justice
When the police arrived at the scene, Sajid had stopped breathing. Ehsan was seriously injured and was rushed to the hospital where he was struggling for life.
After this incident, Sajid’s family was devastated. Sajid’s brother Khalid, who was also a tailor, filed a case with the police. Khalid said, “Mosar was no stranger, he had been tailoring clothes for us for many years. I don’t believe he could go to this extent.”
Police action
The police immediately took the matter seriously and formed various teams to arrest the accused. DPO Attock, Dr. Sardar Ghiyas Gul Khan issued instructions that Mosar should be arrested as soon as possible.
Within 48 hours, the police arrested Mosar from a secret hideout. The same pistol with which he had fired was recovered from his possession. Further investigation revealed that Mosar did not have any legal license for arms, which proved how easy it has become to obtain illegal weapons.
Reflection of social issues
This incident is not just a story of murder, but highlights several weaknesses of our society. First of all, we should consider what are the reasons due to which an ordinary person suddenly becomes a brutal criminal?
Has our society lost patience and tolerance?
Do we make small problems so big that their solution is seen only in violence?
The availability of illegal weapons is another big problem. Until it is controlled, such incidents will continue to happen.
Another important question here is whether our police and judicial system are strong enough to punish the culprit in time?
Summary
This incident makes us think about the kind of world we are living in. We need to improve our social attitudes so that we can avoid such tragedies.
Finally, we pray that Allah Almighty grants Sajid a place in Jannatul Firdous and grants Ehsan a speedy recovery. We need to cultivate peace and patience in our lives so that society becomes peaceful and safe.
May Allah guide us all! Amen.
About the Creator
X Crime
X Crime – Latest Reports in the World
X Crime is your go-to source for the latest crime reports, breaking news,and in-depth analyses from around the world.We bring you real-time updates on criminal activities,investigations,cybercrime,fraud.
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi 4 days ago in Criminal
Federal Law Enforcement Shooting in Minneapolis Sparks National Debat
## **Federal Law Enforcement Shooting in Minneapolis Sparks National Debate** In early 2026, a serious incident unfolded in Minneapolis when federal law enforcement officers shot a civilian during a large-scale operation in the city. The event immediately drew public attention and ignited widespread discussion about the role of federal agencies, public safety, and accountability. The shooting occurred in a residential area, creating fear and confusion among residents and prompting strong reactions from local leaders and community groups.
By America today 5 days ago in Criminal
Bruce Lee and The God of War: Kuan Ti
It starts with love.. The Power to the God Of War and Wealth Walk into a Chinese restaurant (even in Oklahoma, USA), a Chinese police station, a kung fu martial arts studio or even a Chinese temple and you often see a red faced warrior holding a heavy quan-do (spear like weapon).
By WILD WAYNE : The Dragon King5 days ago in Chapters
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.