History

An Exploration of Various Architectural Styles and Their Characteristics
Architecture is a fascinating art form that encompasses the design, planning, and construction of buildings and structures. Over the centuries, various architectural styles have emerged, each influenced by cultural, historical, and technological factors. This essay aims to provide an overview of some prominent architectural styles, discussing their distinct characteristics and influential features.
By Austin Story3 years ago in Art
Exploring the Harmonious Dance of Water and Land
Have you ever stopped to consider the intricate interplay between water and land and how their harmonious dance shapes the world around us? In this article, we delve into the fascinating connection between these two elements and unveil the four key ways in which they shape our planet.
By wisdombenjamin3 years ago in Art
"The Melancholic Muse: Finding Beauty Amidst Sorrow". Content Warning.
Once upon a time, in a small village nestled among lush green hills, lived a girl named Emily. Emily was known by the villagers as a solemn and melancholic young girl. Her heart was burdened by a perpetual sadness, and her eyes reflected the weight of her thoughts.
By Bolang Team chanel3 years ago in Art
What’s love??
Here's an article on the timeless topic of love: Exploring the Essence of Love: A Universal Language Love is a concept that transcends borders, cultures, and time itself. It's a profound emotion that has fascinated poets, philosophers, and scientists for centuries. While it may be difficult to define, its impact on our lives is undeniable. Let's embark on a journey to explore the essence of love, the various forms it takes, and its enduring significance in human existence.
By Ameerah adamu 3 years ago in Art
Known For Wisdom
In the heart of a small, picturesque village nestled between rolling hills, there lived an old man named Wisdom. He was known throughout the village as the keeper of knowledge, a sage whose wisdom was sought by young and old alike. Wisdom had lived in the village for as long as anyone could remember, and his presence was a source of comfort to the villagers.
By Ayomide Richard3 years ago in Art
Unveiling the Egu People of Nigeria: Living in Harmony with Nature through Leaf Dressing. Content Warning.
In the heart of Nigeria's lush rainforests, there exists a tribe that maintains a remarkable connection with nature and traditions that have withstood the test of time. The Egu people, a small and isolated community, continue to dress in leaves, a practice that has persisted for generations. In this article, we embark on a journey to explore the Egu tribe, their unique customs, and the profound relationship they share with the natural world.
By Everest Chidindu3 years ago in Art
THE LADY OF SHALOTT
today I'm going to tell you all about The Lady of Shallot which is a painting the one that you can see in the background here but it's not just this painting actually I'm going to talk about three of these paintings all painted by John William Waterhouse they were made at different times in his career and the nice thing is that he painted the subject a few times but it illustrates three different parts of the story he started out with this one which he painted in 1888 and which is arguably the most famous one it's in the Tate Gallery in London then six years later he made this one that's in 1894. it's now in the Leeds Gallery of Art in well Leeds and eventually in 1915 he painted this version that is now in the Art Gallery of Ontario so by using these three paintings we can go through the story of the lady of shalot but first a little bit of background on John William Waterhouse often when you hear or read about John William Waterhouse it is said that he was a pre-raphaelite painter and that I'm afraid is not true he was not part of the pre-raphaelite Brotherhood he was of a younger generation I mean he was four years old when the pre-raphaelite Brotherhood disbanded and I know that this was a Brotherhood of very young men but they didn't include toddlers no John William Waterhouse was not part of that Brotherhood but he was very much inspired by them as I supposed almost every painter of his generation in Britain was they either embraced the ideals of the prb or clearly rejected them it would be more correct to call Waterhouse a Victorian painter the difference being that in techniques and often composition he worked in the academic style but in subject matter followed the pre-raphaelite Brotherhood because they and he loved stories from mythology and medieval lore especially when they were about beautiful women one of those subjects that he loved and was generally loved at the time were the Arthurian Legends now these legends about King Arthur are historically complex that is we don't really know if there ever was a real King Arthur there may or may not have been an historical base of a king in the 5th or 6th Century the first stories that we know of him were made up and they were made up many centuries after he supposedly lived that is mainly in the late 11th and 12th century they were popular at the court of William the Conqueror and they would become a theme that stories were written upon for centuries to come although I have to say that they became more and more rare over time until there was this 19th century Revival because in Britain in the 19th century people started to idealize the Middle Ages especially those in Britain many books plays poems were written with a medieval setting and often in the Arthurian Legends I guess today you would call them elaborate fan fictions that were written at the time in this case these paintings were based on a popular poem by Alfred Lord Tennyson called the lady of shalot he Alfred Lord Tennyson that is in turn probably was inspired by the 15th century book lamorteur by Sir Thomas Mallory although in his telling the woman was called Elaine of astrolat now Sir Thomas Malory in turn was probably inspired by the 13th century short story called dona discalotta in each of these medieval Stories the lady in question meets Lancelot one of the Knights of the Round Table she falls in love with him and she professes her love but he rejects her and then she dies with a broken heart but not immediately so she has some time to prepare so she writes out what she wants her burial to be like and she wants to be placed in a boat on embroidered cloth beset with jewels and a purse on her with a letter explaining what has happened to her then the boat should be set to drift and in most versions of the medieval Stories the boat ends up in Camelot where King Arthur is made aware of it and the letter is found and read to him in the version by Sir Thomas Mallory Lancelot then offers to pay for her burial but in every case of the telling of the story in the 13th the 14th and the 15th century they meet she falls in love and dies of Love sickness and her body is placed in a boat and set a drift now we'll skip a few sentries and come up to the 19th century where Alfred Lord Tennyson has taken the story and given it his own twist I suppose that he knew the older stories because they were republished in the 19th century and he wrote that poem and they were clearly based on them his first version he published along with a collection of poetry In 1832 although the title page of the book said 1833. but that one was not received very well in fact it was ridiculed in its reviews and this impacted Tennyson so much that he didn't publish any new poetry for a decade so then in 1842 he tried again and in his new collection of poetry he published a revised version of The Lady of Shallot this time it was received quite well in fact several of the poems in it would become Classics of English poetry some of them would become the subject of series of paintings and other artworks for instance the poem Godiva about Lady Godiva would be the source for paintings like this one on which I did a video a while ago and the lady of Charlotte was one of those poems that became very popular and I guess I can see why there's this popular Trope in especially Victorian England about doomed people people who fall in love and die of a broken heart or are doomed by unrequited love there are instances where men are the subject of this but usually it's women and the lady of Charlotte fits right in there think for instance of this painting by John Everett Miller of Ophelia there are many obvious parallels between the two stories and even these two paintings of two women dying on water and both more or less of a broken heart and the lady of Charlotte was the inspiration for many artists associated with a pre-raphaelite Brotherhood people who were actually part of that Brotherhood but also the slightly Wider Circle like for instance this one William Holman hunt one of the founders of supreme referralite Brotherhood or this one by Elizabeth sudal she in case you're not familiar was one of the favorite models of the pre-raphaelite Brotherhood she was the model for the Ophelia that I showed you before and she was also married to Dante Gabrielle Rossetti but also aspired to be an artist in her own right now we're going to have a look at these paintings but not in the order that John William Waterhouse made them because the three different parts of the story that he Illustrated in the paintings he did in the wrong order that is the Reversed order of the story so the one he made in 1915 is this one and it shows us the first part of the story in the poem the last one we'll see is the first one he made and the last part of the story but let's start here this painting he made as I said in 1915. now the poem tells us the story of the lady of shalot but it's different from the medieval stories because in those she is a daughter of a nobleman and she simply meets Lancelot in the course of her life but in this case there's more of a fantasy element to it we are told that there's an island in the river which is Upstream of the city of Camelot on this island there's a castle with towers and in one of those towers sits the lady of Charlotte it can't be far from Camelot because it's described that From The Towers you can actually see the city but in this Tower this lady of Charlotte is sitting and she is cursed we are not told exactly how or why or by whom just that Whispers have told her that she is and her curse is that she cannot look out of her window and she cannot leave her room she is to sit in her room and view the world only through a mirror she has to weave tapestries with images that she sees through her mirror and her tapestries are referred to as her magic web so in the poem she sits there day in day out weaving whatever she sees through her mirror without any care for the more mundane practicalities of these things of where she's going to get food sleep or some fresh clothing but understandably she's getting fed up with all of this now I've put the entire poem in the description below in case you want to read it that is the 1842 version but at some point the verse reads and I quote but in her web she still Delights to weave The Mirror's magic sights for often through the silent nights a funeral with plumes and lights and music went to Camelot or when the moon was overhead came two young lovers lately wed I am half sick of Shadows said the lady of shalot end quote this is the instance we see in this painting here she is indeed fed up with the Shadows that is seeing the world through a mirror and we can see that in her bearing she stretched her arms over her head like if she's stretching her back as if tired of doing the same thing all day and in the round mirror at the back of the painting we can see many towered Camelot but also there are these two people that are mentioned in the poem the two young lovers lately wed there are some intriguing little details here by the way we can see her large Loom that she's sitting behind and we can also see the work that she's been doing there's these three little scenes that she's been weaving there are scenes that have been described earlier in the poem that happened around her Island the comings and goings of people going to and from Camelot the one in the middle seems to be of some knights riding side by side and in this one we can see someone on his knees in front of someone else maybe it's the proposal of the newlyweds that are now walking outside we can also see the little balls of wool in various colors around or on the floor and the shuttles of her Loom with various colors hanging off the loom and one is in her lap note by the way that they look like little boat which of course foreshadows her ending but there's one strange little detail as well in the mirror we can see the handle of the Loom and right next to it there's a poppy but if we look to the front of the painting The foreground we see that same handle without the poppy now I'm not entirely sure why that is but one of the explanations that I read about it says that it emphasizes her dreamy State the sort of limbo she is in and it Compares it to that of the effect of the poppy that is of opium then when we move to the second painting the one made in 1894 we see her in a different attitude she stood up and she seems to look outside of her painting what has happened is part three of the poem in it it is described how Lancelot rides down to Camelot and he is described in detail in being extremely handsome and looking impressive in his armor and his plumes and his black girls that flow from underneath his helmet this impresses her so much that she can't control herself anymore and she gets up goes to the window and looks out directly at him and at that moment her magic mirror cracks we can see her tangled up in her own lines and if she walks she's going to fall which of course is exactly what's going to happen to her behind her we see the cracked mirror and in Its Reflection we can even see the helmet of Lancelot but she already looks disheveled and her Loom seems to explode she goes outside according to the poem down she came and found a boat beneath a willow left afloat and round about the prowl she wrote The Lady of Shallot so she writes her name on the bow of the boat and it's mentioned that it's the end of the day she gets in with her tapestry she loosens the chain with which the boat was tied up and she floats with the flow of the river now in the painting we can see all this happening directly her Tower can be seen off to the left and there we see the stairs she's come down onto the water and she's still holding the chain that she's just undone and we can see her sitting on her tapestry and she's about to lay down because according to the poem She lays down and floats away towards Camelot but she died before she reaches the first house along the shore near the bow we see three candles two of them have been blown out this of course refers to her impending doom that her last candle is about to be snuffed out as well and of course a crucifix you can see it lying there and there on the bow we can also see her name well frankly we can barely see it but it seems to be carved into the front of the boat in the poem she wrote it there herself it doesn't seem as if she had time to actually carve something into the wood but never mind and now she's floating Downstream towards Camelot where of course for ears she reached upon the tide the first house by the Waterside singing in her song she died The Lady of Shallot which is of course a lovely and dramatic ending to a lovely and dramatic poem actually it goes on for a few more verses her boat arrives in Camelot and she's dead and found and just as in the old stories she's shown to Lancelot so in this case there's the last lines of the poem which are but Lancelot mused a little space he said she has a lovely face God in his Mercy lend her grace the lady of shalot so if there is a moral to this story I would say it is don't get cursed in your towers and don't fall madly in love with knights anyway if you want to see these paintings you can go to the tape Gallery in London that's not the tape modern by the way or if you want to see the other one to leads to the Leeds Art Gallery but if you want to go to Ontario for the last one I have to disappoint you according to their website it's not currently on display now before you run off remember to like And subscribe and there's also a thanks button below this video with which you can support this channel financially as I'm sure you're aware a lot of work goes into making these videos and I'd love to be able to continue doing that so if you enjoy them all your help is greatly appreciated anyways thanks again for watching and I hope to see you again soon bye
By Wiam aar3 years ago in Art
The Fountain that Divided the World
and Now for Something Completely Different hi welcome to stories of art my name is today I want to tell you the story of one of the controversies in art it is the story about this the fountain it was signed by R Mutt and I'm sure you've seen it or think you've seen it because very few people have ever seen the original but I'll get to that in a minute it's an object that has divided opinion for over a century now and whether you like it or not it became quite influential in the development of modern art in the mid 20th century in fact it's one of those Works where you can say it is truly iconic everybody seems to know it and still today many people have strong opinions about it some see it as part of the movements that freed art from its former constraints that is to say it made much of what later became conceptual art possible and others maintain that this is nonsense that a five-year-old could make and frankly both of these can be seen as valid points so I thought it would be a good idea to tell you the story behind it and go over the many controversies about it and there are many of those in fact in the last few years a new one has emerged but I'll get to that later in the video but hopefully by the end of this video you will have gained an understanding of this work of the opinions about it and maybe an appreciation for those who hold the opposite view of yours in this debate let's start at the beginning though this object work of art its story starts outside of itself it starts with an exhibition in New York in 1917 there was to be an exhibition it was organized by the Society of Independent Artists that had been formed about a year earlier now they in turn had been inspired by an earlier French group called The Societe de artiste independent and they had been formed in 1884. now they had been formed as a reaction to the official Salon in Paris those had been those large exhibitions where you could enter works of art but only if you were an artist and only if you were a member of the Art Academy the academic de bozar and then only if you pass the selection committee that determined whether or not the quality of your work was satisfactory and the purpose of these exhibitions to many people was that there will be prizes given out by a jury now the associative artist independent tried a different approach they held exhibitions where anyone could enter a work if they paid an entry fee and in New York they wanted to copy this process and so they founded the Society of Independent Artists to have an exhibition on those very same principles the idea was that it was more democratic the audience was to decide whether or not something was suitable or was good art not some panel of so-called experts and then a jury the Americans even went so far as to decide that they would not place the artwork in any sort of categories or any sort of order artwork wouldn't even be sorted by type like sculpture or painting instead they would be presented simply placed in an exhibition Hall in alphabetical order based on the name of the artist the the last name so there was a group of people involved in this society and many of the names are no longer that well known but maybe you've heard of people like Man Ray and Joseph Stella and most importantly for this story Marcel Duchamp you see many years later 45 years to be exact in 1962 Marcel Duchamp claimed that he submitted the fountain to the exhibition in 1917 and ever since he has been credited with it but as we shall see in this video that may not be as straightforward as all that nevertheless he plays a central role in the story so let's have a look at him Marcel Duchamp was French he had come to the United States about five years earlier now Duchamp had mainly been known as a painter in Europe he was associated with the Cubist and was fascinated by movement I suppose now his most famous painting would be nude descending a staircase number two which is this one it had not been received well in 1912 in Paris though according to Duchamp it had been rejected from the exhibition of the independence in Paris which of course would have been impossible because anyone could submit anything but according to him he had been pressured to remove it from the exhibition before the exhibition opened and that contributed to him becoming disillusioned with a Paris art scene and afterwards he moved to New York there he became involved in the local avant-garde movement he had befriended Walter Conrad arensberg who was to become his main benefactor ironsberg came from an industrialist family and he had plenty of money and he gave dushan a place to live and a studio to work in in New York deschamp for his part kept painting and exhibited his new and existing Works in various exhibitions most notably the Armory show in 1913 where his nude descending a staircase was exhibited and was actually admired many of the works that he produced in those days he sold to arensberg although the new descending in staircase was first sold to Frederick C Tori and ahrensburg later bought it from him but only after Duchamp had made a copy of it to replace the original which I suppose is then new descending staircase number two number two but never mind the point is Aaron spare collected almost everything that Duchamp made now in 1916 both aaronsberg and Duchamp were part of the group that started the Society of Independent Artists and helped organized the 1917 exhibition Duchamp had announced that he would submit a painting titled Chula pisteria coordinated but he never did apparently he never even made the painting or maybe he did and then rejected it but no one has ever seen it instead thousands of other artists mostly from the east coast of the United States but also from other parts of the world submitted Works to the exhibition one of those was a woman who submitted the fountain she paid the entry fee and she left and no one has ever heard of her after that but then the organizing Committee of the exhibition saw the fountain and decided that it was not suitable for the exhibition and they rejected it which according to their own founding principles was impossible but they had a vote on it and the majority said that it was a joke and not suitable this led to conflict within the organizing committee which in the end meant that Marcel Duchamp and arensberg resigned and Duchamp claimed that he withdrew his painting tulip Mania except that he had never entered it the resignation of ducha and arnswear came at just the right moment just when the Press was there to cover the opening of the exhibition that is why it made the papers the remaining board issued a statement saying and I quote the fountain may be a very useful object in its place but its place is not an art exhibition and it is by no definition a work of art end quote and that would have been that except that Duchamp and Man Ray and a few others retrieved The Fountain and brought it to the studio of Alfred stieglitz who made this famous photograph of it this is the last known image of the fountain actually it's the only image of it that we can be certain of they then published it in a magazine of sorts called the blind man that magazine was founded by a group of like-minded avant-garde artist in the wake of this exhibition of the independence and in it they wrote about ideas of Art and it contained an article with this photograph of the fountain now the blind man was not what you'd call a successful magazine there are only two issues that were ever made before the makers decided to call it quits and of those only a few hundred were printed originally I mentioned this because I think it's important to understand that this was a very small group of people that were mostly ignored by the public at large it was much later that these Works would gain prominence and actually only because they had written about it and made some photographs because none of the early ready-mates of this era actually survive they were all just thrown away because that is what this is it is a ready-made the idea that you can take an object place it outside of its normal use and then look at it with new eyes and the idea is actually not that it's art it's supposed to be anti-art it's something that is not to be looked at for its beauty but something that should provoke thought Duchamp for instance talked about retinal art which is art that you look at and he wanted to leave that behind he wanted to make art that you would think about instead because in the period 1913-1917 Duchamp had started making ready-mades and it's possible that he even coined a term for it he was in contact with some other artists who were doing this as well and that often became associated with the Dada movement which was an anti-establishment anti-art movement that often treated tradition with disdain and was very often meant to be funny they are often satirical comments on Art they often wanted to ridicule traditional art and the establishment now one of duchamp's now famous ready Mage is this stool and a bicycle wheel known as the bicycle wheel from 1913. this is a photograph of it from her studio in the 1910s today there's one in the Philadelphia Museum of Art and if memory serves I've seen one in the Valley freshart Museum in Cologne but crucially these are not the original ones these were recreated in the late 1950s and 1960s none of these original ready-mades by Duchamp survived to this day and he didn't exhibit them anywhere either it seems that at first they were just mental exercises ways of looking at the world differently for him and his artistic friends not even aaronsberg who bought nearly everything that Duchamp made had any of these Originals in his collections no instead most of what we know about this Fountain and the other ready maze is from the writings of Duchamp and others about art and this tells us something about how he felt about these objects he didn't care about them they were statements but not objects to be looked at and admired let alone to be conserved because if we just look at it there really isn't much to see it's a urinal or do you say urinal I'm never sure I'm going to go with urinal it was produced by some company someone bought it placed it at an unconventional and useless angle that is in this position it cannot be used and just signed it with the name r mutt 1917. so is this art well according to an article in the blind man it is because and I quote whether Mr mutt with his own hands made the fountain or not has no importance he chose it he took an ordinary article of Life placed it so that its useful significance disappeared under the new title and point of view he created a new thought for that object end quote and in its defense that is what happens in art all the time people take ordinary objects and then transform them into art that is they take paint brushes and a canvas and somehow transform that into art or a block of marble and a chisel and somehow it gets elevated to art but of course crucially that is because they have done something to it they haven't just placed some tubes of paint and brushes in an art gallery but still looking at something in a different way is one of the things that art does that is it makes us look at the world in a different way this isn't just true for visual arts but for all art it's in poetry and literature so interesting because it makes us reflect on things that we might have never thought about or at least not in the way it is presented to us and visual arts can do the same thing and often do they make us think about relationships religion stories history you name it and in this case it challenges us to think of is This art and by extension what is art I mean if this is not art then what is or if this is Art then what is not and these questions in and of themselves I think are interesting but then if you ask me if I like it well frankly no I think it's a slap in the face of all art history and old tradition but then again history art history and especially tradition can sometimes really use a few slaps in the face I mean it's good to shake things up and try something new in my also humble opinion now this Photograph that I've been showing you is a photograph by Alfred stiglitz and it marks the last time that anyone saw the fountain for real as far as We Know because there's no record of it after that there is this photograph of the studio of Marcel Duchamp where you can see a urinal hanging in the doorway is this it honestly we can't tell because the picture is too grainy and we can't see the signature but then again how many urinals would he have in his possession by the way if this is the fountain we can see that he didn't treat it with a lot of reverence so he may have just seen it as a joke and a provocation but even though it has become a very famous object now it wasn't immediately after the exhibition in 1917 that is it was mentioned in a few newspaper articles especially because Duchamp tried actively to keep it in the news saying that probably Richard mutt was going to sue the Society of Independent Artists for damages but he never did probably because Mr mud never existed by the way Richard mutt is the name on the tag attached to the fountain on the photograph by stiglitz that's how we know what the r stands for but my point is that the fountain was likely to have been forgotten about and really ready Maids were seldom if ever seen in art galleries at the time now the only reason we know about them is because the artists themselves wrote about them in Publications like the blind man and later in Europe the magazine called dada but they didn't have large circulations these were not widely read things and I don't think that the fountain was mentioned anywhere after say 1918 up until 1934 when Andre Breton wrote about it in an article Andre Brito had been one of the members of the Dada movement and one of the founding members of the surrealist movement and as an art theorist he was read by academics and by artists but it wasn't until the late 1950s and early 1960s that the Dada movement became popular with modern artists particularly with the people who were starting the pop art movement people like Jasper Jones for instance they started to cite dada and ready mates as sources of inspiration and that is why these ready Maids of the 1910s were often recreated in the 1960s which brings us back to the story of Marcel Duchamp he had been an artist making art mainly paintings and also ready-made but he ceased his artistic production more or less in 1923 at the time he changed professions and he became a professional chess player he moved to Brazil for a while but returned to the U.S and traveled extensively through Europe as a chess player but he was always active within the art World albeit mostly on the sidelines he would contribute to film projects or collaborate with other artists on their projects he would make exhibition designs and sets for plays but he rarely produced stand-alone works of art anymore but then in the 1960s these early works that he had made became popular with a young audience so this reconstruction or actually construction of the bicycle wheel was made for several different museums and in an interview in 1962 Marcel Duchamp claimed for the first time that he had made the fountain and he had come up with the name r mutt now up until now you may have noticed that I haven't actually said that he was the author of this work and that's because I'm not so sure that he is you see the story that he started telling in the 1960s is this in 1917 he was walking in New York with Walter arensberg and Joseph Stella when they came across a shop of JL mod Ironworks on 118th Street and he went in and bought a urinal he took it home laid it on his back and signed it our mutt the name he said came from the moth Ironworks but because that name was too familiar he changed it to mutt which just happened to be the name of a popular comic strip character from the then popular comic strip Mutt and Jeff and in his words he said that he liked the idea of the fat little funny man from the comic strip and he gave him the first name Richard which in French sounds like Richard which was slang for someone with too much money and that would be funny to be the name for a urinal and of course the reason that he had it entered into the exhibition was to test if they were really true to their principles which as it turned out they were not and from that interview which he repeated several times until shortly before his death in 1968 it was simply believed that he was the original or Mutt and he then had a series of new fountains made the trouble was that they couldn't find the original urinal so they had to use the photograph by a sticklitz to reconstruct them in clay and then they fired them simply to make them look like the originals so the ones that you now see in museums are actually not made as journals at all they are reconstructions of the one of the photograph of stiglitz so they are not so much ready-made as they are maids and they were all made in the 1960s but now comes the slight controversy you see the story that he told that reporter isn't true it is factually inaccurate on several points one is that the shop that he says he visited wasn't actually a shop not the type where you buy something and take it home it was the kind of place that showcases the Wares of a company that you can then order and they will deliver it to your house and install it which means that he couldn't have gone in and walked out with a urinal another problem is that The Malt Iron Works didn't make this exact type of urinal and they only sold their own products so I'm afraid that we can be certain that he was wrong about this also the name that he used mutt he claimed that it came from The Malt Ironworks and the comic strip Matt and Jeff where he said that it was the short fat guy but mutt is the tall thin guy in the strip but that may just be a simple oversight he may have remembered wrong or he may never have gotten the names of the characters right but also with this in mind it becomes kind of convenient that the two people that he named that were with him at the time Walter arensberg and Joseph Stella had both died years before he told his story and it's also kind of surprising that neither of them ever spoke up about it during their lifetimes but maybe that's only because the object itself wasn't important to them that for instance may explain why arensberg didn't keep it with all the other works in memorabilia he had collected of Marcel Duchamp now as I said before duchenne died in 1968. 14 years later in 1982 A letter came to light that Duchamp had written to his sister in 1917. it was actually written two days after the fountain had been rejected and in it he wrote that he did not enter the fountain into the exhibition instead it was a female friend of his now this is where the plot thickens who would this female friend be some have suggested that it was Rose celavi or Eros celavi which was a feminine Alter Ego that Duchamp used in the 1920s men Ray photographed him as such and the trouble is that he started using the rose Celebi image years later he didn't do it yet in 1917 as far as We Know and if he really dressed up as a woman to enter the fountain anonymously he would have taken a huge risk of being recognized another possibility is Louise Norton she was also an avant-garde artist a friend of Duchamp but mostly a poet and writer she's the one that wrote the article in the blind man that defended the fountain but I seriously doubt that she was involved because when Duchamp made his claims in the 1960s she was still alive and she never made it known that he was lying but there is another friend of his a female friend that really fits the bill her name was Elsa baroness from Freitag laurenhofe and she's quite the character herself she was born in Germany at some point got married but then fell in love with someone else so she divorced her first husband and married a second now at the time divorce was much more difficult process than it is now so that in and of itself would be remarkable but the story gets better when her second husband got in too much financial trouble because they then faked his death and they moved to the U.S where they started working on a farm but after some time he left her there are records of him living in the U.S after that and no record of them ever being divorced but she had to fend for herself and started modeling and got involved in the art movement first in Cincinnati later in Philadelphia and eventually in New York she did performance art she wrote poetry and made ready-made sculptures although she called them sculptures of found objects she also married for a third time and this time to Leopold Von freitak lawn hover who happened to be a baron which is where she got her name and the title that she used amongst the things that she made were these costumes out of found objects which were usually things not generally associated with clothing such as spoons curtain rings tin cans often things that others would see as trash and the fact that she made something out of that that could be elegant or worn by someone that called herself a baroness challenged ideas about wealth and beauty she also liked to make sculptures out of things that were deemed unsuitable for art and she particularly likes to use Plumbing fixtures like in this work known as gold made in 1917 that she made with Morton Livingston Schaumburg making it clear that she liked to provoke she liked to shake things up and apparently sometimes also used pseudonyms now Elsa had died in 1927 so in 1962 could no longer refute duchamp's story so could she be the one the trouble is that we have no direct evidence for it just circumstantial evidence and conjecture but then again with Duchamp we only have his word in a story that doesn't really pan out so perhaps this is just one more example of a man taking credit for a Woman's Work but then again maybe it's not now you may think who cares it's just a urinal placed on its side who cares who placed it there it was a provocation that was bound to be made by someone at some point in some way maybe someone else would not have used a urinal but some other object but ready-mades were at some point going to be shocking to the audiences at large and you may still think that this is nonsense why devote an entire video and quite a long one at that to this subject well a while ago I made an Instagram post about it and I was surprised at the reactions that I got so many people responded to it with emotion sometimes saying that it's what made them hate Modern Art others say that it was such a lovely and thought-provoking piece but what stands up mostly is the people that actually hated it and I rarely get angry reactions to my post and I must say even in this case they were always very civilized but often very clear in their hatred nonetheless and that surprised me I mean sure it's a weird piece and it was made to provoke a reaction but that was over a century ago how can we still get emotional about something like this I mean we have seen so much more since then and I have to say that I kind of like that I like the fact that it still provokes a response even if it's a negative one because it means that people still care because if you say that this is not art doesn't that make you think about what is art to you what does constitute a work of art and the simple fact that it still makes us ask these questions after all this time surely means that it was extremely effective and doesn't that fact by itself make this a work of art anyway a little bit of food for thought which I hope you have enjoyed please let me know in the comments what you think about these things and of course as always you could like And subscribe and I'd like to thank you very much for watching and I hope to see you again very soon bye
By Wiam aar3 years ago in Art
The History of Occultism
The history of occultism is, like a tapestry woven with threads of mystery, spirituality and hidden knowledge. Throughout time from civilizations to the world humans have been mesmerized by the quest for secret truths and mystical insights. In this article we embark on a journey through the ages to explore how occultism has evolved tracing its origins, developments and enduring impact on our consciousness.
By Keith Green3 years ago in Art
Introduction to Occult Practices
Introduction, to Occult Practices; A Beginners Guide The term "occult" comes from the word "occultus," which means "hidden" or "secret." Occult practices encompass a range of esoteric and spiritual traditions that explore the hidden aspects of reality. From astrology and tarot reading to crystal healing and divination the occult has piqued curiosity for centuries. This guide for beginners aims to provide an overview of some occult practices, their context and considerations for those interested in delving into this intricate realm.
By Keith Green3 years ago in Art
Drowning Cities
Amidst the gentle lapping of the waves against the shore, the residents of Crescent Bay had always found solace and joy. Generations had built their lives here, woven into the fabric of the coastline, as sturdy as the lighthouse that watched over them. But now, the sea that had been a source of comfort had turned into an ominous harbinger of change, and the emotional turmoil was palpable.
By Ruth Danzel3 years ago in Art
The black cat
Candice was an artist. She liked to paint pictures. She sent her paintings to an art shop. Sometimes people bought them, but Candice did not get a lot of money.
By Ajay3 years ago in Art