Art logo

Essence, Embodiment, and Relational Reality

Toward a Coherent Account of Personhood, Consciousness, and Being

By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST PodcastPublished 14 minutes ago 4 min read
Essence, Embodiment, and Relational Reality
Photo by Ash Amplifies on Unsplash

The Failure of Reduction and the Need for Synthesis

There is a persistent failure in many modern attempts to explain what a human being is. Some frameworks reduce the person entirely to matter, insisting that identity, consciousness, morality, and meaning are nothing more than emergent properties of physical processes. Other frameworks move in the opposite direction, detaching spirit from reason and grounding belief in intuition alone, often at the cost of coherence or accountability. Both approaches fail because both misunderstand essence. One denies that essence exists at all. The other treats it as something vague and undefinable.

What is needed is not a rejection of science nor a retreat from reason, but a synthesis that recognizes the limits of reduction while remaining grounded in logic, evidence, and lived reality. Human beings cannot be understood by collapsing them into components, nor by dissolving them into abstraction. A coherent account must explain continuity of identity, moral agency, embodiment, and relational existence without contradiction.

Essence as Wholeness Within Wholeness

Essence, properly understood, is not a fragment of a being nor a component assembled from parts. Essence is indivisible, yet capable of expression through multiple modes. It is not exhausted by any single manifestation, nor diminished by participation in something greater. This allows for a structure in which wholeness exists within wholeness without contradiction.

A cell is fully a cell, yet participates in the life of a body. A person is fully a person, yet exists within humanity and relationship. Each human bears the image of God fully, yet God is not divided or diminished by that reflection. Wholeness does not require isolation, and participation does not require loss of integrity. This principle resolves false dilemmas between parts and wholes, unity and distinction, individuality and communion.

The Human Person as Layered Embodiment

Applied to the human person, this framework reveals that we are neither machines composed of interchangeable parts nor spirits temporarily trapped in flesh. We are layered beings whose unity is relational rather than mechanical. The body functions as an interface with the physical world. It is both vessel and temple, carrying the person through space and time while expressing what transcends matter.

The mind operates as a mediator. It interprets bodily signals while remaining open to meaning, moral reasoning, and transcendence. The spirit, at the deepest level, is the core agent of personhood. It is not generated by the body, nor extinguished by bodily failure. It is the seat of identity itself, expressed through embodiment rather than created by it.

Identity Beyond Expression and Interruption

This layered understanding accounts for phenomena that materialist models struggle to explain. Human beings retain identity through sleep, anesthesia, coma, seizures, trauma, and other disruptions of consciousness. Expression may be altered. Access may be interrupted. Identity persists.

This persistence suggests that the self is not identical to uninterrupted brain activity. Bodily and mental states affect how essence is expressed and accessed, not whether it exists. The interface can falter without deleting the user. This distinction between existence and expression is not speculative abstraction. It is drawn from consistent patterns in human experience.

Information as Instrument, Not Identity

Modern science strengthens this framework when interpreted carefully. Physics reveals that matter is largely empty space and that information plays a foundational role in physical behavior. Biology demonstrates that life operates through instruction, signaling, and self-assembly. DNA encodes directives that guide development and repair. Cells constantly rebuild the body without preserving its original atoms.

These findings show that material continuity is not required for functional continuity. Yet information alone cannot account for identity or agency. A blueprint can specify structure, but it does not explain intention or meaning. Information serves essence. It does not generate it.

Disconnection Without Annihilation

This distinction clarifies why disconnection from the body does not imply annihilation of the self. Temporary disconnections occur regularly throughout life. Permanent disconnection occurs at death. In each case, what ceases is a mode of embodiment, not the existence of the person.

This makes coherent sense of restoration rather than replacement. Continuity of personhood does not depend on identical matter, but on the persistence of essence. This conclusion follows naturally from the layered ontology described above.

The Image of God as Personhood, Not Physical Form

Within this framework, the image of God refers not to physical resemblance but to personhood likeness. Moral agency, will, love, creativity, relationality, restraint, and awareness of good and evil are essential properties that reflect divine likeness. These are not bodily traits. They are qualities of being.

Each person bears this image fully, not partially, and God is not diminished by being reflected in many individuals. Wholeness exists within wholeness, and participation does not imply division.

Relational Reality and the Trinitarian Ground of Being

At the deepest level, this account rests on the recognition that ultimate reality is relational. The Trinity reveals that distinction does not require division and that unity does not erase personhood. Each Person is fully God, yet God is one.

This is not a mathematical puzzle but a metaphysical revelation about the nature of being. Love and relationship are not secondary features of reality. They are foundational. Human beings reflect this structure finitely and contingently, which explains why identity is irreducibly relational.

Conclusion: A Coherent Account of Being

Taken together, this framework presents a coherent account of what it means to be human. The human person is an essence made for embodiment. Identity transcends matter without rejecting it. The body expresses the self without defining it. The mind mediates. The spirit is the seat of personhood. Disconnection alters expression, not being. Restoration completes what embodiment began.

Wholeness exists within wholeness. Reality itself is relational. That is not poetry. It is a rational account of being.

Contemporary ArtCritiqueDrawingExhibitionFictionFine ArtGeneralHistoryIllustrationInspirationJourneyMixed MediaPaintingProcessSculptureTechniques

About the Creator

Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast

Peter unites intellect, wisdom, curiosity, and empathy —

Writing at the crossroads of faith, philosophy, and freedom —

Confronting confusion with clarity —

Guiding readers toward courage, conviction, and renewal —

With love, grace, and truth.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.