The New Trade War: How U.S. Tariffs Are Reshaping the Global Economic Order
Short-term gains for America could spark a long-term shift toward a BRICS-led world.

The Shockwave from Washington
In a move that has sent tremors through the global economy, the United States has imposed sweeping new tariffs—some surpassing 10%—on imports from over 60 countries, including some of its closest allies. Billed as a bold step to protect American industry and jobs, this policy shift represents one of the largest trade upheavals in a century.
The U.S. administration has framed the decision as necessary to defend domestic manufacturing from “unfair foreign competition.” Yet, beneath the rhetoric lies a much bigger story—one that could redefine the global trade order, strengthen rival alliances like BRICS+, and potentially diminish America’s long-term influence on the world stage.
Short-Term Economic Wins for the United States
At first glance, the strategy seems to be working—at least inside U.S. borders. The tariffs have already produced visible short-term benefits:
A Boost for Domestic Manufacturing: American steel mills, aluminum plants, and select tech producers are ramping up output, buoyed by reduced foreign competition.
Stock Market Gains: Industrial and energy sectors have seen sharp rallies, as investors bet on a surge in “Made in USA” production.
Revenue Windfall: Tariff collections are pouring into federal coffers, potentially funding infrastructure projects and defense modernization.
In purely economic terms, these moves create a short-lived win for American workers and companies. But these gains may come at a price.
The Immediate Costs – Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions
Even as certain industries benefit, the tariffs have driven up costs in others. Many American businesses rely on imported materials and components, and they are now paying more to bring them in. Inevitably, these costs are passed on to consumers.
Electronics, automobiles, and household appliances are already becoming more expensive, and some retailers are warning of shortages in the holiday shopping season. Meanwhile, long-established supply chains are being disrupted, as foreign suppliers seek out friendlier markets rather than pay steep entry costs into the U.S.
The Global Reaction – New Alliances Forming
While Washington’s move might appear unilateral, the rest of the world is not sitting idle. The tariff shock has accelerated a trend that has been building for years: the formation of new trade alliances and reduced reliance on the U.S. dollar.
BRICS+ Rising
The BRICS group—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—has already expanded to include countries like Iran, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. These nations are using the U.S. tariffs as an opportunity to deepen their cooperation.
Trade in Local Currencies: BRICS+ members are increasing the use of their own currencies or alternative payment systems to bypass the U.S.-controlled financial network.
Energy Deals Within the Bloc: Oil and gas contracts are being signed directly between BRICS+ members, cutting out Western intermediaries.
Shared Infrastructure Projects: Ports, railways, and digital trade platforms are being built to serve the needs of this emerging economic powerhouse.
Regional Trade Blocs Strengthening
Beyond BRICS+, regional trade agreements are gaining momentum:
ASEAN is strengthening intra-Asian trade routes.
Mercosur in South America is increasing cooperation with African and Middle Eastern partners.
The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is pushing forward with the goal of a unified African market.
These developments suggest that U.S. tariffs might be the final push needed for many countries to reduce their economic dependence on Washington.
China’s Strategic Play
No country stands to gain more from the current disruption than China. Beijing has been actively promoting its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a massive infrastructure and trade network spanning Asia, Africa, and Europe.
Now, with the U.S. seemingly pulling back from global trade leadership, China is positioning itself as the “stable partner” in contrast to America’s unpredictable tariff policies. Chinese officials are courting nations hit by U.S. tariffs, offering them market access and investment in exchange for political alignment.
Risks for the U.S. – Losing Control of the Trade Narrative
The most significant danger for the U.S. isn’t just losing a few export markets—it’s losing its role as the architect of the global economic order.
For decades, America’s influence has rested not only on its military might but also on its central role in world trade and the dominance of the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency. The new tariff wave could undermine both:
Eroding Trust: Allies burned by tariffs may hesitate to commit to future U.S.-led trade deals.
Dollar Alternatives: If BRICS+ nations successfully conduct more trade in non-dollar currencies, the dollar’s global supremacy could weaken.
Fragmented Trade Rules: Competing economic blocs could establish their own standards, reducing the U.S.’s ability to set the terms of trade.
A Two-World Economy Emerging
The world may be heading toward a bifurcated global economy:
The U.S.-Led Trade Sphere: Centered on North America, parts of Europe, and close allies like Japan, Australia, and South Korea.
The BRICS+ and Neutral Bloc: Comprising emerging economies that prefer to stay outside Washington’s influence, trading more with each other and with China.
In this new setup, trade between the two spheres could be minimal, with each side developing its own technologies, supply chains, and even financial systems.
Short-Term Win, Long-Term Gamble
From a political standpoint, the tariff policy is a strong talking point for the U.S. administration, playing well with domestic audiences eager for protectionist measures. However, in pursuing these short-term gains, the U.S. may b
About the Creator
INAM ULLAH
Inam Ullah, BS in Computer Science and MS in Wireless Sensor Networks. Passionate about blogging, history, wars, and science. A lifelong learner with a curious mind and diverse interests.




Comments (1)
complete the aricle, kindly. It's incomplete.