Trader logo

Anatomy of a $1.3 Billion Wipeout: What NAQSN Traders Should Know About November's Crypto Crash

When Bitcoin's Plunge Below $104K Triggered Mass Liquidations and Exposed Market Fragility

By NAQSNPublished 3 months ago 3 min read

Bitcoin has had better weeks. During early November 2025, the world's largest cryptocurrency experienced a sharp correction sending prices below $104,000 and triggering forced liquidations exceeding $1.36 billion across global exchanges. Nearly 330,000 traders found positions automatically closed, creating a cascade effect that amplified the initial decline.

This wasn't just another routine correction. The magnitude of forced selling, combined with institutional capital outflows and shifting macroeconomic conditions, created a perfect storm testing both market infrastructure and trader psychology. For those accessing markets through platforms like NAQSN, understanding the mechanics behind such events becomes essential for navigating future volatility.

The Setup: How Markets Became Vulnerable

Bitcoin climbed to $126,000 in October before beginning its descent. That 17% pullback to $103,860 might seem modest compared to crypto's historical volatility, but the speed caught many participants off-guard.

What made this downturn so damaging was the positioning ahead of the move. Long positions dominated derivatives landscapes. When liquidations hit, they revealed how one-sided sentiment had become. Of $1.36 billion in forced closures, $1.21 billion came from longs while shorts accounted for merely $143 million.

The largest single liquidation occurred on HTX: a $47.87 million BTC-USDT long position evaporated instantly. These massive individual positions demonstrate both capital concentration in derivatives markets and potential for violent moves when thresholds breach.

Institutional Money Heads for Exits

While retail traders absorbed significant losses, institutional behavior added complexity. US spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced $1.15 billion in net outflows during October's final three days, removing crucial demand support.

Think of ETF flows as stabilizing forces—when new capital enters, it absorbs supply and supports prices. When flow reverses, support disappears when markets need it most. CoinGlass revealed derivatives stress through declining open interest. Bitcoin futures saw 4% reduction across all exchanges, with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange posting steeper 9% drops.

Federal Reserve's Mixed Messages

Fed policy expectations shaped risk appetite significantly. Governor Christopher Waller's hints at December rate cuts offered dovish signals typically supporting risk assets. However, Chair Powell's cautious tone emphasizing inflation created confusion.

CME FedWatch data captured uncertainty: December rate cut probabilities tumbled from 90% to 67%. Meanwhile, the Dollar Index climbed to 99.886, approaching three-month highs. A strengthening dollar traditionally weighs on crypto through capital rotation toward dollar-denominated assets offering positive real yields.

When Fear Takes Over

Market psychology metrics captured sentiment shifts brutally. The Crypto Fear and Greed Index collapsed to 22 points—"extreme fear" territory. The last comparable reading was during May 2022's Terra-LUNA capitulation.

Extreme fear creates interesting dynamics. On one hand, it signals oversold conditions where contrarian positioning proves profitable. On the other, it reflects genuine anxiety that persists longer than rational actors expect.

Stablecoin flow data provided behavioral context. Exchange inflows decreased 14%, suggesting traders weren't positioning to buy weakness despite attractive valuations. Instead, participants prioritized capital preservation, converting volatile assets to stables and awaiting clearer signals.

Platform Performance During Stress

Extreme volatility raises questions about infrastructure reliability. Can platforms handle volume spikes? Do execution engines maintain integrity when markets move violently?

For NAQSN users and similar venues, platform robustness during stress becomes key consideration. Infrastructure design, liquidity relationships, and technical architecture influence whether traders execute intended strategies when it matters most.

Technical Levels and What Comes Next

Market participants watch several key zones as Bitcoin attempts stabilizing. The $100,000 psychological level looms as critical support. Sustained breaks could trigger additional algorithmic stop-losses, accelerating downward momentum through cascading effects.

A decisive reclaim of $105,000 might signal corrective selling exhaustion. The challenge lies distinguishing genuine reversals from temporary relief bounces trapping early buyers.

On-chain analytics reveal intriguing divergence. Mid-sized wallets showed net selling during declines while large whale addresses accumulated—behavior mirroring historical bottoms. However, unique macroeconomic backdrop suggests caution applying historical patterns mechanically.

Leverage: The Double-Edged Sword

The liquidation cascade underscores fundamental truths about leveraged trading: it amplifies everything. Many affected traders utilized 10x to 50x ratios. A 2% adverse move with 50x leverage equals 100% account wipeout—harsh mathematics countless traders learned firsthand.

Position sizing relative to account equity becomes essential for sustainable outcomes. Even skilled traders with sound views face ruin if leverage and sizing don't align with volatility conditions.

Regional Dynamics for Mexican Traders

Latin American participants face additional complexity. Local currency volatility against dollars creates secondary risk dimensions. For Mexican traders, peso fluctuations amplify or dampen crypto returns independently of digital asset movements.

This currency exposure requires sophisticated hedging strategies or conscious risk acceptance. Regulatory frameworks continue evolving, with Mexican authorities providing increasing guidance on market participation.

Lessons from the Liquidation Event

Multiple insights emerge: Leverage amplifies risk overwhelmingly. Institutional flows matter increasingly as traditional finance integrates with crypto. Macroeconomic conditions—Fed policy, dollar strength—increasingly influence prices. Extreme sentiment cuts both ways.

For those navigating through NAQSN, maintaining disciplined approaches to leverage and position sizing becomes paramount. Markets will continue delivering volatility—that's inherent—but how traders respond determines long-term outcomes.

#NAQSN #BitcoinCrash #CryptoLiquidations #TradingPsychology #MarketVolatility

fintecheconomy

About the Creator

NAQSN

NAQSN - Next-Gen Crypto Exchange 🚀

Institutional security meets retail simplicity. Multi-layer custody, DeFi integration, $ZEIO governance. MiCA/SEC compliant with instant settlement & trading rewards. Built for everyone! 💎⚡

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.