The Nation Is Watching Closely the State of Virginia's Upcoming Election
Reasons the nation is waiting and watching for Election 2025 in Virginia.
Virginia and New Jersey are the only states that hold gubernatorial contests in the year after a presidential election. The elections, which traditionally grab outsized national attention, are viewed this year in Virginia for several reasons.
- Virginia plays a pivotal role in next year's midterm showdowns for the U.S. House and Senate.
- Virginia will make history because no matter who becomes governor, it will break a 235-year precedent by choosing a woman to lead its executive branch.
Who will be Virginia's first female governor?
Two women are on the ballot to become the first female Governor of Virginia. Both of them bring extensive public service backgrounds. However, they have sharply contrasting policy platforms. Voters will determine which woman will shatter a glass ceiling that Virginia has held firm for centuries.
The fact that both major parties nominated women—each with military, intelligence, and legislative credentials—reflects a broader shift in American leadership. Voters are no longer just choosing policies. They’re choosing who gets to embody power for the state.
Winsome Earle-Sears
Virginia's next governor could be Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, a Marine Corps veteran and the first Black woman elected statewide in Virginia. She has emphasized conservative values, education reform, and economic growth.
Abigail Spanberger
Virginia's next governor could be Abigail Spanberger, a former CIA officer with national security experience, who has represented Virginia’s 7th Congressional District since 2019. Spanberger is a Caucasian and a Democrat. She has focused on bipartisan cooperation, healthcare access, and public safety.
More Than a Milestone
The outcome could signal which party is gaining momentum and which messages resonate with voters in a deeply divided nation.
Political analysts said:
"The race could offer insight into voter sentiment in suburban and swing regions, particularly in Northern Virginia and the Richmond metro area. With both candidates already holding statewide or federal office, the campaign is expected to be closely contested."
What we know for sure
Virginia’s only gubernatorial debate was on Thursday night, October 9, 2025, at Norfolk State University, between Democrat Abigail Spanberger, 46, and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears, 61. The 60-minute debate, which was televised statewide, was the only face-to-face encounter of the 2025 race for governor.
Even with poll predictions, no one knows for sure who the next Governor of Virginia will be until all the votes are counted. What really matters is who Virginians voted for by mail, in person before Election Day, or in person on November 4. However, there are some things we know for sure even before then.
We know that Virginia will have its first female governor. Whether Black or White, we don't know. Whether Republican or Democrat, we have to wait and see.
What we also know for sure is that the nation will be waiting and watching along with Virginians to see who the next Governor of Virginia will be: Winsome Earle-Sears or Abigail Spanberger. One of them will replace Governor Glenn Youngkin and move into the Governor's Mansion for the next four years.
Youngkin assumed office on January 15, 2022. His current term ends on January 17, 2026. His 2021 gubernatorial campaign was his first run for elected office. In other words, he won with much less political experience than Earle-Sears and Spanberger. Actually, being the current Governor of Virginia has been his only political position.
Author's note:
This article was designed to show why the nation is watching this upcoming election. Poll predictions and the two women's detailed agendas were intentionally omitted.
Early voting began in September, with Election Day set for Tuesday, November 4, 2025.
About the Creator
Margaret Minnicks
Margaret Minnicks has a bachelor's degree in English. She is an ordained minister with two master's degrees in theology and Christian education. She has been an online writer for over 15 years. Thanks for reading and sending TIPS her way.
Keep reading
More stories from Margaret Minnicks and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Debate Disruption: Winsome Earle-Sears interrupted Abigail Spanberger numerous times
Virginia’s only gubernatorial debate was on Thursday night, October 9, 2025, at Norfolk State University, between Democrat Abigail Spanberger, 46, and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears, 61. The 60-minute debate, which was televised statewide, was the only face-to-face encounter of the 2025 race for governor.
By Margaret Minnicks3 months ago in The Swamp
Trump Says He Will ‘100%’ Carry Out Greenland Tariffs Threat as EU Vows to Protect Its Interests
Former U.S. President Donald Trump has once again stirred global debate by declaring that he would “100%” follow through on imposing tariffs related to Greenland if his demands are not met. The remarks have reignited tensions between the United States and the European Union, with EU leaders quickly responding that they are prepared to defend their economic and strategic interests. What began years ago as an unconventional proposal to purchase Greenland has now evolved into a serious geopolitical and economic confrontation. Why Greenland Matters Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, holds enormous strategic value. It is rich in rare earth minerals, sits astride critical Arctic shipping routes, and plays a vital role in global climate and security calculations. As melting ice opens new trade passages and access to resources, major powers—including the U.S., China, and Russia—have increased their focus on the Arctic. Trump has long viewed Greenland through a transactional lens, arguing that the United States should exert greater influence over the territory to counter rivals and secure access to critical minerals needed for advanced technologies and defense systems. When Denmark firmly rejected any idea of selling Greenland, Trump’s interest did not fade—it shifted into economic pressure. The Tariffs Threat Explained Trump’s renewed statement suggests that tariffs could be imposed on European goods, particularly targeting Denmark or broader EU exports, if U.S. strategic interests in Greenland are blocked. While details remain vague, the rhetoric alone has already caused unease in financial and diplomatic circles. Tariffs, if enacted, could affect industries ranging from renewable energy equipment to shipping and pharmaceuticals. Denmark, a small but globally connected economy, would be particularly exposed, but the broader EU could also feel the impact depending on how widely the measures are applied. EU Pushes Back Strongly The European Union has responded with unusual unity. EU officials have stated clearly that any unilateral tariffs would be met with countermeasures under international trade rules. Brussels has emphasized that Greenland’s status is not negotiable and that economic coercion will not change that reality. EU leaders argue that weaponizing trade undermines long-standing transatlantic relationships and risks escalating into a broader trade dispute at a time when global economic stability is already fragile. Inflation, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical conflicts have left little appetite in Europe for another tariff war. Economic and Political Implications Markets tend to react swiftly to tariff threats, even before policies are implemented. Investors worry that renewed U.S.-EU trade tensions could disrupt supply chains and dampen growth. European exporters fear reduced access to the U.S. market, while American companies dependent on European inputs could face higher costs. Politically, Trump’s stance resonates with his “America First” base, reinforcing his image as a leader willing to use economic tools aggressively to pursue national interests. Critics, however, argue that such tactics alienate allies and weaken collective Western influence at a time when cooperation is crucial. Greenland’s Voice Often Overlooked Amid the high-level rhetoric, Greenland’s own perspective is often sidelined. Greenlandic leaders have repeatedly stated that the territory is not for sale and that its future should be decided by its people. Many residents support greater autonomy and economic development but reject being treated as a bargaining chip in global power struggles. Local officials have also expressed concern that increased militarization or economic pressure could harm Greenland’s environment and traditional ways of life, particularly as climate change already poses significant challenges. What Comes Next? Whether Trump’s tariff threat becomes reality depends on political developments in the United States and diplomatic maneuvering behind the scenes. If enacted, tariffs could trigger a cycle of retaliation, drawing both sides into a prolonged trade conflict. If cooler heads prevail, negotiations may refocus on cooperation in the Arctic, including joint investment, security coordination, and environmental protection. What is clear is that Greenland has become a symbol of a larger shift in global politics—where strategic geography, resources, and economic power intersect. Trump’s declaration has ensured that the Arctic, once considered remote, is now firmly at the center of international debate. Final Thoughts Trump’s promise to “100%” carry out Greenland-related tariffs underscores how economic tools are increasingly used as instruments of geopolitical pressure. As the EU prepares to defend its interests, the episode highlights rising tensions within the Western alliance and the growing importance of the Arctic in global strategy. For readers and policymakers alike, the situation serves as a reminder that in today’s interconnected world, trade, politics, and geography are more closely linked than ever.
By Fiaz Ahmed Brohiabout 7 hours ago in The Swamp
Comments (1)
Sears is disgraceful and Spamburger will win.