The Emirates and ignoring the blood of the Syrians
When counting the number of times the author of these lines addressed

, the ambiguous role of Abu Dhabi rulers in leading the counter-revolutions of the Arab Spring, since the early action taken by the UAE government against Syrian opposition activities on its soil, in February 2012, represented by: “Prohibiting the use of the flag of the Syrian revolution in any way, including wearing it on clothes,” on the grounds that it still recognizes the Assad government, and that raising the flag of the revolution will cause problems inside the Emirates, as was mentioned at the time, which turned out to have exceeded ninety times.
It was impossible not to lead the actions of the rulers of the Emirates, starting with that incident above, about ten years ago, through the reopening of their embassy in Damascus, in late 2018, to the sweet statements of the UAE ambassador to the regime, a year later, in the presence of Faisal Miqdad: “I hope that May peace, security and stability prevail throughout the Syrian Arab Republic, under the wise leadership of His Excellency President Bashar al-Assad,” as well as the army of Emirati political analysts who have been entrusted with the task of whitewashing the ambiguous and unclean Emirati role in leading and recycling counter-revolutions to the Assad regime, and showing it as “ A pragmatism required by the current circumstances.” It was impossible that this scandalous domino game would only lead to what it led to, and not culminate in a visit by Bashar al-chemist, head of the Syrian regime, to the UAE, or vice versa.
The ambiguity of the role played by the rulers of Abu Dhabi is not limited to what they are doing in the Syrian prank, but in the Emirati arena itself, to the point where it seems that the keenness of many Arab writers on the Emirates and issues related to its national security, such as Iran’s occupation of the Greater and Lesser Tunbs and Abu Musa, is much greater Double the concern and concern of the Emirates itself.
economic partner
However, before this and that, regardless of the scandalous role played by the rulers of the Emirates in the Syrian catastrophe, since the outbreak of the revolution to date, and the disregard for the blood of the Syrians; When did the UAE take a position on Iran, as an occupying country with a brutal force of arms on three Emirati islands? Iran, which has countless investments in the UAE, is Dubai's largest economic partner in the region, in addition to the UAE being the second largest importer of Iranian goods.
? This, therefore, leads to the conclusion that whoever supports, with all his might, defunct and criminal Arab regimes dominating their peoples by force of arms, from Syria to Egypt and Libya, in order to subjugate them and abort their dreams of freedom, justice and human dignity, at a time when his hands are stained with the blood of these peoples, which are theirs alone. The issue of self-determination and making peace and war decisions through its freely and impartially elected representatives returns, and at the same time his media machine promotes, with disdain, that his “peaceful” orientations toward Israel are in the interest of the people of the occupied land as well as in the interest of his people, leading to the conclusion that whoever does everything This is nothing more than an ingenious person who assumes the role of the very immoral regimes he supports and lays his eggs in their basket.
In Israel, the people are able, at any time, through their representatives in the Knesset or even through a referendum, to cancel any agreement or treaty concluded by their government with anyone if they feel that they conflict with their interests, but the people of the Emirates, the “Mablouf”, cannot do that. It is, in the first place, robbed of will and decision by its rulers, just like other Arab peoples who are governed by regimes like the Assad regime, which are supported by the Abu Dhabi regime. On the other hand, What a strange mixture and a joke, which lies in the UAE’s conclusion of a peace agreement with Israel, one of its most important declared obligations to confront Iranian tyranny, at a time when it supports the Assad regime, which is, at best, nothing more than a follower of the mullahs of Tehran!?
Even at the level of some ordinary Emiratis, who visited the occupied Syrian Golan Heights, after the signing of the Israeli-Emirati peace treaty, and stood on one of the hills overlooking the Syrian side, next to the Syrian-Israeli border, singing like idiots about “how the terrorism of Iran and Hezbollah are taught lessons that cannot be taught.” forgotten by Israel from here”; They are required to solve the labyrinth of their country's strategy and answer the following:
Syrians' dreams are slain
It seems that the role that the rulers of the United Arab Emirates decided to play, publicly known, represented in slaying the dreams of the Syrians and dancing on their blood, from the first moment in which they blew up their revolution, has no similarity except the Israeli role itself, which, from its longevity, represented a lifeline for the Assad regime. The bond was ever ready to provide him with a lifeline in the hours of his insomnia, especially after the murder of Rafik Hariri in 2005, and then the disastrous chemical deal in September 2013. Thus, it was never a coincidence that this Emirati-Israeli harmony regarding the war waged by Russia on Ukraine Where the fluidity of the positions of the rulers of Tel Aviv and Abu Dhabi is evident at its best, in addition to what these two countries represent, back gardens for the Russian oligarchs and safe havens to circumvent Western economic sanctions on Moscow, as mentioned in the reports of many international and Western media, including them in particular.
It remains to say that what the UAE has done is nothing more than “a man’s flat,” as it is said in the vernacular, and it will be followed by the openness of most, if not all, Arab regimes, whether those that have, for years, been vocal in their desire to return the Assad regime to the “Arab embrace.” , The mother who adopted the pious method in dealing with him.




Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.